/tech/ - Technology★

>>1067684 (OP)

Low quality post but I'll bite. It's a tricky thing to publish anonymous articles and preventing impersonators. If we look how mappers have done this in the past and the present, there are a few ways to prevent this. They implement mistakes in their work so that when they recognize their works they use the purposefully portrayed faults to prove plagiarism. This won't help you against people who know their shit but it will unmask the common thief.

The second thing that comes to my mind is providing imagery of something that is unique in it's nature and that you where you can prove that you posses it; for example the author of this article possesses this specific bitcoin and then you can use it to identify yourself later on.

Or you can be altruistic or stop being a faggot and just use your name, when you fear (((whoever))) they have already won.

>>1067684 (OP)

Using a well protected pseudonym?

Other then that, then "fingerprinting" it so it's unique in a way you can identify.

>how to write and publish a book or tech/science article?

latex. DO NOT distribute as PDF because PDF SUCKS.

Seriously fuck all the niggers that use PDF.

>it has to be in anonymous or pseudonymous way

Then don't publish it under your name.

>I want to prevent someone stealing it and presenting as his

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signature

>if it was possible to sell it and earn on it, that's great, but not necessary

lol

>what are platforms and ways to release book or article, online and in real life?

Upload it to any Git hosting service.

>I could find some homeless guy to provide his credentials if that's necessary

Not necessary

>>1067816

>They implement mistakes in their work so that when they recognize their works they use the purposefully portrayed faults to prove plagiarism.

if I publish with faults, book readers will read it with those faults, it doesn't make sense

>The second thing that comes to my mind is providing imagery of something that is unique in it's nature and that you where you can prove that you posses it; for example the author of this article possesses this specific bitcoin and then you can use it to identify yourself later on.

that makes sense. or GPG key can be used instead of bitcoins.

>Or you can be altruistic or stop being a faggot and just use your name, when you fear (((whoever))) they have already won.

that's stupid, if I release under my real name, (((they))) will kill me within a week, so I won't be able to release any more books in the future

>>1067818

>Using a well protected pseudonym?

how can a pseudonym be well protected?

>>1067832

>how to write and publish a book or tech/science article?

>latex. DO NOT distribute as PDF because PDF SUCKS.

I don't know why you say PDF sucks. but it's not important. let's say I made pdf or latex. now what? where to publish this file? how to market it? how to have the book printed and sold in brick and mortar book shops?

>Then don't publish it under your name.

that does not make it anonymous

>if it was possible to sell it and earn on it, that's great, but not necessary

>lol

?

>Upload it to any Git hosting service.

like github? it's malware and requires (((JavaScript)))

how to make people know about my book and read it?

>Not necessary

how is it not necessary? If I go to book (((publisher))) to publish my book into real book shops (online and offline), they will require me to give my serial number, name, address, proof of authorship, bank account, etc

I will also have to sign a contract

can I use a shell company for that?

>>1067910

>LARPing