[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1cc / ausneets / h8s / htg / islam / leftpol / sonyeon / zenpol ]

/k/ - Weapons

Salt raifus and raifu accessories
Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


There's no discharge in the war!

File: ead82efb764243b⋯.jpg (4.89 MB, 5656x4215, 5656:4215, USS_Lexington_(CV-2)_leavi….jpg)

File: 6933d5df044b4f7⋯.jpg (255.52 KB, 948x711, 4:3, Large_explosion_aboard_USS….jpg)

File: 7306fdf5f65c832⋯.jpg (118.59 KB, 1200x675, 16:9, Devastators.jpg)

File: ffda4aeec591848⋯.jpg (143.19 KB, 1200x675, 16:9, Wildcat.jpg)

File: 22f9383f28204b4⋯.jpg (112.33 KB, 1200x675, 16:9, Devastators 2.jpg)

d77db6 No.558462

Co-founder of Microsoft used his richfag power to find the wreck of the U.S.S. Lexington, a U.S. aircraft carrier that was lost during World War II.

She participated in the Battle of the Coral Sea alongside the U.S.S. Yorktown (later lost in the Battle of Midway) in fending off a Japanese offensive to capture Port Moresby in New Guinea and Tulagi in the Solomon Islands.

Aircraft from the Lexington and Yorktown engaged the Japanese fleet and sank the light carrier Shōhō on May 7th, and the fleet carrier Shōkaku was heavily damaged the next day. Attacks from Japanese aircraft inflicted significant damage to the U.S.S. Lexington that day, and when vapors from leaking aviation gasoline tanks ignited on the flight deck, it cascaded into a series of fires and explosions that could not be controlled. Surviving crewmembers were evacuated and the carrier was scuttled by a U.S. destroyer on the 8th of May.

216 crewmen were killed and 2,735 were evacuated.

The "Lady Lex" was sunk with 35 aircraft on board, 11 of which have been found so far. The Douglas TBD-1 Devastator, the Douglas SBD Dauntless, and the Grumman F4F-3 Wildcat are a part of that aircraft compliment to have been discovered.

d77db6 No.558463

File: 388f5449b0f691f⋯.mp4 (3.01 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Ga3ebAuX1-JwY_J3.mp4)


b1f8c1 No.558481

>>558462

>>558463

Bretty neat


146407 No.558504

Wat? The Lexington Aircraft Carrier is already a museum ship at Corpus Christi TX


d2f8ba No.558513

File: 7870ba9b66ce320⋯.jpg (284.21 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 2785718-metal-gear-solid-v….jpg)

On that note, aren't there some nuclear subs equipped with ICBMs? I could go for some deterrence.


0cce65 No.558515

>>558504

Mandela Effect thanks to the CERN particle accelerator


9ddefa No.558520


b3e116 No.558521

File: 209baa21ba087e0⋯.jpg (6.53 MB, 5656x4215, 5656:4215, ead82efb764243b7dbbe25a954….jpg)

>>558504

There were two. The first Lexington, the one that sunk, was a battlecruiser converted to an aircraft carrier. You can still see its guns in the picture. The second Lexington was a purpose built aircraft carrier that was named in honor of the first sunk ship.


d77db6 No.558535

>>558521

Yea, CV-16 was an Essex-class carrier. CV-2 was a Lexington-class. Pretty neat that they were able to convert a cruiser into a carrier. Helps that the planes were somewhat smaller than what we use nowadays.


69fcd2 No.558537

File: ec3ba8472208214⋯.png (621.02 KB, 800x495, 160:99, ClipboardImage.png)

>>558462

>Co-founder of Microsoft

>Paul Allen

Is he going to get murdered?


5057d3 No.558545

File: db05e99f35c37ab⋯.png (297.72 KB, 2271x2380, 2271:2380, mOnvOJG.png)

>>558537

Look at that subtle off-white coloring, the tasteful thickness of it. Oh my god, it even has a watermark.


f91382 No.558547

>>558537

I like how we clearly remember a name said in passing in a B-rate movie from 30 years ago, but I can't for the life of me remember the name of a person I just met…


deb219 No.558560

What happens to the skeletons/bodies in these wrecks? Do they just get eaten by fish or are there still skeletons down there?


340b41 No.558564

>>558560

Well it depends, for a decent amount of those guys there probably wasn't much left, bombs and torpedoes tend to do that. The evacuation of the ship took a good hour and a half iirc but I don't know if they bothered to recover bodies or not. There were probably at least a few dozen men trapped in flooded compartments, dead or not that were never recovered. There's nothing left of them, fish and whatever else ate them to nothing including the skeletons within a few weeks. Usually wrecks like this one are declared grave sites so no diving or anything like that although it's not like a human can dive that deep anyways


a19257 No.558565

>>558535

Battlecruiser, not cruiser. Lexington was the heaviest carrier in the world up until around 1943.


c3dfa3 No.558589

>>558560

They swim to the shore for revenge


8fc335 No.559699

>>558565

Are you going by standard or deep load? Deep loading is often used for only irregular transits or purposeful raids. Since Lexington was refueled in preparation for a battle from the 25th of April onward, what did you expect? US Navy ship design emphasized armor and range, not necessarily speed. Wouldn't Saratoga displaced more as she incrementally received upgrades during her many, many trips back to Pearl Harbor and Stateside in 1942? If you are only going by standard load, the Akagi displaced "officially" 500 tons more, but with all the creative accounting by all the parties to the London Treaty, who knows what is right or not.


21d384 No.559723

Those are probably the most intact Devastators in the world.


ac7311 No.559885

>>558547

Stop masturbating Jew.


4dc7e3 No.559904

>>559723

They can't even rust properly


f91382 No.559908

>>559885

Quit washing laamas, muzzie.


7ae99d No.560032

>>559723

What are the chances of them being recovered, and could they be put into working order?

I mean, if they can dig a P-38 out of a freakin' glacier and get it airworthy again, this should be nothing.


21d384 No.560034

>>560032

Two miles down is a long way to go for one of the least beloved planes to ever fly under a US flag.


f835a5 No.560059

>>560034

Nobody will expect being torpedo'd by one. Its the perfect plan.


2e7e68 No.560063

>>560034

The devastator wasn't a bad plane. The torpedo it carried was. Even then, they did sink a jap carrier early in the war. I think their failure at midway was more due to not having fighter cover combined with the shit torpedoes that had to be dropped at a low speed and only had a 10% chance of arming and sailing (if that's what you call what torpedoes do) correctly.

Honestly I think a more detested plane flown by us would be the F-104 (which did nothing wrong ether.) While the plane actually deserving such a title should have been the F4F wildcat. just kidding its actually the F35


21d384 No.560087

>>560063

The Mk-13 was shit but the Devastator was still designed in 1934.


25baf0 No.560234

>>558560

They still man their stations, hopelessly trying to resurface the ship so they may begin a Crusade of Vengence against Nippon.


7c7505 No.560245

>>560063

>F4F Wildcat

What was so bad about it apart from its piss poor straight line speed?

The F2A was worse in almost every respect against the A6M2.


1192cf No.560254

>>560034

Well it would be a great tax break for Paul.


81141e No.560912

File: d162cb09abdffc1⋯.jpg (19.65 KB, 306x306, 1:1, 1454647080748.jpg)

>>560063

wasn't the drop speed dangerously close to its stall speed?




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1cc / ausneets / h8s / htg / islam / leftpol / sonyeon / zenpol ]