[–]▶ 00cd47 (1) No.8712>>8716 >>8745 >>8799 >>9087 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
Which trek fansites are cucked and which are worth going to? Is memory alpha no longer worth visiting?
▶ 56bb31 (5) No.8714>>8799
▶ cb9cdf (4) No.8715
▶ cc504e (2) No.8716>>8726
>>8712 (OP)
I really enjoy Reddit.
▶ 7a4bdb (1) No.8726>>8729
>>8716
You should go there.
▶ cc504e (2) No.8729>>8730 >>8733 >>9100
>>8726
I go there all the time.
I've been posting about this place on there all the time, actually, so hopefully we'll get some more activity soon.
▶ 39a195 (1) No.8730>>8738
>>8729
Make sure you tell them we don’t like niggers. Better yet, we’ll tell them when they arrive.
▶ cb9cdf (4) No.8733
>>8729
>I've been posting about this place on there all the time
Gee thanks
▶ cbd788 (2) No.8738>>8741
>>8730
Pakleds are welcome anon. It's Feds we don't want around here.
▶ 44fa30 (2) No.8741>>8743
>>8738
>pakleds
>violent grifters and thieves with sub room temperature iq's flying ramshackle ships
>feds
>space champagne socialists
can we have neither?
▶ cbd788 (2) No.8743>>8744
>>8741
Only if you build a wall.
▶ 40f700 (1) No.8744
>>8743
Yes! Let us build a wall!
▶ 66e4c3 (2) No.8745
>>8712 (OP)
>Which trek fansites are cucked
Trekmovie. I used to go there to see the latest news about the jewjew movies but since a year or two they've become sjw central and STD-IDF.
▶ 49c582 (2) No.8799>>8803 >>8812
>>8714
this tbh for shitposts and dukat
>>8712 (OP)
mem-alpha for serious knowledge and references
and https://www.reddit.com/r/DaystromInstitute/ for better discussions
▶ 273483 (1) No.8803>>8840
>>8799
>Feddit
>Good discussions
Excuse me?
▶ 445e09 (2) No.8812>>8815
>>8799
So everyone hangs out on /startrek/ now? Is it just for the name? I didn't want to give captain butthurt any posts.
▶ 445e09 (2) No.8814
I'd add we're way higher in the listing than /startrek is/. We're at like 33 and they're at like 99. So I guess I was wrong. I visited there a little bit after Mr, Assdamage acquired it and wasn't very impressed.
▶ cb9cdf (4) No.8815
>>8812
>So everyone hangs out on /startrek/ now?
Apples and oranges, I for my part post at both places. This is the board for the spergs, and the other is for the shitposters, and I'm 50/50.
▶ 44fa30 (2) No.8832>>8839
shit I didn't even know there was another trek board.
▶ 90b5f4 (1) No.8838
shouldnt /startrek/ have to change their name or title or whatever since if they use "Star Trek" as well it causes confusion in places like the Active Boards listing on the 8chan front page?
the short-term confusion sucks, but eventually it will sort itself out. it would be nice if /startrek/ would declare themselves for nu-trek and std, but i doubt that's likely.
▶ 3f132a (1) No.8839>>8891 >>8892 >>8924 >>8997
>>8832
there's 3
/trek/ - original board that's dead
/strek/ - trek but active
/startrek/ - /strek/ but made by someone who couldn't handle a 2day ban
▶ 68352b (1) No.8840>>8857
>>8803
reddit in general is shite, but daystrom has its moments, try it before dismissing it
▶ fc1bf5 (1) No.8857
>>8840
Sounds too fedlike.
▶ cb9cdf (4) No.8891
>>8839
>>>/trek/ - original board that's dead
Not completely dead, one sick bastard is posting his trek gay erotica over there
▶ 48d3ad (1) No.8892>>8893 >>8943
>>8839
>/startrek/ - /strek/ but made by someone who couldn't handle a 2day ban
Wait, was that actually what caused a splinter board to form? What's different enough about /startrek/ to warrant an extra board?
▶ 56bb31 (5) No.8893
▶ 3ed2f7 (1) No.8924>>8978
▶ 7916b3 (2) No.8943>>8988
>>8892
Yes. He couldn't handle his short little ban, so he made a board with MORE rules. This is the kind of retard that runs /startrek/.
Also someone put /trek/ in for the hunger games, so this week's hunger games will have all three Star Trek boards competing.
▶ 38e01f (1) No.8978
>>8924
i don't know, either horse faggotry, nigger zoos or gamergate
i don't mind any of those, but they aren't supposed to be on /strek/
▶ d12957 (1) No.8988
>>8943
Shame the three boards will never work together to bring the KKK to the field.
▶ 381148 (4) No.8997>>8999
>>8839
Why don't we add the beautiful star background from /trek/?
▶ 56bb31 (5) No.8999>>9000
▶ 381148 (4) No.9000>>9001 >>9051
>>8999
I dunno, ask the captain.
