IMO string theory is closer to being true than this dark matter/just make up invisible particles theory. String is dimensions curled up and holding the pattern there by the way they are curled and twisted and/or expanded to create 4D that is where all the "mass" you are missing is underneath in the framework of creating 4D reality.

Why is there collections of matter at certian points in our 4D universe? Why does it collect? What keeps it there and in flowing patterns?

This video shows how two sets that look completely different are the same set viewed from a different axis; Mandelbrot vs Julia and both warp and twist when you move the other set in point of view.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfteiiTfE0c

>>2126666

True.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,

Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

- Hamlet (1.5.167-8), Hamlet to Horatio

>>2135799

Thanks for all this

>>2140276

To answer a question on general. In our current theory of gravity it is a force or a warp in space-time usually secondary to a mass that creates a divot in space-time as it moves along its timeline.

What I am strongly leaning toward is that all the forces are just side effects of how the balled up/'fractal' dimensions warp and twist to support our expanded/open 4D space-time.

Another way to think about is the divine created the pattern and gave us our creative free will to twist and warp the pattern to view it in any way we choose. FOL to Mandelbrot.

To give a function in our 4D

Say space travel.

Negate the time axis by spinning it to a point.

Shield or fully Map the local 4D you want to move in space.

Then calculate the number of iterations on the Mandelbrot set from point 1 to point 2.

And then Iterate your ship through them - like a wormhole.

The problem is the MAP :). Where are you going? At what point on the Mandelbrot is the destination you want? Where are you on the Mandelbrot? How do you iterate a 4D object? Etc Etc.

>>2140540

It is my board so …..

So if matter and energy follow the iterations of the Mandelbrot set, from small to large. It is just a mirror/blueprint of a way to create a 4D reality. Not everything seems to fit with Mandelbrot, or we have not figured it out. Think of it as a pattern on how to fold dimensions to downstep and create a 4D universe/bubble.

Ok so if matter and energy seem to flow with the iterations of the Mandelbrot set? What does this mean?

Does it mean everything is controlled by this set?

Does it mean nothing?

Does it mean that fractal folding/partial dimensions have validity?

Does it mean that there are a lot more dimensions that underlie our 4D universe?

What do you think?

If there is a universal pattern

if there is free will

if free will places each soul in the octave they most resonate.

Then you are where you should be and given the opportunity to go up or down as first note it the same note as the highest of the lower octave, and the 8th note is the highest and first note in next octave.

>>2146478

Here's a thought. "Gravity," as you say is just a theory. We have mass and weight (reality, not a theory).

Suppose it is all inclusive that it is our weight that weighs us down? Much like a paper weight on a desk.

Buoyancy, in water, isn't anything to do with gravity, rather the weight of the object that would naturally displace the fluid, the buoyant force. Not g acceleration due to (this is very important) unproven so-called gravity.

If this is so, which in reality makes actual sense and is a reasonable conclusion any theories using gravity are really just another crock of the lies that we are in the process of uncovering. Gravity is like click bait. Takes you on a ride to nowhere.

None of your theories are grounded in truth.

So, I call bs on this thread and wonder what actual benefit it is to Q and our present journey to be free of the lies?

It does the opposite using myths.

>>2147113

I agree. This looks like a collection of "brain farts" that are espousing incoherent ideas.

incoherent

(of spoken or written language) expressed in an incomprehensible or confusing way; unclear.

"he screamed some incoherent threat"

synonyms:

unclear, confused, unintelligible, incomprehensible, hard to follow, disjointed, disconnected, disordered, mixed up, garbled, jumbled, scrambled, muddled; rambling, wandering, disorganized, illogical; inarticulate, mumbling, slurred

"a long, incoherent speech"

Math please

>>2147113

>>2147276

>>2147061

I gather you are not following at all.

Think of our entire 4D world as existing on the surface of a soap bubble and the the rainbow reflections are all that we experience - that is our 4D.

3 in a row very fast? HMM over target?

If gravity is a theory,

So is "anti-gravity"

The logical explanation (observable),

Is that we are contained in a controlled atmosphere living on earth.

Alter those variables, remove earth, and the atmosphere, what actually happens? And at what point is there no atmosphere, and have we actually been there? Past the Van Allen belt?

There are TV interviews of many NASA scientists, and astronauts, that are claiming we have not. Oddly still, 14,000 telemetry tapes are missing from the Apollo 11 mission. (The angle outgoing and re-entry calculations re the Van Allen Belt). Given these unresolved issued, fraud must be considered.

Acceleration is real; momentum is real; inertia is real; weight is real. These are proven elements that can interact. Strangely, space travel is not a proven fact, outside our upper atmosphere. It is highly debated to this day, even among the science community, due to unreconcilable differences of what NASA promotes as "science" and "truth."

What we can see is the liberal universities all have ties to the NWO, and all astronauts are 33° Masons or higher. We must take into account who we are dealing with hear and not just believe anything they say is the truth.

Q lesson #1

This is a red flag that you overlook in a profound way.

qunmasked.blogspot.com

>>2147489

Look, I was under the impression this is a board of exchanging ideas. I gave some ideas, and now you use my input as what??? Equally, maybe I'm over the target. That was a very lame statement just because I don't agree with you.

Give me a break. Process all sides, don't just believe what's been pounded into your head.

I found your claims fascinating, I gave my opinion.

>>2147440

Math please, or simple 4-d drawing

>>2147511

Gravity is defined by the mass the deviates the space time. If there were mass on the other side of the plane it would be anti gravity. If you can create a mass on the other side of plane you can manipulate anti-gravity.

>>2147596

Still, regardless of those pretty words,

Gravity is unproven. Weight and mass are proven. Provide some proof with what has been proven to back your claims up!! Or better yet, do some more research to support your proposition.

Where's that? A valid question. Not to offend.

>>2147638

I don't endorse gravity as a force. I think it is a side effect of the folding of dimensions to fractal.

that is my opinion

>>2147596

Here's my point.

Deception is a great possibility when you examine the known facts.

A lie within a lie is deception.

did you read my comment that mass and energy seem to collect at iterations and deviations in iterations? That is where mass and thus 'gravity' appears.

>>2147680

even if the deviation in space time is up not down it is still a fold in the supporting fractal dimensions that make the place for that mass. I am not quite to the point I say the folds are what we perceive as mass but close.

>>2147663

Yes, but you take it to place where we might not be able to go, and you do use gravity and anti-gravity in your models.

I really did find it fascinating, but lacking much on proof. Especially considering the potential of deception in the matters you use to go where you go.

>>2147680

After all wave particle duality. Mass may be an illusion of perception.

>>2147706

note Weight is gravity based. Weight is local not universal

>>2147738

What if weight is weight based? Why does gravity need to be in the equation if it isn't even proven to be real?

These people that dole out our education are lying bastards.

Question everything.

>>2147821

You are not wrong. All matter is wave.

And Engeneers have the keys.

But Trust - divine is one eye

>>2147851

Weight is base on the angle of deviation in space the downward force. Mass is just the amount of physical matter that deviates the space. It is really similar. Think superman - he was strong because his planet had more mass gravity - thus he weighed more there. Here he weighed less as he was more 'dense'.

Flower of Life guy?

Drunvello Melchizedek developed a whole meditation protocol around the concept. Ultimately the only thing that time traveled was your consciousness.

>>2147925

Study Octaves

>>2147927

Fuck no I want Math - I will get eventually someone will turn the math to geometry.

>>2147927

I think in geometry - intuitively. I want someone to prove the math of the geometry.

>>2147871

Yes. And all waves have frequency. I did not say otherwise.

For instance, sound waves travel faster in water than air.

Einstein was my favorite, now I'm not so sure. Mass issues are also grounded in density. E=mc2. Now I'm doing a full reverse and reviewing.

Mass is Wave

Easy in a particle

Once you get to molecules and organisms it is a whole lot of folding and twisting of dimensions to have that wave appear that way

LOL

Fractal

it is proven that a mass is a wave.

We can perceive on or the other.

That implies that how we view things affects them.

it is very hard to perceive all reality in our 4D as wave as you cannot function here if you do.

>>2147971

relax you have a lot of years to be Einstein.

>>2147961

Math is probably at the base of true science. I love geometry too. And it goes from 2d to 3d. I don't see proof beyond that. What is important in geometry is to have exact numbers (angles, distance). I also think man has decreased in math knowledge because the bastards keep it from us. Algebra and geometry are ancient math. Astronomy as well. There is nothing new under the sun.

So anything 4d?

CERN very will may know about it, it could be antimatter. Everywhere there is collider, evil bares it's ugliness. They've had to move them off campuses due to increased evil. No kidding.

