/ratanon/ - Rationalists Anonymous

mine is a healthy and fulfilling relationship

Owls.

Fetishes are irrational. I had myself self-vasectomied and castrated when I was 19 so I could devote my life fully to mathematics.

fucking eliezer yudkowsky on a houseboat

Strangers. Butt stuff. Mouth stuff. Cum stuff. Older ladies. Ladies with hair on their bodies. Tattoos, dyed hair, and piercings. Robot overlords and sentient weaponized sex crystals.

>>5821

Allow me to interject. What you are referring to as “cum” is, in fact, spelled “come.”

> come, v., 17. To experience sexual orgasm. Also with off. slang.

>

> a1650 Walking in Meadow Green in Bp. Percy's Loose Songs (1868), — Then off he came, & blusht for shame soe soone that he had endit.

> 1714 Cabinet of Love, — Just as we came, I cried, ‘I faint! I die!’

> c1890 My Secret Life III. 143 — ‘Shove on,’ said she, ‘I was just coming.’

> 1922 J. Joyce, Ulysses ii. 471 — Suppose you..came too quick with your best girl.

> 1922 J. Joyce, Ulysses iii. 717 — Yet I never came properly till I was what 22.

> 1928 D. H. Lawrence, Lady Chatterley's Lover x. 159 — ‘We came off together that time,’ he said.

> 1928 D. H. Lawrence, Lady Chatterley's Lover xiv. 242 — And when I'd come and really finished, then she'd start on her own account.

> 1963 D. Lessing, Man & Two Women 35 — Just as he decided, Right, it's enough, now I shall have her properly; she made him come.

> 1969 P. Roth, Portnoy's Complaint 183 — Did you warn her you were going to shoot, or did you just come off and let her worry?

>

> come, n., 5. Semen ejaculated at sexual climax, esp. spilt ejaculate. Also (rarely), fluid secreted by the vagina during sexual play. Cf. come v. 17.slang.

>

> 1923 J. Manchon, Le Slang 90 — Come, sperme.

> 1967 R. Brautigan, Trout Fishing in Amer. 25 — The walls, the floor and even the roof of the hut were coated with your sperm and her come.

> 1969 P. Roth, Portnoy's Complaint 183 — Tell me! what did she do with your hot come!

> 1976 Miss London 23 Aug. 12/4 — His attitude to sex is ambivalent. ‘Each night I had to clean the come off the back seat of the cab,’ he remarks in reasonable disgust.

http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/36824

http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/36821

I want to fuck in a church.

>>5821

> sentient weaponized sex crystals

what?

>>5823

Does this have any relation to the neoregressive iconography of The Cathedral.

>>5816

The specific stimuli that reliably get me off are superficial.. I think if we look for a unifying theme, the underlying rule, what it is is..

Being forced into a virtuous role, of some kind.

I think I've got this issue where I find it really difficult to specialize, narrow my view and just fit myself into the body of society (hence philosophy degree). On some level I must realize that a human has to do that. But intellectually I can't see how or where I should do that. So, the idea is ugly to me. But it's vital, I have to keep looking. So it's sexy to me as well.

>>5822

Allow me to interject. You are a pedantic cocksucker that nobody wants around. Please go swallow a gallon of cum.

>>5826

is this what you tell hookers

>please force me to be virtuous, you dirty slut

>>5827

I want them around. I admire their self-aware contrarianism and I enjoy facts.

>>5829

Endorsed.

dannyplay.tumblr.com

an amusing diversion

my fetish is fucking michael anissimov in an idaho wheat field

make milgram real 2k16

>>5832

yo it's anissimov

bb u want sum fuk?

>>> /erp/

>>5836

this is *supposed* to be a confessions board, dipshit

anal is the true sex, vaginal is for procreation

and dominance in general

>>5823

i want to fuck you in a church. i want to use you to blaspheme against the old and irrational. i want to make you chant the lord's prayer backwards as i sodomize you, as i hail satan with every thrust into your ass. i want to make you cum pentagrams onto the altar as i lay down blood-scented candles around it, each one engraved with the entire text of HPMOR. i want to use the force of your mindblowing orgasm to summon an incubus to eiffel tower you with

>>5839

that sounds amazing but you don't even know who I am

I could be anybody

are you sure you want to fuck me in a church?

autogynephilia

or maybe i'm just a girl?

according to the rightful caliph like 25% of us are secretly girls.

