[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 8teen / animu / ausneets / hnt / lds / leftpol / rel / u ][Options][ watchlist ]

/qresearch/ - Q Research Board

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

Pro Aris et Focis

File (hide): 1fc4376c1177ae7⋯.jpg (20.5 KB, 246x243, 82:81, cartman.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

970a7a (4) No.443663[Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

(1/4)

Hey everyone, I tried to compile a list of tips on how to reach people, who are not familiar with what we do.

I'm sorry in advance if there are some sentences that sound off. I'm not a native speaker and expressing more complex

thoughts can be hard at times, but I think overall it should be understandable. So let's just start.

-Why do people shut themselves off?

The first question I want to ask is why so many people shut themselves off of thoughts that go against the narrative in

the first place.

I think it's because a) people just can't imagine or b) they can't be bothered or don't have motivation to deal with things

outside of their familiar realm of thoughts.

I remember when I first got into this whole "conspiracy game", it was after a good friend of mine commited suicide, which

deeply shattered my entire worldview. I was forced to realign my thinking to this new reality, where I suddenly realized that

bad things do actually happen and can happen to anyone at any time. The moment I heard he was dead was like having a dome of

frosted glass shatter around me.

Within a second I felt deeply disgusted by myself, the things I cared about, trying to be perceived a certain way for the sake

of being perceived that way.. The underlying egoistical motivation that guided my action.

It realize that what he cared about was greater than anything I cared about and the pain sort of forced me to look at the cold harsh truths

you usually repress.

It made me see all the injustice in the world which previously I didn't even reckognize as such, even tough I always considered myself a social and just person.

Eventhough I knew about all the bad things happening, it just didn't seem real to me.

I think it's important to remember where people are coming from in order to reach them, so we shouldn't judge or be condescending

towards those who are not yet "in the know". Most of the time, it's not because they're bad people, they just don't understand how

we view the world, and we should make sure we clarify that as good as possible.

970a7a (4) No.443673

(2/4)

General advice

In order to get people to think for themselves, question and entertain thoughts without rejecting/accepting them immediatly, people need

to experience how to do just that. That kind of stuff can't just be told it has to be experienced. So I'd like to point your attention to the principle

of "Discovery learning" or "problem-based learning".

There are four methods as described by Jérome Bruner that I'd like to share with you.

1. Induction

When we're presented with new information, we try to align what we learned to all the knowledge we already have. When trying to present someone

information that sounds so outlandish and out of the norm, it can help to reference and draw parallels to things that already are common knowlege.

Luckily, we live in an age with countless stories, movies, series, music and books that most people know about. Movies like "American Ultra" or

"Manchurian Candidate" for example can explain the concept of MKUltra quickly and easily and can give the person you're talking to a concrete

image they can connect the new information to.

I think that's also part of the reason why religions have been so succesful in human history. They give people a set of common ideas everyone can relate to

which makes explaining new ideas easier, because you can relate it to an older idea the person already has.

2. Problem solving

Learning to ask the right questions, formulating hypotheses and finding ways to find the answers you're looking for. Learning to learn.

I think that's what Q is teaching us as well. Asking us questions in order to inspire us to ask questions in a similar fashion. The socratic method if you will.

3. Intuitiv learning

Our intuition is capable of more than we can ever be aware of. 90% of the information we receive is just roughly processed in our subconscious

and never really checked. This allows us to come to conclusions without us knowing how we even got to them.

When we're familiar with something, we can skip thinking-steps and directly have an answer without knowing why.

You shouldn't just blindly trust your gut feeling, but it's important to learn how to fathom our intuition,put it into words and use it as a compass.

4. Intrinsic motivation

As I've already mentioned, people can't just be told to think for themselves, the motivation to do so has to come from within.

A way to evoke motivation is to only present parts of information and leaving the conclusion open. Again, that's something that Q is teaching us.

Saying "Person X did thing Y - why did he do that?" is more motivating than just stating "person X did thing Y for reason Z".

If you only lay the first pieces of the puzzle, the person will be motivated to find out how the finished picture looks like.

In the end, propably none of us really knows the full, complete picture, we just see horrible effects and things that don't

add up, so we try to find the cause.

Just pointing out the things that don't add up without your own opinion, lets the person draw their own conclusion.

