>>1022264
>What happens when your machine in "le cloud" shits the bed?
Agreed to everything else, but this is dumb. His whole point is to outsource the backup to the (((cloud operator))). Clouds go overkill on backups, odds of you losing access to your data are lower than winning the lottery. Odds of someone else getting a copy of the data though, are a different matter.
Anyways, shit thread. How is making backups hard? And if you deleted all your badgoy and sensitive data as you'd have to if using a cloud, you would have hardly anything left to backup anyway.
>>1022283
Clouds don't usually cope too well with a 100 GB encrypted volume, since it interferes with partial sync. Wish there was a filesystem especially for clouds that anonymizes file names too.