/fur/ - Furry★

Harp Seals are cute but I can't find any good art featuring them.

I know people are gonna start posting rhinos or anteaters or other uncouth choices eventually, but in regards to naturally cute animals, it's bonkers how there are so few people with Marten characters. They're practically fox ferrets, you'd think they'd be far more popular than they are.

>>68311

Seals are very nice, definitely need more. This is the only seal character I know of (shame the owner is sjw trash)

Would love to see more koalas, anteaters too. Tapirs could make great designs

>tfw no decent Axolotls or Tonberries

I know Red Pandas are somewhat well know to furries, but for some reason I can't seem to find good art of them. They're always draw with human proportions instead of how their bodies are actually shaped. Same goes for Otters.

Alpine Ibexes are nice looking too, but they're pretty much just fancy goats.

>>68413

My man, Mustelidae in general are all underappreciated, well, except for maybe otters, I think those are a little more popular than martens or ermine, at least. Do you have a marten character by chance?

>>68455

Do you mean feral-like in design, or just having an anthro's limbs/facial structure proportional to a red panda's?

>>68462

>Do you have a marten character by chance?

Naw, I've never been able to connect with mustelid characters after owning a ferret myself. They just hit too close to home, for whatever reason. I miss the lil fucker.

(pictured is not mine)

>>68462

>Do you mean feral-like in design, or just having an anthro's limbs/facial structure proportional to a red panda's?

Like cartoon or zootopia proportions where it matches the actual anatomy of the animal. I wouldn't say feral, but close to that, like the actual animal just upright and with hands or human-like hands. Something about human proportions on something obviously more animal feels off, I wish artists would draw characters more like the animal they're based off.

>>68583

This a metric ton.

But, more than this, I wish artists'd draw them with some proper variance in size.

It's so rare to have some good size-difference type stuff that isn't full on macro/micro.

Madagascar probably fucked me up for life.

Not many musk deer (only 25 pics on e621, although as a newfag idk how valid that is as a judge). The actual fangs are kinda gnarly, but I could see it being some teenage tumblrina’s trigendered mess of a fursona.

Also not nearly enough kooikerhondjes, which is kinda understandable considering they look generic.

>>68758

>musk deer

>not pudu

>>68729

That's something I've always disliked about certain artists or parts of the fandom. It kinda works for dogs or animals with similar proportions, but for really stubby animals, it's absolutely irksome.

>>69155

Everything outside of sharks tends to look weird