No.125031
Who else is incredibly vanilla, such to the extent that it's very difficult to find people to RP with?
What I want most is to simulate having a girlfriend who loves me. It's pretty faggy and embarrassing, but an ongoing, long-term, cuddly, romantic RP is what I've always wanted the most. But this being incredibly difficult to find, in the past I've mostly just suffered through wading through people on Omegle for hours trying to find girls or, otherwise as long as I try not to consider it, males sufficiently convincing at roleplaying as girls who don't divulge that they aren't girls, to indulge me in my big boobs/breastplay fetishism until they get bored and frustrated and disconnect. On rare occasion they will stay for longer than a few minutes, and on rarer occasion I'll prod them for an email address (they never ask me, of course, when people who claim to be girls have many more easily-gained opportunities) and they'll accept, and I'll talk to them later on until they get sick of me or I get tired and lose motivation, longing for something else.
No.125033
>>125031
>Who else is incredibly vanilla
That'd be me. I just have a single female modern character grounded in realism, and though I'd be open to other settings I don't really want to fuck around with furries or monstergirls or anything (not that I have anything against those who do).
Do you RP on F-List? Post profile maybe?
No.125035
>>125033
I made an F-List account a while ago because I'd heard it was good for long-term relationship roleplaying, but I dropped it in despair, because obviously how was I going to find someone like me on a site dedicated to a conglomeration of outlandish fetishes?
Besides, something about sites like Omegle with the anonymity and fast pace just feels really comfortable and spontaneous and exciting, though I do wish there was such a service dedicated specifically to roleplaying. It feels much more like a disappointing and embarrassing slog making accounts for RP sites and having prompts and characters that you are expected to labor over to make them ideal, and have them constantly up for other people to read, though no one may ever come upon your profile anyway unless you're actively searching for and talking to people, which is taxing on a socially inept loser like me to begin with, not to mention that I'd found it very hard to find users I would be compatible with.
With random sites like Omegle, at least I have a chance, any chance at all. I also just really like the creative aspect of coming up with things on the spot and building off of ideas with your partner, as well as just the romanticism of running into a completely random person, I guess.
No.125036
>>125031
>hear that f-list is good for long term roleplaying and more detailed than omegle and random chat sites
>seems neat give it check
>futa
>furry cock vore
>futa
>planes with tits
>futa
>tentacle slime self rape orgies
>futa
>diapers
I've expanded from normal things but god damn, some things people are into are just fucking weird.
No.125040
>>125036
Stop checking the features users.
No.125041
>>125036
Even futa can be vanilla, r-right?
No.125061
What is sauce on OP image?
No.125066
>>125041
How can you tell that's not a girl schlicking?
Anyway, /r/ing a version of pic without her visible hand, the console and the text.
No.125068
>>125066
Is this good enough?
No.125071
I would say I used to be a bit kinky when I was new to ERPing, but just got bored/stopped being that way. It's not fun to me anymore, so being a vanilla as fuck ERPer is my thing most times.
I've managed to find some friends who don't care, and if they weren't so busy and such would gladly ERP with me. I just think the dom/sub concept is old to me now, along with BDSM in general.
No.125072
>>125068
It's not what I expected, but it's great! Thanks anon.
Shame the bit of hair at the back of her neck doesn't show up so well though.
Is there a term for that expression so I can find more pics like it?
No.125107
No.125115
Yo, I feel your pain. While I do have some odd fetishes, I'm happiest when it's people having fun with steadily shucking clothes, sex coming as maybe.
No.125121
I'm pretty god damn vanilla myself, though I have a couple of really out there kinks that I don't take too seriously. But unlike most people, I've found a couple people who really do like that kinda stuff. Those people are few and far between, but they do exist. Don't be afraid to post your profile and ask around. It'll take a while, but if you're not a complete shitter, people won't mind that sort of stuff from time to time.
No.125158
>>125107
>final chapter isn't on dynasty scans yet
Fuck. Thanks though anon, appreciate it.
No.125220
How vanilla are we talking about? Missionary only with constant eye contact?
