/fur/ - Furry★

On that site 3% on the right-most portion of the bell curve are competent roleplayers. The majority of the user base struggles with using English language. Things are more grim if kink compatibility comes into consideration.

Even still, the sheer volume of transient users provides a long hunt for decent player that, when successful, leads to interactive text-based porn.

Could have sworn there was an F-list general at one point, not sure what happened to it. Would like to see another thread for it.

It's alright if you find one of the 3% that can actually roleplay like >>74440 mentioned

All the competent roleplayers were banned a long time ago because they refused to put up with the influx of human and self-proclaimed "nigger" profiles.

Never trust "switch" descriptors. Thirsty subs.

>>74662

Nigger profile?

Thank God I only do fur on furs.

>>74666

Maybe it's actually just that you're the kind of person they automatically submit to owo

>>74668

Most, if not all, sex is all about the sub. It's just the way it works. The sub (whether a man or woman) is the sexual object, the more attractive partner, the one receiving more pleasure. H-manga takes this to its logical extreme by often making the doms of a sex-scene faceless ugly men. Their only role is as living dildos for the sub to feel good and to contrast with the sub's beauty. The way furry art usually does this is making the dom some idealized smug-faced jock who doesn't even appear to be enjoying his orgasm.

>>74475

It dropped off because the room is essentially dead. Usually in the low-teens of idlers. Not much point in bringing it back as the /fur/ user-base is all but tapped out, and everyone uses Discord anyway.

>>74668

>it's the attention isn't it?

My dominants get far more attention than my subs. The ratio seems very skewed such that dominants should have their pick, but that could just be for my kinks.

>>74731

>>74668

I don't think it's attention; it seems more like laziness. 90% of F-list subs just lie there and groan every so often. Granted, there are some dud doms out there, but it doesn't seem as prolific as the submissive portion of the population.

F-List/F-Chat really is a cancerous place, IMO.

>>74440

It’s not *that bad*. A pretty high percentage of accounts I actually end up rping with write at least 2-5 lines. If anything, the problems is people expecting me to write 3 paragraphs per message while jerking off that are the problem. Tho finding new partners can be a bit time consuming and the advertising system is completely useless. Maybe I’m just better at screening out bad profiles or some shit.

>>77340

I'll concede that the numbers are likely better, but post length isn't what I'm whining about.

People post 2-5 lines all the time. However, there's a nice laundry list of pet peeves I'm sure others share.

- High school drop-out grammar

- Restating the partner's post without purpose

- Vocab repeats (everything is done softly or gently)

- Phrasing is likewise simple and repetitive

- Character has no consistent personality or no pronounced psychology

- They use the word "cunny" or "cummies"

I haven't text roleplayed since finishing high school. I don't think many mentally matured adults do. Most rpers are tweens. This isn't English class or a job e-mail. There's not much incentive for people to put anything more than the bare minimum for a quick fap.

ERP was better during the Furcadia years when we still used the Rabbit Hole for kinks, personal opinion.

>>77340

>A pretty high percentage of accounts I actually end up rping with write at least 2-5 lines

That is because that is what the average fucker on F-List does, its not hard and pretty mediocre.

>the problems is people expecting me to write 3 paragraphs

That is the top end of F-List users and where shit is actually good

>>77380

Nigger I don’t go on f-list to display my writing skills and creativity. Your brain doesn’t work well when you’re fapping and I don’t like waiting 10 minutes for responses anyways.