>>46939
>The point people always miss is the fact that if he wants to be a piece of shit, can he please stand up and proudly declare himself as such.
Wow, that's a nice bit of totalitarian logic. That's like SJW's saying "why can't racists be open about their racism so we know who they are?" or nazis saying "why do all of those damn jews have to hide? They should be out in the open so it will be easier to kill them." The point is, when a group of people are persecuted, hiding and being scared is a rational response. As for the rest of that tl;dr: so, rights are a social construct. What's your point?
>Some prat on here recently said he made a "sacrifice" when he purchases something.
Oh, I posted that >>44973. Thanks for taking what I said out of context btw, which I later clarified here >>45119. If you think I'm a prat, you should've read the posts of the anon who I was arguing against posted. I'll post a couple pieces of comedy gold here for you.
>What's disgusting about suggesting people be generous you little shit? Or to you is it so shameful you might want to try a file before spending money on them? because most of them are garbage with only a few being worth the money. The other thing is, there are plenty of people who plain can't afford these files, so what is the point of them not getting them for free? The person who makes the content is not gonna get the money anyway. So why bother depriving the person who can't afford it? Some kind of punishment? You can't pay, you can't have it. If some rich bastard was not paying for files it would be pathetic, but that's not the case. Of course you wont understand any of this because your a disgusting piece of trash. But I can guarantee that if I produced anything I had copyright over, if I KNEW people couldn't afford it, they could have it for free.
And
>I bet you say "I don't owe you anything" alot don't you? You seem the type. Because a mother doesn't owe her own child anything. She can do what she likes and just abandon it if she chooses. She doesn't have to do anything with it. Ah, but that thing called decency.
So, not only is he like a middle schooler who never read an econ book and who's understanding of Communism came from second and third hand sources where people can magically have things for free, he actually compares file sharing to child care, of all things. Then, he proceeds to call the anon (who he thought was me) a turd and left as a desperate attempt to have the last word and save face, like a little bitch.
>I know you are strangely cool with people being selfish, but is that not bad behaviour?
No, it's not, nor would I think selfishness in and of itself is categorically bad. Besides, you've done nothing to earn such content, and content creators can distribute their content however they wish. Why are you so emotionally invested over something as trivial as file sharing, which has no impact on how you live your life?
>And to make it clear, I'm not bitter about anons not sharing, like I said IF you want to share, then do so freely. If you want to get down to it and make the effort of uploading it somewhere etc, ok, you are sharing. But do it freely. No "I'm willing to trade" or "I will let some people get access to this" any of that shit.
So, you are okay with people not sharing, but not okay if they trade instead of share freely? How would you feel if I said I do have the AA files, but won't share?
>And you are not aware of the sad people that are desperate to keep something all to themselves, because they think that exclusivity makes them special?
Yes, materialists create a sense of identity and individualism through objects, or pour their entire self-worth into vapid constructed lifestyle identities like being gay, black, white, a gamer, a geek, trans, an intellectual, an artist, high class, etc. Such rampant individualism will only lead to a collapse of th Self.
>Strangely enough the only people I've ever seen complaining about people being ungrateful or having a bad attitude, is the trading and limited sharing types. Strange.
That's because the people who did share are no longer sharing openly, because of the guilt tripping, ungratefulness, and outright disrespect. Duh!