/fur/ - Furry★

>>50559 (OP)

>Personally I think it would be birds/anything that can fly, really

If furry characters can use tools then no, they wouldn't.

>they procreate pretty quickly

Not as fast as rabbits

More than likely the strongest and hardiest like Rhinos or lizards would take over.

Whichever was the smartest/handiest. Boring but correct answer.

So probably parrots and crows will rule the skies, rats, dogs, elephants (and apes if you include them) will rule the land and dolphins and octopi will rule the waves.

>>50559 (OP)

Mammals = Whites

Birds = Asians

Scalies = Blacks

>world with only anthropomorphic animals

>no human minority

shit taste, OP

>>50570

>tfw you will never be bullied for being a dirty humie

why live

You'd need a dynamic of physical ability and social ability. IE: Solitary Tigers don't play well together, so while they might end up being legitimately stronger than others they would probably be pretty rare.

As such, I think the distinction comes down to three possibilities. Wolves or other breed of canine, Lions, or Elephants. Proper amount of physical power and social cohesion to actually advance as a society.

No animal is strong or smart on its own; the most powerful race would therefore be the one that can form the largest social networks as well as being top predators. So probably wolves or lions.

Unless this world allows for human-sized anthro insects, in which case ants take over the fucking planet.

Inb4 the most powerful is obviously coonfoxes.

>>50561

>More than likely the strongest and hardiest () would take over

History has shown this to be untrue.

It is always the most mobile force that dominates.

the one that ends up with opposable thumbs on their hands

>>50574

>>50570

>wanting ewwwwwwmans/to be one in your furry world

owo y tho?

>>50609

>lions

>social networks

lol wut. The foundation of Lions' social structure is collecting bitches and murdering the kids of other male lions. So they'd be Niggers at best.

I like the Bird suggestion-- being able to observe and do the death-from-above is a significant advantage when your species gets into a population boom and wants all the resources for themselves, murdering off all the competitors, like Homo Sapiens did.

>>50609

Agreeing with the ants thing, they already have thier own society and very dedicated workers. Ants would work very well in jobs that require large amounts of team work and communication, and I can see wolves being very desirable in the work place too due to the pack stereotype

>>50563

I'd like to think in an anthro society birds wings would be become redundant. I'm sure most of them would get lazy as society develops motor transport and plans and wing size would decrease into a more human sized arm, maybe go a gryphon type root in terms of developing hands with wing plumage up the arm

>>50620

Because humans are SUPERIOR!

>>50609

I don't know. They obviously could become more intelligent with larger brains but ant social order as it is is dictated mostly by instinct and cues from others and doesn't provide a very good base for the evolution of proper intelligence. Physically, most of the advantages insects have - disproportionate lifting ability, of course, but also things like being able to walk up walls, (sometimes) fly, and most importantly reproduce in massive numbers - would disappear if they were on the same order of size as humans.

>>50674

You could say the same thing about birds and their ability to fly. A back-of-the-hand calculation says that a bird the weight of an average human would need wings the size of a school bus to be able to lift itself.

>>50686

Dragon aren't real, nerd

>>50559 (OP)

Foxes

Humans, because most the time, everything else still's got some major disadvantages overall.

>>50690

Neither are anthros.

I'd think different animals would reign supreme in different regions depending on the geography. Around lakes/rivers, I could see Otters thriving. In Mountains, maybe Goats due to how well they can climb. I feel bigger animals would actually be a minority, due to the amount of food they'd need to intake as a whole. Reptiles would obviously be lacking too, seeing as they have the whole cold-blooded thing going for them.

>>50687

anthropomorphic animals doesn't exist, nerd.

>>50686

If you use this kinda logic then shapeshifting OP ass Roleplay characters are obviously the most dominant.

inb4 cthulu sonas

If you include fantasy creatures like Dragons you gotta include made up fake ass parasites, gods, demons and whatnot and dragons honestly aint shit compared to those.

>>50741

This is true. There are plenty of OCs that are essentially all-powerful gods that are written to be the best at everything and completely unbeatable by any means. >>32308 comes to mind.

>>50764

Not furry-related, but as a kid I drew a huge comic series (back then I was fast as drawing, because it looked way shittier) and I keep making notes how to remake all the stuff 15 years later, make the characters 3-dimensional and the story serious. Also, removing all stuff I downright stole from anime I was watching back then.

It's actually funny to read how it changed when I hit puberty, suddenly female characters appearing and all being that shy anime girl stereotype, everyone becoming super edgy DBZ fighters etc.

