b37101 No.567980
Post Florida massacre, in gun-friendly Vermont, lawmakers pass firearms control bill
Vermont lawmakers gave final legislative approval on Friday to a bill that raises the legal age for buying firearms and expands background checks, becoming the latest state poised to tighten gun restrictions after last month's Florida school massacre.
Updated: Mar 31, 2018, 04:30 PM IST
>Vermont lawmakers gave final legislative approval on Friday to a bill that raises the legal age for buying firearms and expands background checks, becoming the latest state poised to tighten gun restrictions after last month's Florida school massacre.
>The Democrat-controlled state Senate approved the measure, S55, in a 17-13 vote, according to the online legislative record. The bill passed the state House of Representatives this week. The measure now goes to Republican Governor Phil Scott, who has shifted his stance and voiced support for some gun controls after the arrest in February of a Vermont teenager accused of threatening to shoot up a high school. The incident came two days after a former student killed 17 people at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, on Feb. 14. Scott's support for gun controls marked a sharp switch for a governor with a 93 percent approval rating from the National Rifle Association (NRA) gun rights advocacy group in an otherwise politically liberal state with a reputation as a pro-gun stronghold.
>Vermont, a largely rural New England state with a passion for hunting, is one of two dozen states where efforts to curb gun violence have gained momentum since the Feb. 14 shooting rampage that killed 17 people at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. The Vermont bill raises the age for gun purchases to 21 and expands background checks for private gun sales. It also bans magazines of more than 10 rounds for long guns and 15 rounds for pistols as well as rapid-fire devices known as bump stocks. Vermont Public Radio reported that the Senate would take up two more gun-related measures next week. Both are aimed at removing guns from homes in cases of domestic violence or when someone is at risk of imminent harm from firearms, it said.
>Gun control advocates say the turnaround in Vermont and other states has been propelled in part by the groundswell of student-led lobbying efforts and protests calling for firearms restrictions. After the Parkland massacre, Florida's Republican-controlled legislature swiftly passed a bill that raised the age requirement and set a three-day waiting period for gun purchases and allowed the arming of some school personnel. The measure was signed into law by another Republican with strong NRA credentials, Governor Rick Scott.
source: http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report-post-florida-massacre-in-gun-friendly-vermont-lawmakers-pass-archive: firearms-control-bill-2599676https://archive.fo/RbsxZ
b37101 No.567981
75d492 No.567985
Civil war it is, then.
That's about all, peace out.
3e4fe0 No.567987
Let the streets flow with the blood of the lamestream media.
b37101 No.567989
warning any vermonters fleeing your all-white state will be shot at the border. no retreat faggots
1e55ab No.568020
>another recucklican proving he's just a donkey in an elephant costume
c4cc08 No.568023
Based Jew Yorkers fleeing their shithole and then voting for the same policies on Vermont
41f791 No.568043
948084 No.568044
>>568023
We just need to make being from New York illegal.
7c9b1b No.568045
>>568020
>>567980
>Just doing what trump wanted
>it’s 4D chess
>Trump has nothing to do with this you shill
A true /k/ommando kills communists and Nazis
7c9b1b No.568046
>>567985
>>568043
>>568043
>le habbenin xD"
/pol/ and /leftypol/ are not /k/ buddies
aedeb2 No.568056
>>568045
Pretty much this.
59e2c0 No.568062
God all of these fucking websites suck, both the news websites and the state's own legislative website.
Is there a provision for grandfathering magazines or is this full confiscation mode?
3d2cf3 No.568063
>>568062
Short answer is yes to grandfathering. For now.
More information from the 1776 thread:
>>557777
>>567837
There were a lot of moving parts to this train wreck.
75d492 No.568069
>>568046
>/pol/
I don't think you know who I posted, he's just a Vermont YouTuber. He's the same person >>567987 posted.
398906 No.568095
>>567980
I'll keep saying it until it happens: Whoever tries to take my guns is going to get shot to death. Repeat, I will shoot to death whoever tries to take my guns.
3a4d52 No.568140
Their bodies will be pumped with silver spoons and lead. That's about all, peace out.
62b3c0 No.568144
>>568095
What if they want to take your guns to the range with you
c4cc08 No.568150
>>568140
>posting styxenhammer
61e7af No.568153
>>568144
Always keep one holstered, for SELF-DEFENSE.
14039b No.568164
>>568140
Please tell me she's single.
f9147d No.568167
>>568164
I'm so sorry strelok, but he's already married. Also, you're a prancing la-la homo man.
14039b No.568175
>>568167
>different glasses cheekbones chin eye distance and she has HRT tits
Nah not the same. That's pretty creepy how much she looks like that dude though.
f9147d No.568176
>>568175
>mentions HRT
Okay, so you're just pretending. Here's your last (you).
