/erp/ - Erotic Roleplay★

>>96108 (OP)

If you ever get around to running this game, I'm in. Maybe then I can finally fulfill my fantasy of being the party's designated stress-relief cocksleeve.

Sounds interesting, but did you have a setting in mind?

Yeah i would be interested in this to. More of a Dom myself.

>>96110

>being the party's designated stress-relief cocksleeve

That's pretty much the attitude I'd be looking for in a sub player, but like I said before I think it'll be harder for me to find doms than subs. There would probably be more competition for the "right" to be the party's fucktoy. But, that's still speculation on my part.

>>96112

Not just yet. If I do end up running it as a Pathfinder game, I'll probably use Golarion because it's a setting I'm very familiar with. There's a decent chance I'd end up making a custom setting too, and in that case I'd probably do some general worldbuilding and then only fill in finer details as we go along. It'd be the sort of cooperative world building where a nation could be added just because it's part of the backstory for a PC. That doesn't necessarily lead to a very clean and well-developed setting, but on the other hand it should be remembered that the game is just there to be a vehicle for the ERP.

Though, if you're just asking about genre, I'm leaning towards a high fantasy sort of setting with a sexual bent. Monsters are more interested in raping/breeding than killing, treasures and magic may frequently be sexual in nature, armor comes in the most bikini-like of varieties, and the general attitude regarding sex is pretty relaxed.

Question. what sort of encounters do you maybe have in mind for this mainly Dom party?

>>96108 (OP)

How would this be played? Would you schedule revisit sessions of play by post like most games on the board?

Depending on the answer, I might be another interested party. Personally I have experience playing doms and subs, so I'd likely play whatever is needed.

>>96116

I don't want sessions to be bogged down with long combat encounters, which is part of why I'm hesitant to use Pathfinder, as it's a very combat-focused system. I'd prefer something where combat is handled in a more free-form and open-ended manner, something with a faster pace.

In pretty much all cases, the party would be able to fuck their way out of a fight. You could fuck the guards into submission, or throw your subby sluts at the beasts as a distraction. Actually killing your enemies would probably be the party's last resort, so you can expect that actually fighting enemies will be dangerous.

Approach the game with a (non-literal) "My dick is my sword" mentality.

If you want specific examples of the kinds of creatures you could be fighting and/or fucking… Beastmen, orcs, tentacle monsters, sex demons, elemental creatures, animals of various sorts, dragons, civilized or not-so-civilized humans, and- of course- some monstergirls.

Does any of this address your question at all?

>>96122

Most likely the game would be played on Roll20 with regularly scheduled weekly sessions. I'm open to the idea of a play-by-post game, but my understanding of things is that most play-by-post games move very slowly and usually fall apart as everyone ends up waiting on someone to post for days. If the potential players greatly prefer the idea of a play-by-post game with a leisurely "post whenever you feel like" pace, I'd do that, but otherwise I'd end up doing regular sessions on Roll20.

I suppose there's a third option in the form of play-by-post with regularly scheduled post times, but… Do people really do that?

Answers my questions mostly. Hmm i'd opt for more free form, simply because I'm kinda unfamilar with pathfinder. I mean im open to learn but just never got to it.

>>96126

I don't think Pathfinder is particularly complicated, but I say that as a a person who has played it for years. To a new player, it can be pretty intimidating.

It's also distinctly combat focused, and since I don't want a game that is especially combat focused (or at least which doesn't practically require combat to resolve encounters), Pathfinder is probably a poor choice. The only reason I'd really be using it is because of my own familiarity with the system, but the more I talk about this the more I feel like making a very rules-light system of my own would be the best way to go.

>>96125

I'd prefer not to play in Pathfinder, in my experience it gets bogged down by too many rules, and if you allow non-core stuff it gets REALLY stupid REALLY fast.

As for the medium of play, I can see your point about not wanting to play by post. I'd really have to think about times before committing to interest, and even then I'm not so sure since I'm super shy about voice chat with strangers, especially when it comes to erp

Well even if on R20 you can use just the text options.

