/tech/ - Technology★

>>1043573 (OP)

Cool but useless

I like it: in browser editor, git-like source view, offline first, ability to fork websites, dat urls are hashed by default and p2p.

It has lots of potential just needs a bigger community that’s actually using the platform properly. If there was more digital-xerography, more people creating tools for it, Chrome/Firefox support for dat, etc

>>1043573 (OP)

nice run-on sentence, faggot

are you a phoneposter by any chance?

>>1043589

Yup I don't even type it myself I just use the recognition thing on my phone I use the omni chan app

>>1043582

I think beaker also had IPFS support at one point But they removed it for some reason

The Website only talks about their p2p thing and if I look at a new browser, it's because it potentially changes how I can interact with sites in a better way not that it offers some twitter clone full of people I don't want to talk to.

Also:

<CoCK

>>1043597

What ever floats your boat moo moo

>>1043573 (OP)

Beaker is cool, and I hope it gets more people using it. It does have the same privacy problem as torrents do; basically to read and access stuff exposes your IP address to anyone seeding the content.

>>1043596

They removed it because the team partnered up with the dat project. I assume they signed some sort of agreement to support only dat.

It's a good thing IPFS is trying to get integrated into all browsers, instead of requiring a new one.

>>1043573 (OP)

>no privacy policy or TOS

bye

>>1043896

True Building a new browser from scratch is kind of hard And if they did he would be very unstable

>>1043896

Mozilla and Brave promised to add IPFS over a year ago. What's taking browser devs so long?

>>1044141

IPFS is still in alpha. It takes time to implement stuff, especially stuff that's nowhere near completion.

Anyway, at least Brave is still working on adding IPFS.

>Beaker is built using the Electron framework and therefore uses the Chromium browser as a renderer for webpages.

Sigh.

Does it have request blocking?

>>1043573 (OP)

A browser for bloated text-based hypertext web pages. Using unsafe protocols from the 70s and an authoritative domain name resolution service.

I don't understand how different TLDs have a fucking different prize. DNS has it's owns faults.

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

These are our enemies. Why are we supporting them?

Yeah, right. Fucking kike.