Federal reserve ending? Structure. (needed first)

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4 Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: c92bf75acbdbdb5⋯.png (59.96 KB, 2000x1236, 500:309, 4-bitcoin-cash-logo-flag-f….png)

File: 4323b8c43eb6970⋯.png (7.97 KB, 355x206, 355:206, structure.PNG)

File: 4ae6f96deaba3be⋯.png (16.31 KB, 355x206, 355:206, ClipboardImage.png)

Federal reserve ending? Structure. (needed first) Anonymous 05/11/18 (Fri) 21:01:52 dbcc18 No.1375804

Greetings anons -

Perhaps this thread is premature - but it will need to be talked about and resolved for true [FREEDOM] to occur.

Most anons here know that the Federal Reserve and central banks are a key to allowing the deep state to operate. Q posted previously a list of central banks all controlled by the Rothchilds.

When asked about the federal reserve ending, he simply said "Structure." (pic related) After thinking about this for quite some time, I am fairly sure that it means that the federal reserve/banking complex provides structure so the economy doesn't collapse and cause immediate chaos in the streets.

As an financefag and goldbugfag for many years, I can attest that the financial system is heavily manipulated and controlled by the cabal via collusion among investment banks banks, central banks, governments, and the deep state in general. Markets and banks are propped up by the FOMC, "plunge protection team", and of course you remember the banker bailouts.

I understand that bitcoin/cryptos are a topic of controversy here. There are good reasons for that as, just like justice in the government, justice in money is being fought by the same behemoth with the same tactics. Shills, disinfo, lies, coopting of good ideas are extremely prevalent among cryptocurrency communities.

However, I have good reason to believe that, just like the Qanon movement, that coin anons when banded together anonymously can push the coin projects that are actually against the banks and for true freedom out to humanity and build the STRUCTURE that we need to end the fed/banking enslavement.

That is the beauty that lies herein - creating a new financial structure outside of the banks and slowly but surely gathering steam (just like the Qanon phenomenon), we can make the fed obsolete with far less pain than ending it now. If people knew the truth and the fed ended today, it would send people to the hospital.

My point in making this thread is to help push the snowball towards that structure and create a hub for its discussion. Where we go is up to the rest of you anons. I will be here to help as I can. No famefagging required. WWG1WGA.

Anonymous 05/11/18 (Fri) 21:21:31 cae961 No.1375972

https://cheddar.com/videos/facebook-plans-to-create-its-own-cryptocurrency

Anonymous 05/11/18 (Fri) 21:37:40 dbcc18 No.1376131

>>1375972

No centralized efforts should be respected. Could too easily turn into another central bank. We choose which coins to use. I won't be using that one.

Anonymous 05/11/18 (Fri) 23:51:39 cae961 No.1377437

>>1376131

I kinda dropped that link in this thread due to a similar topic. I know, that /we/ won't use such a kind of currency, but I see it kind of as a threat, because in my opinion, it's doomed to become success if launched correctly. Currencies in general need a network effect to be usable. And who has a better network effect than Facebook? Facebook has lawyers, they can integrate payments very easily and think, that Facebook is used worldwide, not only in the US. Now, when some local currency fails, what'd be a better alternative?

But, let's think twice: would it actually be a threat, or maybe an opportunity? If it would be a real cryptocurrency and not "WoW gold", then we have the following effects:

1. It's not Fed, it's not banks

2. It informs the normies about cryptocurrencies

3. It may spark new millionaries, that aren't connected to the existing cabal, like other cryptocurrencies did

Regarding your idea, I think the anon community lacks organization in the coders area for now to launch such a project. And if we start yet another token, then we'd have a problem with greediness and it's not a problem that we want to deal with, believe me. But I'm an optimist - I'm sure we have among ourselves minds bright enough to come up with something revolutionary, especially when we would work together.

I have a lot of ideas regarding the cryptocurrency design from a user perspective, what stopped me, at least for now, from implementing them was a prevalence of human trafficking networks and red markets. In my opinion currencies are just a tool of a value exchange in a given local environment, I hope we could find some way to preserve this locality to encourage local trades and possibly find a way to make taxing cheap and easy. I know it's all possible and there's a lot of unexplored space.

Anonymous 05/12/18 (Sat) 01:51:21 dbcc18 No.1378703

>>1377437

Any cryptocurrency can be good or bad depending on its rules. The beauty of it is that the rules must be clear.

Network effect is key. There are already some big crypto networks, some of which appear to be being steered by good actors with a good set of anon-types behind them.

Anonymous 05/12/18 (Sat) 01:56:12 612b01 No.1378766

File: 1a33a4340026bae⋯.png (163.1 KB, 1371x782, 1371:782, Sectoral_Financial_Balance….png)

>>1375804

Maybe they will keep the structure of the current system and flush out the turds/corruption? Would prob be easier than starting from scratch.

Our fed/central bank controls monetary policy (the price of reserves aka the overnight interest rate for interbank lending).

The real levers of power on our economy are set by congress via fiscal policy (taxing and spending).

When looking at the economy it’s most commonly split up into 3 sectors:

*govt - is the currency issuer (at the federal level) and can’t become insolvent in debt denominated in it’s own currency

*private - is a currency user and can become insolvent see 2008 crisis

*foreign - is currency user and can become insolvent)

The U.S. uses a free floating non convertible fiat currency. Therefore the US treasury has access to infinite dollars but it doesn’t have access to infinite real resources (we can’t run out of dollars but we can run out of real resources, once the productive capacity of the economy is breached then inflation can occur called demand pull inflation aka too many $’s chasing too few goods). IOW with our fiat currency there’s no solvency risk only an inflationary one.

The debt limit and law requiring bond sales to match deficit spending are relics of the gold standard/convertible currency system we used to have. The draw back of that system is that it’s a fixed money supply and limits fiscal space.

There’s a reason the US went to a full fiat system during WW2. Yes there was inflation during that time but it happened bc most of our domestic capacity was directed at the war effort so there was too much money chasing too few goods. The sale of war bonds happened to curb that inflation, not fund the war (since we were fiat for that time).

Tax cuts act as an increase in income and savings for the private sector. The deficits they create for the govt sector are equal and opposite to the surpluses they create for the private sector (note how red and green lines in attached sectoral balances chart are mirror images of one another. Long story short tax cuts are good for a struggling economy. Bad actors are against tax cuts for a reason.

Removing the seditious fucks from congress will go a long way in rectifying that.

Godspeed fellow patriots. Study monetary sovereignty and sectoral balances!

WWG1WGA

Anonymous 05/12/18 (Sat) 02:06:49 d6183a No.1378929

>>1378766

we still need to get rid of the fed