/k/ - Weapons

Also they wear fashy haircuts while pretending that races don't exist. They're a couple of fag hipsters for sure, like that bearded hipster guy who french kissed Milo.

>>554525

Gavin McAnus?

Fits the same profile.

>yanks always insist on wearing berets but can never figure out how to fucking wear them

Pisses me off to no end, it doesn't make you special forces if you have a beret

Who?

>>554526

Yeah that one. Tongue kissed that poof Milo on camera, it came out of nowhere it was the most disgusting thing I've ever seen. I sprained six muscles on my face in the split second of cringe before I closed the tab.

>>554521

That's nice, dear

>>554525

>Also they wear fashy haircuts while pretending that races don't exist.

it's hipster.

>>554539

>it was the most disgusting thing I've ever seen

>he hasn't seen the one where the taig shows his arsehole to the camera and then sticks a buttplug in it

>>554549

Jesus Christ…

Karl forces Ian to wear his hair down and put on dresses

>>554532

He literally wears all sorts of hats and helmets. It's a schtick.

>>554601

>Don't know about Ian, he might be full blown gay.

He has a longtime gf

I like how when someone falls of you fags' graces, there must suddenly be something wrong with them. These are pretty cool guys, eh shoot guns and doesn't afraid of anything. Stay jelly, fags, you're like 16yo hs girls, talking shit about your rivals.

>>555279

Except they are hypocritical and have changed massively the last year. Day and night difference between what they were, and the gun community rarely has one person who we can all look up to on YouTube; they had it and ruined it because they couldn't keep politics and feelings out of it.

>>555275

I know, I'm commenting on his inability to wear a beret properly, and your nation's inability to wear them in general, yet your military insists on wearing them all the time.

>>555282

What politics?

>>555282

What in the hell are you talking about?

>>555288

>>555291

I presume the by-now infamous and cringy Race War video, also this:

>>555292

But that's not really that controversial outside of 8ch. Isn't it more like you're bringing political expectations in every piece of media you follow? I saw the same thing said about Hicock45, and that's just retarded.

>>555295

They also shut down comments on their Rhodesian FAL video over shitposting.

>>555296

Yeah, sure, and I didn't agree with that, but I can see where they are coming from. I mean, /pol/ shitposting doesn't really look good on a channel, and it seems they did have a huge following on the *chans. That was just them realizing that. I don't think they're anti-freedom just because of that. Certainly not enough to start making shit up about them.

>>555296

I think you're just butthurt they don't openly advocate for genocide. That FAL video was on Forgotten Weapons a growing video encyclopedia of guns, not an entertainment channel strictly for already pro-gun people. Plus it had Vickers in it so I doubt he wanted his name associated with comments that were racist and/or appeared racist.

>The failure of Rhodesia was a travesty for the Africans as well as the European settlers.

>>555302

>I think you're just butthurt they don't openly advocate for genocide.

By this I mean they aren't white nationalists calling for a Trailer Park American Ethno-state

>>555288

>>555291

>>555292

The "censoring the Nazis" but condemning YouTube for censorship fiasco.

>>555307

What?

Forgotten Weapons is educational programing with no bearing or intent when it comes to politics. This is a good thing. No guns and euros can watch the videos without getting triggered. Slowly they'll come to appreciate guns like many of us, as beautiful historically rich machines that are measured by their potential to kill simply because that is the best metric.

>>555310

>Forgotten Weapons is educational programing with no bearing or intent when it comes to politics

If that was actually true Ian wouldn't open his faggot mouth and let the leftist talking points spew out like he did in the Luty and Etronix videos. Not to mention his wink wink, nudge nudge shitting on Col. Cooper and absolutely cringe 'I want to suck your dick because you fought natzees!' trash with the Varestuleka guys.

>>555310

You seem to misunderstand. I recommend not taking my word for it and looking into it yourself. I was once the same, I donated to them and got several shirts for them. But now I don't have respect for them due to some of the stunts they've pulled. I must once again look for someone to appease my autism and firearms cravings.

>>555316

>let the leftist talking points spew out like he did in the Luty and Etronix videos.

Sincerely would like a link. I like to be informed.

>shitting on Col. Cooper

Something more to it than a difference of opinion on essential/preffered firearms?

>'I want to suck your dick because you fought natzees!' trash with the Varestuleka guys.

Afaik Finland fought like hell to gain and maintain independence.

>>555317

>I recommend not taking my word for it and looking into it yourself.

Once again sincerely requesting links.

>>555319

>Anon if an encyclopedia starts leaving out information because it might be offensive it would be a bad encyclopedia. Not as bad as an actively biased one but still shoddy.

I completely agree with you. What I don't understand is what information is being left out of the gun biographies on FW? You don't need a history of the right and wrongs of Rhodesia to understand the significance of a Rhodesian FAL and it's quirks. Quite the opposite it doesn't add anything of value to a conversation regarding a specific gun and has the potential to takeaway from it.

>>555310

>with no bearing or intent when it comes to politics

>intervenes in politics

>makes political statements

>>555325

When did a video on Forgotten Weapons get political?

>>555324

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnVUnO2GI1w&t=185s

This is the video that the comments were censored.

>>555324

>Sincerely would like a link. I like to be informed.

You say this after attempting to speak with authority on the subject. You're being either ignorant or disingenuous. If it's the former it wouldn't be hard to educate yourself, so please do so before coming back so we may have a genuine discussion. If the latter is true then I hope you choke to death in a pool of your own blood and vomit.

>>555335

I can speak with authority as to what has been posted on FW. You seem to be confused about my curiosity regarding Ian's personal beliefs and my statement regarding FW content.

>>555340

>You seem to be confused about your chromosome identity.

Ian irks me for wearing commie cockades, and a bitch ponytail.

>>555330

I think my point on this video stands. Vickers as well as FW likely do not want to be associated with racist shitposters. Censoring relevant information that may aid in the historical understanding of where it came from would be wrong. That being said the video is about the gun and it's context moreso than the rise and fall of Rhodesia.

>>555343

>/K/

>Not absorbing as much gun content as possible

You lackin

>>555347

>I think my point on this video stands. Vickers as well as FW likely do not want to be associated with racist shitposters.

Cool, same with YouTube, but they got at YouTube about MUH GUHHHNNNS! But refuse to do the same for something they dont like. Classic Hypocrites with a "do as I say, not as I do" entitled attitude. But once "Nazi" memes poke up they need to be as PC as they can. Fuck that noise, I will find another.

>>555302

Its the fact the fat fucked stated Rhodesia was Apartheid right off the bat which is horribly incorrect. I am very glad I've been able to tell that fucker off in person.

Within the first minute of the video on the Luty smg he refers to Luty as a "British subject". Can't be American if you don't understand the subtext of being referred to as a "subject"

>>555351

In total agreement there. He's mistaken but that's almost certainly from being exposed solely to media in the US and not doing further research into the politics. We're taught as if South Africa and Rhodesia are one and the same, which we know is absolutely not true. All that being said I didn't watch that video to learn about Rhodesia. I watched it to learn about the FAL, the same can be said for all FW videos.

>>555348

>>Not absorbing as much gun content as possible

While I am at it, I might as well get as much gun facts from Dian, or Hillary. After all, its GUNS GUIZZZ!!!!

>>555355

Then why am I going to bother getting my facts from him then? Sounds like critical historical information is missing and was not looked into.

>>555302

What's wrong with genocide? I mean objectively.

It saves more lives in the long run and it's a valid military procedure.

>>555349

>MUH GUHHHNNNS

Where the fuck do you think you are, retard? Do you post here because you're actually a gun enthusiast, or do you just come here for the political bullshit?

>>555324

>hue hue hue sincerely want a link

gassed

>>555358

Why doesn't he go into detail as to why WW2 was fought everytime he has a gun from the war? His videos aren't about the overarching politics behind the circumstances of a gun unless that's what makes it interesting. In the FAL video they explain where it came from, and why it had to go through the sanitizing that it did. Why there were sanctions and the morality surrounding those sanctions is not important to the history of the gun.

