[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 8cup / arepa / caco / cutebois / cyoa / fascist / fast / leftpol ][Options][ watchlist ]

/gamergatehq/ - The GamerGate Headquarters

BTFOs are Life, Ethics is Hometown
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

Board Rules 2018

1: No direct-linking corrupt sites, please use archives.
2: Please don't fight amongst yourselves or with the board mods.
3: Don't break 8chan global rules, spam the board, or troll other users.
4: No doxing, threatening, or actual harassment of any person is allowed.
5: The topic of this board is #GamerGate, and all that it encompasses and does.

Have fun!

File (hide): 1463887853073.gif (2.37 KB, 200x166, 100:83, 1434577413649.gif) (h) (u)

[–]

68bdd7 (13) No.324108>>324114 >>324200 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

Watching the current shitshow with Hillary cheating like crazy and Bernie Sanders and his supporters being gas lighted and slandered by the press; I have to wonder something.

Was part of the reason for why the anti-GG side mobilized with the speed and venom that they did to protect Zoe, partially motivated by a desire to test out doing the same to protect Hillary during her Presidential run?

Essentially, when Gamergate broke and the left's normal methods of silencing those who seek to expose their corruption failed, their cronies who had real media connections, came up with the idea of using the scandal to test out full-on censorship methods they were planning to use to protect Hillary and slander her rivals, by way of testing them out on protecting the corrupt wench Zoe.

You could make the argument that they did so because they needed to know just how far they could go before people called bullshit on them. Which is why Hillary and her cronies haven't gone fully 100% retard like Zoe and her ilk did. The whole thing backfired mightily by way of how hard gamers and such fought back and how it created a ripple effect on using those tactics, as hard as they could, against Sanders.

Given how calculating Hillary and the mainstream are; Zoe might have been the perfect shithead for them to practice dirty tricks to protect in prep for Hillary's coronation. "Bernie Bros" is straight out of the anti-GG lexicon and the whole "Hillary has experience getting shit done" spiel and it's variations is sort of a smarmy catchphrase you'd expect from the anti-GG side.

68bdd7 (13) No.324114

>>324108 (OP)

Loosen your tinfoil hat a bit.

It's cutting the oxygen to your brain


68bdd7 (13) No.324118>>324201

My interpretation is different. GG was a microcosm of something that was already happening in a larger scale. Promotion of Listen&Believe, The Narrative, unethical journalists, media institutions, questionable "social science academics", politicians and political donors who believe and promote an agenda over accurate reporting, accurate research and study, careful law making and application.

Those things were already happening before GG flared up. What made GG different I think was it was the first recorded and observable moment where a group of people did not acquiesce to SocJus bullying tactics. That seemingly small act started a fracture in SocJus armor and their Narrative, and SocJus started biting their own festering wounds.

Without getting too bogged down in the trees, I suggest looking at the big picture for a second. Whatever or whoever politics and politicians you support, look at what it is they are seeking from you. If any of them asks you to justify what you enjoy or have*, even if you are doing no harm to anyone else. Do they really have your best interest at heart?

*For those who want to see some trees, I'll be more specific. Beware of anyone or groups that tries to threaten, cajole, or shame you by asking you to surrender your belonging, your behavior, or your idea, for no good reason other than the sake of -their- ideology.

ie: Why do you need that awful gun? Don't you care about the kids? Why do you need that vidya? Don't you know it's violent and sexist, don't you care about the kids? Why do you need that piece of art that was deemed problematic by us, don't you care about the women and kids? Why do you need that large car, don't you care about mother earth and the kids?

Why are you talking to people we deem problematic? Don't you care that they are literally hitler?

Why are you using your voice? Don't you care that you might offend someone?


68bdd7 (13) No.324121>>324203

File (hide): 1463932652649.jpg (295.37 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, Trump kek.jpg) (h) (u)

I'd be lying if I said I didn't see parallels between GamerGate and the problems "they" are having now between fundamentalists who believe they're doing the right and noble thing fighting corruption (Bernbots) and assholes getting a kick out of just fucking up the system for their own benefit and amusement and actually gaining from it (Trumpire). I think it has more to do with how those kind of people just generally are as opposed to a calculated dry run for a presidential campaign.

Both aGGros and Hillbots are the same kind of "worldly while never having extended contact with people who look or think or behave differently than me" people, and those people really, genuinely believe they're calm and collected as their opponents froth and sperg their way into their own defeat. The problem with that is when too many people start looking, they start getting it from too many angles, and have no idea what to do about it. The Huffington post "Tee hee, notice anything?! ;)" post was supposed to be a grand TAKE THAT! against the straight white males and the Patriarchy… until someone who didn't look or think or behave like them pointed out something pretty obvious that they didn't realize before posting. Because they were never in positions TO need to see or think about it, every problem could be dismissed by having it chalked up to the antics of the straight white male boogeyman. Except when it turns out that wasn't the people fucking with them? Uh oh…

It wasn't a calculated exercise test out tactics for 'the big show', it was just a smaller demonstration of the only way they knew how to fight back when they didn't get what they want exactly when they wanted it. Only now, it's becoming more obvious the shit isn't as immediately effective as they once thought, and what's more might actually end up costing them big time in the long run.

tl;dr, dumb people who bungled it on a micro level (because it was always just about maintaining easy lifestyles for lazy idiots, none of them give two fucks about 'controlling videogames') just assume they can do the same thing now, on a greater level, and it's becoming more and more obvious now that it's not working.


68bdd7 (13) No.324123>>324124

The tactics we are seeing employed are essentially universal, and certainly not limited to GG or politics. America and Western Civ have become predominantly gynocentric in nature, and as such gossip, innuendo, slander, and other female oriented behavior have become prime motivators in society.

Go read up on the role of women in Nazi Germany (Judasfrauen denouncers of the Volksgerichtshof), or how the STASI relied heavily women (e.g. prostitutes) to keep tabs on targets and the general populace. Put simply, what we are seeing now is certainly nothing new, but simply a logical result of women gaining political power and transforming the culture to reflect female values such as manipulation, treachery, and an all-encompassing herd mentality.

"First You Get the Women, Then You've Got the Children, So Follow the Men" -- Adolph Hitler


68bdd7 (13) No.324124>>324171 >>324203

>>324123

When do you graduate middle school?


68bdd7 (13) No.324159

The extremist attitudes that antiGG introduced have since gone mainstream. Think back to 2014. When they called us "white" and "male" as if those were insults, it was unusual and absurd. Now it's all over the media, MSM is using "white" and "male" as slurs.


68bdd7 (13) No.324165

Occam's Razor tells us that it's probably not that complicated.Shillary campaign organizers might glean a lesson or two from us, but implying Chelsea has any connection organizationally to someone with REAL power is not likely.


68bdd7 (13) No.324171>>324174

>>324124

I'm in 7th grade, why?


68bdd7 (13) No.324174

>>324171

I believe the implication is that you sound like a child.


68bdd7 (13) No.324200

>>324108 (OP)

Yes, obviously. Have been warning you since day one.


68bdd7 (13) No.324201

>>324118

>What made GG different I think was it was the first recorded and observable moment where a group of people did not acquiesce to SocJus bullying tactics.

Tactics first used in drug policy and other social justice movements, oddly enough. And used against cops and politicians, not some sex trade worker.


68bdd7 (13) No.324203

>>324121

Dunno, I've been following the Clintons for 20 years and this always smelled funny

>>324124

> muh antiseptic

That stopped working in 2009 Schlomo.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
12 replies | 1 images | 1 UIDs | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 8cup / arepa / caco / cutebois / cyoa / fascist / fast / leftpol ][ watchlist ]