No.125227
>>125220
Well, "vanilla" was the easiest way to explain it, but I guess it's more than just being very normal, because I have literally no interest in vaginal intercourse. You can see how this would be frustrating to any actual girl that I would be roleplaying with on Omegle, and of course the girls there also like things that most girls like, like choking and rape and cliche, boring, shitty drama.
No.125259
>>125227
>You can see how this would be frustrating to any actual girl
Implying you're actually writing with women. :^)
Nah I get what you're putting down. Even kinks if over indulged can become stale.
No.125266
>>125259
>Implying you're actually writing with women. :^)
See, you would think so, but there's certain things that women obsess over that men don't really tend to give a shit about. I feel like a lot of dudes wouldn't give a shit if I just kept fixating on boobs or whatever as long as my writing is good, whereas that almost invariably bores the hell out of women. It also makes me feel really bad when the girl I'm roleplaying with offhandedly describes my character as tall, confident, dominant, or handsome.
>Even kinks if over indulged can become stale.
Not for me, I guess, I seriously just don't get sick of the same things. I just wish I had a partner as boring as I am so we could enjoy being comfortably boring together.
No.125267
>>125266
>It also makes me feel really bad when the girl I'm roleplaying with offhandedly describes my character as tall, confident, dominant, or handsome.
Do explain. Can't a tall, confident, handsome, dominant be into cuddly romance? Not all dom sub play is based on 50 Shades of Grey.
>Not for me, I guess, I seriously just don't get sick of the same things.
I guess I don't get what you're putting down. I thought your were tired of dom sub play.
No.125269
>>125267
>Do explain.
It makes me feel like shit when women describe my character like that, because it reminds me what women like, and I'm not like that at all, so no woman would like me for who I am. Every time that's happened it's really taken me out of it, and I can't enjoy the story anymore because I can't stop thinking about it.
>I guess I don't get what you're putting down.
Sorry, I should have explained that what I don't get tired of is the few very vanilla things that I like, where other people I see talking about moving on to different fetishes a lot as if they're collecting them. I just can't relate and other people can't relate. And of course like I said, to add onto that, I'm evolutionary retarded and not into vaginas, which clears out the field of potential partners even more. I really am hopeless.
No.125271
>>125269
I like short, subby guys. Don't worry, seriously. I'd gladly play any of this cute fuckery with you! D'you have a discord or an F-List, I dunno?
No.125275
>>125031
Right here. I have a small roster of characters meant for cute cuddles, comfy stories and gentle romance, but they never really gain any traction. Playing male characters is especially bad, because no one wants you unless you have a gimmick.
I'm pretty lucky that I do have two or three people on F-List that I would describe as being very romantic, but it's difficult to meet with them often due to time constraints and, if I'm being perfectly honest, I don't know if the spark is still there.
No.125278
>>125269
I don't care much about appearance, but I like to play with someone who is dominant enough to tease and play the chase. If I don't get much of a response, I start getting bored.
I'm not a big fan of vaginal either. Because a lot of the time people concentrate on describing the act alone and don't say much out of the usual groans, "this is great" and stuff like that. Nice back and forth teasing is what makes me excited to write my next reply.
No.125281
>>125266
>there's certain things that women obsess over that men don't really tend to give a shit about.
What are some others?
>>125269
>it reminds me what women like, and I'm not like that at all, so no woman would like me for who I am. Every time that's happened it's really taken me out of it, and I can't enjoy the story anymore because I can't stop thinking about it.
I think we all have things that take us out of the RP. Probably all for IRL connected reasons.
No.125283
>>125031
Is anyone else vanilla when it comes to sex and doesn't need it to happen much or even at all, but still has loads of weird fetishes that they want to roleplay in scenes that are sexual but can stop short of sex itself?
This is a bit like >>125269 's not being into vaginas.
No.125291
>>125278
Because a lot of the time people concentrate on describing the act alone and don't say much out of the usual groans, "this is great" and stuff like that.
But couldn't you say that about other sex acts? I mean there's more to sex than penetration, but it is the main event. But as someone who worries about resulting to just groaning and grunting, what advice would you give to a straight blue?
