/islam/ - 8ch Masjid

>>18266

How could we possibly know this when he has yet to serve a single hour as President?

Trump has expressed his disdain for Muslims and his love for Israel. He has even proposed - to great adulation - a National Muslim Registry in the United States, which would make us all open targets for anyone who chooses to look up Muslims in their neighborhood.

No, we will not be safer and he is not our ally.

>>18269

No one knows the details of the plan for the registry yet.

I'm pretty sure as it is worked through, that glaringly obvious flaw in it will be sorted out or it almost certainly won't get passed.

>>18270

The hope, of course, is that Congress will never allow it to pass; or, on the off chance that it does pass Congress, the Supreme Court will strike it down.

>>18272

All it takes to get to the Supreme Court is a few brave souls who refuse to register, but live openly as Muslim. It's not always an easy thing to do, but this is something we definitely should fight all the way to the top.

>>18266

>Is the muslim world safer with a Trump presidency?

No, us foreign policy always remains the same no matter the party. What happens with him would have happened with Hilary.

Also, don't listen to Imran Hosein, I think he is a marxist shill pretending to be muslim. He glorifies russia to an extent that it seems they are angels, he also praises communist leaders like che guevara. He is pro shia and alawi to the max, he supports assad. And not to mention he was born in south america in Trinidad and Tobago so that's probably where he gets his communist views.

>>18276

>don't listen to him listen to me!

piss off.

>>18281

He gave arguments and proof.Your arrow meme doesn't make any sense.

>>18282

His arguments were adhom, he provided no proof, and even if he is pro shia or anything else so what?

The sheikh was giving his opinion on a political event that's all.

And he's entitled to that opinion - he might be right he might be wrong, Allah alone knows.

>>18284

Just search on youtube "sheikh imran russia" and "sheikh imran syria" you will see what im talking about. And the problem is that he is pro sunni killers.

>>18281

Ah, good. Another brit who learned debate technique from /pol/.

Wasn't this the guy who said the world was going to end by last October?

>>18269

The love for Israel is true. Which is part of the reason why he's Just as bad as anyone else. Just an establishment Rebublican Neoliberal Secular Modernist pretending to be cool. To be fair, what he said about "Muslims" he specified to be Radical Muslims like Wahhabis

>>18282

He gave no proofs.

>>18276

Today I learned that liking Russia, a country whose Muslim population is mostly Sunni, is pro Shi'a. And that prefering Assad to Nejdchimps means you're literally a Nusrayi.

He's cast shade at Iran before. So I doubt he's "Pro Shi'a"

Apart from people ranting on Ummah.com (The Takfiri version of Stormfront) there is absolutely no evidence that he's a Marxist. Which is particularly ironic for a Wahhabi to say, seeing how much your movement gained traction be leeching off of Marxist Third Worldism.

>>18287

>he specified to be Radical Muslims like Wahhabis

Make no mistakes, friend. If you pray more than once a day and avoid pork, you ARE a "radical Muslim" by Trump standards.

>>18287

>implying i'm a wahabi

Listen, O son of a 2 minute mutah, Imran Hossein is absolutely a pro iran and pro russia shill, just watch his videos he constantly talks about them.

He claims russia is the last bastion of Christendom and that shia muslims are doing a good job killing sunnis.

The same russia who bombs the innocent children of the Levant with it's great power to keep their dog Assad, whom has no power of his own, and the same iran whom allies themselves with those literal thugs for temporary gain.

If he is not a rafidhi playing taqiyyah then he is most likely a russian marxist shill.

>>18290

Ah. Okay. You're an Ikhwani Muslim Brotherhood then? That was my second guess.

My third is you're just plain crazy.

And I am far from Shi'a. Although I'm generally okay with non Ithna'ashari branches of it. Basically I just despise Iran.

>>18292

Nice adhoms rafidhi :^)

>>18293

Alright. You don't like the MB either. I'm going with crazy.

And It takes a special kind of autism and lack of self awareness to accuse someone of ad hominem before using an ad hominem.

All directly after using a steady slew of ad hominems.