But here is where I think demons and the endless black abyss and Antarctica come into play, but they keep that secret too. And all of that is explained in the Book of Enoch.

I want our full knowledge. The whole truth. I don't necessarily doubt dimensional travel, but it is not possible using current rocket science as we know it.

>>2148077

That made me smile:))

>>2147935

That's what blew my mind:))

>>2147899

Well, in all honesty, Superman was a Hollywood movie. We learned, they make movies to support the shit they say. Like Snowden and Titanic..

opps in gen Lol

>>2148133

Ok tutorial

2 is is a page of paper

3 is a box

4 is the box moving through time and space.

5 is seeing the box move through time and the timeline

6 is seeing the alternatives that the box could have changed course.

etc.

>>2148177

Octaves are spiritual

I attached the 432Hz v 440Hz comparison of concert A above.

Which looks more healing?

Yet they intentionally changed it to 440. This is like in the mid 1800s and here in America in the 1900s.

Why? Now they are pushing microwaves on us w G5. We are the receptors it is [a kill switch] and they haven't even tested it for effects on plants, animals or humans. Short distance so they're putting antennas on every street light or 200 ft or so. If you could see it, it would look like a smog cloud everywhere.

They've been using frequencies to cause us harm for years.

Sorry to go off topic. But it is bad frequency. They weaponized everything in our world.

>>2148384

LMfao you are making me study

OK

>>2148384

not attachments send the urls

>>2148384

I am not sure about G5 yet i am old and do not freak out easily

All matter is energy

If our reality is created by folds in universal dimensions and perception.

Two variables:)

1 : The folds and twists of universal geometry

2: Our perception of it and where we are in it.

:)

game theory

>>2148628

Lower October? lol

Lower octaves

>>2148543

That's where I think they took us astray.

Sent us down the wrong road on purpose.

Could this be more accurate:

All matter is wave frequency?

They threw in the "speed of light squared" presented in Einstein's theory to keep us confused because it is difficult to comprehend, which made us just accept is like lower case dummies.

But it is really the frequency of light that everything comes from.

Does that make sense?

>>2148911

And further, that light is Jesus Christ.

The Bible says he holds everything together — as in atoms. He was there in the beginning, and God spoke it into existence.

Satan and his satanic flock would definitely not want us knowing that.

>>2148355

Ok. What is a "timeline?"

Is it a real thing?

I hate the autocorrections on this stupid phone. It was tonation not donation, and my other lame typos, sorry.

>>2148543

You need to study moar on quantum mechanics and less David Wilcock

>>2147645

Well, now you're making me study,

So we're even. Lol

>>2149207

Yeah and Copernicus was part of the Cabal, although:

… Nicolaus' father was actively engaged in the politics of the day and supported Poland and the cities against the Teutonic Order.

>>2149207

The world is round.

1. Coalescence- Gravity pushes all objects toward the center. Therefore, after a certain amount of material accumulates a heavenly body becomes a sphere ( loosely). We see that in all heavenly bodies.

2. A lunar eclipse has a round shadow. So we are at least on a round something because the shadow is rounded no matter what hemisphere you see the eclipse.

3. There is a wonderful u tube vid that shows 2 cameras. 1 on a tripod at sea level and one hovering in the air strapped to a drone. The sun sets on the sea. Camera on the tripod sees it set. At that moment the hovering camera is rocketed to 400 feet. The sun rises in the remote view finder and sets again. This is proof the world is round. The flat earth model cannot explain this.

4. Mother nature is a simple girl. She wouldn't make all the objects in the heavens (beyond certain size) round and then make the earth flat.

5. NASA fuckery photos add to this theory I get it.

6. All the math done by the nerds and plane routes etc etc add to flat earth theory. I get it it's tastiness!!

7. What if the earth was just bigger than they are telling us and the sun closer? It would explain all the anomalies and the earth could still be round.

8. Crazy?? Well no different than the earth is the only "special body" in the know universe. I prefer to think that maybe the nerds just fucked up the math or the earth has a larger circumference than they are saying.

9. What if flat earth model for south pole being a shelf surrounding us is real and beyond that barrier is the rest of the big blue marble and it's inhabited by aliens that actually govern our little ant hill?

10. I digress . If there are multiple explanations for the same phenomenon how likely is it that the earth is actually flat? Where is this scientific proof really? Triangulation of google maps? Again mathematical error is a far more likely scenario for those discrepancies.

Hope this sounds objective and is helpful not trying to belittle anyone for exploring a theory :)

>>2148543

‘If you want to find the secrets of the Universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.’ - Nic Tesla

Just explain the eclipse issue.

I generally ask, if curvature is 7.8" where is it? And how does the water bend?

If you look to notice, horizon is flat.

But, that is very brief. Lots of stuff on photofag. Sorry for my sarcasm over there. You'll probably spot my tracks.

Anons can be mean!

I really love physics. To me it's the study of what's real. All I can say, is it was one WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF after another.

Followed by anger.

They are lying bastards.

>>2149737

,,,But as mentioned gravity is unproven. It's just an idea. In fact, it may be a fraudulent idea….

That's all you need to hear to determine this is a loon or a shill

>>2149550

Book of Enoch will blow your mind. They tried to destroy that book. It was on the Ark w Noah and survived post flood, or it could not be referenced in the Bible, both in the new and old testament. God hid it in Ethiopia. 3 copies found in late 1700s. Jesus read that book. Enoch said it was for a future generation. It explains dark matter, but it calls it by its original name, demons. Demons in the abyss over Antarctica way… Why do you think the Satanists flock there? Military Operations w Admiral Byrd, secret treaties.

There's so much valid information to consider.

It won't kill you to read it. Leave a comment over there. But, again sorry for my sarcastic memes. Enoch is downloadable for free. The Ethiopic translation is excellent. But read all three is better. It's a short read. Lots of info on demons and giants who lived on Mt. Herman. This is no shit, you will recognize Hollywood movies. Ancient giant "gods" we were told were myths, well guess what? Hollywood capitalized on it. Go figure.

Funny, flat earth was the accepted teaching in late 1800s, Nat Geo 1888?

There was advanced weaponry involved. TV superheroes use advanced weaponry. You will even recognize names. They say truth is lies and lies are truth. Cabal removed Books. Probably under guard at the Vatican with everything else they ripped off. Kept knowledge secret, kept sheep in darkness.

No coincidences.

>>2150006

That's what amazes me. Gravity is not proven, so you tell me what it is?

Instead, automatic name calling, just like Mr. Smith. Well, too bad.

It's all gonna come out

And you can't stop it.

You will see

Potus knows. He made tweets.

Explain his video with Buzz Aldren trolling him and NASA. They ripped the people off for trillions and trilllions. Potus will crack you up. Buzz rolls his eyes… "How did we ever do it without space." Why would Trump say that?

Troll master.

K, going to sleep.

>>2150009

It is interesting an worth the read, if you understand where is originated. It made lots of money for popular authors & Hollywood bu mocking conventioal religion) National Treasure, Matrix, et al, so I am "certain" it is legit (/sarcasm off)

Development

Three periods can be discerned in the development of Gnosticism:[60]

Late first century and early second century: development of Gnostic ideas, contemporaneous with the writing of the New Testament;

mid-second century to early third century: high point of the classical Gnostic teachers and their systems, "who claimed that their systems represented the inner truth revealed by Jesus";[60]

end of second century to fourth century: reaction by the proto-orthodox church and condemnation as heresy, and subsequent decline.

During the first period, four types of tradition developed:[60]

Genesis was reinterpreted in Jewish milieus, viewing Jahweh as a jealous God who enslaved people; freedom was to be obtained from this jealous God;

A wisdom tradition developed, in which Jesus' sayings were interpreted as pointers to an esoteric wisdom, in which the soul could be divinized through identification with wisdom.[60][note 21] Some of Jesus' sayings may have been incorporated into the gospels to put a limit on this development. The conflicts described in 1 Corinthians may have been inspired by a clash between this wisdom tradition and Paul's gospel of crucifixion and arising;[60]

A soteriology developed from popular forms of Platonism in which the soul ascended to union with the Divine;

A mythical story developed about the descent of a heavenly creature to reveal the Divine world as the true home of human beings.[60] Jewish Christianity saw the Messiah, or Christ, as "an eternal aspect of God's hidden nature, his "spirit" and "truth", who revealed himself throughout sacred history".[23]

The movement spread in areas controlled by the Roman Empire and Arian Goths,[62] and the Persian Empire. It continued to develop in the Mediterranean and Middle East before and during the 2nd and 3rd centuries, but decline also set in during the third century, due to a growing aversion from the Catholic Church, and the economic and cultural deterioration of the Roman Empire.[63] Conversion to Islam, and the Albigensian Crusade (1209–1229), greatly reduced the remaining number of Gnostics throughout the Middle Ages, though a few Mandaean communities still exist. Gnostic and pseudo-gnostic ideas became influential in some of the philosophies of various esoteric mystical movements of the 19th and 20th centuries in Europe and North America, including some that explicitly identify themselves as revivals or even continuations of earlier gnostic groups.

