[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / arepa / cyoa / hisrol / htg / lovelive / porn / tacos / vg ]

/qresearch/ - Q Research Board

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Attention newfags: Leave the Name/Email field blank for your safety/anonymity. Do not create new threads. You may post in any thread already created. Thank you.

File: ac90cf938539b82⋯.png (646.8 KB, 1701x2102, 1701:2102, ClipboardImage.png)

d1172e No.1106577

DING DONG THE WITCH IS DEAD

READ THE INDICTMENT BITCH!!!

b94295 No.1106698


79754d No.1106808

>>1106698

Oh shit. It's happening.


8375d6 No.1106887

fake and gay fuck off


79754d No.1106965

>>1106577

Yup. Fake.

https:// www.nationallibertyalliance.org/files/federalcourt/rederssofgrievences/1017-03%20US%20Attorney%20Letter%20to%20dismiss.pdf

Someone IP ban this faggot.


cbb714 No.1107024

BO BV delete this CRAP

IT's FAKE as shit

anyone who wants to disagree

Bring supporting Documentation

that verifies this old fake crap we debunked last Month


ead12a No.1107106

>>1106965

It is not fake. It is a Common Law Grand Jury, the Court docs exist and there are 65 records in the doc history. You can find it all at pacer.gov. It has however been dismissed.

What is interesting about the response from the 8 Chan community is how both the SHILLS and PATRIOTS are virtually identical. SHILLS don't want people to understand the power WE THE PEOPLE wield. The Patriots think it is a distraction, and it is only because the case is going nowhere. Not because it is fake.


689696 No.1107559

>>1107106

Did they accept that common law grand juries can indict?


689696 No.1107752

>>1106965

The US attorney asked to dismiss because the group declaring themselves a common law grand jury was represented by someone who was not a lawyer.

This is a typical response to we the people arguments.

An acquaintance oof mine figured out that the state did not have the authority to require drivers licenses, so he drove with his "we the people" license for years until he got pulled over.

He went to traffic court and told the judge his theory. The judge sounded truly interested, like he had heard this before. He picked up a giant book of "Rules of Evidence" and another giant "Rules of Civil Procedure" and told my friend he expected him to be familiar with the rules when he gave his defense.

My friend decided to do the offered community service and got a license.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / arepa / cyoa / hisrol / htg / lovelive / porn / tacos / vg ]