>>31919
Seems to me like you're either LARPing or don't understand how minds work. I'm going to respond anyway, specifically to your last paragraph, and why that doesn't work.
Basically, the subconscious mind won't make those links that the conscious mind doesn't. The subconscious mind isn't smart enough to have the complex thought of "Having sex with another dude's big cock will make orgasms better". Either they'll notice this subtle word changing and reject it, or *they will not notice the change and think the file is about their cock growing bigger, and only feel like their cock is growing bigger, not experience attraction to cocks*.
You're either LARPing, or have bought into the LARPing of hypnotists overblowing how much the subconscious mind can do.
Also
>Those who have learned tricks such as tonal and rhythm changes to subconsciously link their voice to the listener's own breathing and heart beat and then changing it up to initiate feelings of pleasure or calmness.
what the fuck
How is this link established?
I've never ever noticed this. In fact, I've frequently noticed my breath/heart rate being different than any pattern in the recording.
People's heart and breathing rates are wildly different, a recording would never be able to simulate this.
Sure, you can make people calmer or more excited to change their heart rate/breathing rate, but simply changing the rhythm of your voice would be too drastic, and if not, too minute, a change for people to follow it.
Why does an increased heart/breathing rate mean a feeling of pleasure?
>>31974
>sub-sentences meme
This is like the NLP meme. If the person consciously notices it, they can reject it. If they only subconsciously notice it, then it doesn't effect them.
However, if they consciously notice it and let it pass through, then it's no longer sinister, since they've accepted it.
It's like subliminal advertising, except even worse since it requires more cognition to properly comprehend. And subliminal advertising is already really ineffective http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30878843
(In short, subliminal advertising has only been shown in controlled lab settings to work on products that were already known and somewhat liked, but not on products that the participant would already choose, and in some real world attempts found to be completely ineffective).