>>1038154
I suggest that you research the term "non violent communication".
I'll give you a short of what it is about.
Gandhi considers and has proven that there's two kind of violence, one that is physical, and the one that is passive.
Gandhi (and a lot of other people in history) has observed that passive violence is what leads to physical violence.
Calling someone a faggot in this conversations context isn't passive violence because it's an example, now calling someone a faggot
for real (unironically) is passive violence.
For example instead of saying that he's a faggot you could formulate it like this:
I do not like that this man is being sexually attracted to another man, because I think that males are biological made to reproduce with females and that not fulfilling male/female bonding is harming that man's mental health. I think the displaying of that man in an effeminate way in public is also a worrying to me because his behavior indicates to me that he mentally suffers and that people seems to accept his mental suffering is also alarming to me, I do not like seeing people suffer and not recovering from their bad health, I wish them to have fulfilling lives that brings joy to them and the people around them.
Another example of passive violence is with anon >>1038166
In his sentence, this part:
>And by the way, I disagree with you, but I don't want to be convinced
Is a form of passive violence too, because in the context he strictly said that he does not want to be convinced thus meaning that what ever you would say does not matter to him.
Of course I suppose that anon >>1038166 did not mean that in this way because he afterword asked you to ponder on your own post, but the way he formulated does not help anon >>1038154 to engage in your request.
Non violent communication is a way for people to be able to understand the underlying needs behind feelings/words, thus establishing mutual communication.
Same for the sentence:
>but why did you take an issue with that?
This is an evaluation. Anon as mixed is own feelings to what he read and made an interpretation, which is called evaluation in NVC.
Anon >>1038166 you're on the right path, I encourage you to continue, NVC is hard but I think that anyone willing like yourself can do it.
I'm posting the magnet that I was given, I suggest the folder Non violent communication which contains the audio book.
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:209bc83dd197f2a721aabac76acf1bf997901825&dn=Marshall%20Rosenberg&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3a6969&tr=udp%3a%2f%2fexodus.desync.com%3a6969&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.publicbt.com%3a80&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.ccc.de%3a80&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3a80&tr=udp%3a%2f%2fzer0day.ch%3a1337&tr=udp%3a%2f%2fopen.demonii.com%3a1337&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.leechers-paradise.org%3a6969