>>96128

I share the same sort of shyness, so the game will be text-based even if it's not play-by-post. If you're not familiar with how Roll20 works, it's basically a chatroom with a grid-based map the DM can draw and create tokens on.

I don't have a particular time in mind at the moment for when the game's scheduled sessions would be or how long they'd last. My own availability is fairly straightforward: Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays are not an option. Pretty much any time on any other day works for me. I'll be hammering out a specific schedule as I select players.

Hmm I'm really interested in playing. World building as well. I'm up to talk and maybe help out with ironing out the world even if i don't end up getting time to play.

huh weird says like half the replies vanished.

oh now of course as soon as i post they all come back… thanks 8chan

OP should start namefagging in this thread.

Maybe you should query /tg/ about rules systems. But first, figure out what purpose you have for including a system, as opposed to going 100% pure RP.

Maybe take notes/ideas from this here?

>>62780

>>96130

Well, that kinda kills my ability to participate. Would still love to see you guys all play though if you post logs or something!

>>96135

>OP should start namefagging

Yeah, I shoulda started a while ago. It's done now, though.

>figure out what purpose you have for including a system

It's two-fold, really.

One reason is because I enjoy the element of chance that dice introduce to things. I don't want a complicated system that will pull attention away from the ERP, but it's fun to be able to roll dice to see if you succeed at difficult tasks. Plus, having some amount of stats that describe characters helps really differentiate them. Bob's backstory says he's a mechanic and you can tell that he's good at working with mechanical things 'cause his bonus on rolls for that kind of stuff is higher than everyone else's.

The second reason is because I explicitly want one or two PCs (the subs) to be less useful to the rest of the party. They're playing the part of characters that are just there for the sexual use of the real heroes, the party's community whore. That disparity could be played out in a 100% RP game, but I feel like it will have more impact when there's something actually enforcing that disparity (lower stats for the subs, for example) than when it only exists because we agree it does.

This is at least as much about playing out the fantasy of being the slut of a gaming group/having a slut in your gaming group as it is about actually playing the game. I know there are some subby anons out there that will squirm in their seat knowing they and their characters are only kept around because they get the rest of the group off.

This sounds awesome! I have a DM posted on this board that I'll share again, not to steal your thunder, but to try and maybe help you pick a system, or even homebrew your own. Would we be playing on the board, on F-list, or somewhere else?

I'd love to be a player for a change too, in case that wasn't clear

https://www.f-list.net/c/inventive%20gm/

I won't be participating in your game, but you should definitely check out Dungeon World as an alternative to Pathfinder.

It has an incredibly lightweight core ruleset and is built around creating quick, dynamic stories by forcing the game forward through failed rolls (which it's biased towards), mechanical rewards for pushing the plot forward, and classes/abilities which basically force a strong personality on the players (and in some cases even force plot to happen).

Gameplay itself moves very quickly, and unlike Pathfinder, is built on rolls/cooperation between GM and players to create the story. The GM's mostly there to nudge things in the right direction, rather than to craft the entire experience. And since the combat system is based on more of a pass/fail type of system, it's quick and easy to generate encounters on the fly, which is a pain in the ass to do in Pathfinder.

It's a little weak for prolonged stories since it's fairly sparse mechanically, and letting the dice take over some of the story makes it a little tricky to craft larger narratives. But it fixes the min-max heavy, poorly balanced, combat focused, slow paced, linear gameplay that I find annoying in Pathfinder.

Also it takes like 5 minutes to roll a new character once you're familiar with the process, so feel free to kill PCs with impunity.

I'd be interested in playing, but I'm a complete newbie when it comes to dice games. So I guess I'll just watch. Surely, there are a few subs in line wanting to slut it up with everyone already.

I am super interested, but I have very little PnP game experience. Would this disqualify me?

I'm a switch, more geared towards Dom/power neutral stuff.

>>96147

>feel free to kill PCs with impunity.

Kill? Or turn into mindless fuckpuppets for the monsters?

>>96108 (OP)

Oh boy I sure do love lewd tabletops

>>96130

But that time just completely misses me. Oh well.

>>96147

Thanks for the recommendation, I'm checking the system out now.