No.125319
>>125291
Not that guy, but personally I like giving a lot of my character's thoughts and feelings as something is occurring, rather than just writing out what can be outwardly seen. This might clash with what your partner wants though if they don't want an omniscient view, and just want to know what their character can perceive, but I would imagine that most people wouldn't mind and would actually prefer the extra detail.
>I mean there's more to sex than penetration, but it is the main event
I can understand this kind of thinking because this is how humans end up reproducing, but it really depresses me when I'm disappointing my partner because they're waiting for the big penetration event and, to me, the cuddling/breast play stuff is the big thing that I'm excited for.
>>125278
Agreement with this post generally, in terms of looking for something outside of just describing the act. I like getting the thoughts and feelings of the other character, too.
>>125271
I wouldn't even call myself submissive, because I'm not into the dominate/submissive thing anyway. I just think it's way too constraining, and I like it when both my partner and I switch back and forth between those roles fluidly, sometimes several times in the same scene, basically without saying concretely "I am being a dom/sub right now." I just meant to say that I'm garbage and I'm aware of it, and theoretically I would probably find it satisfying for a roleplaying partner to tolerate my lack of self-esteem.
No.125320
>>125281
Off the top of my head and outside of those mentioned, guys are perfectly content to do a completely and immediately sex-focused roleplay, where with girls (on Omegle and such, at least) you will frequently see a desire for romance, and then *maybe* sexual things if that stage goes well. The only issue with this is that these prompts are often really shitty, canned teen movie drama plots, and they will often desire that your character be confident or popular or rich or otherwise high in social status, which I've frequently seen rehashed as you being the captain of a sports team, or the heir to some major company or literally a fucking kingdom.
Men just don't usually give a shit about that sort of thing generally, though I personally would highly prefer it when a woman is in the complete opposite role where she makes herself more vulnerable, because it's more charming and easy to relate to and sympathize with, not to mention that it just makes for a more sentimental story, if you're into that. It might just be a reverse of the same coin, but I figure that many other guys enjoy this to an extent as well, maybe not overtly fetishizing it as much as me or as much as women talk about wanting a "strong, confident, popular man", but unconsciously liking it regardless because men have a natural urge to protect their woman. But for me it's not so much a one-sided protecting role so much as finding a partner who is my equal, where we mutually support each other; girls who are shy, modest, nerdy, et cetera, more so than just being very cute to me are very relatable.
This is what I've observed, but it's sort of common sense, anyway.
No.125445
>>125319
>it really depresses me when I'm disappointing my partner because they're waiting for the big penetration event and, to me, the cuddling/breast play stuff is the big thing that I'm excited for.
I feel like this too, except it's submission and weird fetishes that are my big thing, not vanilla play like you.
No.125460
≥like hyper, chubby, weirdish character quirks but despise furries
>otherwise vanilla, sappy as fuck, RP doesn't revolve around kinks, romance and cuddling
>get made fun of because I'm not into zoophilia, prostitution, NTR, BBC, etc etc.
There was like, five people total I got along with kink-wise and I just got banned
No.125491
Who /enjoystheOOCbantermorethentherp/ here?
No.125535
>>125491
I find sharing kinks with someone kills two birds with one stone in terms of making friends. It's nice to knock down those awkward barriers right away and have something to talk about too.
No.125542
>>125460
How'd you end up getting banned?
No.125560
>>125542
The great Curvy Ladies Saltpocalypse of January 19th
It's about as retarded as it sounds, but I can explain it if you want.
No.125568
>>125560
Go on, why not.
Or is it easy enough to guess: Someone in an important clique got mat at someone and ruined it for everyone.
No.125593
>>125568
The complete opposite actually, someone not in the clique complained about shitposting in a private channel, was told to fuck off, got hardcore triggered and two globals ended up banhammering half the channel.
Said shitposting was lambasting a furry rando who took it well and actually fit into the group, while the person complaining/being offended by 'bullying/harassment' was someone who was idling and had never fucking spoken in chat before. Triggered virtue signaller was Kunoichi Asagi, global was Ashe.
No.125599
>>125031
>>125035
>What I want most is to simulate having a girlfriend who loves me.