>>18293

You're a Quranist, aren't you? :^)

>>18300

Exept that's literally what you have been doing to everyone who disagrees with you you [foul language]ing [social epithet] [social epithet]

>>18303

:^)

>>18306

I bet you're a Paki.

Those Moose are probably a step up from your goats.

>>18307

Nice Ad Hom

This is now designated ad hominem thread

Post your ad hominems here

>>18284

Did you watch his videos? Are you saying he is neutral and unbiased towards russia and iran? Are you saying he is a good sheikh?

My arguments are NOT ad hom towards imran hossein, just imagine the opposite, what if a sheikh was pro saudi and usa and glorified them. It would be very suspicious and I would ignore him.

>>18311

How's life in Indonesia?

>>18311

>ad hominem

I prefer to think of it as friendly banter. I'm not seeing anyone really offended here.

>>18322

[triggered]

>>18311

I thought Poland didn't have any [racist epithet]s?

>>18483

Source on pic?

>>18488

Pretty sure it's just a meme.

Ruqayyah didn't have any children survive into adulthood.

>>18492

I'm more interested about the website this is from.

>>18499

Idk, I saw it randomly browsing and followed the link but forget what website.

It was a "genealogical" website.

>>18507

seems interesting, is it a joke website?

>>18266

>a large amount of American people

Trump lost the popular vote and barely won the electorate in most states.

>>18527

The word I Used was Reetard if anyone interests

>>18528

it's not even a social epithets.

>>18523

Since there is absolutely zero evidence for dead people or illegals voting, your statement means nothing.

>>18528

Nobody is interested.

>>18527

What type of muslim are you?

>>18530

>Since there is absolutely zero evidence for dead people or illegals voting, your statement means nothing.

<- Vid related , Lou Dobbs covers dead and illegal voters this election.

Also another vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiywDVCPzwI where Obama is giving an implicit nod and wink to illegals voting without worry since it's "strictly confidential" and they won't be "hounded down".

So I think saying there is no chance illegals voted is kind of naive.

PBS analysis claims the same thing, if you remove illegal voters Trump won the popular vote as well (which explains the landslide Electoral win). http://video.wgby.org/video/2365892274/

>>18548

>MSM

>Reliable source

Try again.

>>18548

The popular vote currently has Clinton ahead of Trump by ~2 million votes. There is absolutely no way 2 million illegals and/or dead people voted. The people dick riding Trump are just going to have to realize that he did not win the popular vote. It's not like it hasn't happened before.

Further more, state recounts would expose illegal voters but Trump people won't let that happen. You have to wonder why the Trump camp doesn't want recounts.

>>18550

Well its all over "alternative media" if I posted that you would say "fake news". Research it.yourself.

>>18576

I have researched it and there is no actual evidence.

>>18290

Hey that's my language :DDDD

>>18545

a secular one

>>18585

You mean munafiq?

>>18592

Whatever you say.

are you the leaf on Hizb ut-Tahrir too?

>>18596

Yes

>>18581

of course, but you ignore all evidence to the contrary.

http://alexanderhiggins.com/vote-fraud-12-michigan-hillary-vote-disqualified-recount/

Voter Fraud Favoring HILLARY in MI. More Votes than Voters logged. State Law requires them to be discarded

>Over 1/2 of Hillary Clinton’s Detroit Vote Faces Disqualification

>Michigan officials say they can not reconcile vote counts in 610 of 1,680 precincts, or 59% of the precincts, in Michigan’s largest county , Wayne County, which Hillary won by a margin of 2 to 1 over Donald Trump because the original vote counts in the poll books do not match the number of votes in the machine printout reports.

>Specifically, the number of votes recorded by the voting machines were higher than the number of voters that were logged into to vote in these precincts.

>>18633

I think you need to re-examine your definition of "evidence". It may fit your personal desires or substantiate your personal narrative, but that's what we call "confirmation bias" and it's not evidence.

If what you're saying is true, then why does Trump desperately not want a Michigan recount?

>>18826

We have crossover traffic with /pol/. They seem to think that Trump is some sort of savior. I suspect at this point, though, that they're just trying to protect their memes.