>>890979
So you blindly trust him.
You are the one thinking in 1D by believing Q is such a flat character.
>>890346
>>889958
Some of you seem to yet not understand, I'm not implying Q's using us to attack the left, or that I don't believe in Q's being in Trump close circle. I quite do so.
Best Case Scenario
As I mentioned in my first post on this board: When the police discover a pedo they don't bash in, arrest him and save the victim, they let the victim to be abused for months so they can gather evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt a get a fast trial to jail for a long time.
Just because Q is on our side doesn't mean he's "good" or that he's above dirty tactics, which wouldn't be a problem if it wasn't because he has mentioned he's above dirty tactics and wouldn't risk a patriot's life for the plan… and most anons just believe him.
If this case is true, then okay, use Q to bring the other side down.
Worst Case Scenario
>And despite how it may sound is not to discredit Q's position which I already stated to believe in, but his intentions==
Ok, why to come to imageboards of all places? "Last bastion of free speech" yes, "Bastion of intelligent speech"? Fuck no.
First of all, Q comes to a bunch of random anonfags with codes to be resolved. But why? Is clear he already understands the map or the major part of it and has Military Intelligence on his side, you know, actual competent people that have more to start with.
MI Compromised, unexpected ally: Fine, so he comes here… and is being attacked by clowns in about 5 days, great plan. Also, the CIA has 7 supercomputers and somehow take days to compromise Q's tripcode originally based in SHA1 which even the Qmap pdf mentions it can be bruteforced in 5 minutes by your average guy.
4chan compromised, en route for 8chan: First of all, Q and the anons mention paid CIA shills… as if they've never seen board banter all of the sudden.
All that spam is exactly what you would expect from your regular imageboard mouthbreathers and the average /pol/ nutcase. Also, CIA can take down goverments but can't catch Jim Watkins legally when his site is one of the most despised in the clearnet and they would get total public support? Then again, vandalism is a common CIA technique.
Looks like if Q is faking hackings or causing them to gain simpaty.
>Q still has to post something of substance.
Q has posted many evidence of his knowledge of future events but pretty much has us (And the clowns that have complete free access to this site) do nothing but discover. As an anon posted in another thread responding to another that said Q was a traitor leaker: "Q hasn't leaked anything".
>Why a coded message?
The message is about two main things, the actions of our side and their side both future and past.
If its about our side then why post it here were clowns can watch unimpeded and have professional cryptologist teams? Maps and codewords than have proved to not be very complex as Google searches have confirmed most of the investigations.
If its about their side then why post it? Most we can do is archive as theorizing gets repeatedly derailing.
I say that:
>That he organized the Bangladeshi bomb attempt before "predicting it".
>That every awful thing Q has predicted has been his doing.
I'm saying Q is planting evidence and is using us as witnesses of his own alibi
Which means POTUS has an enemy very close to him, probably a spy to sit right next to POTUS, his role is so important he's willing to let a lot of evidence against his own side be disclosed and land them in jail and suspicion in order for this Right Hand man to be double checked even by literally most lunatic, conspiranoic people in the planet who happen to have one of the last bastions of free speech in the world this side of the clearnet.