/gamergatehq/ - The GamerGate Headquarters★

>>321646 (OP)

Dude they have been doing this with the MRAs and supreme gentleman Elliot Rodger.

https://archive.is/gEqfC

Sooner you guys realize that the feminist pandering media will slander you incessantly for chump change the better.

>>321646 (OP)

Funny, she's doing all this shit and Bernie just keeps burning her down.

>B-But, my time is now, America-kun

Your time is up.

>>321933

Britcigarette here:

What sort of things has Trump done that make him a misogynist?

Ive heard the term thrown around a few times regarding trump.

But obviously knowing about GG I understand that most of the time muh soginy is used inappropriately to deflect criticism and avoid discourse.

I saw that celebrity apprentice thing and he (like most men) seemed to be a little softer on the women than the men.

BERNIE PROMISES TO SPILLED SPAGHETTI IN EVERY HOUSEHOLD (elected or not)

>>322022

Near as I can tell - despite some overlap - MGTOW, the MRM, and PUAs all address the issue that society is broken, and they generally see eye to eye that one of the problems is rampant feminist legislation (often poorly thought out - primary caregiver, no-fault divorce, child support bypassing alimony law - none are terrible ideas on their own, but when you combine all three the system's exploitable as hell) enabled by traditional conservative white-knighting. The differences show up when you realize the MRM wants to 'fix' the system, or at least reform it into something less broken, the PUAs want to exploit the broken system to swim in cut-rate pussy, and MGTOW are disenfranchised enough to shrug and walk away because they view neither goal as worth the effort.

So when you say "the MRA is tainted by the MGTOW types," I don't know what the FUCK you're talking about.

Quintuply so since you end up at MGTOW yourself, grabbing your own little piece of the world however you can.

P.S. Don't call it "the MRA." It's a singular title and you shouldn't use those when dealing with groups.

"The MRA spreads hate."

"The Jew spreads hate."

It's a sign of collectivist thinking, which is, historically, fucking poisonous. The collective noun is "the men's rights movement," or MRM for short.

>>322280

>they try SO hard to label him

He has himself come down in favour of torture - worse than what we do now - going after the families of soldiers engaging in asymmetrical warfare with a monolithic global superpower, and censoring the internet.

I wouldn't trust the man to run a hot dog cart.

>>323648

>>323643

>They will throw down arms so fast after that.

Are you fucking high? No amount of brutality on the part of an invading power has resulted in pacification, not from more than a damned continent away.

Learn some goddamn history, faggot, or some basic fucking psychology.

Cut the military budget, repurpose it to oil alternatives, and GET THE FUCK OUT. We have one thing we want in the entire shithole sandbox, and we STILL do not have it because we're playing patsy for the people who do.

Alternatively, sieze the fucking oilfields, set up a DMZ wide enough that you can't just ignite the oilfields with small arms fire, and tell all of the natives to fuck right off.

Options A and B are semi-viable. Option C has so far given us forty years of increasing hostilities and bloodshed, including on our own soil. "Moar torture" is literally failing to learn from the last forty years of our involvement, it's practically institutional retardation.

>ISIS would lose morale so fucking fast

>We have telegraphed every attack on them. They know their families are safe.

ISIS would gain manpower and FUNDING so fucking fast. They get it from us hitting their civilians accidentally with Hellfire missiles, What the fuck do you think some torture vid's going to do when you put it next to their children covered in napalm? No one's gonna give a shit, apart from it being more cemented in their minds that ISIS is fighting a holy cause against a great evil.

And since you seem a bit slow, I'll explain that under the Geneva conventions, incendiaries against civilians or in civilian areas are war crimes, specifically because of the propensity for and unpredictability of collateral damage. I'll also remind you that Obama's launched them into (at last count, could be more by now) seven separate predominantly-muslim nations in the Middle East, most of which WE ARE NOT AT WAR WITH.

And you fuckers wonder why something like ISIS got started.

>>323654

>Are you fucking high? No amount of brutality on the part of an invading power has resulted in pacification, not from more than a damned continent away.

The Americans nuked the Japs and they became kawaii.

>>323661

It was also a war that didn't start with us invading Japan, chuckles.