>>74438
>>74438
So you’re saying that cuntboys aren’t actually female. And going outside of the realm of fiction where you can just have XY folk with vaginas for whatever reason, note Alpha-5 Reductase Deficiency, and guess what males (with XY chromosomes) with it tend to have between their legs.
>>74444
Oh come on, now you actually are just very plainly saying that cuntboys aren't actually females. Where's your ideological consistency?