One off qproofs are good, but math is impossible to deny. There have been prior posts that have discussed the numbers in brief, but I believe it is the one rock-solid proof that cannot be as easily dismissed with "coincidence", Q was wrong about issue x, etc.

I have a decent understanding of probability: enough to know that all of the Q 'coincidences' are mathematically impossible, but not enough to spell out the math of why it's impossible.

If we can turn this into a meme, it could be a worthy go to to prove Q real to a significant swath of people.

>>2577040

>Q was wrong about issue x

You're talking about "trust Sessions", right? I'm with you man. If Sessions and Mueller really were working for Trump then Trump would be a party to their lying to the FISA court to get fraudulent warrants to surveil Trump. If Q were correct, that means Trump would have to commit federal felonies on at least three occassions (perjury to obtain the first FISA warrant and perjury two more times when the FISA warrant was extended by the court) to place himself under surveillance by the FBI. Not only that he would have to be the party responsible for locking his own campaign aid in solitary confinement and having the FBI raid his own lawyer. It's just not possible that's the case, so it's obvious that Q is a fraud. The question is, how do we convince these true believers of that?

>>2577505

>Filtered.

you can filter me but you can't filter reality faggot.

>>2578062

If you post pictures to twitter you'll notice the string itself increases in some manner so it's not a hash collision it's just really good timing.

>>2578062

Post pictures back to back, you'll see they've got quite a few same characters which will illustrate what I mean.

Hardcore Bitcoiner here.

If Q uses Bitcoin to sign a message using the key to an address he controls - we would know 100% it was him.

Example:

The is a guy nakes Craig S Wright who in 2015 tried convincing the Bitcoin community that he was satoshi. The community demanded he prove it by signing multiple messages with the private key know to belong to satoshi.

He signed one transaction, which would be possible to fake under controlled circumstances, but multiple messages under changing circumstances is impossible.

He disappeared for years after the embarrassing thrashing he got from cryptoworld.

Now he is forever known as Faketoshi.

Q could use Bitcoin to prove that he is the one Q, with 100% accuracy

https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#126

KM =Kristine Marcy

I don't need proof. Some things you just know in your gut. Trust your gut.

>>2578606

3:53:06 = 3+5+3+6 = 17, not 16

Aaaaah, what the hell.

The answer is:

This comment ITSELF is statistically impossible.

It's called the Prime Paradox.

>>2578784

Q said proofs are necessary. I absolutely trust the plan. That's why I think we need to assemble proofs that will be effective.

>>2578062

Thank you patriot. This is exactly what we need.

Do we have any theories as to how Qteam was able to get DOITQ? Is it because they have the algorithms?

"17 golf courses teed up: Everything you need to know"

"12" Collectible…Talking Doll - Includes 17 Phrases"

"17 things…said he will do if elected president"

"…accidentally refers to 17 years of Obamacare"

"…Grants Ethics Waivers To 17 Top White House Staffers"

"…set to take 17-day vacation to New Jersey golf resort…"

>>2578062

Q uestion: You already stated this in your post, Twitter pic file names are supposed to be random… I shared this proof with a programmer, he said you can't change the file name, he verified it was posted to twitter via iphone, and said the pbs.twimg.com is owned and operated by twitter, and assign the random file names when uploading the picture like u mentioned.

As a nonQ believer, he chalks it up to coincidence, ppl trying finding meaning wherever possible

What are the possibilities for Q/POTUS to manually change the image URL… Trump team has the tech/access to change it would have to be the case yes?

>>2709233

Which I’m sure they do! They took twitter down and injected code into it at one point a few months ago! Lurk more!

Also, go back and study Vault 7.

>>2577425

kys

>>2731679

Capped, Saved, 10/10. You are excellent.

>>2731679

This is a good starting point but we need a more accurate sheet that references real frequencies

Is there a tool that we can use to analyze POTUS Twitter, e.g frequency of certain words etc?

>>2577425

>If Sessions and Mueller really were working for Trump then Trump would be a party to their lying to the FISA court to get fraudulent warrants to surveil Trump.

Dude, if you are going to troll at least get the basic, even-an-idiot would know facts right.

Sessions was not in the DOJ (actually he was working on the Trump campaign) when the FISA warrants were obtained.

Actually, Mueller was not in government at that time either.

This may be what you're looking for

Dozens of verifiable "coincidences"

Really activates the almonds and makes ya wonder:

"How many coincidences before mathematically impossible?"

>>2579428

You’re welcome patriot!

>>2709233

There’s probably a few ways they could do it but in summary the NSA/MI can make twitter their bitch if they want.

Your programmer friend is basically suggesting that it occurred at random and Qanon is the luckiest person in the history of the planet to hit those 1 in 1 billion odds.

>>2712501

This ^^^^

Do you really need mathematical proof that there are bad guys at this point ? I think it's highly likely that Q is tied to Trump but then that does not imply any of what is happening is good.

Just look at these hoax false flags, just had one in Florida. They got away with it again, all the fake news they want but we're supposed to think something big is happening because Trump was spied on. Fake news event right there, nothing.

Has Trump told them to stop the hoax false flags for the incremental gun control and 'mental health checks' ? If he has and they keep doing them, why does he just keep on saying nothing about it ? So we all agree there's a deep state, we are agree there's 'attacks' based on false pretenses and fake news, but for some reason when Trump has opportunity he won't take it.

>>2577425

This anon has no fucking clue what the hell he’s even talking about. Moron of the highest order. Say hi to Mr. Brock for me, dipshit.