/k/ - Weapons

>>566530

>Even Alex Jones more red pill than most of /pol/ on trump

I can't help but thing these kids are just bait. They want to provide a target so god damn rich and deserving so someone will mkultra the entire crowd.

>>566531

I think you should try watching the video first.

>>566530

>1:32 did you just compare J.Bush to Saddam Hussain !?

Wait do leftists love Bush now?

>>566554

Thinking the same thing.

>>566530

Is it me, or is the only thing these anti-gun people can offer is a bunch of fat middle fingers?

>>566530

>infowars

I'm sure the interdimensional pedophiles are a big issue, but his support for the faggot in cheif is enough to permanently discredit him. You should know better, froggy.

>>566530

Sure, nothing smells more than grassroots movement than fat, balding boomers and millenials with glasses and beards.

>>566530

The enemy is fortunately not very bright but that also makes them very easy to control by the first emotional bullshit they encounter.

Anti-gunners don't know shit about guns, more news at 11

>>566670

>Soy is bad for you

>By the way buy our products that are 90% soy fillers

So fucking stupid, and phytoestrogens aren't even biologically active in mammals.

>>566733

>phytoestrogens aren't even biologically active in mammals.

Where did you get that idea?

>>566810

From a simple google search. There is no evidence that shit causes lower t levels or sperm counts.

>>566733

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429336/

>>566812

>he actually uses Google

No wonder you're defending soy.

>Soy, phyto‐oestrogens and male reproductive function: a review

>"Overall, there are some indications that phyto‐oestrogens, alone or in combination with other endocrine disruptors, may alter reproductive hormones, spermatogenesis, sperm capacitation and fertility."

>Endocrine disruption by dietary phyto-oestrogens: impact on dimorphic sexual systems and behaviours, Patisaul

>"Consumption by infants and small children is of particular concern because their hormone-sensitive organs, including the brain and reproductive system, are still undergoing sexual differentiation and maturation. Thus, their susceptibility to the endocrine-disrupting activities of soya phyto-oestrogens may be especially high."

>>566822

A meta analysis study in 2010 found no link between male fertility and testosterone levels. You're going to have to find something a bit more conclusive than what you posted.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19524224

>>566828

>nuh uh i don't like your studies!

Spoken like a true soy boy.

>Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, Volume 76 Issue 2

>"An abundance of animal data unequivocally demonstrates that soya isoflavone exposure, at doses and plasma concentrations attainable in human subjects, including soya-reared infants, can permanently alter the structure and function of neuroendocrine pathways in both sexes. […] Although unsatisfying, a parsimonious approach to soya intake is to follow the classic adage and consume in moderation. Development of dietary guidelines should consider the endocrine-disrupting properties of soya and other hormonally active foods, particularly for vulnerable groups such as pregnant women and hypothyroid individuals."

>>566828

Yes there’s no link between fertility and testosterone levels but there is a link between getting your dick wet or not.

>>566733

None of such pro-phytoestrogen hypothesis has been proven yet, however any person with an Internet connection may simply type two words "soy testosterone" into the Pubmed search window to find dozens of studies proving soy is harmful for males.

>>566864

search bar*

>>566828

>muh studies

Kek, a single study doesn't mean shit, lad, every year there are studies that are released that completely disagree with studies of the same thing from the previous years.

t. biomedical scientist

>>566549

yes.

http://thehill.com/homenews/news/357109-poll-dems-have-favorable-view-of-george-w-bush

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/george-w-bush-democratic-opinion-poll_us_59f0c60be4b092dad3bb3fed

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-20/democrats-are-embracing-george-bush/9068916

Speaking of google, and zombies,

http://thegunfeed.com/google-adsense-gives-gun-feed-policy-violation-posting-david-hogg-profanity-laced-interview-video/

Which page just says:

>The video has been removed from YouTube, but it looks like Google wants to completely wash out all references to it entirely…

Did anybody see what that was? Like, put it in the .webm thread maybe? Could be funny, could be heart attack inducing.

>>566733

>inb4 linking the 'soyboy debunked' video

>>568355

<multiple studies agreeing with each other is the same as a one off study

>>568370

I'm talking about this >>566828 anon, I'm the same Bonger, my ID just changed for some reason

>>568373

pretty sure that non-static ip's and (((phoneposting))) causes that.

sage for off-topic

>>566733

>wrong and wrong

Good job, you fucking CNNigger. Chug your soy sauce.

>>568548

>soy sauce

That raises a question: how the fuck did Japan survive a diet of mostly fish and soy?

>>568821

Just talking out of my ass but I would guess that taking regular old soybeans and grinding them up wouldn't produce the same phytoestrogen chemicals that processing it does.

>>568821

Fermentation.

>>568822

Not sure it works like that. Keeping bees taught me how to isolate thymol from thyme so I can deal with mites. I wouldn't grow thyme if I couldn't get thymol easily, (((they))) wouldn't get the US addicted to soy if it wasn't an easy source of phytoestrogens.

I'm guessing >>568823 may be onto something and fermenting soy destroys it, either that or the Japanese have some kind of immunity to it.

>>568822

>wouldn't produce the same phytoestrogen chemicals

There's nothing to produce - the phytoestrogens are already in the bean from day one. It's a natural part of the plant. Many plants have naturally-occurring estrogen-mimicking chemicals in them, with the only difference being that soybeans contain a lot of it.

>>568828

What >>568823 said is correct. Soybeans have been known to humanity for thousands and thousands of years, but until methods of fermenting it were discovered, the beans were only considered fit to be animal feed.