It mght be considered as "alt-Jewish" or "alt-Christianity". It is not considered as "canonical" except by various "esoteric (i.e. mystery) religion (Jewish and Christian offshoots)

Some include it as "historically interesting" but not part of mainsteam Judiasm or Christianity.

Is is the underlying "religious/philosophic roots" of Theosophy (Blavatsky), Thelma (Aleister Crowley). Freemasonry (Albert Pike" Ariosophy (Hitler "Ayran" basis) and other occult-based movements

See Wiki series sections on Hermeticism and Sprituality for a broader historical view showing their common roots and teachings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeticism

"Be cafeful who you follow"

>>2150266

I call BS

>>2150446

Ok still up. I spare myself all of that searching and analyzing what "men" and their committees and councils spew, because they aren't God.

They're the ones who removed Books, and now we have 100 different religions. They splintered God on purpose, to incite wars, now on a global level. Remember Ireland Protestants v Catholics. To me, they are all full of shit NWO churches they financed and created, including their preacher slaves. You want proof, just ask. I have the research. One ex. Jerry Falwell. They got him on the hook with money. He pissed them off then they put the SES (that they also controlled) on him to investigate his money. Sound familiar? Rockefeller and Illuminati family trusts financed many many churches. So, run full force away from the Catholic Church who blatantly advertise their pagan sun/satanic ways, (but the sheep just sit in the pews blind). Russell Trust. Mason Watchtower. It's the same for them all, and I sure as hell am not going to read any, not one, of the books out there by the hundreds of people pushing their rendition of how I should view God. God doesn't need men to define him and limit him or add or subtract from him in error.

It truly simplifies matters just to trust God. If your feet go off, you go into the hands of misdirection. He makes a hiway for you. What more do you need?Enoch lines up with God, and I know he does, because for over 10 years I've been reading the Bible front to back, over and over. God says that's how you read it. Not cherry picking verses to support man's new age thinking. Mock me if you want, but in 2007 I had a vision in a dream of God's Temple floor. The flooring. Planks. And these really thin wiggly worm things kept coming up and squirming back down under the floor really fast. I had a side cutaway view. And God told me not to step foot in any of the churches because they were corrupt. And their money was dirty. So since then I've been just reading his Word and keeping the real Sabbath (that he did not change, another lie) 321ad Sunday Law (day of sun worship). Would God, whose name is jealous really approve? 4th Comm. Remember the Sabbath, keep it holy, Jesus is King of the Sabbath. That means 7 in every language on earth, but now it's Sunday. Catholics even changed the commandments. So fuck that. And I'm not jewish. He says read his book for knowledge and the secrets of the universe, and he is right. It is a live book. Interactive energy. It is not 2 separate religions, or the 100. There is only one flock. One God.

Israel is not repudiated

We were grafted into the root

>1981099

The whole world has been deceived.

And this is a harvest. Underway. Lose your man made religion organized under IRS laws, and Cabal Satan's trickery, and go back to God.

Start over with God.

He's the one w Hz

Sorry. I hate the Canal

For all the evil they've done

To God and his children.

>>2148979

This video tries to explain dimensions up to 10. A droning boring voice but not too bad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ca4miMMaCE

>>2152279

>>2152350

Nice man made graphics.

What can you prove with unproven graphics? That's what they do, even if they have to pay some professor millions to lie for them like Nye.

Neil Degrasse (sorry if misspelled). This guy said in interviews gravity was unproven, but look now. All the Illuminati professor puppets coming out on script because the people are calling bs on their lying web of lies. Lyn D Rothschild, works for NASA.

That is no coincidence.

>>2152205

Gravity is not proven. The force is your weight of the mass. Can weight be a force, in lateral collision for instance?

As in weight and acceleration of vehicles crashing? Planes colliding, dropping a dish on the floor. You're saying gravity…. Where is the gravity? Gravity is a farce.

In fact, it will never be proven due to it's a deceptive lie. Part of an equation of more deceptive lies.

The universities a branch of the Illuminati. The "world churches" are a branch of the Illuminati, even if some don't realize it. That's the beauty of their matrix. Everything operates inside it. They jacked our wetware.

It's like a Mason kept in the dark, that thinks he is serving God, when that's not who he's serving at all.

Time to plug into your own brain. Ask God. He will show you anything you ask, and he won't lie.

That's what will actually cut your strings and free you.

>>2152205

That's what all their arguments start with,

"It's well documented and accepted (as fact) do you see their trickery there?

Start sorting out the lies.

What's make believe, what isn't?

Weight isn't. Go drop something on your foot. Is it in mid flight that gravity kicks in? Where does the force begin?

>>2152178

I love the hydrogen wave function, you can see God's signature like music on water:) It is about frequency. Everything has a song to sing. Tesla, who they destroyed, is right. They wouldn't let him share his knowledge with the people. They neutralized him in a very sad way, stole it and kept it for themselves.

>>2152171

Satan, and his sunn worshippers, on the other hand, have the sun in the center of the universe. Copernicus just made that up to give glory to the sun. Satanists mock God every chance they get. Even the Masonic temples are a mockery to God. The have an outside court, and they installed their mockery of God on us in such a way that we don't even know we are being used to mock God. Why? Taking God's children away, to death and destruction.

God's truth is verse upon verse, his precepts. Light.

Satan is lie upon lie generation upon generation. That's how he did it. He's still busy, but he knows his time is short.

It saddened me to know the extent of their evil, and what they did to my parent's generation, 1918 born.

The wars, financial collapse, wars, deception in churches.

They bring the death and darkness, and grind God's concepts and poor people's faces in the dirt.

Now revealed is human sacrifice to Moloch. Hundreds of thousands, millions over the years. Ancient ways? No, never stopped.

The entire story is in the Bible. God told the end in the beginning. He let us know in advance, sent his Prophets, sent his son, but we don't pay attention, and they murder murder murdered them all.

Woke up I am fully awake.

Fuck those bastards.

>>2153243

HHO plasma

>>2152892

My thought processes is that Gravity is just the deviation in space time and the question is if it is mass that causes that or the folds and twists of fractal/curled up dimensions that cause the warp.

Weight versus Mass:

1) Mass is a measurement of the amount of matter something contains, while Weight is the measurement of the pull of gravity on an object. 2) Mass is measured by using a balance comparing a known amount of matter to an unknown amount of matter. Weight is measured on a scale.

>>2152997

The divine tends to make things in an elegant beautiful manner that is why I think the Mandelbrot is just a part of the answer.

>>2140086

If this is right.

Then the FOL internal view to the shaded areas is rotated about 20 ish degrees up and about 45 is degrees away (into page) and and point of view is pulled back looking down at 65 degree angle; to warp the petals and funnel in that manner. Let me know if your perception is different.

>>2155595

I'm sorry, that makes no sense.

You just said

>Weight is the measurement of the pull of gravity on an object; and weight is measured on a scale.

So, the pull of gravity is measured on a scale???? It's our mass that gives us weight. Both these things are proven.

Gravity is a true red herring because it's made up!! A theory. You don't need it.

Take it out and work with what's actually known and proven and you will make progress. Your problem/equation has an fundamental error in it, a built in intentional error. They sabotaged our fact base to fuck with knowledge and keep us going in circles.

>>2153243

What is the frequency Kenneth?

We are waiting for you to disclose the "secret frequency"

Is it not curious that Tesla was dealing with frequencies, including the electro magnetic field, energy and vibration. And they took him out. His shit worked. Gravity wasn't a variable for him. Electricity was.

They replaced they Tesla with E=MC2, that is the "Theory of Relativity." They brought Einstein over to America, he was a paid actor working for those we've identified as big fat liars.

Please. The speed of light squared?

We've been duped. Wild goose chase.

Somebody, start a new school.

>>2156382

Since you seem to be the Keeper of All Knowledge, why don't you start one yourself and illuminate us

>>2156382

BTW - Gravity is a "force" not a "thing". Mass is one measurement of a "thing"

>>2156279

Weight is based upon the divot in space time you are standing on. You weigh less on the moon.

Every time you hear the word gravity translated it to divot in space time.

>>2156344

You try my patience so.