>>5839

i'm not 130 but now i want to fuck in a church too

>>5830

Endorsed, but I also want "gallon of cum" anon around because that image is hot.

(I was describing a scenario around it but that might be more appropriate for /erp/.)

>>5840

*opens incomprehensibly vast spreadsheet* according to my calculations, there's a Let Me Out Of The Box Already% chance that you're hot. that's high enough for me, bb~

>>5822

>> come, v., 17. To experience sexual orgasm. Also with off. slang.

>slang

Are you seriously trying to tell people how to spell their slang words

>>5841

Same.

>>5844

ok, let's meet in a church and fuck

>>5819

My fetish *is* mathematics!

>>5827

They probably already did to develop such strong opinions.

My captcha was "cokska" so make of that what you will.

>>5848

let's

ratchan has proven itself useful already. i propose that we repurpose this place as a hookup board

No hypnosis fetishists? I've run into like 3 rationalists through erotic hypnosis stuff.

>>5851

My (rationalist) ex was into mind control/hypnosis I think

Hey everyone:

Sub or dom?

>>5853

switch master race tbh

>>5853

switch, but i'm sick of other switches who are all like "i like to dom once every few months". would like to avoid more than 70% of one or the other.

>>5853

my fetish is deconstructing binaries

(I'm not into sub vs. dom, I'm into expanding my range of experiences)

>>5856

See, i'm into dom and into sub but it has to be a binary here

rolebending is confusing and weird because I dont know what state of mind to be in

>>5857

I mean, sometimes it can be fun having a mock challenge for dominance thing, but it's difficult to maintain for very long.

But, like, subbing then getting your partner turned on and then "taking advantage" of that to shift into a dom role is fun, from either side. But it's just frustrating if you're both feeling sub.

someone else doing the planning, really

>>5855

> SPANK ME HARDER BITCH

> yes master *spaf* do you want an other?

>>5860

Fair play.

cuckolding

yeah, i know

barefoot, pregnant chubby girls

>>5822

>> a1650 Walking in Meadow Green in Bp. Percy's Loose Songs (1868), — Then off he came, & blusht for shame soe soone that he had endit.

Good heavens. You learn something new every day.

>>5851

I like it. >>5818 here

>>5853

For me, it's like this:

Domming: Requires more effort from me (since I'm in control of the situation), but is higher quality (since I am pretty good at controlling situations) and usually ends with the sub really enjoying it and expressing such (as they are wont to do) which makes me happy.

Subbing: Requires less effort from me (the whole point is not being in control), but is probably lower quality (most people willing to dom suck) and rarely does the dom really care.

If I had a guarantee of good quality, and I somehow the effort-levels were equalized, and my partner was certain to be enthusiastic, then I'd go with a sub role - that's my actual preference. But it's easier to get quality stuff when domming, if I can muster the effort, so…

Of course this perspective is drawn exclusively from ERP, so maybe that's not how it works in the real world.

>>5827

'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as cocksucking, is in fact, sucking/cock, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, sucking plus cock. Cock is not an action unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning sexual sucking made useful by the sucking lips, fingers and vital bodily components comprising a full sexual partner as defined by social justice.

Many people users run a modified version of sucking every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of sucking which is widely used today is often called “cocksucking”, and many of its perpetrators are not aware that it is basically the sucking system, developed by the sucking Project. There really is a cock, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use.

Facefucking!

>>5869

are you sure you don't mean skullfucking?

>>5870

Is skullfucking more than brutally fucking someone's face?

>>5871

it can also refer to fucking their literal skull

>>5851

I'm not into that, but one time I read mind control erotic fic for the humanist insight, and it was just 100% nasty. I started to realize mind control was a misnomer for whatever this stuff was providing, it was mind destruction. They seemed to relish not the repurposing of a mind but the levelling, the subjugation, the reduction.

