>>568392
Questions and points to put in your letter to the ATF:
-How can the ATF define “Single function of the trigger” to include a finger “bumping” off the trigger repeatedly and therefore functioning the trigger each time?
-What will happen to all the current bump stocks in circulation? What about their owners?
-How does ATF plan to prevent criminals such as Stephen Paddock from making bump stocks from readily available parts at Home Depot for under $35 dollars, such at a metal bar and two screws with washers connected to a firearms grip and stock?
-Will ATF consider a metal bar with two screws and washers to be a machine gun if also present in the same dwelling as a semi automatic firearm, since they may be “readily restored to shoot” as a machine gun in ATF's determination?
-Will holes drilled in a pistol grip or stock be considered a machine gun in the same manner ATF considers holes drilled in certain areas of a receiver to be machine guns?
-Does ATF plan to regulate an individuals finger which can bump a trigger rapidly without assistance from bump stock type devices?
-Will this rule regulate belt loops, which can be “readily restored to shoot,” a semi automatic firearm in the same way a bump stock does. Will a belt loop be on the same level as a shoe string which ATF has classified as a machine gun in the past?
-Will wearing pants with belt loops be illegal while operating a semi automatic firearm under this rule?
-Does ATF or Congress plan on allowing citizens a legal method to register their previously owned bump stocks on the NFA registry?
-Will the act of bump firing a firearm be considered “making a machine gun?'
Feel free to add some points of your own. Please spread this far and wide, lets beat the high score of 80,000 comments.