We have W E I G H T.

We don't float. We have buoyancy. A buoyant force yes! That's real. Gravity is bullshit that's why it's never been proven.

Theories are theories. They can't even test these theories. How convenient.

Go stand on a scale and guess what, you can determine your weight. Not a theory. SEE the difference?

>>2156313

None :)

Answers lie within are not given.

And frequency may be unique and may alter over time for each.

>>2156415

A force acts on a "thing". Study physics & quantum mechanics instead of the comic book versions of them. You explanation is a "word salad" of gibberish

>>2156382

Tesla was an engineer. I actually think he may have figured out a way to shield a 4D object from space time timeline, but with no control.

>>2156451

Keep em straight! Love it. We do need to separate from Hollywood grown replacement knowledge.

They saturate our heads for a reason.

We need to detox:)))

>>2156438

Weight is Mass of object and the pull of the mass from another object - get it now?

>>2156471

And you thinking is based upon what evidence?

>>2156483

Tesla stuff was used on fabled experiments.

They may not be true (montauk and Philadelphia).

But Elon did send a Tesla to Mars. Saw the Mandela effect real time.

>>2156438

Partially true, but what is the other object? The scale? If so, and if you put the scale on your head would it pull you "up". If so, you have discovered anti-gravity - if not, you proved yourself a fool

>>2156521

WTF?

>>2156521

you

Earth, Moon, Mars, etc

I am about to be sarcastic

>>2156521

opps I forget some may be way younger.

If they have not taught you the difference between mass and weight. They should have done that in 7-8 grade or earlier.

>>2156521

Was that a joke? Spoof on anti-gravity?

Cuz they gave you gravity unproven, so why not add another imaginary word to your vocabulary. They like to do that, it's their favorite.

>>2156415

No, it's an unproven nothing taking up head space. Why do you argue like it's proven? It's junk science.

>>2156740

Damn LOL

I wanted to discuss dimensions and people are mad about gravity.

LMFOA

OK Gravity is repeatable and mathematical.

What people don't get it is not a force but a divot in spacetime - falling it is mathematically falling. So can you all get on the same page.

The next question is why is it falling? That is my bet.

Gravity will IMO be a side effect of the fractal dimensions knot work under the surface of our 4D reality, as will mass.

Albert Einstein

1879-1956

Born in Germany,

Brought to USA by ?

Nikola Tesla

1856-1943

Born in the USA

They were contemporaries.

Tesla: "The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but no one can think deeply and be quite insane."

I wonder who he was talking about. LOL

Albert Einstein

1879-1955

Born in Germany

Brought to the USA by ?

Nikola Tesla

1856-1943

Born in the USA

Ripped off by NWO bankers and left to live in a one room hotel until he died.

The two were contemporaries.

=

Tesla:"The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but no one can think deeply and be quite insane."

Wonder who he was talking about?

RAnch secured

>>2157312

They were different breeds.

One theoretical

One an engineer.

>>2157561

Not quite correct

Nikola Tesla was born an ethnic Serb in the village Smiljan, Lika county, in the Austrian Empire (present day Croatia), on 10 July [O.S. 28 June] 1856.[12][13] His father, Milutin Tesla (1819–1879),[14] was an Eastern Orthodox priest.[15][16][17][18] Tesla's mother, Đuka Tesla (née Mandić; 1822–1892), whose father was also an Orthodox priest,[19] had a talent for making home craft tools and mechanical appliances and the ability to memorize Serbian epic poems. Đuka had never received a formal education. Tesla credited his eidetic memory and creative abilities to his mother's genetics and influence.[20][21] Tesla's progenitors were from western Serbia, near Montenegro.

…………..

A move to the US

Edison Machine Works on Goerck Street, New York. Tesla found the change from cosmopolitan Europe to working at this shop, located amongst the tenements on Manhattan's lower east side, a "painful surprise".[40]

In 1884, Edison manager Charles Batchelor, who had been overseeing the Paris installation, was brought back to the US to manage the Edison Machine Works, a manufacturing division situated in New York City, and asked that Tesla be brought to the US as well.[41] In June 1884, Tesla emigrated to the United States.[42] He began working almost immediately at the Machine Works on Manhattan's Lower East Side, an overcrowded shop with a workforce of several hundred machinists, laborers, managing staff, and 20 "field engineers" struggling with the task of building the large electric utility in that city.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla

Tesla was mechanical Einstein pure thought and math.

>>2158415

Yeah, he was a theoretical physicist. I guess that's a thought scientist. Haha.

Apparently all theory and no proof.

That is kinda suspicious in this game of make-believe we find ourselves in.

It reminds me of a great

Leon Russell song.

>>2158263

My oversight. Thanks for the extra info

Maybe, just maybe, they will make his body of work available. With all the science knowledge seekers, it would bring huge breakthroughs and I bet you guys could go 4D!

I keep thinking we will get goodies at the end of all this. Like truth kernels please.

>>2167130

Could you show us the formula for that? I don't remember learning about "the folding knot of fractal dimensions" in advance math classes.

Maybe you confused with Gordian knot (disentangling an "impossible" knot); an oxymoron and self-contradiction

Maths typically don't use such "poetic language" since it is invariably imprecise and ambiguous. Or maybe that is the purpose?

The Mandelbrot is a Set of Boundary conditions. The Center black area is inside and the periphery is the 'speed' a number arcs to infinity. What is all the black is touching the 4D plane and all the periphery is the way fractal dimensions support that 4D? And if you rotate it around as you move through the Julia sets the Mandelbrot warps as you do so.

>>2167130

Yeshua.

He existed before all things, and he holds everything together.

Colossians 1:17

>>2168116

Divinity would and I am sure did create an elegant pattern.

>>2181504

I figure the fractal dimensions are also in constant flux in relation to our 4D reality as well. If it does lead all the way back to FOL I feel that is a more solid pattern.

I have no problem thinking there are 'unstable' X dimensional universes; as all that means is that dimensions only contains energy patterns not matter.

>>2180792

For someone sophisticated to intelligently discuss a Hopf Hypersphere, the concept of an event horizon should be trivial. Have you "researched" the term with Google?

Once you have maybe you could find another colorful graphic to signify your comprehension of the sophisticated math which defines both?

If not, perhaps you might provide another "pretty picture". The concept of a "lens" to view a black hole that "captures" visible light beyond the event horizon seems counter intuitive and oxymoronic.

Thanks for playing

Obviously, big words =/= big understanding

The grand unified theory is unlike what any "scientist" perceives. It is near complete and will emerge soon enough.

The fundamental property of the universe is that it is derived from a pure information field.

It is the axiomatization of this information field that is the structure for the GUT.

Much like M-theory unified different versions of string theory, an axiomatic understanding of reality as a system will transform our understanding of its true nature, and thus transform our understanding of all systems in their totality.

Consciousness is fundamentally tied to this framework.

What is consciousness but a perspective?

What is perspective in relation to information?

Its processor.

Resolve.

>>2183076

I may have incorrectly used the Horizon when I should not have, as following that train of thought would make every point in space/time a black hole and I am pretty sure that math collapses very very quickly. Boundary Event corrected.

>>2183985

HMM?

Have thought of it as Point of view like Game Theory and that the video game is 4D reality and the fractal universe is the code that creates and powers that game. But your post implies all energy is just information as well.

>>2184056

Energy both is and propagates information.

Can information be truly destroyed or created?

It can only be transmuted.

The fractal universe and game theory are emergent patterns within total information.

The information field is itself aware and sentient.

>>2184888

That could make the forces in our 4D reality the loaded springs of fractal dimensions holding that area into a very condensed state.

>>2184862

You better re-take Geometry 101. Meters per second is not a measure of length. Your pictures are nonsensical.

What are you using for your units of energy?

Is that kinetic or potential energy, They aren't the same

How much "information" is in a lighting bolt (exited electrons) or a bonfire (heat energy/excited electrons).

Define your units of mass & the speed of light then do the simple multiplication and tell is what E is, and what are the units of measure.

Or,,, you can spin your wheels with a sixth grade understanding of "area"

The speed of light squared (i.e. "to the 2nd power") is not a square - it is a number with units of measure of meters or centimeters per second - Nothing to do with "area of a square"

A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

>>2185056

it is about the E=MC^2 equation - you seem to have missed that. That equation is about velocity and acceleration. Energy defined by the equation is Joule Newton through 1 meter.

>>2185056

all squared equations can be graphed as a square, it defines it that way in math and arrays.

Well if you can't jump math subjects just not worth my time.

>>2185056

All multiplication creates an array. Two numbers is a 2d graph.