▶ 56bb31 (5) No.9001>>9002 >>9054
>>9000
I am the captain
and i have no idea how the css shit works
▶ 9dcdde (1) No.9023
420 chan have a cosy Star Trek board, it's very slow but good quality:
https://boards.420chan.org/1701/index.php
▶ 112889 (1) No.9054>>9065
>>9001
You've got a Vulcan Science officer, use them. Although what we need is a Smug Klingon image on righthand side of the board
▶ 56bb31 (5) No.9065
>>9054
>You've got a Vulcan Science officer, use them
that doesn't actually help me
i tried putting some css in the board stylesheet, but nothing seems different
▶ c009ba (2) No.9087>>9090 >>9102
>>8712 (OP)
stardestroyer.net forums
▶ 2ef9cc (1) No.9090>>9102 >>9123 >>9131 >>17370
>>9087
>stardestroyer.net
>The Mike Wong personal home page
>"Ours is one of the increasing number of inter-racial marriages in modern society: a growing 21st century trend. Luckily, we live in Toronto, the fifth largest metropolitan city in North America and the most multi-cultural city in the world. Others are not so lucky. There are still vast regions of the world (and even some areas of our own continent) where inter-racial marriage is frowned upon.[…]"
100% Non-Poz
▶ c1d131 (1) No.9100>>9114
>>8729
why would you purposely ruin such a comfy board with fucking low IQ normalfaggots, nonbinary gendertransphasic landwhales and degenerate poz pigs?
captcha: lxrage
▶ 6d9051 (1) No.9102>>9103
>>9087
>>9090
Sadly two Wongs can't make a white
▶ 7916b3 (2) No.9114
>>9100
Is that fucking Lassie?
▶ c009ba (2) No.9123>>17370
>>9090
>star trek
>non poz
Pick one. The forums are full of austists that try and figure out the power levels of sci fi factions. Bringing up 40k or Time Lords is sure to inspire a tism fit, otherwise the Empire wins. I visit once a year or so to figure out if a sci fi show is worth watching.
▶ 2b173a (1) No.9131>>9139
>>9090
>Luckily, we live in Toronto,
Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal, is the Canadian equivalent of Seattle Sanfran Portland AIDS cancer.
▶ 2c2f9c (1) No.9139
>>9131
can confirm, unfortunately.
▶ 4373d3 (1) No.11639>>15978
What's the most retarded thing you've seen on
http://stexpanded.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page
Anons?
▶ 9b90ad (1) No.15978
>>11639
I dug around here recently. If you separate the crap, it actually has a lot of decent info on the canon Starships.
▶ fbe158 (1) No.17311
What would a Swole Wiki be like?
▶ 097712 (2) No.17370>>17376 >>17387
>>9090
Wow. Someone else mentioned that.
That site at one point had over 2k people logged on daily, now it struggles to reach a dozen.
>>9123
A user by the name of Connor Macleod once did a massive series of 40k calculations that put them at fairly high amounts of power. Years later he got pissed at being associated with them, and now drones on with solipsist garbage about how nothing can be proven because of variable exmaples and blah blah blah, and is now a moderator on a former SciFi discussion and communtiy site, Spacebattles. It's now a tumblrific propaganda outlet masquerading as a hobby and fanfic site.
▶ 794d07 (2) No.17376>>17511
>>17370
>That site at one point had over 2k people logged on daily, now it struggles to reach a dozen.
Current Year's a hell of a drug.
▶ d769c3 (1) No.17387>>17419 >>17495
>>17370
>That site at one point had over 2k people logged on daily, now it struggles to reach a dozen.
Why are those sort of communities so self destructive?
▶ 8a1d51 (1) No.17419>>17421
>>17387
>Why are those sort of communities so self destructive?
usernames.
▶ 864d7d (1) No.17421>>17490
>>17419
This. Most account-holders are lurkers 90% of the time that watch other people post. As they start reading the flame wars that pop up, they start "siding" with one high postcount sperglord or the other. Eventually they build up the courage to chime in and repeat whatever their pet namefag says, and start molding their opinions to match "le based forum veteran xD," and participate in whatever retarded shit they're kvetching about now with even more volume.
It's basically what you'd get if you crossed reality TV with Twitch Plays Pokemon.
▶ 88ad88 (2) No.17490>>17493
>>17421
To they have upvotes for maximum cancer?
▶ fc06dd (1) No.17493>>17496
>>17490
I was talking about forums in general mang, not any specific instance.
▶ 794d07 (2) No.17495
>>17387
>Why are those sort of communities so self destructive?
Social media was designed for the Internet from years ago, where it was a luxury, and if you wanted to be online at all you needed to have your shit together enough to have a job, and a pretty good one. Back then, if you got free net access, you were either in higher ed, or smart enough to work for an ISP.
Since the system was designed for these people, it had no defense against subsidized crazy people staying home and posting high volumes of nonsense all day.
Thanks, Obamaphone.
▶ 88ad88 (2) No.17496
>>17493
That is a given except arrse though, that shit is absolute kek
▶ 097712 (2) No.17511>>17524
>>17376
I once got banned for saying I didn't like flamers.
Funny thing is, I was quoting ike Wong word for word. from his blog, one of the pages. You also can't really argue for stay at home mothers.
Which Wong all but advocates for in his introductory to his blog.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/category/blog/
Read and enjoy. And I have never had a satifactory answer as to when exactly the site died, but I do know that if you make an account and get to see the hiden board where they roast people, you will find a thread where they roast one of their own and keep calling him a virgin until he quits the site. For fun.
A lot of people like to point the time that Wong banned about 7 people and permadeleted at least on account in its entirety, DestructionatorXIII I think, and claim thats what killed it. But at that point it still struggled to maintain 100 people logged in.
I'd like to theorize that SDN died like it did because of the supremely ban happy nature of the mods, and the occasionally absurd rule sets of debate and the anti fun attitude of everyone.
▶ 53344f (1) No.17524
>>17511
>I once got banned for saying I didn't like flamers.
What's wrong with flamers?