Internet Bill of Rights

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4 Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: bad137500e60b03⋯.png (483.74 KB, 850x444, 425:222, ClipboardImage.png)

Internet Bill of Rights Anonymous 03/05/18 (Mon) 14:10:49 7a9850 No.556744

I noticed there is another petition for an Internet Bill of Rights. It is not gaining any momentum and the deadline is quickly approaching. Q said, APART we are weak, but TOGETHER, we are strong.

We should use this platform as a means to architect such bill of rights. If you do not feel comfortable using this platform, I have attached my proton email address to my handle, we can each collaborate through that platform to keep it hidden until we have the final copy, then we can publish it to the WH petition website. All we need are 100,000 signatures, there are more than that following Q and his Anon's.

Where we go one, we go all

Anonymous 03/05/18 (Mon) 14:53:07 8aa33a No.556927

>>556744

An educated citizenr,y being fundamental to the betterment and advancing of civilisation, dictates no infringement which limits or restricts information access and provision shall be put in place by any government or corporate body.

Anonymous 03/05/18 (Mon) 15:01:31 362ce4 No.556966

Why the fuck would I help a company that has had direct ties to No Such Agency in the past? We already have a bill of rights, why the fuck do we need a new set? Why don't these companies just ACT on good faith, and show us they are not scumbags instead of trying to lobby to congress to pass some fucking rights (we already have) just so they can do some snake shit and sneak something else into the bill? Why can't they just act on good faith and be a good company? These people literally own CNN. They are not good guys, so fuck this.

Anonymous 03/05/18 (Mon) 15:32:19 7a9850 No.557110

>>556966

To be truthful, all the Internet companies have or previously had ties to No Su ch Agen cy…By the way, the filters have learned that the above is how we communicate. Our current BoR's are based solely on gov't protections, not protections from corp's. This e-BoR's would protect us from both gov't and corp's.

Need your help Anonymous 03/05/18 (Mon) 16:30:24 7a9850 No.557420

>>556927

>An educated citizenr,y being fundamental to the betterment and advancing of civilisation, dictates no infringement which limits or restricts information access and provision shall be put in place by any government or corporate body.

>>556927

Neither Congress, nor government institutions, nor government agencies, nor individual, nor any company hosting or managing a bulletin board service, means of interacting with other followers or friends known hereafter as “collective”, shall not infringe on the rights guaranteed to United States citizen’s, whether naturalized in the United States or born in the United States known hereafter as “citizens” from the rights defined below.

Amendment I: No citizen shall have their freedom of speech or freedom of religion rights infringed upon from the collective. All United States citizens have the freedom to say what they wish and worship whom they believe in.

Amendment II: This Internet Bill of Rights shall instate a body to manage, monitor and maintain all new technologies and services by a group of individuals from each state in the Union. The body shall be referred to as the “Internet Governors Committee”. This body will work closely with the collective and will be voted in by a majority citizens vote, the collective will not be prohibited from participating in any part of this process. Each individual voted to this body, will have a term limit of 7 years.

Amendment III: Any new technology that the collective invents shall be published and openly available to any citizen, unless it is detrimental to United States National Security. United States National Security is defined as a product or service that will compromise the protection of its’ citizens. The collective will only be able to declare this type of description after such evidence is deemed appropriate by the Internet Governor’s Committee (IGC).

Amendment IV: The collective shall not have the authority to throttle or decrease any citizens Internet connection. During times of National Emergencies, as defined by the President of the United States, the collective will use and maintain Web 2.0, funded by the collective and not tax payers funds, in so doing will make available the Internet for citizens to contact and assist other citizens in times of need.

Amendment V: The collective shall not introduce any compromising service or product which is determined by the IGC to be used in part or whole against the citizens. Compromising service or products include, but not limited to: deterioration of citizens health, mental or subconscious automation, [fill in the blank]