/k/ - Weapons

Patroling the Mojave makes me wish for nuclear winter.

>>543571

It's not gonna go anywhere. Even the faggots who started the process said it wouldn't go anywhere.

>>543582

That's true so far. But then again, how will things change when Newscum becomes governor? Unchecked progressivism always hits the wall of reality…….

Let me dream.

For the time being I'll believe. Hope for the best, but expect the worst and so forth.

New Amsterdam when?

If this happens other states will break off into smaller chunks which will actually not be entirely a bad idea, especially ones that are overly dominated by cities that fuck over the countryside folk.

>New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

Yeah, no. This isn't happening. California would never agree to split in a way that would have the slightest chance of being redder than they are.

>>543865

I could see it happening just for how dumb Gommies are.

It's pretty pointless because the moment it becomes nice, the leftist would move in to ruin it.

>>543865

>>543875

>what is West Virgina

>>543884

Virginia was not a part of the United States when West Virginia seceded.

>>543886

Because it was part of the CSA at the time? Seems like a bit of a loophole to >>543865 to be quite honest.

>>543879

don't run when you can still fight. i'd be in alaska or east coast russia otherwise.

>>543575

I'd be fine with just the nuclear part

t. in LA

>>543858

There needs to be a law where if one city drowns out everyone else ie. Chicago, Seattle, the entire west side of California, they'll become their own city state. What gets me the most is that just by browsing the comments on news articles on this you'll find nu-males literally using terms like cletus, inbreeds, and legitimately believeing they are above the others further inland. Especially their claims that the only parts of california that matter are the ones with hollywood or mobile phone game devs. If they are better and they don't want to be associated with cletus then why not just let them go?

>>543911

I see the future to preserve the Union if possible to be more of a Austro-Hungarian dual monarchy out of all things. Because the main difference in the US is now City and rural. The "state" term is kinda useless when you have a bunch of city fags ruining the rest of the state (Cali,WA, il, etc.)

>>543988

Every city that goes above 10k population is cleansed. Cold blooded but it is the only way. In this internet age there is absolutely no reason to live in a city

>>543988

Well cities have more people. It makes sense that more people dictate policy than less people. It's almost like having bicameral state legislatures is the solution or something.

>>544002

>more voices means more correct

Copernicus would like a word with You (^:

>>544002

>>543999

I don't think it will be possible to clense all cities, therefore, I argue that the only way to prevent cities from having too much powerand eventually causing their own downfall is to let them run their little anonymity as long as it doesn't affect rual folk.

>>544008

But that's not what I said. We're talking about the fact that people vote. Obviously those with more votes win, correct or not. There's nothing inherently evil about cities. If cities had less people, cityfags would be complaining about the exact same thing. Nobody complains that Wyoming has less representatives than Texas, specifically because we have the senate. This is what I was referring to. If you're going to go on about Copernicus, then I suggest that you form a system of government where only scientists get to choose what happens, and nothing short of a 95% certainty gets to be done. Please learn to differentiate an is from an ought.

>>543999

I live in a Red city with about 500,000 people in it.

>>544020

AnCapistan.

Honestly you could fix most of the issues by returning the Senate to the governor/local politician vote, and only allow property owners to vote on the House.

>>544045

what this guy said.

there are right wing cities larger than 100,000 people (e.g. mesa arizona, san diego CA) It's just that cities usually have minorities and they are not conservative.

but the whole "citiez r librul" meme is misplaced, it's just a concentrated demographic problem.

See: https://alt.coxnewsweb.com/statesman/metro/081205libs.pdf

>>543878

>>543884

>>543886

>Virginia was not a part of the United States when West Virginia seceded.

Fake news.

Virginia was officially admitted in 1788 and Virginia's vote to secede in 1861 was not legal under under the constitution. However Virginia's state legislature approved the split in 1862 and then so did federal congress in 1866 making it legal.

Basically it only happened because of the civil war clusterfuck and also why it won't happen for commiefornia today :'(

>>543865

Oh I dunno, I think commiefornians would be all for splitting from the evil nazis that infest the continent starting 10 miles off coast.

