/k/ - Weapons

>>584710

>Sawed off shotguns and silencers are the same legally and socially as pot

Wew.

I mean, good luck with that. I guess to follow the same steps you'd need a state to pass a "we wont pursue flashlight-to-gun adapters because we don't care about suppression" legislation.

We have some individual sanctuary cities who won't enforce statewide "scury guns" bans, so maybe it's possible. But I don't think that's in the same league.

So, first step is to write your legislators, and write your neighbors to write them too?

>>584710

Also, shame on you for not thinking of archive .is

http://archive.is/UmAOP

Saging for doublepost.

>>584710

>more potheads with eroded brains shambling around is good

>legalizing weed will lead to uncucking guns

magapedes get out.

Best way to win war on drugs is to start indiscriminately killing buyers, manufacturers, dealers, suppliers and mestizos.

>>584713

I want a late rider.

>>584721

Legalizing pot isn't going to make much of any new smokers in the short term, and will probably reduce it's popularity given a couple decades. With time, state/local governments will be taxing the shit out of it just like they do with alcohol and tobacco. By then, the longterm effects of smoking the jazz devil will be known and also cause a damper on the number of people who use it.

>>584710

Pick 1. Which do you pick? This is how it works. You get 1. Gotta pick.

> suppressors/silencers?

> SBR & SBS (basically the same)?

> full auto?

> grenades?

> weaponized drones?

> national open carry?

> national conceal carry?

> forced allowance of carrying in establishments now permitted to deny entry to carriers?

> forced all states to allow carrying in bars?

> force all states to allow carrying by any lawful adult, on any school grounds?

What do you want to legalize? Pick 1 and ONLY ONE.

>>584731

>kenaf

Why?

polite sage because dumb question probably

>>584755

Duly checked, strelok.

I'm torn right down the middle, between SBS & open-carry.

I'm going with national open-carry, because that will turn the cultural tide in our favor over the years. Guns won't be something the next unibomber wants, but joe, and mary, down the street who work for comcast and raise their two and a half kids.

>>584755

National conceal carry. Which is insane that we have to request that considering it's the second right we have in the constitution but leftism is a hell of a drug. That's the one that would do the most good for the most people, assuming that's national reciprocity you're meaning. i mean technically we already have national CC, every state HAS a CC program, they're just made practically impossible to do in NJ, HI, NY, etc and reciprocity is off the table in all of those shitholes

>>584755

All of them. Start with SBS/R as that is the easiest, continue from there. Getting rid of one item will both set a precedent and give us some momentum.

>>584755

Schools so it stops school shootings or ends with more dead MKultra zogbots without endangering kids.

>>584759

I never suggested banning possession, only

>production

>distribution

>consumption

>being a mestizo

(^:

>>584787

Very interesting, thanks!

>>584880

I think it would be pretty hilarious if Trump, not Obama, federally decriminalized cannabis.

>>584931

It would shoah leftist bungholes something fierce.

>>585170

Given the near pathogical opposition yo anything the man has done it would not surprise me if they suddenly ran articles about how legalization would be a bad thing despite the historic support they had.

I don't understand, what does this have to do with guns?

>>584755

>>forced allowance of carrying in establishments now permitted to deny entry to carriers?

>>forced all states to allow carrying in bars?

Aren't these redundant? Anyway, probably grenades. Not sure of any place one cannot fire full-auto, besides what ranges allow.

>>585172

From what I have seen so far

>stoners suddenly start admitting they are addicted and claiming Trump is tempting them with their evil marijuana

>reddit and /pol/ start talking about how based he is and how weed culture is actually pro white

>he sneaks in a bump stock ban but everyone ignores it because DUDE WEED

>>584766

How? With open carry a nigger might think twice about robbing a guy with a Kalashnikov on his ♂shoulder♂, let alone an obvious pistol holster on his belt.

>>585174

If DoJ changes it's opinion on weed, then there is a chance the NFA can be changed or even repealed.

>>584766

Just CC without telling people. Who's gonna know?

>>584755

>pick one

F/A. The second amendment isn't just for personal self defense but rebelling against the government. Grenades would be nice but they can be improved.

>>584755

Full auto, as the other anon said. Not only is the ability to suppress absolutely necessary to match government forces in armed rebellion, but, as full-auto is the thing that terrifies normies the most, the fact that it's legal can be used to convince them that everything else should be legalized.

>>584755

Full Auto. It's the first way I ever shot a gun, so it has the most nostalgia for me.

>>584755

full auto

>>584755

Concealed carry ideally, open carry would work too.

Full auto would be my third choice.

I'd rather have a shitty 38spc with me when I need it, them a really sweet mg in my safe at home.

>>585424

My choice would be national vermont carry before they fucked it over.

>>584710

>going for the DUDE WEED LMAO crowd

it's like he knows he can't win the 2020 elections

MUH ISRAEL