>>1050510
>>50kW
>
>Wikihow: How to kill everyone with pacemakers
>
>>Thinks this is safe
>
>Enjoy your low oxygen cells and inevitable cancer.
He said watts, not kilowatts, retard.
> or some indigo light worker shit (despair code)
What? Are you OK dude?
>not spending the rest of expenditure to seeding or archival of scihub, dark directory (non-cp), planet pirate, et. al.
>dark directory
>planet pirate
Huh?
In any case, sci-hub already works perfectly well, why would he spend money on something that already works fine?
>>1049054
You're not gonna get anywhere broadcasting FM, WiFi, or any VHF/UHF stuff on international waters. Only short wave and maaaybe AM.
>>1043590
You don't need to modify or reverse engineer anything, the SDRs already work fine and expose all capabilities that the hardware has.
If you want a broader spectrum you'll have to buy more expensive hardware. You can only get so much performance out of any given ADC.
>>1043506
ULF requires having football-field sized antennas. For ultra low rate comms there's QRSS, but it's pretty much useless in the real world. You gotta accept unless you're using some exotic mode like satellites or EME, your signals are going to be detectable by others. There might be some way to do ultra spread spectrum transmissions that can't be easily seen on a waterfall display, but I've never seen it or even heard about it, not even by the military.
And at that point, it becomes pretty useless on a realistic level. How much R&D is going to take to make a modulation scheme, wide band amplifier and antennas, software that works reliably and can be used by anyone, etc? Besides, even something that can't be easily detected (at the receiving end) is going to stick out like a sore thumb on a waterfall display when your opponent gets close enough, say, within a few 100 meters.
>>1043504
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Your post is so full of inaccuracies I won't even go point by point. A proprietary SDR is somehow going to alert the government that you're using it? Yeah, right. What "open source" SDR do you propose? All of them are built on proprietary ADC and FPGA/ASIC hardware.
Your VGA idea would work if it wasn't for the fact that you would still need an amplifier to transmit more than 10 meters away (I've tried it myself), and almost all video cards block the pixel signal output during HSYNC and VSYNC, which results in a botched signal if you're trying to use it to transmit arbitrary signals. There's only one USB dongle that allows you to not do that, but it's running an absolutely proprietary SoC with proprietary firmware in it, so yeah, too much fuck this and fuck that but it seems like you should go and read a book before spouting your bullshit.
>Compare that to a SDR that operates in a similar range costing 20$ USD and being put on a watchlist along with having to ditch the hardware after pirating radio too long and buying a new one every time which gets complicated fast.
Why the fuck would you throw away your hardware? Is that just part of being a paranoid schizo retard?
>>1043501
>There's all the fully FOSS wifi chips that are also SDR by definition
Oh yeah? And what chip is that?
>that are also SDR by definition
No it's not.
>>1043338
>>1043259
>>1049085
cringe
>>1043489
>Now don't forget to bounce your radio waves off random shit to get it the fuck away from you and of course make all your own equipment so you don't get on a watchlist or some shit. Don't ask you local homosexual ass mongers for any help as they will rat you out to the commies/kikes out of boredom. Get creative you don't have to transmit audio you could transmit GSM signals so that phones get your message and here whatever the fuck it is you considered so important to go through all this effort to broadcast it. Or transmit data so that computer's VGA/HDMI ports pick up the signal and display whatever the fuck it is. OP you are a faggot but stuff like this is a neccessary art to avoid the botnet and censorship in the future or even now depending on the data being transmitted and why.
Holy shit cringe. I don't disagree with the essence of the message (except some of the stuff you mentioned doesn't work) but try to speak like a normal human being and stop sticking out like such a sperg in all the threads you show up to.