>>543871

>tfw Nig Yorkers did this to VA

>>544086

San Diego is a right wing city?

>>544101

We can deploy disinfo to make New California happen.

good, Hollywood should become it's own country. fuck em

>>544098

The CSA did nothing wrong btw

>america (((illegally))) declares independence from an alien government

>wins war

>Southern states (((illegally))) declare independence from an alien government

>loses war

>>543999

What a dumb nigger

>>544113

san diego and the county that contains it are pretty much the last GOP stronghold in California. Whereas New York City has 4 republican council members out of 50, san diego's council is half republican and that's with all the rigged california elections

>>543911

>There needs to be a law

Didn't Colorado just pass legislation making it that any change to state law had to be ratified by all county governments before it takes effect?

>>544164

>>544164

How the fuck would the AG doing his shit even play out?

>buisness finds out there's wet backs

>helps ICE out a bit

>beaners removed

>AG chimps on buisness

>buisness might get raped

>appeals

>lol california

>go to supreme court

>California gets ass raped

What then? What the fuck is their plan after getting told fuck no and probably even having officials arrested.

>>544167

http://archive.fo/2018.01.19-160934/http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article195434409.html

Since when do Commies have any forethoughts?

>>544171

>we'll prosecute u for stopping illegal activity

I hope these people get raped and killed by cartels.

>>544163

I thought Northern Californian cities like Redding had a strong right wing presence, too?

You're saying we can undo Reagan's shit by biking ET back home?

>>543865

Would technically make their electoral college votes count slightly more per person. Just need the media to meme that and ignore that the new lower-population state will have a greater red effect than blue. Almost no chance of that, though.

>>544171

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

>>544167

>>544171

>>544177

You're ignoring the fact that the only companies that hire illegal immigrants benefit from hiring them illegally (protip, even legal immigrants work for virtually nothing, you just have to list in on the tax documents/insurance forms). If they're hiring illegal immigrants in the first place, they probably don't give a shit about ICE. The occasional manufacturing plant that hired a solderer from Asia/Electrician from some Hispanic country for a temp position without realizing they were an illegal immigrant are few and far inbetween. You occasionally get it when you're a small business and hire a family friend, but you generally don't get it at the medium/large business level since the illegals working those jobs have fake documents even if everyone knows they're an illegal.

Pretty sure the first two points of the law:

>Requires employers to ask immigration agents for a warrant before granting access to a worksite.

>Prevents employers from voluntarily sharing confidential employee information without a subpoena.

Should (keyword should) be the general law in any scenario, illegals or not. The rest of the law is bullshit though.

>Requires employers to notify their workers before a federal audit of employee records.

>Gives the attorney general and labor commissioner exclusive authority to enforce new provisions of state labor laws.

>Prohibits employers from re-verifying information on employment verification forms, unless compelled to by federal law.

>>544223

Fuck, thought the first one said "Law Enforcement Agents" not "Immigration Agents."

I guess the point still stands.

>>543571

>that boarder gore

God no.

>>544124

>The CSA did nothing wrong btw

Except the part where they lost the war. It's the winners who get to write history.

>>543868

>>544101

>>544113

Nobody is dumb enough to do something 100% against their best interests. Wishful thinking along these lines turns you stupid if anything.

>>544197

>Would technically make their electoral college votes count slightly more per person.

California now: All-or-nothing 55 blue votes.

California after New California split: Maybe around 30-40 votes blue, NC adds the remainder to red plus 2.

There is no way to spin this. California would've split decades ago if it was possible to do this without giving advantage to red or dicing up the territory unnaturally. The only semi-realistic way for New California to exist is if the whole state secedes and it becomes Very West Virginia.

>>543911

>city states

YES! I've been saying this for ages. Just look at the populations; my home state of Mississippi has just over 2M people. NYC, LA and Chicago have 8.5, 3.8 and 2.7, respectively. That is a major issue when it comes to governing in the name of the people you govern. Problem is, we're headed in the opposite direction than what we need for something like that to take place. For a population density based division to be any use at all, we'd need strong state's rights laws. Instead, we're headed toward more and more federal power at a local level.

>>544112

What about fewer points per person per square mile?