I cannot believe this is something people need. I cannot believe this is the way some people are supposed to be.

>>5873

Do you not have any fetishes, then? Mind control is just one branch of domination/submission; there are a lot of kinds and a lot of people into it. It's the most common class of fetish in my experience.

It is pretty gross though yeah.

>>5873

Sounds hot, any recommended fic?

>>5873

It's not that we fell we need to happen to us, it's just something that's fun to fantasize about.

And Holy shit is it fun to fantasize about.

Chastity (amongst many others) and I might have found a keyholder. Who's not into me, as such. Which is its own kind of hot.

My fetish is hair - long hair especially, but short hair is attractive if you have the face for it (you probably don't). I love playing with hair, pulling hair, everything short of worshipping hair. I like the texture, smell, form, and movement of hair; curly, straight, wavy whatever, as long as its thick and healthy. I love ponytails, they just get me sooo horny. They expose the neck like short hair, but expose length like long hair, and can be pulled easiest of all.

So I fucking love it when a girl puts her hair up for me, tying it back in an elastic.

That's my fetish - although I suppose you could argue its just a mild paraphillia.

>>5873

They aren't supposed to be like that, and they aren't unless they glitch and become addicted to pleasure :3 Its simply the exploration of that side, can you understand some people need the opposite? To be 100% in control, subjugate and destroy? A lot of disciplines outside of sexual fetishes have similar ideas like religious people that want to submit to God 100% or tantric sex. A lot of people delve into both sides of this equation so don't be so scared. A switch that fully appreciates both sides of it yet doesn't needs it to have fun > The rest of us.

>>5874

Yeah I have submission fetishes. I think >>5880 knows what's going on. It's a sort of overindulgence. Like when a man can't be bothered going out to find a mate, and decides to stay home and masturbate. He is stifling himself. Likewise, the degenerate erotica uses the cheapest, easiest most obvious kinds of stories to get that bean flicked, inevitably missing whatever ineffable kink in the soul lead to the emergence of the fetish. The erotica is not representative of the correct functioning of the adaptation, it represents a sticky modern failure mode. If it were more effective it would obsolete itself. It's conceivable that there could be very very well-crafted mind control erotica that lifts souls rather than baffling them…

Or if there isn't, I wonder if I could write it…

>>5879

Do you have much hair yourself

femdom, which is pretty silly for a conservative/reactionary, but at least I'm not nydwarcu full homo

>>5853

Why are there more subs than doms anyway? Seems vaguely maladapative.

>>5882

Does it matter if he does? I wouldn't expect this to be symmetrical.

>>5885

I would expect him not to. Autoerotic stimulution can be very annoying.

If this is so, he would be running from the very thing he's being pushed towards, possibly the thing he needs. Tragic.

>>5884

To a first approximation, all women are subs. Men have greater variability than women in all areas, so let's say 50% male subs. That means 75% subs and 25% doms total.

>>5887

Maybe. IIRC the results from surveys on people having dominant and submissive fantasies was something like 2.5% dominant and 5% submissive for women, and 5% dominant and 10% submissive for men.

Of course, either I've had a skewed selection in the women I've dated, or that data's bullshit. 4/5 who've brought up submissive fantasies, two of those four also bringing up dominant ones, and all of them being open to a bit of both.

5% ROTFLMAO, more like well above 70% women have rape fantasies, and I wouldn't be surprised if the number is something like 90% in reality. For men it probably looks something like this "45.8% of men in a 1980 study reported fantasizing during heterosexual intercourse about "a scene where [they had] the impression of being raped by a woman" (3.2% often and 42.6% sometimes), 44.7% of scenes where a seduced woman "pretends resisting" and 33% of raping a woman.

>>5885

Hairfag here, I deliberately keep very short hair, in a very masculine style, because if I want women to perform their gender roles regarding hair, I have to perform mine.

I wouldn't worry to much about turning myself on, I still get no reason boners in my twenties.