1e39d9 No.568251
>>568045
I thought NatSoc Germany had very laxed gun laws
>inb4 muh unarmed joos
7164c8 No.568316
>>568251
>needing a permit
>lax
cf9438 No.568434
Gov Phil Scott "fully intends to sign this bill"
d67ac5 No.568436
penn fell to
**fuck me they’re going to raise to 21*(
56cafa No.568452
>>568316
Not only that, but a permit issued only to those who could demonstrate need, and "whose trustworthiness is not in question", a criterion which sounds about as fair, objective, and rigorous as the current push for mental health screening.
df20e2 No.568464
>>568176
>clone stamp everywhere
At least put in an effort.
af09b5 No.568470
>>568251
>lax
>implying
They allowed firearms for the Volk, who, as >>568452 put it, were trusted by the state. The Volk were allowed weapons, unlike what a lot of liberal in the correct sense propaganda will tell you, but it was pretty limiting.
>>568045
At least National Socialism supplies the lost with higher purpose. Marxism is soul-sucking.
In case anyone hasn't seen it, watch: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe
Daily reminder that subscribing to an ideology is pleb-tier.
dc8339 No.568478
>>568452
but considering it meant not being a commie or a jew, it worked pretty well for them. At least, as well as things can go when the jews ship all the tech and factories to the soviet jews in order to arm their mongol hordes.
4a5ad6 No.568485
>>568452
>communists or jews are not allowed guns
<wow rulez 2 hard to follow
In interwar Poland that rule also included democrats and permits were for production and usage of weapons, ammo and explosives.
72cdd2 No.568529
>>568470
the people were allowed to own firearms. In fact, it was because they owned firearms in sufficient numbers that the volksturm was created, armed, and equipped in the final days of the war.
d7e4ed No.568570
>>568436
What's Pennsylvania's new laws? That's four states that have increased gun laws over this shooting I believe.
75d492 No.568607
>>568512
Bernie is from New York, not Vermont. He is the Senator for Vermont, though.
1b4bc2 No.568633
>>568512
I remember when he was hardcore libertarian and even put out a paper supporting gun ownership during what I think was the early Obama years, but all of a sudden he's guzzling the kool-aid and bending the knee to Killary.
What the fuck happened?
7398eb No.568641
>>568633
Threats and shekels, anon.
e6d346 No.569757
http://oregonvotes.org/irr/2018/043text.pdf
http://oregonvotes.org/irr/2018/044text.pdf
Oregon has a couple initiative petitions that could be on the ballot this year; 43 would ban magazines over 10 rounds and anything that it defines as an assault weapon while 44 adds storage requirements. Thanks to it's bayonet lug, even the Garand would be verboten by 43 if I'm reading this definition correctly:
>“Detachable magazine” means an ammunition feeding device that can be loaded or unloaded while detached from a firearm and readily inserted into a firearm.
I'm pretty sure this is actually worse than california; there's no way these could actually make it onto the ballot or pass, r-right?
e15188 No.569761
>>569757
>“Detachable magazine” means an ammunition feeding device that can be loaded or unloaded while detached from a firearm and readily inserted into a firearm.
So basically belts and clips are magazines now?
f9147d No.569772
>>569757
>no magazines over 10 rounds
>banning muh assault weapons
>storage requirements
>no scary attachments
Australian-style false flags, bringing Australian gun laws to a state near you. Wait until they start talking about how a pump action is practically automatic, and lever action rifles are basically AR-15s.
773477 No.569780
>>568633
>Bernie
>Libertarian
What the fuck are you on? He's always been a commie.
7015d6 No.569794
If this shit keeps up Britbongistan will have better gunlaws soon than Burgers.
432266 No.569805
>>569794
Not a single 56%er or Oath-larper will do a damn thing about it either. Despite all this talk, I don't have faith that most Americans wont immediately just cuck out and hand over weapons. Too gentrified, all the boomers, gen Xers and mellinials will just hand them over, they lack the guts. They are too afraid of consequences. Barring the extremest types, most of the people getting shot will be __>25. Bunch of kids who are hardcore left or right, and the rest of the country will cheer on the death of their children. I guarantee it, I have met a lot of outspoken gen Z, all the others run off the "As long as it doesn't effect me" mentality, however it all effects the kids, and they resent the older generations for it. I doubt they'd have any hangups, call it youthful stupidity, or righteous anger, maybe both. Look at what a lot find funny, a lot of existential and suicidal memes and a lot find the whole concept of a war appealing. Though maybe I'm just seeing things. Something will happen soon though.
d16abf No.569817
>>569805
>I don't have faith that most Americans wont immediately just cuck out and hand over weapons.
Majority won't, they will hide them. However, they won't do a god damn thing for the same reason your fat ass and my fat ass ain't gonna do a god damn thing, being that we see nobody else doing anything so we think that no one else is willing to do anything. They, and we, will probably only fight once backed into a corner, because America is still far too well off to get people motivated enough. Comfort leads to complacency which leads to weakness of the spirit.