>>555365

Rarely is there political benefit from committing genocide. There are few if any examples of genocide benefitting those that carry it out in the long term. Winning a war is not simply about killing the most people.

>>555370

You're on a board where the discussion of a PS1 game was derailed into the usual Nazi crybaby bullshit, and had posters earnestly claiming that the OP was political from the beginning, even though the OP only wanted to pork a french QT. There is no convincing these people.

>>555356

>>555367

>Where the fuck do you think you are, retard? Do you post here because you're actually a gun enthusiast, or do you just come here for the political bullshit?

>>555369

Yet no one has presented anything that would suggest Ian and/or Karl are anti-gun in the slightest. Or are you so braindead as to think someone on k would give a shit what they believe outside of the topic of guns? If I wanted to hear about how the Jews control the world I would go to /pol/ you stupid fuck

>>555372

The bubble these people live in. I can't imagine being so much of a sjw that you can't stand it when people don't actively reinforce your identity.

>>555367

So, I shouldn't take in all things about firearms? Or should I ignore some things like my point was?

>>555380

Ian and Karl are not going to defend your Nazi shitposting. That's your job. You're the one that's into it. They defend guns because that's what they're into, and presumably, what this board is into. When you deride that with an idiotic characterization like you did back there, you're implying that you don't really care about guns and this place is nothing except a shilling zone for you. I'm fucking tired of you political faggots fighting over boards as if this were a fucking contest to own the board. I just want my fucking guns and I want your retarded ass out of here. Most of you niggers don't even own a single gun.

>>555381

So I should be okay with the hypocrisy?

>>555382

It's not hypocrisy. They defend their interests not yours. If you don't actually like guns, then I can see why you might be frustrated at their refusal to defend your Nazi shitposting. However, they don't like Nazis, and presumably nobody who is outside of this site does. The great thing about the internet is that you can always try to gain independence from any platform you don't like. Ian and Karl did that. They would rather not be censored because they want to teach people about guns, but they've never once claimed that youtube was outside their rights to do what they do. So are you or are you not claiming that Ian and Karl are outside their rights to get rid of you in their comments sections? If so, then what is the problem? Presumably they did not ban you from youtube. I don't think they have the ability to do that. If the BO bans you here, will you claim that's also hypocritical, since they also want gun rights, but maybe don't want to allow shitposting?

>>555387

Yes, but Karl and Ian aren't saying that youtube has to give them a platform to post gun vids on too. They are asking. It's a request. The bottom line is this: You think any sort of moderation is hypocritical if it's paired with any mention of freedoms like gun rights. If that's the case, then I assume you fully support interracial marriage, immigration, and other things that come about by refusing to moderate the behavior of others. If not, then I do not understand why, by your own "logic", you're arguing that you have a right not to be moderated.

>>555396

>last time I checked that's not asking at all

It's definitely asking. Youtube can say yes or no. Now, it's true, that consumers have some sort of power. Quality discussion is also its own currency. Unfortunately for you, Karl and Ian have decided that yours has no value, and that's why you're pissy.

>Even so I will not accept your argument as valid and changing the situation enugh to make it different.

You won't accept my argument because you're don't have a counter to it. If you did, you would have done so. Either you believe all moderation is wrong, or you don't, and if you don't, then I don't see why you think this kind of moderation is wrong.

>>555397

>It's definitely asking. Youtube can say yes or no.

Now this has got to be satire! Fantastic chuckle!

>You won't accept my argument because you're don't have a counter to it.

I did, I said it's not different enough. It's not about counters. Relax friend. Moderation is not wrong, but saying "WAAAA I WANT TO POST GUNNNNS ON YOUTUBE!" and then saying "WAAAA I DONT LIKE YOUR JOKES, MEMES AND POLITICAL OPINION! REMOVE!" is autistic and I would rather not support this and I consider hypocritical. I should be able to post something on youtube and let the youtubers determine if its relevant, just as Ian feels about youtube. I consider the situation the same, making him a hypocrite.

>>555399

>Now this has got to be satire! Fantastic chuckle!

And this has got to be no arguments. I tried looking for it in there, but can't find it.

>I did, I said it's not different enough

So what's the line, because now you're saying that moderation is fine, but this is somehow not the kind of moderation that is fine. So, what is okay, according to you, and why?

>Moderation is not wrong, but saying "WAAAA I WANT TO POST GUNNNNS ON YOUTUBE!" and then saying "WAAAA I DONT LIKE YOUR JOKES, MEMES AND POLITICAL OPINION! REMOVE!" is autistic

Well, I'm sure neither Karl or Ian made those statements, and they aren't saying that Youtube has to let them. They said they're going to go independent and take their content to other places. That seems like a negotiation. Why didn't you just take your dank memes and Nazi shitposting to other channels. After all, I'm sure they'll miss such a valuable viewer like you.

>I would rather not support this and I consider hypocritical.

Well, it's not hypocritical. You have the same avenues as they do, and clearly they do not like your politics because you are a fucking Nazi, since that seems to be what you're complaining about them banning. They certainly don't ban conservatives like me, or libertarians, or even fucking liberals. Memes seem to be fine too. So really, it's just that they won't let you call people niggers or kikes in their comments section.

>I should be able to post something on youtube and let the youtubers determine if its relevant, just as Ian feels about youtube

No, Ian doesn't feel he should be able to post anything. He thinks it would be better if he did for both Youtube and himself, as well as the community, than if he did not. So now you're making up false premises. Ian did not ever say he was entitled to a platform on Youtube.

Again, you seem to think that because Ian wants to post gun content, he should let you post anything you want in his comments section, even if those comments detract from his video and bring unwanted audiences like Nazis. I don't see why you think this follows, and you have not yet explained it. You seem to think you're entitled to post anywhere, and you're certainly mistaken.

>>555407

Do you not understand the simple argument that Youtube will take down videos and threaten the existence of a channel just for posting a swastika, and that maybe Ian and co don't want InRangeTV and ForgottenWeapons to go down because of that?

From what I understand, they'd rather self-censor and demonetize themselves voluntarily in order to stay and spread their videos on Youtube, even if it's a platform that hates this kind of content, because putting their videos out is more important and blurring a symbol and closing down one comment section because of some people's retardation is an acceptable price to pay if it means they stay.

Actually, not that it matters very much, since as of late, Youtube has started taking down gun channels anyway. Guess that's why they're on BitChute too now.

>>555371

Does a commie purge counts as a genocide?

-t. country who did it

>>555372

>discussion of a PS1 game

should've went to the vidya thread tbhq famalam

>pork a french QT

waifu discussions are not raifu discussions, and therefore should be directed to /ak/ threads

<tfw no gunz and shieeet

>>555457

>Actually, not that it matters very much, since as of late, Youtube has started taking down gun channels anyway.

What? this is new to me, please elaborate further baugette-boy

>>555462

Hank Strange was banned a few days ago, Military Arms Channel blanked his channel out and left only one "Youtube is attacking us" video, after receiving channel strikes of his own.

Remember hickok45's channel was "mysteriously" taken down years ago, I think it was in 2016? It was only reinstated because everyone (up to faggots like TotalBiscuit) noticed and demanded it back.

Several other channels expressed concern that the same thing might happen to them (DemolitionRanch…).

>>555464

>Hank Strange was banned a few days ago

Fuck

>>555383

>they don't like Nazis, and presumably nobody who is outside of this site does.

Jewgle this: kitörés túra

>>555464

.22Plinkster was shitcanned as well.

>>555485

What if Europe gassed the Serbs though?

>>555832

Any update on what site they're going to move to?

>>555834

I haven't heard or seen anything. I know both Strange and Plinkser have Full30 channels.

>>555477

Isn't that the march out of Budapest with the SS? Me thinks I missed that this year.