>>96156

>>96161

Experience with dice games isn't going to be a necessity since I plan to keep things relatively simple in that department and we're mostly going to focus on the ERP.

Well a lack of knowledge and experience could lend itself to the idea of the weaker less competent adventurer cock-slee…I mean tag alongs.

>>96169

Then I might consider it, since I have pretty much the same schedule as you.

>>96161

>power neutral stuff

ew!

>>96110

>Maybe then I can finally fulfill my fantasy of being the party's designated stress-relief cocksleeve.

What kind of cocksleeve would you be? Loving or dutiful? Treated kindly or like a servant?

>>96169

Awesome. Since you can't do Friday-Sunday, my best times are Monday and Wednesday. I'm free anywhere between 10am to 7pm EST.

>>96185

Sometimes a lady just wants a dicking without getting Dr. Freud involved.

>>96147

I've looked over Dungeon World and although I saw some things I liked, I also saw some things I didn't I've opted to just create my own system, but I did borrow some ideas from Dungeon World (namely, Bonds). It didn't take too much work, as this is actually just an expansion on an old system I made a long time ago. I think it's pretty simple, and you can read about it here: http://pastebin.com/WEQ7G1fP

Please let me know if this system seems appealing, confusing, fun, obnoxious, or whatever else. If it turns out nobody likes it, I'll probably drop it in favor of something else.

>>96170

The submissive, less-competent characters will probably be handicapped in some way so that they actually are less-competent. I don't think OOC experience with dice games will play into it much because I want to use a simple and easy to grasp system.

In the case of the system I dropped in a Pastebin and linked earlier in this post, making our subs useless would probably be accomplished either by giving them lower stats and/or adding a level cap for them that the dom party members don't have to deal with.

>>96196

>Sometimes a lady just wants a dicking without getting Dr. Freud involved

But who doesn't want a threesome!?

>>96108 (OP)

http://zerochan.ru/g/res/52.html#i52

I'd definitely be down for this. Also down for being a dom, too who occasionally has the tables turned on them. I'm free any day after 4, assuming nothing else is planned.

>>96206

I like the system you have. Pretty straightforward and fair. Plus I feel like Fetishes and Bonds are a nice touch.

>>96108 (OP)

Would there be more forceful things involved for those who like their characters a little less slutty? I'm an experienced PnP player and would love to see what you're planning, but I'm pretty partial to more of the chaste type with my subs. If you're overburdened with subs, I can absolutely play a dom as well, but I tend towards the other end purely because I have much more of a specific type as a dom than a sub.

>>96220

Yep, that seems about right.

>>96226

Like I said before, I've taken the Bonds bit from Dungeon World, but the Fetish part is my own.

The thing to keep in mind is that falling to Corruption is likely inevitable. It's like with Call of Cthulhu, except that the inevitable end is being mindbroken by pleasure instead of becoming insane from studying the Mythos too much. There's very little way for a character to lose Corruption once they have it, and although I suppose someone could play in such a way as to minimize Corruption gain that'd obviously defeat the point of the whole game so I don't think anyone will.

Considering stacking on fetishes is the shortcut to power but also the highway to faster Corruption gain, character that are really powerful will probably also be at higher risk of rapidly gaining corruption. So even though there's not really a hard level cap, there's a mechanism in place to ensure that high level characters do eventually get taken out. Combined with the fact that low level characters level up faster than high level ones (they need less experience), and I think the system should balance out fine. Well enough, anyway, since it's really all about the lewd stuff anyway.

>>96230

I think you could certainly start off that way. You could make a subby character with a Corruption of 25 or so. They'd be far from a slut and probably could even be a virgin if you want, but as they gain Corruption (and they will) it would represent them giving into temptation and becoming lewder over time. Eventually their Corruption would reach a point where they're really not someone you could call chaste at all anymore, but even at that point I suppose they could maintain a facade of chasteness and purity. It's just a facade that would quickly break down when they are faced with their fetishes and hard dickings.

What's the specific sort of dom you're talking about, out of curiosity?