>>2194061

Of course I could be wrong.

Or it could be the 211,985,280 m/s^2 as that is the line from Hypotenuse of C^2 to the edge of C^2 array and the arc could be bowed out toward the edge, but it is the math that creates the geometry not the other way around. What happens past that(which ever one) - well I figure a 4D boundary condition.

Don't know what is you might think about this videos but I found it easy to understand, specially to younger people.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSmdSw9eEIA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSmdSw9eEIA

>>2184154

I write something (information) in a piece of paper.

I burn the paper then die from a heart attack.

Where does the information go?

>>2196777

Not Tesla…

https://www.quora.com/Did-Tesla-really-say-that-the-Earth-was-flat

>>2196777

You mean acceleration? That is how physics defines gravity now meters per second squared.

I did notice the Joule and Newton are basically the same measure of Power as I understood it one for electric and one for matter.

>>2197136

Collective Consciousness. Casey wrote a lot about it.

I guess we better go back to mass.

Mass is defined In physics, the property of matter that measures its resistance to acceleration. Roughly, the mass of an object is a measure of the number of atoms in it. The basic unit of measurement for mass is the kilogram.

Again a bit of a circle of thought. Mass is the resistance to acceleration, and Gravity is the acceleration, and power is the change to the velocity or cause of acceleration - and all use the other to define itself.

I just found a line in wiki about Mass that I just LOVE!

In modern physics, matter is not a fundamental concept because its definition has proven elusive.

>>2198147

I figure we may have to go to the quantum level to try and untangle the way space/time creates the 'knot' known as Mass that has resistance.

I do notice that it at this point physics starts moving a lot more toward Tesla (ie resistance, flow, etc).

>>2198207

I would be interested to see anywhere in the scientific literature (physics; e.g. quantum mechanics) refers to tangle in space/time and any reference to a "knot".

Looks like someone pushing a "new theory" by misstating known physics.

Can you give us a quick list of the things 'discovered at "the quantum level" ( hint: look for 12 "things") and tell us where the "knot" fits.

What does quantum "mechanics" say about "time"?

Please, expose your ignorance further.

>>2203985

Not offended even though you really tried. Answer why gravity that is suppose to be the force that warps space has no units referring to space? There seems to be no equations defining the force that bends space. Time Einstein covered that in special relativity, but I think got stuck on how gravity works when all he had to do was treat it like time if he was keeping acceleration concept. But it seems from Newton to now we are missing the primary force of warping of space and measuring and observing the interactions within the set not the boundaries of the set that are warped by the objects in the set.

>>2204028

Ok I get that. That would make the units of Gravity to be kg*m/s^2 - right? Not defining gravity as just m/s^2?

Any force that affects space should include the units of meter squared or meter cubed!!!!!!!!!!

>>2203679

Definition of elusive

: tending to elude: such as

a : tending to evade grasp or pursuit

b : hard to comprehend or define

c : hard to isolate or identify

Matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter

Matter is usually classified into three classical states, with plasma sometimes added as a fourth state. From top to bottom: quartz (solid), water (liquid), nitrogen dioxide (gas), and a plasma globe (plasma).

In the classical physics observed in everyday life, matter is any substance that has mass and takes up space by having volume.[1] All everyday objects that we can touch are ultimately composed of atoms, which are made up of interacting subatomic particles, and in everyday as well as scientific usage, "matter" generally includes atoms and anything made up of these, and any particles (or combination of particles) that act as if they have both rest mass and volume.

However it does NOT include massless particles such as photons, or other energy phenomena or waves such as light or sound.[1][2] Matter exists in various states (also known as phases). These include classical everyday phases such as solid, liquid, and gas - for example water exists as ice, liquid water, and gaseous steam - "but other states are possible, including plasma, Bose–Einstein condensates, fermionic condensates, and quark–gluon plasma.[3]"

Poster note added:

"Classical everyday phases (solid liquid gas) but under special conditions/circumstances (i.e. NOT everyday)"

This makes the definition "elusive" because you have to identify the specific unusual conditions/circumstances where special rules states apply. This requires a much more complex description of the parameters of those special conditions

Hope that helps to clear up your confusion

>>2204223

Well I was not trying to add plasma, and I know the states of matter. Mass in basic is resistance to acceleration - like it is electric resistance. I do understand it is moving a mass takes power, do you understand by that definition it also allows mass to be viewed in its wave form?

>>2204223

Resistance most typically is an electric term. That would be open up the particle wave duality.

I understand I tend to think outside the lines :), but when shown I am wrong I will admit it, and when not sure will admit that too.

I believe Einstein - gravity deviates space/time or vise versa. But I don't think he got it down and that is the missing piece and am amazed physics is just ok with a unit system that warps space with no units referring to and measure of length involved in the denominator!!!

M over time is not how mass warps space!!!!!!!!!!

any warp of space must include force over a measure of length area or cube. M over time just does not fit the bill.

>>2204051

The difficulty is in trying to visualize it in layman's terms.

Newtonian mechanics (Laws) don't apply at the subatomic level (smaller that electron/proton/neutron). At that level things cannot be observed in any direct fashion we can "see" visually. We have to model the expected/theorized behavior , then "look" for the evidence. It basically requires all math at this level since our 5 senses can't record or "see" them. However, we can measure their effects/consequences and compare those to what we expected.

Both Fermi Labs and CERN conduct those experiments but "proof " is that the they behave as we expected or reconcile when they don't.

I personally had 4 years of serious math, electrical engineering and physics (including 1 year of quantum mechanics.). That was absolute minimum to even begin to makes sense of (early; 1970ish) quantum mechanics. The have progress far beyond that level, so that my old quantum mechanics text books are obsolete relics, and VERY incomplete.

Not to talk done to you, but this field has most of its "proofs" in electromagnetic theory and exotic math. A very small percentage of people bothered to spend their time on this so can't even graph the basics, which are extensive mathematical proof. It is little like speaking a foreign language know only within that math/physics "tribe". Outsider don't "speak the language" and ergo can't get a clear understanding of those conversations.

Sadly, a lot of misunderstanding arises in attempting to "translate" into common everyday terms and concepts. The result is a lot of willd speculation based on misunderstanding of what is actually "known'

Under-informed people speculate on what the science "says: and come up with dozens of uninformed speculation, they try to pass off as "insider knowledge". Net result - lots of theories with phrases laced with buzz words (like quantum, time-space, frequency, fields, etc.

Those who learned the terms and science can spot them is one second but debate/conversation is pointless without minimal training in math & physics.

If you are really serious about understanding (and I only know a small fraction) you will have to invest a lot of time with some very complex math and serious physics (Newtonian mechanics, quantum mechanics, electro-magnetic field theory, etc.

Unfortunately, most will give up in exasperation, and become victim of the charlatans with their many "theories" based upon nothing but what they "believe" wrapped in New Age "religions" with believers and followers.

Like Q always said "Be careful who you follow".

I am not looking for, nor do I want, believers and followers.

But, I will occasionally attempt to expose the most flagrant "quantum prophets". It normally only takes a simple question or two and watch them implode trying to explain their "mumbo jumbo.

The same method Socrates used to expose the Sophists.

BTW - I wouldn't count on any time travel or extra dimensional travel in the near future, The Hindu religion has been promising that for about 4,000 years and their country & culture hasn't progress all that much, if you remove the British East India Company (which is primarily responsible for their "modernization). American hi-tech gave them another boost.

>>2204689

for the last sentence - I don't. 4D reality, but it is not really understood by us lol. I have held off on delving into quantum again as I feel it is futile for my agenda - no geometry involved. It is all about spin and time and mass. I am not even sure they measure trajectory. I feel it is all explained by geometry just like Einstein, and yes I am not a physicist other professional occupation.

>>2204689

electromagnetic ? hmm ? interesting. That fits.

>>2204689

Once they redefine gravity they can break through a lot of the bull shit of preconception.

>>2204849

it is very hard to find a unified theory if one of the basic forces is defined wrong.

Mass is resistance

Flow is acceleration.

etc etc.

mass = ohms

>>2204790

If geometry is your interest by all means pursue it.

However, think you will find that at the quantum level "geometry" isn't much help to comprehension.

However, the opposite is likely true. Pictures and geometry are helpful to visualize small portions or simple aspects. The limitation is our visual limitation to only be able to visualize 3D objects/ Primitive but useful.

The mind can see "pattern" that aren't visible.

For instance, consider a vacuum, then draw a geometric figure to represent it.