>>555832

>.22Plinkster was shitcanned as well.

I don't follow my e-celebs, but from what little I saw of him he seemed pretty normalfag friendly, so that kind of surprises me. Did he talk about 2A things a lot or something?

>>555832

I don't understand why you're such a fucking faggot. It took me 5 minutes of googling and looking at his social media to find out youtube gave one of his videos a strike so he threw a hissy fit and took his channel down. They didn't "shitcan" him, HE took it down. And he's already put his channel back up, you brainless drama queen homosexual. Please leave your over reacting faggoty antics off 8chan.

>>555834

>What if Europe gassed the Serbs though?

I doubt anyone would miss them.

>>555844

Indeed, every year people from all around Europe gather in Budapest to go on a 40km long tour, following the path of German and Hungarian soldiers who broke out from the city, and tried to reach the German lines. Somehow this doesn't seem to be 8chan's annual meetup party to me.

>>555910

If next year grants me time to bugger off I think I shall join in that, SS insignia acceptable in the land of magyars?

>>555365

>>555485

>What's objectively wrong with genocide?

>Benocide es ackually bretty gud X—DDD

What's wrong with monopolies?

Competition is what brings innovation, it's are large reason for why Europe, not China, was able to dominate the world: competition between other Euros bringing about sustained innovation. It created the building blocks for life as you know it.

Ending the struggle between humans on an international scale is Utopian: it can't succeed in the long run unless it succeed's and sustains everywhere, if not, it falls apart eventually.peace won't bring you greatness, begone commie chink logic!

>>563963

>Reviving a month old thread with a retarded post

>>563981

>I'm using SJW tactics on a suspicion of what Ian might think

>this is a good thing

Just kill yourself.

>>563981

I demand proofs.

>>555302

>killing niggers is bad, better turn them into overpriced pets with none of the benefits any pet offers like

>companionship

>obedience

>pleasant looks

>good around children

>>563963

>Competition is what brings innovation, it's are large reason for why Europe, not China, was able to dominate the world: competition between other Euros bringing about sustained innovation.

Comparing Europe before the 21th century to China after the warring states is quite unfair. You see, there was no innovation in China because it needed none. It discovered all the problems of life and all the solutions to those problems, and it was a world unto itself. A few centuries and the same thing will happen with the Western Civilization. Then there will be no innovation whatsoever. You can already see this happening with small arms, for a handy example.

>>556490

https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96nk%C3%A9nyuralmi_jelk%C3%A9p_haszn%C3%A1lata_Magyarorsz%C3%A1gon

No, although you can cry to the EU if they catch you with a red star. Fucking commie bastards. Still, there might be exceptions for reenactors, you should ask the organizers of the tour.

>>564187

Which video was it, what did you tell them?

>>555276

Sauce?

>>564187

>>564206

Should delete this, maybe. If this comes back to a bunch of gun guys sabotaging their own we're pretty fucked on the grand scheme of things.

>>564218

Ian is not one of our own, don't fucking kid yourself.

>>564218

I already screencapped this thread, to preserve the SJW faggotry that this idpol faggotry has turned into. This is the future you chose.

>>564206

And how will it impact his videos? Will we miss some rare firearm because of you?

>>564225

Actually, now that I think about it, this is some rebbit left-wing COINTELPRO going on. Some anon linked and posted screenshots a few months ago about them coming to both shit/k/ and 8/k/ to cause havoc while also furthering their own agenda of getting gun celebs removed from the internet.

>>564230

I think it's just Nazi faggots being outraged that people outside of this site don't share their ideology and then the site eating itself. As far as I know, the leftypol faggots are starting to think that this means he must be a commie instead. It's almost like this site has decided that you can't just be neither.

>>564218

>Sabotaging our own

How in the world is he 'our own'?

>>564238

Cry more.

>>564239

I'm not the one trying to fuck people's lives up because I'm offended.

>>564241

That's just you projecting.

>>564243

No, it's not, but the attempt is there. If that retard had the power to do worse, he would.

>>564244

Yes because you thinking he wants to ruin Ian's bitch life is totally the same as actually him ruining Ian's bitch life.

>>564247

>I'm not the one trying to fuck people's lives up because I'm offended.

What I actually said. Notice the word "trying". Ian makes content at auction houses, in fact, that's most of his content. If you limit the amount of houses that will deal with him, then he makes less content. Yeah, the intent is clearly there and you're doing mental gymnastics to avoid the conclusion.

>>564249

Trying would imply that he actually wants to ruin Ian's life. Maybe you're not that familiar with the English language, so I'll give you the definition to reinforce what I'm saying.

>try - make an attempt or effort to do something.

That something is ruining Ian's life, right? So that means he's actually putting an effort or attempt to ruin Ian's life. So you do think that he has a want to ruin Ian's life, which just isn't true. He's trolling Ian at best. Even if he succeeded in removing Ian from EVERY auction house in the United States, his life still isn't ruin. Even if he succeeded in removing Ian's presence in EVERY video platform, fat chance of that happening, his life still isn't ruin. Only until he somehow succeeds in removing Ian from every video platform, every auction, and getting him fired from ARES, then you can say he ruined Ian's life. Him getting Ian kicked out of one auction is inconsequential. Hell even getting Ian's Forgotten Weapons youtube channel taken down is inconsequential, because he still has Full30 and Full30 will never boot Forgotten Weapons.

>>564255

>uses Brave like a fucking retarded faggot

What's wrong with Brave?

>>564256

>a third position is inherently centrist

I know you're playing a masterful ruse, but that's just silly.

>>564258

when you alt tab too much some tabs die and can't be closed, moved, or switched to.

Or it's just that the botnet on my PC gets angry and sabotages it.

nvm it's a common issue

>>564260

>out of context

https://web.viu.ca/davies/H479B.Imperialism.Nationalism/Hitler.speech.April1921.htm

Except it isn't. Where's your proofs that is is? Or are you just gonna keep posting shitty MS Paint images that don't refute anything like the underaged cuckchanner you are?

>>564258

It doesn't do anything it's advertised to do and it's just another bloated Firefox fork. Also it's for retards who are too stupid to use uMatrix and other extensions to protect their privacy.

>>564266

>"There are only two possibilities in Germany; do not imagine that the people will forever go with the middle party, the party of compromises; one day it will turn to those who have most consistently foretold the coming ruin and have sought to dissociate themselves from it. And that party is either the Left: and then God help us! for it will lead us to complete destruction - to Bolshevism, or else it is a party of the Right which at the last, when the people is in utter despair, when it has lost all its spirit and has no longer any faith in anything, is determined for its part ruthlessly to seize the reins of power - that is the beginning of resistance of which I spoke a few minutes ago. Here, too, there can be no compromise - there are only two possibilities: either victory of the Aryan or annihilation of the Aryan and the victory of the Jew.

>"It is from the recognition of this fact, from recognizing it, I would say, in utter, dead earnestness, that there resulted the formation of our Movement. There are two principles which, when we founded the Movement, we engraved upon our hearts: first, to base it on the most sober recognition of the facts and second, to proclaim these facts with the most ruthless sincerity.

Sure sounds like centrism to me. :^)

>>564269

>>Literally proving my point about it being out-of-context

Except I just linked the whole speech where it's Hilter dragging the Right and the Left, like in that singular quote. It's not out of context at all. Are you gonna just keep babbling like the inbred nigger you are? If so I'm just gonna filter your ID and ignore you since you aren't an educated white person.

>>564272

>You don't agree with me! Blocked!

Talk about being an sjw, kek.

>>564275

Who are you quoting, reddit?

>>564276

You, you brain damaged retard. Take a break from slobbering over Ian's cock while getting triggered at people who don't do the same sometime

>>564278

Looks like you changed your IP, someone is salty they got blown the fuck out and proven wrong like the 56% they are. Cry more, faggot.

>>564264

Yeah, I remember it acted quite badly when you opened more than a dozen tabs.