It leads to a deeper understanding that really docks in your brain.

____________


970a7a (4) No.443680

File (hide): ae0fa536f3bae59⋯.jpg (78.69 KB, 435x435, 1:1, brain.jpg) (h) (u)

(3/4)

Now I'd like to talk a bit about the different personality types. Before I start I want to say that hardly anyone

is just one personality type, it's more of a tendency kind of thing, a little like distributing skills-points in a video game.

Also it's very general and could be viewed and further explained from a million different perspectives, but I do think it's a

handy way of looking at people in our context.

Lastly I think it's important to not judge someone for being the personality type they are. Every persons brain is

structured a little different, so everyone processes information a little different. You shouldn't be mad that someone perceives

things differently and instead figure out where barriers in communication lie and adapt your language to fit someones understanding.

That being said, for our purpose I suggest we view our "audience" as three groups, the "opportunistic masses", the "emotionals" and the "logicals".

1. The opportunistic masses

The first thing I think everyone should be aware of is something I call the "opportunistic masses". People who jump the bandwagon.

In German we call them "flags in the wind". Basically people who go with whatever they perceive to be the common

opinion.

These kind of people are a bless and a curse. They don't really care too much about morals, ethics, facts and really

anything outside of their own immediate reality.

This makes them the main tool for occult elites, because they are easily progammable, don't question and really only care what's in for them.

The good thing is that when the narrative changes, they're willing to change their stance without hesitation and won't even need to be conviced,

since their thinking isn't based on conviction to begin with. If the work we do is promising, they will be on board.

When the narrative changes they'll just say that it was "obvious all along", even if they irrationaly defended the old narrative to the last point.

This can be infuriating because they're claiming credit for something they contributed nothing to and don't even understand the

implications of the discussions and arguments.

One shouldn't get too upset tough. Instead they can safely be ignored, since they just go with what the majority of thinkers say.

So the thinkers are the ones you should put your focus on.

Thinkers are the ones who think about, question and modify the narrative. Thinkers act out of a sense of what is right and convictions.

Conviction based on false information, however, can be fatal and fixing that should be the main priority.

The thinkers generally can be broadly classed in two categories. The "logicals" and the "emotionals".(See the attached graphic)

It's basically where you put your train of thoughts emphasis on.

When trying to change someone's mind, one should first ask how this person thinks, in order to successfully reach them.


970a7a (4) No.443691>>446978

(4/4)

2. The Logicals

The Logicals are good at precise, logical processing and have good analytical skills. They do often times hesitate to question

authority tough and fail to view society from a bird-perspective. It think it has to do with analytical thinking requiring you to view

things seperatly in order to abstract and reconstruct them, so you're more likely to deconstruct than put the pieces

together.

For them, you shouldn't go too overboard, and stick to verifiable facts. Lots of details and few conclusions and big ideas,

since you kind of want to lay the groundwork for their own analysis. Also you shouldn't be too emotional since that can be

perceived as manipulation.

Just the cold facts and let them do with it what they want.

3. The Emotionals

The Emotionals are mostly guided by their feelings, which brings a lot of passion and genuineness with it.

They have an hollistic view on the world, which allows them to make a lot of connections but on the downside it means that

they are not that capable of taking in depth looks at things. This makes them prone to manipulation.

Being guided by your emotions is often considered foolish or naive, but ultimately, it's humanity's measure.

Logicals want a challenge, but what that challenges wants to accomplish is guided by what the Emotionals perceive to be good and pleasent.

For these people you should on one hand make sure that all the connections and conclusion you have are correct and well

thought out, since its likely that they are just gonna regurgitate what you said instead of verifying it.

Also it's important to make clear that you have good intentions. For some people we seem like mad,´shady lunatics when in

reality we suspect and try to point attention to the most horrible atrocities on earth. Don't make it look shady, use pleasant designs

and stick to a few facts with lots of demonstrations, so it really sticks with them.

So, yeah, that's it. Hope someone finds it useful! :)


22c95d (1) No.446978

>>443691

Good thread anon. Thanks for not being nonsense.


f5e835 (1) No.447377

>>44369

Nicely done Anon!

Peace ✌️




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
5 replies | 1 images | 3 UIDs | Page ???
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 8teen / animu / ausneets / hnt / lds / leftpol / rel / u ][ watchlist ]