>>96232

>corruption/mindbreak

Interest instantly dead. Sorry, but I can't stand sluttification. I might still be interested in playing a dom though, depending on what you're gonna be throwing out at the party from that sort of perspective. My dominant characters generally tend to be big, brash, and passionate. And a little rough. Or a lot, sometimes.

Shortly, I'll be creating a skeleton outline/"character sheet" (using the largest air quotes you can imagine) that people can use if they want to try making some characters, and after that I'll start working on stuff for the setting itself.

>>96236

>Sorry, but I can't stand sluttification.

Sorry to hear that, but that's sort of a major theme I'm going for, especially now that I've codified the rules for the game. I don't care for bimbofication, but sluttification (particularly when the character ends up happy to be slutty and the transition happens "naturally" rather than just with drugs, mind control, or the like) is a pretty big thing for me. If someone else were running this game I'd probably already be making a slutty cum dump to apply for the game with.

That aside though, the description of your dom tendancies sounds about right for what I'd be looking for. It sounds like this game wouldn't be to your tastes but otherwise you're welcome to apply.

>>96232

Corruption/Mind break? Fucking my way out of situations? I'm in!

>>96241

How many players do you plan to have? And will you choose them or it's the first one that comes in gets a spot?

Would there be room for occasional visitors to barge in and maybe play a support character or someone not entirely related to the main party? Like, some wandering merchant or stuff like that?

>>96247

I'm looking for either four or maybe five players. I plan to only take one sub if there are four players or two subs if there are five. We'll see how it works out, though. Also, I'll be picking from people that apply rather than just taking first come, first serve. I've posted about this game on both Roll20 (where the game will probably be hosted) and on F-List, so there are more people applying than just the people in this thread.

As for your last question… I dunno. Probably not, but I can't say it's totally impossible.

>>96241

Is there a character creation guide to this?

Also, can we make multiple characters and pick one depending on other folks interest?

>>96249

http://pastebin.com/WEQ7G1fP

Look here for an outline of how the system works and a bit of a walk-through on how to actually make a character.

It'd probably be best if people try to limit how many characters they make so I don't have to sift through too many, but if you're a switch and want to make both a sub character and a dom character, that's fine.

>>96241

Out of curiosity, what's allowed for Race and Sex?

>>96254

Pretty much whatever you want. Neither of them affect anything mechanically, and as far as race goes I don't particularly care whether I end up with a party of four humans or a werewolf, a half-dragon, a minotaur, and an ooze monster. Sex, on the other hand… Well, I'm into sexism and such, and would be perfectly happy with having the sub(s) be female and everyone else be male/shemale/herm. That's far from a requirement in my mind though. It'd just be a happy coincidence for me if it works out that way. The kinks you're into, your time availability, and the character concept in general will matter a lot more.

How do we contact you? Here? On f-list? By email? I'm all over this campaign

>>96256

You can post here in this thread, or if you want to contact me privately you can do so on F-List at https://www.f-list.net/c/Lewd%20Dicethings OR on Roll20 at https://app.roll20.net/users/824784/lisa-d

You'll also find a list of my own kinks of F-List, of course, which can give you an idea of what sort of things you might see in the game, kinkwise.

>>96267

Your attributes are off. The problem is that you've pulled 4 points out of them (1 from STR, 1 from CON, and 2 from WIS). You can only pull a max of 2 points total out of your attributes to put in other attributes.

You also only start knowing half as many spells as your Magic score, even though you can know as many spells as your Magic score.

Otherwise, the character checks out pretty well. Beyond the fetishes your character has, what kind of stuff are you into?

>>96269

STR: 2

DEX: 4

CON: 3

INT: 3

WIS: 2

CHA: 8

Magic: 4

Song of Submission - Places hypnotic suggestions in the target's mind to bend them to his will.

Song of Radiance - Makes someone (usually himself) more beautiful and endowed sexually.

Gotta raise that magic :P Also, I'm more of a sub at heart, but this works out pretty well, since one of my kinks is Role Reversal/shifts in power dynamics, either done to my character or another character. Other than that I'm a huge sucker for facesitting and/or smothering, along with some typical BDSM stuff like latex, bondage, discipline, etc. Although I'm pretty easy with my fetishes; as long as it's well written I can enjoy it.

