bf068e No.5884
If we were to pretend that we get to write the Bill of Rights for the modern age internet, which privileges would you include in order of importance? This is assuming we are writing 10 original rights given to all law abiding U.S. citizens.
Keep the count to 10. They should not regurgitate the original Bill of Rights and should respect consumers alike. They should also set the playing field for combating future changes in the dynamics of file sharing, content managing, piracy, intellectual property, deplatforming, and decentralized forms of communication.
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
741673 No.5904
>>5884
Amendment 9 would go first: "The listing and enumeration of the following rights shall not be construed to deny other rights that people have, nor to disparage any rights that people have."
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
cd3803 No.5914
>>5884
>intellectual property
Get rid of it completely, as a start.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
e7c6f7 No.5930
Some sort of amendment that prohibits the deplatforming of any legal speech on social media sites would be top priority. There would need to be some sort of language in there to allow specialist forums to delete speech that is not on-topic, but otherwise it should all be protected, and companies that offer publicly available general use social media sites should be held liable for the actions of their moderators, should they engage in systematic suppression of free speech.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
bf068e No.5945
>>5930
In the beginning, companies initially offer a communication platform that is NOT legally considered a public platform. Meaning they do not have to abide by federal law and support free speech. This is completely normal and is akin to anyone creating a small startup website forum to chat. The problem is once a platform gains massive traction and becomes a major form of communication (like Twitter), companies still do not have to abide by federal regulation because they are still a privately held website.
So to build on top of your comment, there should be a legal standard to say when a media platform like Youtube, Twitter, etc. become so big that they MUST be considered a public facility. But then you need to factor in "is it then government funded/sanctioned?" It's a mess and outside of my field of knowledge.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
176f78 No.5992
>>5884
how does any modern thing impede on the original 10 bills?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
176f78 No.5993
>>5945
in this case i would say, the answer is that twitter still falls in teh same catergory
think about how a website can stay afloat. the only terms i can think of in the same thing as this is
ok like right now i remmber when websites were so going so fast you coulndt type fast enough to get a reply out if it was long enough before it 404'd.
anyone who buys and runs their website and fails should have to endure all of the whatever the internet has to offer to it. if its a complete piece of shit and wont show how it prospers at least wwe got he federal reserve private bank to blame on.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
26f093 No.5995
>>5884
1. People have the right to create a website that has rules, terms of service, and community standards where they are free to shut you the fuck up without you whining about it.
… actually, that's it. No need for anything else.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
176f78 No.6005
>>5995
yea or not and make a journal like a faggot
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
000000 No.6047
What's the point if it can't be enforced?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
195623 No.6089
>Social media and internet companies do not have the same rights as other companies and must be under a different form of regulation so they do not undermined people's basic rights
Anyways, it'd go like this:
>A right to a platform
People can no longer be deplatformed for their political views and must be given an equal and unbiased standing in a public space.
>The right to anonymity
People can no longer be data mined or be required to give their personal information online with or without consent.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
9cf3c5 No.6131
1. Everyone is allowed to add any content at others internet provided service, owner of internet provided service is allowed to deny any conent.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
0de266 No.6149
http://archive.md/KYPKN
https://pastebin.com/vefkAf1Z
A huge list of current online alternatives.
Also important to note this p2p based browser: https://dissenter.com/
Dissenter allows users to engage in a new online p2p chat over the web that cannot be censored or controlled. Anyone who has the Dissenter browser can open up any web URL and start chatting among one another regarding the topics of each individual URL. It also blocks all Big Tech tracking/ads by default.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
0de266 No.6153
>>6149
List Of Private VPN Services
http://archive.md/i6UhZ
https://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-keep-you-anonymous-in-2019/
Learn How To Take Back Your Online Privacy
http://archive.md/PzEDc
https://www.privacytools.io/classic/
Also check out https://dissenter.com/
With Dissenter users can speak freely and openly over a p2p chat network, each having their own chat room for each and every individual URL opened up with Dissenter all over the web!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
132c44 No.6155
>>6047
Nothing can really be enforced unless there is some kind of massive governmental takeover of ALL backbone internet infrastructure much like China has done, with national firewalls within the ISP backbones. Until that happens in America/Europe the internet will remain completely decentralized where control is impossible otherwise.
See some solutions we currently have today:
>>6149
>>6153
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
f649b4 No.6175
>>5884
Manifestos are free speech
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
6eee91 No.6504
Make it illegal to deplatform a website like FagWheels tried to do with 8kun.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
9b2f69 No.6543
You are fucking stupid OP.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d080e4 No.6569
>>6047
This, they do not even abide by the current bill of rights why would an internet bill of rights be any different.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2b8747 No.6792
>>6569
Rights are given to us by creator, the constitution merely affirms them, our (we the people) divine mandate, ballot or bullet guarantees them – the paper itself merely gives formal notice of the consequences thereof.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
0f775b No.7002
>>5884
What makes you think this would be any more meaningful than that other bill of rights which is consistently ignored by those sworn to defend it?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