Another - 1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256

You can draw that but the visualization may not be help to predict the next number in the series unless you understand the "relationship" you can "see" but can't draw on paper. This kind of stuff is to be found in Metaphysics (i.e. a philosophy discipline, idea but not physical form) but not in Physics (physical form)

Spirituality belongs in Metaphysics not Physics, which can be explained and proved mathematically. Metaphysics relies on beliefs and idea, and no one has shown (yet) that they have a physical aspect.

Nonetheless, countless people proclaim you can easily turn one into another at will.

Question: Has anyone yet turned lead into gold (alchemy) or straw into gold (Rapunzel). Some would suggest (via force of one's will, concentration, positive energy, etc ) that it came be done, but no evidence exists

>>2204943

You need a lot moar science/ You mistakenly oversimplify what you have read or heard.

I will gladly explain it all to you but can only do it in Amaraic or Babylonian.

Do you speak either?

>>2205117

I tend to have a bit more than a 3D view of geometry.if you missed that. But I don't mind charging windmills. :)

My spiritually is fine it is mine not anyone else s. I would rather see if it fits math. Kinda science geek.

>>2205208

kinda forgot it after 12 incarnations

don't be a MF ass

>>2204288

The partical wave "duality" has been resolved by quantum mechanics. Your information is sadly out of date.

Is Shroedinger's cat alive or dead.

Is Plaank's Constant still true.

Is the Bozeman Constant valid at -273 degrees Celsius?

Does Bohr find his shells at the beach

>>2205274

Bad Karma - you will have to repeat this life

>>2205345

particle wave duality resolved?

Sauce?

it may take me a day if valid.

>>2205274

You Babel nonsense then expect a serious answer?

You showed that with the last series of brain fartz

>>2205384

my last one was sarcasm back to you for what i felt was sarcasm from you

>>2205380

If you want to "play" you will have to up your game.

You are getting tedious, and boring.

"it may take me a day if valid."

I think you have embarrassed yourself adequately.

>>2205469

have a nice day you are so much superior to me you fart rose petals I cannot compete.

Well tomorrow i will just ignore this Aramaic dude and go on studying electrical and quantum.

Things to study and connect mass as resistance to electrical resistance. Quantum to see if has geometry aspects that connect to fractal. Gravity in relation to deformation of space to form a true formula with a measure of length, area or volume in the denominator.

Any deformation in the fundamental axises of our 4D universe will alter the way those 4D objects are 'seen' from within the 4D set. The example Einstein concentrated on was time, but if you alter the 4D axis you will also alter the length, width, and depth. This will alter the volume of the object which will alter the density or mass of that object. Well that is what makes sense to me (but I do not see a math connection so I might be wrong what changes mass).

Mass=Energy

Energy exhibits mass in relativity.

So long as the system is closed with respect to mass and energy, both kinds of mass are conserved in any given frame of reference. The conservation of mass holds even as some types of particles are converted to others. Matter particles (such as atoms) may be converted to non-matter particles (such as photons of light), but this does not affect the total amount of mass or energy. Although things like heat may not be matter, all types of energy still continue to exhibit mass.[note 9][24] Thus, mass and energy do not change into one another in relativity; rather, both are names for the same thing, and neither mass nor energy appear without the other.

Interesting:

Mass–energy equivalence also holds in macroscopic systems.[29] For example, if one takes exactly one kilogram of ice, and applies heat, the mass of the resulting melt-water will be more than a kilogram: it will include the mass from the thermal energy (latent heat) used to melt the ice; this follows from the conservation of energy.[30] This number is small but not negligible: about 3.7 nanograms. It is given by the latent heat of melting ice (334 kJ/kg) divided by the speed of light squared (c2 = 9×1016 m2/s2).

>>2197136

Information always exists in infinite forms. It existed before you conceived it and will exist after. What you did was write down symbols that conveyed some information through a physical medium. This medium is naturally transient and thus so is the information passing through it. Just because you burnt the paper and had a heart attack doesn't mean that information won't pass through a physical medium again. You are but one loop of perspective among billions, which increases the probability of that information manifesting again (or before).

Sure, it could've been some real great information, and it though it manifests in a way with its own unique err's and ah's, the essence of it is what is important and exists independently of the physical realm. Especially if it is important or otherwise valuable information (e.g. even if newton died someone would have still discovered gravity eventually)

>>2197943

Now, is collective consciousness a progenitor system or an emergent system or both?

>>2211453

Can't double check your math, but go ahead and take one more leap that energy = information. What do you perceive now? Where do the dots connect?

>>2211745

smile

information comes after breaking mass to wave and energy being the cause of gravity and causing 4D warp. Spinning the axis to understand the warp in 4D then confirming the 4D boundary condition and the energy passes that - then energy becomes information :)

>>2212040

There you go.

Welcome to the pure information system. All systems exist under its umbrella and all can be axiomatized accordingly.

Also P =/= NP

It is more difficult to transmute knowledge to form a new system than it is to verify that knowledge which forms the new system.

Lorentz transformations are a way to shift the xD axis or rotate it to view it in a different way, It is used to be able to tell the difference in time and spacial time dilation and length compression but can also be used on any vector to see how the axis shift.

Basically the warp in space-time can be mapped with Riemann surfaces using the Lorentz transformations and the Einstein Tensor (force basically of gravity deviating space time). That gets us to the boundary of 4D that has been warped with a twisted or spun axis to view that boundary. Now Einstien Tensor is next to look into and how it relates to kg (and its static energy/waveform), p (momentum), and how that energy is related to Einstien Tensor.

>>2212040

Now I need your assistance.

What type of fundamental operators are used to define information in its pure form (i.e. defining the pure information system before it manifests as any sort of physical form)?

As energy is distributed over a field (or wave function), is there a way that we might describe its characteristics in a fundamental way via pure information or only as it manifests in a macro form (matter as wave function, etc)?

The theory regards each layer/system as emergent from the previous:

1) Pure Information System (bedrock)

2) Information Interaction System

3) Quantum Field Systems

4) Physical Systems

The pure information interaction system is probably the only thing hung up at the moment. We already have abundant understanding of the emergent quantum and physical systems.

>>2218195

How is the pure information structured.

Which specific quantum fields do you mean. There are several and different properties.

Of are you just talking out your ass with some words thrown together to imitate understanding?

>>2213547

Cute pictures from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation.

As you surely know they are useless without the math behind them.

A much better site which explains the math is https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/special-relativity/lorentz-transformation/v/introduction-to-the-lorentz-transformation

Come back and tell us what you think of their explanation (since I'm site you are familiar)

If I recall correctly they were covered in jr or sr year in Electrical Engineering. Probably was jr year since I took Quantum Mechanics in senior year.

We should compared notes - I presume you were BSEE or Physics major?

>>2218391

I appreciate this question, thank you.

It's structured in binary.

All quantum fields represent -one layer- within this theory.

Do you have insight to provide or just low-key insults?

Could you take a moment to reinterpret your current perspective under the umbrella of a different paradigm?

I'm not asking the world of you here.

If this sounds like idiocy to you, i'd still like to hear your pov.

>>2218462

yea I know I can do the math barely on the time and x axis on a vector makes by brain hurt, and Reinmann surfaces I am just touching the topic with a glancing understanding, well so far.

after and arguement in general about energy and force last night I must admit.

E and F are not exactly the same except for every meter cumulative E= F * meter.

Then it dawned on me Gravity is a force on space time - thus units have to be G= kg/m or G=kg/m^2 or kg/m/s^2 - but kg has to be in there, not m/s^2.

There appears to be some issues with our unit definitions at least at that level of physics.

?G=kg/m/s^2 ?

Acceleration would just be the difference between space-time deviations of objects right?

Goals - Schwartzchild radius and Plank Constant will define the smallest amount of energy in smallest area of space - base. then Einstien Tensor etc.

>>2219832

and E=Fm doesn't make sense either E is both SE (static energy) and KE (kinetic energy), and Fm would not define KE - F/m^2 might.

I better get ready for work F, E, and G are all melding into one force in my mind - ahhhhh.

>>2219892

I keep getting to the point all energy/force is just acting on the axis of our reality - not us - well unless you follow the thought that 'us' are protrusions of twisted warped axis to create a standing wave in within the surrounding axis. Ahhh I need a brain nap.

>>2218195

Once you move beyond a 4D physical reality all the rules change. There is no mass thus no resistance, There is no work for there is nothing to move as flow proceeds without impediment. I see it as pattern, all axis relax to normal position and all energy sits in potential. To define further you would have to define a set and calculate the probabilities of an event not forgetting that the 'set ' is not isolated and the probability of an outside influence affecting the event (ie chaos theory).