>>564268

>It doesn't do anything it's advertised to do

So it doesn't protect muh privacy?

>uMatrix and other extensions to protect their privacy.

Is there a constantly refreshed list of such extentions?

>>564280

>Literally proves himself wrong

>"n-no u"

>Doesn't even understand the 56% meme

There is no need to be upset, munchkins

>>564283

>>Literally proves himself wrong

Never happened, especially considering I'm never wrong.

>>564292

>complains about cuckchan /k/

>actually uses image macros

Did you just blow in from reddit?

>>564293

So you went from accusing anon of ruining Ian's life to he didn't really do shit? Which one is it?

This shitty thread reeks of /leftycuck/

>>564307

It's rebbit COINTELPRO.

>>564252

>Trying would imply that he actually wants to ruin Ian's life

He contacted every auction house and got a response from one. If he could have gotten multiple responses he would have. If he could have gotten Ian fired somehow, he would have. The malicious intent is pretty obvious.

>>564314

>He contacted every auction house and got a response from one.

I don't think Ian even makes money by looking at these firearms for his auction houses, so he's not really attacking Ian's income. You can argue something about YouTube ad revenue but that gravy train died out a long time ago and he makes most of his money from his videos from Patreon. If he went and tried to take down Patreon and try to get him fired from ARES, then you can call malicious intent. Sounds more like mild trolling to me.

>>564321

>I don't think Ian even makes money by looking at these firearms for his auction houses, so he's not really attacking Ian's income.

It's how he makes content. His patreon will stop having supporters if he stops putting out new content.

>If he went and tried to take down Patreon and try to get him fired from ARES, then you can call malicious intent. Sounds more like mild trolling to me.

If he could do that, he would have. The only ones he thought would be offended were the auction houses, so he did that. Malicious intent is obvious. It isn't trolling to try to sour relationships between a content creator and the source of his content.

>>564414

Man it ain't the first time someone has uploaded stuff that isn't smut to a smutsite.

>>564291

James D Julia throws his videos on the auction page of the item he looked at.

>>564420

The situation simply made me laugh.

>Are these guys fags? They dress like this, they always hang around each other, they're never seen around women (except probable beards), they've become increasingly erratic; if you told somebody that these were the characters you were hanging around I think they would be rightfully concerned.

One month later:

>InRangeTv has moved some of it's videos to PornHub

>>564443

Please fuck off, COINTELPRO.

>>564422

Will they make their gay porno now?

>>564508

Karl is known to be THE most hung guy in the desert, possibly one of the biggest in the world. his cock has been described as "like an evian bottle", with gargantual thickness that would rival shane diesel and shorty mac. im estimating his size to be at least 8.5" bone pressed, with OVER 7" of girth. he would have absolutely destroyed Ian's boipucci.

they would have spent hours and hours on foreplay, getting himself wet enough just so he can take it. i can just imagine him begging for it, with Karl barely able to force it past the knob, and Ian moaning and squirming, demanding him to force it in deeper. he would have orgasm'd within seconds of taking the entire length, being filled and stretched right up to his small intestine.. the orgasm would have been powerful, with his colon muscles clamping down on Karl's throbbing monstrosity, his whole body quivering in euphoria..

i bet he still masturbates to the memory of it

>>564473

Will Ian be top or bottom?

>>564572

Hans, please don't get your leather out

>>564473

> now

they'll publish it (^:

>>564443

More like Ian McGolem

Just because some races were over 10 thousand years behind whites doesn't mean they're worse!

Having no writing system or any codified law is not a valid reason for racism.

>>564598

>implying women can consent

Women's consent should lie with her father or oldest brother.

>>564613

>did you even read Dave Cullen's book?

No, I was just remarking that the OP makes for a decent copypasta.

>man and sexuality has been reduced to the point where you can't even have a male best friend without people accusing you of being gay

Fuck the LGBT community, they've done nothing but hasten our collapse.

>>564614

>Karl drinks unfiltered water

Why am I not surprised?

I'm really tired of people whining about what others think all day. Live for yourself and who matter to you, not some ecelebs who you don't know. If I had to guess Ian is a typical American libertarian minded normal person who likes guns, he isn't a racist, he doesn't belong to any fringe political groups, he isn't a domestic terrorist and he isn't either sided with the KKK or Antifa.

>>564614

Is stacey poole a tranny?

>>564619

Jokes on you, I'm historically illiterate enough to not recognize those two men, who I assume are Scandinavian royalty :^)

>>564598

wow. what a fag.

>>564598

>karl still being this much of a fucking lolcow

You know what? I'm glad I never fucking watch their shit directly. Even if this is all Karl's doing, Ian has had more than enough time to tell him to stop being so much of a bitch.

>b-b-but the naaaaaaatzeeees

>just ignore the fact that the website was funded by people who would be hanged for treason in a sane world

>just ignore the fact that a bunch of channels got shut down for disagreeing with the msm narrative by showing unpleasant truths

>i just dont like being in the same general area as alex jones so ill be next to the people with the prolapsed anuses

How about this: Take the Solothurn and make Ian shoot with it so you stop using the same air as Alex Jones, you fucking whiny idiot?

>>564291

>had an email from one of the auction houses

>Didn't screencap it

So you don't have proof then? I don't know what stops you from screencapping it now.

>>564804

You could always hooktube his shit. It won't give him views or ad revenue.

>>564732

>>564804

I dropped their shit like a rock with the dumb race war video.

>>565112

I think you mislabeled that webm, Strelok.

>>564614

>Would you rather associate with a man who is pro-second amendment, or a site that is most probably not pro-second amendment

Gee, I wonder who.

>>565156

Associate with a man who's pro second amendment, or associate with prolapsed assholes. That's YOUR choice friend.

id go gay to Walther PPK used by an SS Officer

*to get

>>565199

There is whole lot of Russian prison riddles/jokes, that are basically are choices between bad and worse. Proper choice is to choose 3rd option that is not presented.

>>565236

No, I saved the webm on mobile pls no bulli and I opened the wrong one that I thought had the same file name but it was a completely different webm. Sorry for my autism.

I don't understand the controversy about Ian. FW is a solid channel with no gay politics. I don't see any of the cucky shit that happens at InRange as representative of Ian because I'm certain Karl is the one who comes up with that bullshit and bullies Ian into doing it with him. Karl is a hyper-libertarian faggot who larps as a specops hacker. Ian just wants to finger fuck guns that no one else would finger fuck, and his autism is worthy of my respect. I would really like it if he grew the balls to stop the abusive relationship he has with Karl. I'm sure it's killing him inside.

>>565250

>I would really like it if he grew the balls to stop the abusive relationship he has with Karl. I'm sure it's killing him inside.

But it's pretty class he has no intention of doing either of those things. Ian is the recognizable face of the two, and he's the one that puts together watchable content, Karl is just some fag he met at a competition. Ian has all the power in their professional relationship, and chooses not to use it, so he's complicit. And it's not like he has to sacrifice Inrange if he ditches Karl, any half-competent mallninja could replace him without sacrificing quality. Ian had NO reason to keep associating with this faggot, but he does, and as a result he's not worthy of respect.

>>565263

>Ian has all the power in their professional relationship

Karl is better shooter. Like over 9000 times better. This is very big considering what hobby they are in. And how serious they approach it. You are talking from the position of e-celebrity and channel manager only, not shooter first.

You can practically touch over screen how Ian suffering over the fact that he sucks at shooting. he camouflages it with goofy clown style, ''look i am just clown, cosplaying stupid euro because everyone likes good joke about le-euoros in America, haha nobody cares if i trip over and fall, ahaha, and I laugh about it too ahaha *falls on the ground, hugs himself and starts sobbing*. Ian is a little nerd brother and Karl his one foot taller football star big brother and nothing Ian can do about it.

>>565271

>over 9000 times

Post discarded

>>565250

>>565263

see vid

>>565250

>>565271

Basically, these. It's a combination of abused wife syndrome and the nerdy little brother complex.