And now the largest struggle I have is remaking the villain from the later comics during my edgy phase, because he's got all problems you can imagine:

>self-insert evil version of the self-insert main character

>comes from unknown dimension, aware of being in a comic, screwing up the story and characters for his own benefits

>he switches all character personalities, everything basically ended up as a slashfic

>kills all characters, just to revive everything and repeats the process over and over, while one character escapes through time and has knowledge of it all

>creates anything out of nowhere

>at one point gets frustrated because his life is based on however he wants it to be, so everything is a lie

>turns his own life into a harem anime, basically, because he doesn't manage to steal the main character's GF

>has the ability to do ANYTHING with a magic pen, which later turns out to be the source of that ability, so it gets destroyed and he can't get stronger from that point on, basically gets defeated because the main characters train to get stronger than him

It was fun to draw at that point because I was able to add any shit I wanted and that helped me to learn to improve.

But nowadays, that guy is completely idiotic and a Sonic fandom level power fantasy (and that's why I hate the fandom, because I know exactly why they create such characters, to cope with their shitty lives they fail at).

So I try to find a way to not only give him a reason for his existence (already found one), but also a way to add limits to his power.

And it's kinda hard to give a character limits while still adding the ability to create objects from nothing, giving him mind-control for his army of slaves and stuff like that.

The solution I came up with is introducing abilities during the whole story with other characters including the limitations and then it turns out he's seen them all and managed to learn them all.

>>50741

>shapeshifting sonas

I was so pissed off when I ended up in an online/ RP relationship on Second Life (yeah I know) once and developed a massive crush on the character, but then it turned out she kept changing her look completely all the time, most likely for other guys.

That was a crushing feeling because you tried to make it real in your head, but it was just a pixelated puppet you can attach stuff to.

It was just like the holo wife from Bladerunner.

>>50766

>comes from unknown dimension, aware of being in a comic, screwing up the story and characters for his own benefits

So Deadpool.

>he switches all character personalities, everything basically ended up as a slashfic

So like Ranma 1/2.

>kills all characters, just to revive everything and repeats the process over and over, while one character escapes through time and has knowledge of it all

So Pucci from JoJo.

>has the ability to do ANYTHING with a magic pen, which later turns out to be the source of that ability

So Death Note... kinda.

Anyway, as for limiting powers, you simply have to not use stupid-crazy abilities in the first place. Or retcon in that they weren't as powerful as the guy first thought. Like Dr. Manhattan; you'd think a guy who is totally immortal and can see all of time simultaneously would be impossible to outmaneuver or beat. But he can't see anything related to himself, and later on a flood of tachyons were released to cloud his vision of the future. Turns out that outsmarting him wasn't actually that difficult.

Having abilities come from a source that can be destroyed or blocked is a good solution one I used with my coonfox OC. Mind-control probably wouldn't work on like robots or maybe some kinds of aliens with weird brains. Being able to create matter from nowhere only works if there is an external energy source (e=mc^2); trap him somewhere that energy can't reach, and he's useless.

>>50776

Fun fact, I neither knew Deadpool and Jojo and Death Note didn't exist and this point.

I copied most stuff from Digimon though, especially the villain from the first 02 season, which the guy was basically based on.

And now I'm kinda pissed because ideas I had keep appearing and when I draw them now, nobody will believe that I came up with them on my own.

E.g. the way the character breaks the fourth wall is much like Deadpool. The way he discusses how he can't die because he's a main character has recently been done in Gwenpool.

Many characters in my comic had abilities similar to what happens in One Piece later (e.g Trafalgar Law) or similar to Sharingan abilities.

But to be fair, nowadays you can't really be original anymore, everything has been there.

>>50776

My idea is that he's got limits. He's full of himself and doesn't have a plan, he just sees the world as a huge playground that he wants to rule.

To basically he doesn't train after defeating the good guys and doesn't realize that meanwhile, they get stronger and learned to counter his attacks from the first battle.

>>50796

>And now I'm kinda pissed because ideas I had keep appearing and when I draw them now, nobody will believe that I came up with them on my own

I've had that happen a few times. One of my novels is set "twenty minutes into the future", with a lot of speculative technologies, and every once in a while I see that something I came up with has actually been developed. The longer I drag my feet with getting it published, the less it seems predictive and the more it seems derivative.

If ever I come up with an idea, and it later showed up in, say Naruto, though... that was a sure sign that I needed to step back and rethink what I was doing. At that point, it would have become completely obvious that the idea just sucked balls in the first place.

>>50574

GOD iktf

>>50816

Exactly, I made up new stuff too at that point. The character's abilities where very inconsistent anyway.

>>50564

Wouldn't an anthro ape just be a human with softer body hair?

>>51750

An ape that is perfectly bipedal, or just a really ugly hairy human.

>>51769

Speed is largely a matter of weight-reduction. Contrast a cheetah with a lion.