>>2218462

Good video in the first min :)

On the way home thought - well the Lorentz transformation is basically just rotation around the Y axis and that is easily solved with trig and the pytharean theorm. Then in the first minute arctangent. I will have to check the math as I was pretty sure it would be sin and cosine and solving for hypotenuse or side. And if it this simple there is no reason for a series of solutions - it is a freakin table.

What is going on in Lorentz is the rotation of axis and frame of reference. Rotation around Y axis. This cause a perception of time dilation and length shortening. This can be perceived also as acceleration and deviation of space time that creates an area of space-time that has a divot. opps I just went beyond physics sorry.

Basically as I perceive it Schwarzchild radius is the total compression of mass excluding volume. The Planck length is the smallest measure that can be 3-4 D. I you placed that smallest mass over the smallest length? i will have to check the units but …. is that the force that is every unit of space-time or is that the energy to break through space time?

>>2218462

your video so does not take it to the next level and bring it to geometry.I get algebra has to fit. I am geofag. so annoying algebra when I know it is just a rotation around Y.

So a series of 5 videos to try and explain something I got in a moment of free time?

People all we see and experience can be placed in Euclidean geometry if you spin the axis!!!!!!!

LISTEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YES you can take it 4 or 7 or 11 D but for here you can figure it out if your mind is multi D and you can spin it , twist it and view in a different way - see hopf

You may use different terms from point of view, to acceleration, to warp in space time, to WTF.

But :) That is how you get to TOE

He started out so well and went back to traditional bs in later vids

The Lortetz transformation is a rotation on Y axis easy geo solve. Don't need all this bullshit. If want to do x can or time can. if want a vector can and all axis change!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WTF it is rotation of axis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DEFINE the angle of change and it is FUCKING Pythagorean!!!

sigh.

Draw a 3D axis

Rotate it around the Y axis - the time as Z dilates, and the X and length contracts. That is Lorentz.

>>2220212

The few people here that actually understand the "big words" you use also notice how you misuse the to mislead.

Notice that those that are overpowered by your use of that "cut & paste" level of "understanding" sprinkle with pure BS can't respond and those who see through your charade don't bother.

The few responses you get are idiotic questions that make no sense

What is sad is that you are pathetic enough to need this kind of phukery for your self-esteem.

Information is "structured in binary" although all form of energy are waves (i.e. frequency/wavelength). Binary is discrete and has limited ability to represent analog waves.

See Fourier analysis vs Fourier synthesis, The limits are illustrated in the Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem. I have cut & pasted a section that highlights that limitation.

<snip> from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist%E2%80%93Shannon_sampling_theorem

Sampling is a process of converting a signal (for example, a function of continuous time and/or space) into a numeric sequence (a function of discrete time and/or space). Shannon's version of the theorem states:[2]

If a function x(t) contains no frequencies higher than B hertz, it is completely determined by giving its ordinates at a series of points spaced 1/(2B) seconds apart.

A sufficient sample-rate is therefore anything larger than 2B samples per second. Equivalently, for a given sample rate fs, perfect reconstruction is guaranteed possible for a bandlimit B < fs/2.

When the bandlimit is too high (or there is no bandlimit), the reconstruction exhibits imperfections known as aliasing.

<snip end>

Short summary - Conversion from binary to digital can be "adequate approximation" if the sampling rare is high enough (fi.e.faster).

But the converse is not true because "an adequate approximation" can not be reconstructed because, by definition ("i.e.adequate approximation) is not granular enough,

QED

>>2225623

the difference here is ego. Here i have none. What you show is basically a tendency to be passive aggressive which is way to subvert others to advance your own agenda.

>>2225623

Yes I advance mine but honesty I give ideas even if not sure I admit when a bit off and I ask for others ideas?

Do you?

No you act superior to just barely equal.

Please re-evaluate your approach to life.

>>2225623

>Sampling is a process of converting a signal (for example, a function of continuous time and/or space) into a numeric sequence

A Reinmann surface? See it can be just not one field it is all fields. It has to be all fields to be a TOE

I will add Fourier to my research.

tell me if I am wrong.

Einstein learned you had to spin the axis (Lorentz) and then added a tensor to bend space time. Is that tensor 90 degrees as is should be or is it following the Reinman surface? It does not matter geometry can figure it out. IE - bifurcations of reinmann set to map the fluid bend in 4d. i will figure out how to twist the axis so it is a function soon.

>>2225701

You ask for insight and got it (Post 2225623 - trips)

Now you want to play the victim card?

According to you, I am "barely you equal", but in your previous post you "had no ego"

Why no intelligent response, It should be trivial for a genius like you.

Why the butt hurt? Just decimate my argument.

My approach to life in to expose fraudsters like you. I see why you would want me to "change my approach". You feel bullied

The nature and tone over you many, many posts shows everyone how you operate.

Bombard us with YOUR superior knowledge and insight.

When challenged, cry like a little butt-hurt biatch, and re-emphasize that you consider me "barely equal" to you.

Make your case and stop crying,

Grow some balls, counter my argument or GTFO.

We don't need anymore one-side lectures from your over-inflated ego; a bully who cries if he gets hit.

QED

>>2226204

LMFAO

'how you use to mislead'

first sentence>>2225623

.passive aggressive.

i don't care if you have a different field and view. I call you out because you tell me wrong without solid evidence. You may be right, I may be wrong, You may be wrong and I am right, we may both be right, or we may both be wrong. That is logic.

from gen

Planck is smallest length.

Schwart is smallest mass

mass over length should be the smallest part of 4D.

copy

actually the energy on space time units should be realistically.

kg/m^3/sec

and the base unit of the smallest should be kg/planck*3/sec

copy

The static energy of a mass is basically a force it is potential. the Kinetic energy is energy as it is active, as is the spin. The spin and amplitude of the wave of an object are a force as they are potential energy to be released.

and energy is mass.

copy

Einstein proved in basic physics and with equations ll reality is just perspective. Lorentz, reinnmann, and tensor. Research.

copy

i must correct Force is an outside energy acting on …

Energy is internal or inherent

Both are energy and a force but one is within and one is exerted externally like a tensor.

>>2227256

This is what happens when you put your physics book into a shredder and then grab the shreds to compose a sentence.

Not gonna waste time countering

Simple Google kinetic energy and potential energy and you will see how incoherent that "statement" is

Base energy over base area per mass should be.

Planck Constant (energy)/Schwartzchild Radius=

6.626070040(81)×10−34 (kg*m^2/s^2)*s over/

2(6.674×10−11 m/s^2·kg–2·m2)*mass/c^2

or

the number divided out is

49640325258312756215088.821230791

sorting that jumble of units ahhh it should be an energy over a unit of space/time.

>>2229843

so does that mean?

Mass * 49640325258312756215088.821230791 is the energy on the smallest radius of space/time?

Einstein didn't prove jack shit.

He was hired by the enemies within to run the circles game on your mind.

Frequency is the physical reflection of the element of the "matter" in the wave. It has matter. It has substance, light has substance, and gravity, your junk science remedy you can't let go of, has zero to do with it, because it is non-existant.

It is only planted in your face for "chaos. They love their God "chaos."

It's in all their handbooks.

Proof will be you will never get to a "formula" that actually checks out. Never.

What if there's actually no line of division between kinetic and potential energy? What is your measuring tool worth?

Waves never shut down, but signals do.

>>2226317

Bravo! You describe the chaos perfectly, except you left out

the constant of chaos

= you will never be right.

But good luck.

>>2231073

Actually that is addressed Frequency and Amplitude to matter - I just haven't figured it out yet and got there yet. It has also been admitted that there is gravity to energy and gravity is just the transformation of the axis viewed as bent space-time, first step for physics to get to the full pattern.

My plan was to graph the Planck length on the X and the Schwartzchild Radius on Y with the deviation arc of space-time below the X . But wow the difference will dwarf the Planck at 10^-35, and 1 unit of Schwartzchild (kg) at 10^-5. So my graph cannot be to scale.

The plan was to show the deviation of space time per unit length, then area per set of mass and then energy. It appears the triangle though a right triangle has a huge Y and very tiny X axis and thus is very hard to show the process of bisecting the hypotenuse to find the arc of deviation and repeat to find the Reinmann Surface of the deviation of space time. I can show you but it will not be to scale

The numbers are:

1.616228 X 10-35 as X

and

1.485183 X 10^-5 as Y or negative Y

Then an arc from 0 X to 2 times the value of X

Then figure hypotenuse of right triangle of the XY

then bisect and you can figure the midpoint of arc (space time variation) at the 45 degree (270-45). And repeat if you need to define the Reinmann surface in a simple 2D process.

>>2232267

This is the process not to scale

.>>2193802

>>2193479

>>2193802

process not to scale

Why does physics want to hide simple geometry?