The reason le epic totally nazi gen z might have a chance is because every single generation before them is steadily driving this country into the fucking ground at a rate that they might be knowing hunger once they reach adulthood. What you described with their gradual apathy toward human life is a sign of the way their cards have been dealt and how on some level they realize that and are preparing themselves mentally.
c3a28f No.569915
>>567980
> in gun-friendly Vermont, lawmakers pass firearms control bill
This sucks. Vermont was a very pro-funs state.
7e7f7d No.569927
>>569805
Why would a 56%er do anything about it? They're the ones who are ruining our country. They relish in it.
3d2cf3 No.569978
>>569761
He doesn't know about the "ammunition feeding device" language which is ((coincidentally)) popping up in all these laws. From Vermont:
https://legislature.vermont.gov/bill/status/2018/S.55
> As used in this section, “large capacity ammunition feeding device” means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept:
> (A) more than 10 rounds of ammunition for a long gun; or
> (B) more than 15 rounds of ammunition for a hand gun.
Fuck this communist state. Guns were our ONE FUCKING THING! We're still circa 1920's white, so it isn't like we have an actual gun crime problem. They just want to be like the cool kids in California.
d7e4ed No.569986
>>569978
An M1919 feeding off of 10 round belts would be the saddest thing I can imagine. So what's the chance of this shit passing?
56cafa No.569987
>>569986
Doesn't the M1919 use a disintegrating belt? Under the wording of the law a belt make by attaching links together is banned regardless of length, since it "can be readily restored or converted to accept" an amount of ammo above the limit.
That law bans the use of any gun requiring such a belt.
In fact I'd say it probably bans belt-fed guns altogether, since even for cloth belts they can say it's "readily convertible" by stitching more on.
432266 No.569992
>>569987
Nah, cloth belts. They can use disintegrating, but traditionally it's cloth.
3d2cf3 No.569994
>>569986
Already passed. Our Boomer Cuck Governor is going to sign it as soon as they get him the other two abominations they rammed through: extreme protection orders (ie fuck due process ) and "domestic violence" seizures (ie Duluth Model forever penis niggers). The cuckservative wants a big public signing so he can make a fucking event out of pissing away over 200 years of freedom.
Real irony? This thing started out as a pro gun Democrat's bill to let Vermont police departments sell seized guns to FFLs before they parasitized it with amendments to get their bullshit through faster. Poor old man ended up voting against his own bill.
>>569987
I've said it before and I'll say it again: They know it's incoherent. That's the point. It forces those who wish to obey the law to follow the strictest possible interpretation and makes it harder for newbies to get into the activity in the first place. They're playing the long game. The fewer people who have real experience with weapons, the more people they can inculcate hoplophobia in.
d7e4ed No.570000
>>569994
You know what to do with those 30 rounders, strelok.
8e9d88 No.570020
This is still not a situation voting will get you out of.
5e6e7b No.570044
>>569994
>started out as a pro gun Democrat's bill to let Vermont police departments sell seized guns to FFLs before they parasitized it with amendments to get their bullshit through faster.
Is this common practice, or has it just become a thing? Attaching so many single amendments or bunching up a shitload of nightmarish laws under a single piece of legislation, and then ramming the whole thing through the whole legal system before people even have time to read the legalese, let alone comprehend the implications?
656b12 No.570048
>>569957
>100% aryan
She's an Iranian shitskin. What is this meme?
d67ac5 No.570085
>>570048
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan
> is a term meaning "noble", which was used as a self-designation by Indo-Iranian people. The word was used by the Indic people of the Vedic period in India as an ethnic label for themselves and to refer to the noble class as well as the geographic region known as Āryāvarta, where Indo-Aryan culture was based.
b6cf5a No.570094
>>570044 (two pair)
>Is this common practice?
Unfortunately, yes, and it has been for decades.
Even in recent memory, have you forgotten how the traffic ticket gun ban got added to the budget and rammed through? Because the budget is the one piece of legislation that's guaranteed to pass each year.
0e9e96 No.570103
>>569805
Should move to Rwanda. It's actually a fun country and not a dystopian third world shithole like the US.
421da8 No.570104
>>570103
>t. rwanda propaganda office
432266 No.570108
>>570103
THat depends Habimana.
Is me being white gonna be good for me, or will it cause me problems. Also would Rwanda be a good base to hunt boku haram and somalis, or are they sympathetic to their causes? 'Cuz if I move to africa, there is 1 career I have in mind.
56cafa No.570136
>>570103
How much would it cost to have a standard of living there reasonably comparable to the first world?
Is a white man more likely to be treated respectfully or met with hostility?
afd82d No.570205
Vermont anons could try buying 30 round mags discreetly in New Hampshire like I plan on doing. I live in MA and we can on,y get ten rounders here