http://lesswrong.com/lw/o6p/double_crux_a_strategy_for_resolving_disagreement/Anyone tried double-cruxing yet? Did it help you get past any bullshit?

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki	Show oekaki applet (replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf, pdf Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: f8dca49791d6f1b⋯.jpg (22.82 KB, 430x376, 215:188, slytherinlocket.jpg)

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:17:45 No.8056

http://lesswrong.com/lw/o6p/double_crux_a_strategy_for_resolving_disagreement/

Anyone tried double-cruxing yet? Did it help you get past any bullshit?

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:17:56 No.8057

Not going to read the whole thing… What old-as-dirt common sense monkey interaction protocol has LW rediscovered this time?

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:18:05 No.8058

>>8057

looks like "find falsifiable arguments that are depended on by your positions".

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:18:14 No.8059

File: e2f07d39e969629⋯.jpg (59.8 KB, 300x343, 300:343, avorriment.jpg)

>>8058

And tell your interlocutor about it when having a discussion.

I was at a double-crux workshop and we tried it afterwards. The group was so homogeneous that we couldn't really find disagreements to double-crux on.

Sigh.

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:18:28 No.8060

>>8059

You attended a CFAR workshop? Tell us more, anon.

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:18:48 No.8061

>>8060

Not quite. EA Global, Duncan gave us little morsels of the legit CFAR workshop.

I have yet to use the things he taught in real life, but now that I remember it's a common beginner's mistake.

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:18:58 No.8062

>>8057

Hey, don't be mean, we're like 80% literal autists, it's not common sense to us.

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:19:11 No.8063

I've been doing this for years before knowing about lw.

Am I the chosen one ?

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:19:22 No.8064

When are we going to see quality effort posts like this on /ratanon/?

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:19:33 No.8065

>>8064

I try to come up with good conversation starters to drive off the bait coming in from /pol/ and /a/, but I'm not a top-quality socialite. Making Ratanon Great Again is hard.

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:19:42 No.8066

>>8065

An imageboard like this isn't really the place for effortposts. This place exists for rationalist and LessWrong themed shitposting.

On which note,

>Again

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:19:56 No.8067

>>8066

Hey, it was great for about four and a half minutes ten months ago. Didn't you notice?

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:20:07 No.8068

>>8067

Are you the same faggot that keeps saying this shit in all threads ? If yes do the rational thing and deny what I said while insulting me.

Anonymous 08/19/17 (Sat) 22:20:19 No.8069

>>8068

I don't know. I have the memory of a gnat.