In Lorentz transformations it is a smaller triangle and easier to see the shift around the axis.

Gravity is just a transformation - just like Lorentz. It is just spinning the axis.

It is odd the base is so far pushed into the axis LOL.

It is also the amount of energy to keep our base unit of space time in place. We are soo far.

>>2231872

I see progress, but it's a contradiction of terms, admitted that gravity…,

when gravity is an unproven theory.

Weight is real, determined by density.

Divot divot wherever you are not made up, is weight of any matter sinking or slung, splatting into whatever other matter it hits. Where it splats is at the heart of what you seek to know.

There is no chaos involved.

This is a universe of order.

There is always weight, no matter what they say, however minute or insignificant it may seem, it's key. Matter matters.

Acceleration, speed, angle, inertia, etc., of the matter sinking or slung defines the divot. Divots are not all equal, but show me a divot that's not a dead end?

Motion has origin so does movement. That force has nothing do do with gravity.

Time is personal, local.

Gravity is make believe.

Time-Space-Gravity are just words that do not belong in "formulas," but Einstein knew that already.

It is already, and it doesn't change.

Chasing changes that will never change. We live in an ordered universe.

>>2232471

weight is nothing it is defined by locality.

Mass is Energy. Axis are POF of reality. Physics just is lost in the algebra.

as I said before

it appears all is force on axis and what we see/experience perceive is just a spin of those axis

>>2232584

That makes no sense, using Einstein.

If mass is energy. Algebra says

Energy is mass.

Where is the speed of light2?

See how fucked up Einstein is?

Keep going, you will, maybe, eventually.

Algebra you can count on.

Once I thought physics was math based and I could count on it, but it is far from that.

Math doesn't lie,

so what happened? Really?

>>2232716

The key is not you.

The key is using the math to convince the 100th monkey. You may not get that all force is energy and all energy affects the axis and all axis are define our perception and that we have the ability to change that, but i weigh 170 Lbs.

>>2232801

Is that 170lb on your spinning axis?

Sorry, just a funny I couldn't resist. I'm no key and never said I was.

But there comes a time see the difference between science fiction and science. The two don't mix, and if true, physics could not get "lost" in math, algebra or geometry, no matter how hard it tries to hide.

>>2232801

No need to get uppity in your PhD.

Of course I know force is energy. There's energy behind force. I guess there's ×the speed of light2 too!

Laughing out loud now.

Add in some more components.

Chaos likes that.

Ok. Not meaning to piss anyone off. I'll check in on your progress in a couple of days. Hopefully you ditch the Einstein guy and fire up your own brain cells.

Another firm of energy.

Speed of light

Inside your brain.

Damn, Einstein was so smart.

Go figure. Good luck.

>>2233105

What you don't get is chaos theory is based in fractals outside 4D and well defined.

>>2233135

if you stop your tirade and use Pythagorean theorem you may figure it out.

8 dimensional model of the universe

https://www.ted.com/talks/garrett_lisi_on_his_theory_of_everything/transcript

>>2237415

>https://www.ted.com/talks/garrett_lisi_on_his_theory_of_everything/transcript

I have been humbled.

>>2126184

Nice board…

Don’t know if it as been posted but you can use mandelbulber to generate some fractal geometry…

A graphic for Lorentz transformation move from 1 to 2.

That shows cube in X axis getting shorter, and cube in T axis stretching.

>>2210898

they are not c^2 is (m^2)/(s^2)

joule is therefore newton meter

you could argue that momentum is energy but not force

>>2257654

momentum is kinetic energy.

Force is potential energy that has not been used yet, basically.

>>2259108

Would that make 423,970,560m/s^2 the radius of 1 kg of mass uncompressed?

>>2259153

or 1 KG of mass has radius of 423,970,560 light meters uncompressed?

>>2259170

No wonder mass warps space time.

I guess I better revisit the Schwartzchild Radius.

>>2259108>

>2259170

E=mc^2

423,970,560 m/s^2 (Kg in lightmeters) * 89,875,571,873,681,764 m/s^2 (c^2)=

38,104,573,643,194,868,440,750,080 m/s^2 (lightmeters)

No I don't think so probably just the Hypotenuse.

Copy:

Speed of Light squared is the light square our 4D world exsists in.

They hypotenuse of that square - 423,970,560 m/s^2 is the Mass radius for 1 KG of uncompressed area of mass.

The ratio to speed of light is 1.414213562. The amount of radius beyond the light square is the Mass energy link beyond our 4D world to Fractal Space.

>>2260972

So the Yellow shaded areas are the ones that will show the foundation and linkage of space time and our further connection to our universe.

The areas in yellow appear to be two separate arc triangles.

Dividing 1.414213562 into two you get

0.707106781865475244.

Next will be calculating A and B of the arc triangle.

>>2261078

Damn i made a mistake:

Y axis A= R- sin(angle) or 423970560 - 299792458 = 124,178,102 m/sec

X axis B= cos(angle) or cos(45)* 299792458 = 211,985,280 m/sec

Hypotenuse of each arc triangle = 245,678,570.398 m/sec

Sorry.

Crap I need Coffee

Y is right x is just C - 299,792458

Hypotenuse is

324,493,018.245 m/s

>>2260972

Light Square Mass energy that moves beyond that light square is in yellow and in 2D folded on the light square or the sphere depending upon how you view it. Note energy is split affecting X axis, and Y axis (1/4 of a petal each). When the Mass energy beyond the light square is folded the yellow shaded areas fold back together to create a wave pattern in '3D" beyond the C by C light square.

>>2259170

The mass is energy is the hypotenuse of the Light square (c^2). The energy is greater than the speed of light so the remaining energy must go somewhere. It bends space time and follows the lines of geometry through the nodes of the Light Square. The energy would follow the wave 90 degrees from the 4D reality, at least until it reaches another node and may switch again (fractal).

The Light Square I have calculated using E=mc^2. But that is just for validity and conveniece, as I see no reason that the light square could be measured very large or very small. On the way to work this morning visualizing how the Mass wave surrounding the light square - it seemed to me that it would warp the square into a circle from that view. Like a pixel :). Pixels are tiny points of light and color when combined make a picture. Fractals define each pixel by the number of passes through the equation or node. Me may be watching a much grander movie than you think :).

We may be God's reality TV. :)

>>2147113

>So, I call bs on this thread and wonder what actual benefit it is to Q and our present journey to be free of the lies?

>It does the opposite using myths.

As you've so wonderfully demonstrated by both first admitting your nescience in relation to the worth of Sacred Geometry and following it up with "I consider this a myth because I don't understand it and as such, refuse to see any worth in it."

>>2147276

>confusing way; unclear.

You're certainly ignorant in regards to the importance of Sacred Geometry and so instead of actually doing your due dilligence and doing research which would ascend your consciousness, you choose instead to partake in the negative action of complaining and dismissing something because you do not understand or do not wish to understand it.

Surely you both must recognize the insanity of your positions. You're both effectively saying "I don't understand this, therefor you're crazy" It's absolutely childish.

>>2272502

I understand far better that you can imagine.

I would find you credible if you could coherently answer a few simple questions. That would thll me exactly how well you know the subject.

1) What is the geometry on a mathematical "point-in-space"?

2) What is formula for the square root of negative number ?( you could provide a properly labelled graph if you prefer)

3 What is the natural geometry of one gallon of water in open, unbounded, free space?

Thanks in advance for your prompt answer

>>2271811

>>2272914

Sitting here trying to visualize the dimensional folds to I can do a graphic of the Mass Wave as it travels a sphere around the 4D Light Square.

>>2273201

Try saying that in mathematical terms, not in the language of a Voodoo High Priest.

Flowery nonsensical prose isn't math or geometry (a sub-field of mathematics)

Waiting for a sane answer to a simple question that someone with your advance knowledge should have no trouble answering.

Unless you are just bullshitting everyone.

>>2273410

Tick-tock……

Still waiting

>>2273372

I am not saying I know everything. I am theorizing. In mathematical basically everything can be reduced to 2D and expanded All dimensions we think about are 90 degrees so that is how I vizualize them - after 4 that is very hard and why I reduce it down to 2D and then work up. I doubt I could do Einstiens General Field equations but do understand Mass influences the fabric of space time and thus must use energy to do that. I noticed that the C^2 of Einstien had a hypotenuse larger than C and I figure the over energy may be what is the tensor on space-time. I will have to look through General Relativity again and Schwartchild Radius again for further insight and probably have to explore the quantum potentiality as the 'petals' are probably quantum waves IMO.

>>2273471

I am not a physicist so I am learning.