Ian's personality does a complete 180 when he's on InRange. You can really tell the difference if you watch one or two FW and a couple of random InRange videos. I remember the first time that I actually checked out IR. For a long time I had no intention of doing so, because it literally supplied nothing new. Literally the sole selling point of IR is Ian, and I'm pretty sure 90 percent of people who watch it realise that, let alone Karl. A nerdy guy showcasing rare guns that nobody else does, and fingerfucking guns I'll probably never even touch in my entire life? Sure, I'd watch that. And honestly, if it weren't for IR, I wouldn't give a hoot about his political beliefs, ad I did not wish to hear them, even if they exactly agreed with my own. But IR provides no new content that already-existing channels don't. A bunch of fags shooting rifles in the desert? Shilling for products? Going to gun shows? Telling me about putting together ARs? Competition shooting? There are TONS of other channels out there doing the same thing much better.

Anyway and I do realise that I went on a rather long tangent there my point is, I was aghast when I watched a couple of IR vids for the first time to say the least. Ian's personality, or at least his on-screen persona, does a complete 180 whenever he's on IR. He turns from a competent, objective (his nerdiness and pecular rather gay enunciation notwithstanding), even though terminally uncool presenter to somebody elses bottom bitch! An upleasant, nasal, whiny liberal-type soyboy whom I cannot help but disrespect. Kinda like a cross between that terminally uncool IT guy who's way out of his depth even when dealing with even the simplest computer problem, and a soyboy, only with guns instead of Nintendo switch. His role, accordingly, on IR is that of the lady with glossy lips used to sell you ice cream on ads. Nothing more.

TL;DR of it, on IR he's Karl's bottom bitch. His role, accordingly is to bend over and reaffirm whatever Karl does, and do whatever Karl wants to do, and this includes the 'political' content of the channel. If Karl asks him to bend over and takes his cock up his butthole, he does, and moans to the best of his ability to please him. Even is sense of 'humour' on that channel is basically what confirms to Karl's idea of 'humour'. see embed related, which is the first IR vid I saw without even knowing it's from that channel.

Why does he do that, I don't know. The only thing that comes to mind is that he needs Karl either because he wants to show that he has some basic ability when it comes to actually snapping in a barrel, and buy himself some 'street cred' which brings about what >>565271 pointed out his cheesy over 9k remark notwithstanding, or that he's a friendless nerd who's that desparate for human company.

Which brings me to my second point which I shall try to make to the best of my linguistic ability: Karl is a toxic combination of a classical duchebag, a fucking worthless faggot, and a cocksucking holier-than-thou liberal, a waste of breathable air, space, and a useless worthless cuck who should be taken out and shot.

>>565404

Alright Karl leaf shitposter hiding behind an American VPN Strelok from AZ. Would it help if said I didn't mean to trigger you this bad? I mean, you've managed to shit up what is essentially a shitpost thread turned somewhat serious.

>>565407

dammit m8, I was waiting to see how much autism he would post before someone finally replied to him like he wants. You spoiled the fun lad

>>565413

Joke's on you mate, I'm a nofunz asiapoor hiding behind a Euro VPN.

Saved your present though.

>ctrl + f "near a tomato"

>>565435

>based on these posts institutions owe no one anything when it comes to platforming. Therefore, deplatforming people for not lining up with the institutions image is fine.

>based on this post informing institutions that they are platforming people that may not line up with their image is wrong. Big think.

>deplatforming is now "fucking someones life up," and objectively bad. interesting

Now, mind you, I'm neither taking his side, nor question the validity of you being in a position to bigthink.png over these posts, and I certainly don't think the whole auction house thing was 'morally wrong'. I'm just playing devil's advocate here. But is there anything inherently wrong, or contradictory about those posts?

Well, let me explain by an example: suppose I come over to the States, take citizenship, and genally live there. By doing so I've asked the US govt. to live on US soil under the condition that I agree to the rules of the US and whatever state I choose to live in.

>does the US government owe me the right to live on the soil of, and under the protection of the law in the United states.

Certainly not.

Now, suppose I apply and they grant my request. By doing so, I've given them the 'right' to fuck my shit up if I, whether knowingly or unknowingly, break any of those rules.

Now, suppose that I, perfectly legally, buy a gun, and in complete privacy of my own garage, saw the barrel off with no ill intent for others, and not to use it for any criminal porpose. Then, you tell on me, and according to my agreement with the US govt., they send over some friendly G. Men over to my house, fuck my shit up, shoot my dog, chain my kid to the radiator, send me to jail to pick up soap bars for some years, or send me back to wherever I came from.

>does the govt., owe me an apology for fucking my shit up?

No, that was certainly within their 'right' to fuck my shit up.

>was it morally right for them to fuck my shit up, assuming that I was otherwise a good boy who din du nuffin, and generally behaved myself, and certainly had no intent to commit crime, or any other ill intent, by breaching my agreement with them in this manner?

That can be debated. But from a moral standpoint, some people will question the G. Men's actions, and they have every right to.

>are you morally wrong for snitching up on me?

See above.

>Libertarianism, assuming you are bright enough not to buy into the dem-rep dichotomy here, has no tools to remove communists. you are bound to the NAP to let them swallow your country whole because welp, they arent attacking you personally so its fine.

I'm not going to play devil's advocate on this one. I won't argue with you either, because I've made two long, autistic posts ITT already. But I should like to point out a few things already:

>your understanding of right-libertarianism in general and the NAP are fundamentally flawed.

See vid related:

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=l2-jH1vFrW8

>inb4 muh BASED black man muh e-celeb back to plebbit

I'm not endorsing this guy. I hate e-celebs and the like more than you do, hence the lack of embed. But it's an enlightning enough vid for our particular intent.

Furthermore, what part of

<Physical removal of communists, leftists, and parasites and "advocates of alternative… lifestyles" et. al is a prerequisite to establishment and maintenance of a libertarian social order

Do you not understand.

>has no tools to remove communists.

>you are bound to the NAP to let them swallow your country whole

See >>565450

And for further enlightment, see >>565452

>>565412

Says the greatest goylem.

Are you ready to die for Israel?

>>565435

>deplatforming is now "fucking someones life up," and objectively bad. interesting.

Depends on what platform you want to remove them from, if the platform is their JOB then yes. Also this act was cowardly and cast shame on your ancestors.

>>565482

Haha. No it isn't.

>>565383

>Hell, half the time i come to /k/ just to screencap retards like you who BABBLE about NONSENSE

<Karl is so obsessed with what we think of him that he has a folder on his computer full of screencaps calling him a cuck that he repeatedly copies so he can put one copy in the recycling bin and keep the other copy to recopy and recycle when he's angry and wants to de-stress again

>>565493

ITT:

>karl raging over people talking shit about him

<ian questioning the morality of deplatforming him

Exactly what I expect of them. You can practically tell who's the top and who's the bottom in their… particular relationship by the types of posts they make.

>>565490

It's a tactic used almost exclusively by women and weak men.

>>565377

>Karl is a toxic combination

Your avoid to mention most important ingredient. He is excellent shooter. It would be easy to disregard him if he was "standard" limp-wrist liberal who sucks at everything that is done by hands. But he excels at that and you can't attack his /k/ommando substance. Only his non /k/ommando related qualities. He is your enemy and even worse he is stronger than you type of enemy.

>>565523

Solid and valid point.

Also, going through that wall of autism that was my post, I realise that I've made more typos than I ever care to admit. If someone else made that post, I would have called him an illiterate nigger.

>>565524

Damn, I still get confused whenever ATFchat gets wordfiltered to 'honeypot'.

