/tech/ - Technology★

>>1063871 (OP)

<1 ruble has been deposited into your account.

>secure coms

If you mean real security then a letter with stenography deilvered by dead drop is your best bet.

If you mean from passive survielance at tier 1 data centers from thieves copying everything passing through there. Then you have several options and mumble is not one of them due to the centralized client-server model that makes infiltrating the server using a openssl generated certificate laughably easy.

You could use the TOX protocol which is E2E and P2P with no central server. You could use bitmessage which is the same thing as tox but it distributes messages in such a fashion as to avoid traffic analysis by those tier one data centers. You also could use zeronet which may or may not be E2E at times but it is P2P and much easier to use then the above, at the cost of more resources.

There's also things like I2P, vpn, and tor bridges to obfuscate, pad bytes to avoid traffic analysis, and add latency to your traffic as it travels to its destination. Although I have yet to find a program that will flood your traffic with random bits to the max bandwidth your connection has, and then reduce the amount to allow your traffic, and the traffic of whom you communicate, through.

>>1063892

Exactly. If you want privacy forget about voice. Your best bet is PGP encrypted text encrypted and decrypted on airgapped machines. Forget about strong anonymity though. If you send it through the Internet your adversary will know. Heck, even if you do dead drops the FBI will know about it if they care about you. That's how they caught those Russian spies.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYFOXeItRFM

If you want weak anonymity then maybe Tor can be enough, but in any case they will know you're up to no good and in most cases they'll be able to connect the dots and figure out it's you who is doing whatever you're doing.

So yeah, no, the retards at /pol/ who think a civil war will be easy peasy for them because they can blend in with the civilians are retarded.

The difference with Vietnam or even Afghanistan is that the government already has a surveillance infrastructure in place. Any agent can wander around and blend in too, unlike (for the most part) foreign countries. They have security cameras installed, complete with facial recognition and databases. They have radar, sea and air defenses, and control over what gets in and out of the country over airlines and freighters. It'll be much harder to smuggle military hardware from China or whatever. They have a pretty good idea of everybody's income and net worth.

Their only hope is for the soldiers turning against the government, but how many of them will have the balls to aim their weapons against other US soldiers? AFAIK, most of them have the "we are the good guys, whoever the government says we have to fight against is the bad guys". Do you really think that will change if the target becomes "domestic terrorists"? Do you think the population will support whoever is blowing up power and cell towers and preventing them from watching their game and getting on Facebook? Or even support rebels blowing up innocent (in their good goy mind) jews and niggers and preventing them from lawfully owning a hunting rifle and a pistol for self defense? No, most people won't support the rebels when the check from the bank stops clearing because the rebels blew up the bank, and they're bored because the rebels blew up the TV station and the fiber optic cables. They'd rather sit in their couch and drink beer and be oblivious as to what's going on demographically, politically and culturally. Otherwise we wouldn't be in this big of a mess in the first place. No, most people will rat out their friendly neighborhood terrorist to the feds, no doubt about it.

I don't know how it will play out, but I know there's not much chance of a civil war for a couple decades at least.

It may not be "secure" in the autistic way but it IS secure in that you own your server and not some data collection program which was built to collect and process your data in an easy way. You can still be targeted at an individual level but the level of sophistication that requires is a million times that of writing SELECT <your data> from userdata WHERE <user> = <you>;

>AFAIK, most of them have the "we are the good guys, whoever the government says we have to fight against is the bad guys".

We don't become zogbots because we love zog. We do it because we want to play with guns and shoot motherfuckers in the face, and there is only a couple legal outlets for that. With the exception of non-whites, we would much rather test our mettle on enemies deserving the bullet.

>>1064113

In the mind of most people the terrorists will deserve to get shot. You're an outlier just by being here.

>>1064079

Oh shut the fuck up. It's not autism, the NSA implanting devices on servers and siphoning everything is a fact. There being a fertile trade of 0 days in the intelligence community is a fact.

Your program just meets the most basic requirements of being open source and allowing you to run your own server., congrats. Are you going to make a thread about Firefox too? No, because anyone can find it with 1 minute of searching. Same thing here, don't make threads shilling basic shit.