Name: Akane

Race: Catgirl

Sex: Female, Lesbian

Sub or Dom: Sub

-----

Personality: Akane is very flippant and care-free. She is always cracking jokes and treating her enemies as ones. She's a little overconfident and self centered. She's also a bit of a dirty minded slut.

Backstory: Akane was born to a well known magical girl family. At a young age she was shunned for having abysmal intelligence, and was practically disowned. She spent the rest of her life trying to prove that you could be a magical girl with no magic. She picked up the slack with a highly customized light machine gun, and a bitchin' motorcycle. She adopted a cool, devil may care attitude and went into the monster fighting business. Though she never won her parents respect.

-----

STR:4

DEX:4

CON:5

INT:1

WIS:1

CHA:5

-----

Skills: Firearms Specialist (Knows A LOT about guns), Toned Body (For her relatively small stature she is absolutely ripped. Due to her determination and cardio she can lift carry things that would normally be much more difficult.),

Fetishes: Tentacles, Amazons, Mind Control

Fetish Bonuses: +2 max luck, +1 skills

-----

Corruption: 69

Luck: 2

Magic: 0

>>96267

>>96273

>>96287

I'd like to be able to talk to you privately and do some short, one-on-one ERP with each of you, just to get a feel for your ERP and ask a few questions. Could you three send me a private message at one of the sites mentioned in >>96261?

That special kind of 'being euro' feeling right now, friends

>>96310

Yeah I feelin that too

>>96310

>>96318

Sorry to hear that your time zone makes things difficult. I'm not from Europe but a couple of my favorite ERP partners are, so I've had to deal with how awkward it is to set up lewd stuff from across the ocean.

>>96314

Mechanically, everything on your character looks good. I've sent you a note on F-List to talk about your kinks more, but since you're at work I understand if you can't reply to that until later.

Also, your post reads very well, especially considering you typed it on your phone.

>>96310

>>96318

Same here, wrong timezone and my schedule doesn't match. I'll watch the thread anyway since it's a nice idea.

>>96145 is europoor too, maybe we can get something going?

I play female/herm purely dom characters, but I don't have my hopes up since my hardest no's are rape, death and bad ends in general, which seem to be the ultimate goal of this kind of game. Even if I don't get to play because of my limits you're still at least three, it's worth a try in my opinion.

We could get in touch through Inventive GM to avoid derailing this thread, if they are ok with it.

Huh, surprisingly a lot of doms. (although two of characters posted are more switchy, still, I expected to see more subs)

>>96332

I think everyone expected you to be overflowed with subs, so they thought they'd have a higher chance being picked if they played a dom

Which is funny because it had the opposite effect

It's all fun and games till you openly ask for subs…then it'll probably be a tidal wave of people.

>>96333

>>96335

Well then, it's time to open the flood gates because I officially have all of the doms I need.

If you applied with a dom character and were selected to participate in the game, you have already been privately contacted explaining so. For all the other doms, I'm sorry to disappoint you. However, if a dom player slot becomes available later on and I need to find a new player, I will likely post in this thread (or make a new one if this thread is months old by then) saying as much.

On the other hand, we do not yet have a sub for the party, so I am still recruiting for that role. After discussing things with the players I have selected so far, we have determined that the game will normally be running at 9 PM (EST) on Wednesdays and continuing until everyone in the group is too tired or has cum enough to be satisfied. We're aiming for around 3 or 4 hours per session. The kinks that the current party considers most desirable in a sub are bestiality, watersports, and breeding. If you are interested in playing a sub and can meet these conditions, you might be perfect!

Also, for anyone interested in applying as a sub but who has not yet made a character (or who made a dom but is willing to make a sub to play instead), please remember the following restrictions apply to sub characters: instead of 4 free attribute points you only get 2 free attribute points, and instead of 3 starting skills you only get 1 starting skill.

>>96370

I ended up liking the idea so much I made her on F-list

https://www.f-list.net/c/isiri%20naudihr

>>96360

What a shame, I got here late and would've loved to do this as a dom, good luck with your game OP.