>>565391

>>565399

Thanks streloks, now I need to go re-download PR (and uninstall Squad). It’s amazing how the bare minimum amount of effort you need to put in to download PR is enough to keep the community fun. I should have never thought that once it got on steam (as Squad) the community would go to shit. Tryhard fags, kids, the occasional roastie gaymer gurl, and the fucking PCness of almost everyone. I remember my first game in PR playing as Israel, my whole squad talked with stereotypical kike accents and whined about everything. It was fun. Then I get Squad and half the squad chastised me for making a single Allahu Akbar joke while playing as terrorist. Even Slav jokes weren’t accepted playing as the tracksuited Chechians.

Off-topic/rant sage

>>565454

>I'm just playing devil's advocate here.

Social contract theory, sure, but that doesn't mean shit when the agreement is made under duress.

If I'm born into a socialist shithole country, then I never had a say in the agreement, and often don't have the means to escape it.

If no alternatives exist, as in a one world government or a monopoly on a medium of communication, then I never really had a say either, as the only choices are to play ball or remove yourself from the game.

>>565542

> I get Squad and half the squad chastised me for making a single Allahu Akbar joke while playing as terrorist. Even Slav jokes weren’t accepted playing as the tracksuited Chechians.

Jesus, it's that bad? Regularly playing PR you occasionally hear people lamenting about how Squad sucks balls but it's mostly related to the lack of content. After the /v/ general died I haven't had any anons to play with, maybe it might be worth looking into seeing how many streloks would like to play together.

>>565578

>Social contract theory, sure, but that doesn't mean shit when the agreement is made under duress.

That is a valid point. Also, the very reason that I mentioned immigrating to the US, rather than being born in it in my example, to make it applicable to the case in hand.

Also, as I mentioned earlier, I was playing devil's advocate there. Nothing in the first part of my post neccecarily reflected my own position on the whole matter. Do I believe that the state should have such property laws that limits me from modifying my own property in a certain, in particular harmless way at the first place, in that case the barrel of my rifle? Of course not!

>>565435

>you are bound to the NAP to let them swallow your country whole because welp, they arent attacking you personally so its fine.

Like the Strayan and toothpastebro said, killing commies–that is, those that have loudly and explicitly expressed their desire to use the government as a tool to buttfuck you–is hardly an NAP violation. Further, commie infiltration of civic institutions only matters insofar as there exists an apparatus through which the commies may impose their will upon others with an air of legitimacy, i.e. government. Without the state subsidizing their bizarre theories nobody's actually interested in funding them, and any attempts at subversion fall flat. Even if a small number manage to be successful in spite of this, it doesn't mean shit because without a state, there's nothing the commies can use to impose their retarded ideology on everybody else.

>>565584

>Jesus, it's that bad?

I only have some 30 hours on it but I would say the community is staunchly anti-fun. I personally attribute it Squad being on steam while to play PR you have to go to the website and follow ~5 or so instructions to play. Some squads I’ve been in were pretty great, but the vast majority all seemed like faggots. I’ve even had kids that obviously don’t know how to play so I tell them to take Rifleman or fuck off and stop taking up a specialist class, only for the whole squad to get mad at me for “being mean” and two guys were trying to teach the kid how to play. That same fuck got mad at me for not healing him (I was medic) after he ran into a compound half our team was assulting and died. I told him to fuck off because I wasn’t running in to surely die, to save his dumb ass and then I was yelled at for eating tickets because I wouldn’t save him. I hate redditfags and PCucks, but kids are much more annoying because I can at least play seriously (without fun) with them, kids just screech and act like autistic… well, kids.

>>565614

>what the fuck man, did it really get shit it up that much? I remember RPing kebab and fighting for israel before the logi update and no one batted an eye.

On Squad? As I said above I only have 30 some hours but I’ve never played a kikes vs. kebab map, I didn’t even realize they had more than US, kebab, Russia, and Chechians. I remember one Squad lead in PR that kicked people from the squad who didn’t pretend to be kikes and weren’t kevetching about everything. Yet squad seems to be much more Pc friendly.

Again I only have 30 some hours in Squad as compared to my PR hours, but hat is just my experience. Sage for off-topic ranting again.

>>565454

ok frist off, nigger wants to babble about himself for the first 2:40 of the video. wew.

>libertarianism is a means of avoiding or resolving conflict over scarce resources

who other than him defines it in this way? libertarianism is generally defined, and the definition i was using, is, in a word, autonomy of the self free of government intervention so long as that autonomy does not directly violate the non aggression principle. so if this is the foundational principle of his video, its already not applicple to anything i said because libertarianism means something fundamentally different to him.

aw fuck karl deleted his posts

>>565674

>autonomy of the self free of government intervention so long as that autonomy does not directly violate the non aggression principle

What if i abuse the fact that humans are emotional beings and manufacture consent through peer pressure and social engineering?

Either to sell my totally not-cancer-inducing food, or to introduce communism

Nobody gets hurt, in fact, everyone voluntarily agrees to it

>>565680

thats what im saying, thats a-ok under libertarianism

>>565666

>the closest the world has ever seen to a libertarian state was the united states, and communists have been wildly successful in turning that on its head.

I'd say the fall of the United States is a better example of the failures of democracy and not the failures of the free market, and/or a liberty mindset. Europe is similarly democratic to the United States, but without the US's libertarian ideals. And because of that Europe is going down the drain even faster than the US is, despite the constituent nations having (before the commies) much stronger cultural identities and an established history of monarchism. Thus libertarianism clearly isn't to blame for the rise of commies.

>libertarianism still requires civic institutions, namely law courts. the total lack of a state would be some variation of anarchy.

Courts can be privatized quite easily. Most libertarians (that you'd find on chans anyways, dudeweed Gary Johnson cocksuckers notwithstanding) are anarchists in the sense that they don't want any kind of state.

>>565680

>What if i abuse the fact that humans are emotional beings and manufacture consent through peer pressure and social engineering?Either to sell my totally not-cancer-inducing food, or to introduce communism

That's really fucking expensive to do on your own, for one, and in a free market you have to deal with competition. Monsanto can get away with the shit it does because through patents, they ensure that the government will snuff out their competition.

>>565680

Precluding the premise that Communists aren't human and therefore don't receive protection under the NAP, the thing about Communism is, only a tiny minority voluntarily agree with it. They have to use force to get everyone else to go along with it, which is why every Communist state has always been a bloody mess. This naturally violates the NAP, so as soon as they attempt to implement their program, it would result in retaliation. Furthermore, as >>565684 said, Communists routinely fail when they aren't backed up and funded by external powers. Their ideology cannot compete and therefore requires intervention to render it operable, which is why Commies love working for the government.

>>565666

I don't like the hippie, and you're still a little girl.

>>565696

It's not forced, it's allowed. Only time it's forced is for miscegenation, but it really is moot because death penalty is given for miscegenation.

>>565697

pretty gud then.

though I'd have mandatory euthanasia for severe retards, as they don't deserve being ripped apart and dumped in medical waste bin.

Bit confusing to read with the drugs part, but i assumed it's consumption and manufacture/distribution?

>>565700

Yeah first tab is possession/consumption, the second one is manufacturing/distribution. Though I wouldn't require people to get a license to manufacture tobacco, weed, booze, psychedelics if it was just for personal use, because who cares?

>>565710

Karl came on and started acting like an internet tuff guy, while posting half assed memes trying to fit in. It was pretty funny.

>>564414

You'll find it in the cuckold section.

>>565724

>A mod from another board who's too lazy to sign in.

Kek, signing in would make no difference unless he was a /k/ vol. Our 'mods' obviously aren't universal like they are on cuckchan due to the Infinity concept.

t. Created >>>/offtop/ when I was 16

>>565739

I also made >>>/polofftopic/ which was likewise a failure. It was all in a noble effort to save /pol/, back when it was actually redeemable before the election.

>>565741

I know that feeling. I miss the early days when I would be really excited to come to cripplechan. Back when it was the last frontier of the internet. I remember being overjoyed when hotwheels replied to a post of mine on /b/. I remember being really pissed off at the state of /pol/ after the second exodus, now look at it.

>tfw came here on a failed raid from masterchan.

I miss the old days.