Also, learn how to properly use your commas, big guy.

>>51854

>not separating your phrases with commas

Not only are you dull, to the ways of fitness, but you are illiterate, as well.

>>51854

Imagine a cheetah, but taller though. I think It's a tallness thing, not a weight thing. Compare the roadrunner to Wile E Coyote.

wolven master race because fuck you

perfect combo of intelligence, power, social ability, sexy floofy tails

>>51919

You have no idea what you're talking about. Commas aren't used for separating phrases; they are used for separating clauses. It's a completely different concept.

>>51919

This physically hurts to read

>>52129

Don't you try to pull that American crap, on me. You fools haven't learned a thing.

>>52132

Physically, to me, this hurts, to read.

>>52143

Okay, buddy. You are, clearly, the superior, user of, commas, so I will, acquiesce to, your, infinite, gram, matical, wis, dom, d, u, d, e.

Extra commas: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.

>>52180

You're still doing it wrong, knave.

>>54937

>horses not removed

pleb

also birds could have a huge benefit to the military and overall surveillance, as well as being contributing members of society

cows/pigs could serve as food for the carnivores

>>50559 (OP)

Depends on how far technology has advanced. Earlier on, something decently large, socially minded, intelligent, cooperative, and by those standards likely a carnivore would be at the top. Wolves, wild dogs, lions, hyenas (who contrary to popular belief are perfectly capable hunters) would have the distinct advantage of building societies and hierarchies. The only archetypes I can think of from the herbivores are elephants and wild bovines like water buffalo and cape buffalo.

As technology advances, size would have a reverse effect. With modern technology, very little would compare with a rat. Small, efficient, intelligent, can cooperate with its own kind very well, curious, can reproduce very quickly, can live in squalor with little impact, perfect for the modern world. A house and food for a single rat who works a desk job is barely any expense. An elephant working the same job takes a massive amount of resources. Even assuming that their relative sizes are dragged toward a human median mass, they would still be extremely disproportional. If paid the same, there would be no winning for large animals as the rodents drive down wages. Rats would eventually outstrip their larger competitors in white collar jobs, population, and eventually government.

>>55082

Like mexican jews.

>>50776

magic pen thing sounds more like the neet artist in Inuyasha, the chick from inkheart, or the artist thing from Kirby.

Also lol, DBZ, edgy... Funny that you mentioned Ranma, but apparently forgot about the Mermaid's Scar ad on it. Rumiko used to be edgy as fuck before dog boy hit it big.

Also not actually that OP, now Bastard, Certain Scientific Railgun (Accelerator), Locke the Superman, those some OP mofos. Also you kinda already stated how he got beat, plus his weakness.

Those three basically have none. Each for different types of story reasons though.

>>50796

Well, to be fair, I've never seen even the edgiest of the edgelords make anyone similar to this guy: https://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Petar%20Brzica&item_type=topic

>>55030

Why would Agent 47 be a cat? He would be a lab rat.

Niggers

Lmao who am I kidding they would still be slaves to the other primates

>>50559 (OP)

Probably the ones with the abstracted, idealised forms that shift to suit their whims and conveniences.

>>50565

thinking emoji

Honey Badgers

>immunity to poison

>super aggressive

>very strong

>bullies jackals, cobras, lions

>doesn't afraid of anything

Niggers

Gorillas would rule Africa with an iron fist if they were human level intelligent.

>strong as fuck could tear most things apart with bare hands (paws?)

>can use feet as hands

>could dual wield weapons while still effectively having two spare hands

>could wield much larger weapons that shoot much larger boolits

I'm now imagining gorilla warlords fighting a guerrilla gorilla war against each other, and they all dress in bizarre shit like Africans do because of the magic protection superstition.

Opossums, maybe?

Resistant to poison/can eat lots of different stuff, climb trees, able to adapt to lots of environments, prolific breeders...

Assuming anthropomorphism allows them to keep these traits, AND that they don't get purged, they'd simply outbreed everyone.

>>63749

but their dicks are small so humans would cuck them with their giant black human dicks

>>63749

>can use feet as hands

Barely. It's more to say they have such poor hand dexterity that their hands function like feet.

>could dual wield weapons while still effectively having two spare hands

And move how? Scooting around on their ass? Don't be absurd.

>could wield much larger weapons that shoot much larger boolits

Irrelevant. Small bullets kill just as easily as big ones; the only advantage to bigger ones is for greater range. If you could equip every soldier with a minigun it would make no difference because most bullets don't hit anything, being used for cover fire. If you want a "big gun" to take out a hardened or entrenched target, you call in an artillery strike or airstrike. Only people who have no idea how warfare works thing it comes down to the size of the soldier's personal weapons.