You're incorrect, morgan. He was not a pedophile. Why? Because historical accounts and teachings are inconsistent with your fallacy. Before I get deeply into this let us take a look at the timeline of Prophet Muhammad's (pbuh) life.
the start of the mission was in the year of 610 AD (Mecca)–and the migration to Medina was in the year of 623 AD–the Prophet dies in the year of 633 AD
It is known that Muhammad married Aisha before his journey to Medina in the year of 620 AD. This was 10 years after the "revelation" that claims Aisha was 6 years old when they married, and that also claims he started having sexual intercourse with her 3 years and few months later, which was at the end of the year (623 AD) when she would be (9) years old. 🙄 This implies that she was born in the year (614 AD) which was the (4th ) year of the revelation according to Bukhari. This is nonsense because-
Historical references show that Aisha's older sister Asma was 10 years older than her younger sister & born 27 years before her migration to Medina. That would make Asma 14 years old & would also show Aisha was born in the year of 606 AD.
So by the time they married (620 AD) Aisha was 14 but remember they waited 3 years and a few months before consummating. Making her 17 or 18 at the time (i'm not sure what month it was.)
Another reference also confirms Aisha's age. Asama's well documented murder shows that she and her son were murdered at the age of 100 on the 73rd Hijri (yearly anniversary of migration to Medina). This again proves Asama's age of 27.
Another reference also shows that she remembers her father and Muhammad leaving to Abyssinia which is in the 5th year of revelation. If she was born in the 4th year of revelation as Bukhari claims she wouldn't remember that because she would be 1.
Finishing up i'd like to inform you that there are many clouded hadiths and that's been a huge issue for a while. What I want you to do is buy a Quran (I can buy one for you) and read it. When you come across a hadith that sounds strange you can open the Quran and see if it contradicts the laws of Allah. If it does the hadith is fabricated. There are more ways to test the legitimacy of a hadith like I did above but that's the advanced method. Have a nice day and I hope you are guided onto the right path.
tl;dr: https://imgur.com/gallery/KTQI1
sources:
https://books.google.com/books?id=HjjcRAZQ1s4C&pg=PA216&lpg=PA216&dq=asma+27+years&source=bl&ots=_E8JdcLHpN&sig=T1IPvdKd5R9fhyeLPh6FushcBWk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiqlruA77nVAhXK5oMKHQeCAKwQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=asma%2027%20years&f=false
https://books.google.com/books?id=uxVRCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT192&lpg=PT192&dq=asma+27+years&source=bl&ots=uGg9jheKx9&sig=3TqvpSglRUzElFqMWXvy8150Xuw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiqlruA77nVAhXK5oMKHQeCAKwQ6AEIKzAB#v=onepage&q=asma%2027%20years&f=false
https://books.google.com/books?id=lciNw9PbJOAC&pg=PA92&lpg=PA92&dq=asma+27+years&source=bl&ots=1NO9M9j2W1&sig=NFtxBqtIoNK0SEgJBAVNrPMjJak&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjFmcienLrVAhWnv1QKHZsUAycQ6AEIWTAM#v=onepage&q=asma%2027%20years&f=false
Ibn Kathir, Al-Bidayah wa’l-nihayah, Vol. 8, p. 372, Dar al-fikr al-`arabi, Al-jizah, 1933
Ibn Hajar Asqalani, Tahdhib al-Tahdhib, p. 654, Arabic, Bab fi’l-nisa’, al-harfu’l-alif, Lucknow
Siyar A’lama-nubala, Al-Zahabi, Vol. 2, pg 289, Arabic, Muassasatu-risalah, 1992
Al_Qari, Ali. Merghah Almafatih : Sharh Meshkat Almasabih. p. 331.