>>565743

>>tfw came here on a failed raid from masterchan.

lmao pedofag.

>>565743

>pissed off at the state of /pol/ after the second exodus

that was the reddit exodus that happened iirc in 2015. Q2.

>>565745

Where the fuck did the time go. The only things have have been constant in my life have been imageboards and being armed to the teeth.

>>565746

I was there for a week after cuckchan went to shit. It wasn't clear at the time whether masterchan or hatechan would win out. I came here during a raid, found it much more comfortable and never went back. Masterchan developed the pedo reputation shortly after that as the regular users left for hatechan whilst the pedos were attracted to masterchan by the lax moderation. It wasn't always a pedo site.

>>565747

Yeah, I think it was around the time hotwheels was desperate for money and appealed to Reddit for the clicks. He was advertising and begging for shekels and decided that turning 8chan into a major site like Reddit would solve his financial woes. Massive pushback from native users occurred as you'd expect. Hard for me to remember though as all the shit with infinity never, Jim, Josh, the flip hookers, gamergate, Ben garrison being on /pol/, it all bleeds together, you know?

>>565792

You flag says otherwise.

>>565695

i couldnt care less what you think of me.

>>565397

Did anyone save it?

>>565829

Right here >>565724

>>565831

My mistake, I should have read further. Thanks.

>>565724

I couldn't help but read it in Karl's voice.

I think Ian would have done himself more of a favor if he just said in the Rhodesian FAL comments section that he didn't approve of the comments that he didn't like, then just pinned it. I haven't seen the Race War video, but given how much I dislike Karl I'm afraid of suffering a pinched nerve from the cringe it would induce. Karl himself reminds me of a post 2012 libertarian, meaning he's probably full lolberg, suffering from delusions like forcing Christian bakers to make faggot cakes in the name of free speech.

>>565677

Shit did someone archive it?

>>565853

>I haven't seen the Race War video

It's right here >>564443 in all of its unredacted glory. The text was not added. I saved that thing in 1080p and forgot about it for a long time before re-encoding it to vp9 for this thread.

>>565859

Now it's my turn >>565724

>>565853

>forcing Christian bakers to make faggot cakes in the name of free speech.

That's not even a free market sentiment, those fucking faggots. Some who actually believes in the free market and free association, two things lolbergs say they embrace, would realize that a private business can choose to disassociate from anyone they want to and are not forced to sell shit to anyone they don't want to sell shit to.

>>565861

Thanks leaf, you're alright.

>>565864

Don't you have more of a chink problem anyway? I was posting in the fucking Far Cry 5 thread on /vg/ about tank fucking and missed Karl. I'm so mad.

>>565865

Oh wait, timestamps say Saturday. Clearly I need to keep up better.

Does this mean we'll be getting a passive-aggressive inrange video about 8/k/?

Also did a mod our maybe even our new australian overlord manage to get a peak at his post history before he deleted everything? I'd be interested to see what else he's posted if anything. Why does the cool shit always happen when I'm asleep or away, fuck.

>>565724

Wait what?

>>565724

Oh wow what a fag.

>>565869

Seconding this. Normally I'd be against a vol doing this type of thing but in a special case like this I think it's ok. What's the betting he's a massive wheraboo?

>>565873

>What's the betting he's a massive wheraboo?

Didn't he basically admit that in one video anyway? Karl I know you're still reading this thread still you egotistical fuck - please stop dragging Ian into your LARPing shit.

>>565869

this

>>565860

Alright, I'm going to watch it. This will suck.

After watching it, I think I could have tolerated it save for that fucking text at the end. It's like making a joke then saying, "but seriously though".

>>565860

>I saved that thing in 1080p and forgot about it for a long time before re-encoding it to vp9 for this thread.

Not that I don't appreciate you sticking it into a postable webm should be useful to explain to fags on /v/ what's going on but could you please put the 1080p original up on catbox.moe or something? That way we can all archive it in that quality for future use. Better to have as many redundant copies as possible. While I'm on the topic a reminder to all anons to please at the very least back up their /k/ folders if they aren't doing regular backups of their system anyway. Shit can - and inevitably will - go tits up and you don't wanna lose that.

>>565875

We could also just look for post style and go from that. He'll have lost the ability to delete anything that's older than shutting down his browser or at least that's how it works for me.

>>565878

If I knew how to use that deep fake tool, I would insert Karl's face into all of Pvt. Pyle's scenes.

>>565879

Here it is: https://my.mixtape.moe/yhfduz.mp4

Original filename was "Race War!-1.mp4" because I saved it second after saving a 360p one. I'm glad I did a double take and saved the best one.

>>565877

I'm happy to have made you cringe tonight, Strelok.

>>565882

>Original filename was "Race War!-1.mp4" because I saved it second after saving a 360p one. I'm glad I did a double take and saved the best one.

Thanks anon, you did good work saving this stuff. Again I know you're still reading this Karl, why don't you come post?

https://www.full30.com/video/e8359fa5a7fccf010fb3ccea418a7618

>ian still hellbent on sucking jewtube cock

<but at least he has grown the balls to disagree, ever so mildly, with karl

Also what is with him pronouncing 'until' like 'intil'.

>>565886

>Also what is with him pronouncing 'until' like 'intil'.

Americans can't into vowels anon don't be a bully.

>>565886

<but at least he has grown the balls to disagree, ever so mildly, with karl

Haven't watched the video yet, will he not be fucked live on Pornhub?

Holy shit it's here!! Start tagging!

https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph5ab1c1035e3d2

>>565911

What is the pornhub stance on this?

>>565904

>Haven't watched the video yet, will he not be fucked live on Pornhub?

He actually did adress the pornhub issue, and basically said FW will not share the same space with cuckold porn.

But he is still on InRange, which is on pornhub, which means he will bend over and take Karl's cock if he demands so.

Also, I haven't seen this brought up, but what is Pornhub's stance on having non-porn vids, in particular gun and political vids put up on their website? I hardly think they stand a better chance of not getting shoah'd on a smut site than on jewtube for that sort of stuff.

>>565930

They remove stuff like that if it gets popular. A gaming youtuber did the same thing a couple of years ago and he got banned from pornhub.

>>565930

What's their stance on deep fakes?

>>565924

>karl turns down hatreon as a potential backup to patreon because he doesn't want to be associated with the word hate

>actively has his videos on pornhub with a blue fucking checkmark next to thumbnails of girls getting their shitters pounded

did his fucking paypig seattle friend suggest this?

>>565931

Do they have a report/ flag button? Can't we simply report them?

Otherwise, ironically the only course of action available to get them shoah'd seems to be giving them views and likes.

>>565934

>did his fucking paypig seattle friend suggest this?

Fucking hell that video

>>565936

Don't do that, that's not funny. What's funny is tagging their videos as cuckold porn so they're getting associated with cuck porn. Though their viewers would probably be into that shit.

>>565937

>>565934

>seattle paypig

I need context, like a webm. Sounds familiar, but I don't remember that.

>>565936

fuck reporting them, on pornhub they have no control on the comments. i want to see how they handle pornsite comment section.

>>565938

tbh its only chinese whispers on my part atm, he did a few videos with some "hacker homesecurity" faggot from the left coast and i was told on here that he was a literal pay-to-be cuckold.

>>565950

>What's more dangerous: having sex with hundreds of people who might have STDs and prolapsed assholes or an legit medical elixir

If it's good enough for Magellan it's good enough for me.

>>565950

Seriously, what is this false dichotomy bullshit this cuck is spewing, and why the hell do you think Pornhub gives you more 'platform' when your target audience migrated to full30 anyway? I mean, even if you're hitting for the SJW crowd, a great deal of feminists have serious issues with almost any type of porn, because it exploits wymyn. Either platform also features stuff you don't want to be associated with, and there is a third fucking option which does not feature any type of content you might have objections to, and doesn't force it upon you!

