[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 4rider / bmn / chaos / dewevil / lds / nariz / sei / sonyeon ][Options][ watchlist ]

/fur/ - Furry

all fur one and one fur all
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

►►► Get Whitelisted | Rules | Catalog | Log ◄◄◄

| Find & Share | Art | Edit | Literature | Porn |

[–]

 No.73663>>73669 >>73844 >>73846 >>73848 >>73941 >>73965 >>73979 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

Question:

How do you react when furrys sexualize a furry-like character from a anime/video game/ect.

 No.73669

File (hide): 80aa4595b5a2520⋯.png (492.74 KB, 1500x1500, 1:1, 1525722068677.png) (h) (u)

>>73663 (OP)

>furrys

>a anime

>retarded question


 No.73674>>73687

File (hide): 5d4d3861c1f21ca⋯.jpg (70.66 KB, 253x750, 253:750, 1464319545189.jpg) (h) (u)


 No.73676>>73844

I'm probably in the minority but I wholeheartedly dislike it. I'd rather see artists drawing new characters that reflect their own imagination than reproducing something from a video game or TV show. It's also capitalism taken to an absurd degree. "You've watched the movie. You've bought the merchandise. Now let our franchise enter your sexual fantasies as well."

It's also loosely a kind of cuckoldry, but mental in nature. The artist has their own original ideas they could be creating but instead they're being voluntarily "cuckolded" by the company that created the show/game into creating free pornographic advertisement for them. This is especially true of artists whose career is disproportionately committed to a certain franchise, like MLP or Pokémon. It's gross to me seeing people whose fursonas are modified versions of characters from such shows. Like, you can choose absolutely anything your mind can imagine to personify yourself as... and you opt to choose a pre-existing character from a TV show, modify it slightly, and say that's you? Come on, dude. That's no different than drawing art someone else's fursona and claiming it's you because the hairstyle is different. /rant


 No.73687

>>73674

only post the thread needed


 No.73844>>73965

File (hide): 5220da30356a641⋯.jpg (120.79 KB, 1200x986, 600:493, CrdqrnkXgAEYyH8.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 4e76040cf4f42d2⋯.gif (1.61 MB, 500x278, 250:139, source.gif) (h) (u)

File (hide): cba146ea6ed8f3e⋯.jpg (29.43 KB, 369x369, 1:1, tI033bj-_400x400.jpg) (h) (u)

>>73663 (OP)

Morgana is my favorite character from Persona 5. I was legitimately worried when the game ended if he was going to completely disappear and was really happy when he came back. Normally I somewhat dislike when furries sexualize characters but Morgana has mostly been saved from this, I haven't seen that much porn of him compared to some of the other furry characters. Probably because of his diminutive chibi stature.

For me it depends on how the character is portrayed. Like if the character is supposed to be strong willed and demure and they're portrayed like a slut I dislike it more.

>>73676

I don't think pornography of their characters counts as advertisement. They generally really dislike getting that sort of negative attention.

I do agree that I think furries are too obsessed with popular culture characters and should focus on making their own but a recurring theme with furry artists is despite being artists they tend to be really uncreative and just copy what they see instead of trying to create something better. To the point where I don't even find it surprising when a furry artist admits to me that he's incapable of drawing things that aren't pokemon and can't draw people.


 No.73846

>>73663 (OP)

What a shitty question. First: That's what I do and Second: That's why we are here.


 No.73848>>73960

>>73663 (OP)

That's the only thing I do.

Established characters >>> snowflake neon OCs


 No.73889

How do I react? I'm the one doing it boyyyy.


 No.73941

>>73663 (OP)

Aroused


 No.73960>>73981

>>73848

One million times this.

Characters from video games or anime always have better designs than any OC out there, and the good OCs always take something from established characters for themselves, like their species, clothing, or the concept behind their design.


 No.73964

File (hide): db7e8f349437c32⋯.jpg (115.9 KB, 503x576, 503:576, latest.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 0c49a63cdb89ef8⋯.png (47.73 KB, 383x459, 383:459, latest.png) (h) (u)

Shamfur enough dispray?


 No.73965>>73968

File (hide): cfb87a167f27d11⋯.png (61.5 KB, 1093x1346, 1093:1346, cfb87a167f27d11a1e82833f1c….png) (h) (u)

File (hide): d5f371cb5d65d24⋯.png (1.27 MB, 1609x3000, 1609:3000, d5f371cb5d65d24bfde01e1741….png) (h) (u)

File (hide): 275cb2a991dfc08⋯.png (1.82 MB, 1319x2000, 1319:2000, 275cb2a991dfc08407dc81cf78….png) (h) (u)

>>73663 (OP)

>>73844

i want to fuck it


 No.73968

>>73965

where's the barbs


 No.73971

Eh, kinda impartial to it. At this point, I've seen so much sexualization of Sonic, Starfox and Pokemon, I'm kind of desensitized to everything else of the like.


 No.73979

File (hide): 9ceb02ece79ae80⋯.png (105.34 KB, 331x286, 331:286, What are you waiting for.png) (h) (u)

>>73663 (OP)

Depends on the franchise.


 No.73981

>>73960

You're ascribing some kind of magic to established characters, as if their creation was a divine happenstance instead of just normal people drawing shit. It's stupid. Why would you think it's somehow impossible for any new creation to be as good or better than established ones? You think those characters were drawn by special people? Who went to special schools to learn how to create characters...? Goddam are you a moron.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
16 replies | 7 images | Page ???
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 4rider / bmn / chaos / dewevil / lds / nariz / sei / sonyeon ][ watchlist ]