There's a THIRD FUCKING OPTION that does not force you to choose between Alex Jonestein and anal prolapse female 'objetificashun'.

>>565951

<nobody ever uses turpentine for medicinal purposes

>used to get rid of lice

>used to treat abrasions

>used as an antiseptic

>used to get rid of parasites

>used as the active ingredient in most chest rubs

How can he be so shit at fieldcraft? I mean, this isn't uncommon knowledge if you're the slightest bit interested in first aid or survivalism.

>>565955

>He's a turd brainlet, in lines with Sargon.

I used to think he was just a pathetic cuck, but he's revealed his true nature, as nothing more than a brainlet who needs to be put out of Ian's misery.

>>565957

You can even ingest turpentine, not a lot of course right, but it has been used for centuries now as medicine. Karl has an overblown ego, little bit smarter than the average population, still dumb as fuck in the grand scheme of things and definitely dumber than he what he thinks he is. I just wonder if he was always like this or if his Jewtube fame made him like this. Seriously, fuck InRange. There's way better gun channels, with way better polish or better information, than that pair of turds.

>>565955

>don't try to rationalize a retard's actions just laugh at the retard and walk away.

Solid fucking advice. Gotta remember that instead of having my blood pressure rise sky high every time a retard does something retarded as retards are wont to do.

>>565957

>I used to think he was just a pathetic cuck, but he's revealed his true nature, as nothing more than a brainlet who needs to be put out of Ian's misery.

You got it wrong Strelok. He's a pathetic cuck and a retarded brainlet.

>>565960

I understand completely. You see some retarded fucking shit and you want to rectify the retarded shit because it'd be better for the retard doing said retarded shit. But don't, they're retards, they can't reason. So, don't bother with them. I still have problems with arguing with retards and instead of laughing at them, but I'm getting better at it.

>>565968

>inrange tv is the best gun program on the internet

This is washed up/ female game dev/ vidya 'commentator'-tier 'about' section.

>>565968

This is high schooler tier comedy. This is something I would've found funny in high school or in middle school.

>>565972

This just validates what I was saying earlier, that Karl the Cuck's ego is over-inflated.

>>565968

>Videos Watched: 9

>>565975

Karl likely has aspergers. Haven't seen attempts at comedy that poor since I last knew an aspergarian.

>>565724

but is there a DMCA on >>>/delete/ ?

>>566011

>Chuckle Brothers

>Japanese flag

Nani? Unless you just saved it without knowing the context I guess.

>>566024

lurk moar, he's a gaijin on foreign soil

>>566027

I'm aware there's one of those but I thought he was an American. I seriously doubt the Chuckle Brothers crossed the Atlantic.

>>566035

There's a half-samurai Anon here too

>>566040

There's got to be an interesting document sitting on a government system listing all the information they've gleaned about anons from lurking /k/. I'd pay to read that shit.

>>565953

>full30

Unfortunately full30 is utter disgusting failure of design

>epitome of flat cancer

>animated backgrounds

>animated elements changing without your input

>can't get full list of channel videos

>pop up (!) search menu

>no dates

Pornhub layout is over 9000 times :^) better . It is good old youtube with dark theme. Of course layout is not only thing needed, pornhub content association means no future for gun channels there.

>>565684

>Courts can be privatized quite easily

I was shooting heroin and reading “The Fountainhead” in the front seat of my privately owned police cruiser when a call came in. I put a quarter in the radio to activate it. It was the chief.

“Bad news, detective. We got a situation.”

“What? Is the mayor trying to ban trans fats again?”

“Worse. Somebody just stole four hundred and forty-seven million dollars’ worth of bitcoins.”

The heroin needle practically fell out of my arm. “What kind of monster would do something like that? Bitcoins are the ultimate currency: virtual, anonymous, stateless. They represent true economic freedom, not subject to arbitrary manipulation by any government. Do we have any leads?”

“Not yet. But mark my words: we’re going to figure out who did this and we’re going to take them down … provided someone pays us a fair market rate to do so.”

“Easy, chief,” I said. “Any rate the market offers is, by definition, fair.”

He laughed. “That’s why you’re the best I got, Lisowski. Now you get out there and find those bitcoins.”

“Don’t worry,” I said. “I’m on it.”

I put a quarter in the siren. Ten minutes later, I was on the scene. It was a normal office building, strangled on all sides by public sidewalks. I hopped over them and went inside.

“Home Depot™ Presents the Police!®” I said, flashing my badge and my gun and a small picture of Ron Paul. “Nobody move unless you want to!” They didn’t.

“Now, which one of you punks is going to pay me to investigate this crime?” No one spoke up.

“Come on,” I said. “Don’t you all understand that the protection of private property is the foundation of all personal liberty?”

It didn’t seem like they did.

“Seriously, guys. Without a strong economic motivator, I’m just going to stand here and not solve this case. Cash is fine, but I prefer being paid in gold bullion or autographed Penn Jillette posters.”

Nothing. These people were stonewalling me. It almost seemed like they didn’t care that a fortune in computer money invented to buy drugs was missing.

I figured I could wait them out. I lit several cigarettes indoors. A pregnant lady coughed, and I told her that secondhand smoke is a myth. Just then, a man in glasses made a break for it.

“Subway™ Eat Fresh and Freeze, Scumbag!®” I yelled.

Too late. He was already out the front door. I went after him.

“Stop right there!” I yelled as I ran. He was faster than me because I always try to avoid stepping on public sidewalks. Our country needs a private-sidewalk voucher system, but, thanks to the incestuous interplay between our corrupt federal government and the public-sidewalk lobby, it will never happen.

I was losing him. “Listen, I’ll pay you to stop!” I yelled. “What would you consider an appropriate price point for stopping? I’ll offer you a thirteenth of an ounce of gold and a gently worn ‘Bob Barr ‘08’ extra-large long-sleeved men’s T-shirt!”

He turned. In his hand was a revolver that the Constitution said he had every right to own. He fired at me and missed. I pulled my own gun, put a quarter in it, and fired back. The bullet lodged in a U.S.P.S. mailbox less than a foot from his head. I shot the mailbox again, on purpose.

“All right, all right!” the man yelled, throwing down his weapon. “I give up, cop! I confess: I took the bitcoins.”

“Why’d you do it?” I asked, as I slapped a pair of Oikos™ Greek Yogurt Presents Handcuffs® on the guy.

“Because I was afraid.”

“Afraid?”

“Afraid of an economic future free from the pernicious meddling of central bankers,” he said. “I’m a central banker.”

I wanted to coldcock the guy. Years ago, a central banker killed my partner. Instead, I shook my head.

“Let this be a message to all your central-banker friends out on the street,” I said. “No matter how many bitcoins you steal, you’ll never take away the dream of an open society based on the principles of personal and economic freedom.”

He nodded, because he knew I was right. Then he swiped his credit card to pay me for arresting him.

>>565950

I don't know about that in particular, but he previously cited videos teaching you how to make meth or explosives when saying it's unreasonable to ban gun content.

>>565953

Again I hate to defend the sperg but they don't only have videos on YouTube and PornHub.

They have videos on BitChute and Full30 as well.

Are you retarded or did you willingly choose to not look things up?

>>566108

Nigger I know they have a full30 account! That's literally where I watched IR for the first time. My point is when you already have full30 and BitChute, why use a fucking smut site to host your shit.

>>566118

>why use a fucking smut site to host your shit.

To signal something, not sure because it sure as shit isn't virtue

>>566118

Because everyone's talking about it now.

Where he fucked up is not using short sentences to explain why he did it so neanderthals like yourself don't misunderstand.

>>566120

Is this is the InRange version of the 1488D chess argument?

Get a life, Karl.

>>566120

>Neanderthals

>bad

fuck off nigger

>>566124

>>566128

>>566130

>reddit COINTELPRO

I should have known.

>>566145

>porn loving cuckolds

>posts anime

Don't thump your bible at me, reddit, your incel tricks won't convert me to your pedo cult.