Omegle is terrible for a lot of reasons, and chances are you'll waste more time with shitty, random partners who don't come close to what you want than you would on f-list.
But as someone who has probably turned down people exactly like you on f-list, let me give you some advice: Work on yourself first. NO ONE wants to play with a simpering sad-sack whose only notable quality is that he's depressed and just wants someone to love him.
You know what people like? Other people. People with interesting qualities and intriguing personalities. People who can hold conversations and who are worthy of their time and focus.
Some of the worst RPs I've had were with generic, bland "handsome dude" characters. Blank profiles. Hub characters. The "I'm into everything!" kind of players. Some of the best were with clearly defined, strong personalities who knew what they liked and how they liked it.
tl;dr - You want cuddling? Grow a personality first.
No.125602
>>125599
>generic, bland "handsome dude" characters. Blank profiles. Hub characters. The "I'm into everything!" kind of players
I think you're projecting really hard, man, because that doesn't describe me at all, but I understand what you're saying. The opposite version of this, the generic "popular girl" character, bores the shit out of me and there's not really any joy in playing with them.
No.125656
>>125602
>because that doesn't describe me at all
Not them, but you're the one who already described yourself as that by being so blandly clingy.
No.125658
>>125656
Take your passive aggressiveness to another thread fam, this isn't the place to be shitting on folks for being lonely and sad.
No.125750
>>125535
Completely off-topic question, but what's the source of that image? Google reverse image search turns up nothing
No.125751
>>125750
Artist is Sprite37, characters are Marx and Cassie. Fair warning, for whatever reason Cassie's designer/owner dislikes any nudity on her part and actively trawls f-list for people using art of her.
No.125779
>>125658
The depths of f-list are harsh upon us all
No.125932
>>125779
You know, there are other sites out there.
And I say that to everyone. Not Omegle, of course (what the fuck) but actually take some time and look the hell around. I know of at least five sites one can ERP on, though one of them technically has rules against it (PMs and don't-ask-don't-tell). But hell, if you find that a community doesn't suit you, it's not like they're the only one to exist, others do. Make a hub profile and use it for other sites and ignore flist otherwise.
No.125984
>>125932
You actually can occassionally land some surprising catches on Omegle, but yeah. There are plenty of other sites.
No.127570
>>125031
Had no idea this place even existed before today but yeah, same here. I wouldn't call myself the most vanilla of guys, but I understand the feeling of being considered to vanilla that other people won't even bother with you. I've had some decent luck in the past couple months on F-List, but lately it feels like if your character isn't gay or a futa then no one will even look twice at you.
No.127577
>>127570
I don't like gay or futa.
But I'm kinky as shit.
No.127594
>vanilla
>lesbian
>not interested in penis
>not interested in strapons or dildos
>not interested in pictures of real life actresses / models / whatever, only art
>so many gay female profiles are fixated on shemale worship
>so many bi female profiles are male leaning or otherwise inclined toward phallus
>tfw no comfy gf
No.127595
>>127594
Post profile? I feel the same way, I have a few lesbian characters myself and trying to find partners is really difficult.
No.127622
Not sure if this is related at all, but am I the only one who's sick of the whole dom/sub thing? I don't really feel confident to dom and lead every action, not to mention it's boring when you barely get any response back. I've tried being "sub" as well, but it ends up just being humiliating at best or creepy at worst. There's probably a lot of nuances in all these positions, which makes it much harder to find the right partner.
I'm trying my luck on switch characters, but they always seem to decide on a role depending on my character rather than both doing their parts.
No.127625
>>127622
Well duh, of course it is a spectrum ranging from times in which one character does control everything totally but its ok because it comes with the kink (inanimate TF is my go-to example, but even that can have sub act out in the process rather than only react); to proper give and take domming with top that leaves room to act and sub that takes those opportunities; to just two people doing things without either holding superiority.
And I freely go all over those lines on my always-dom character.
And widespread inability to have RPs without those pronounced roles is kind of a cancer on flist.
But it is as usual: gotta dig and dig till you find people that do the shit you want the way you want.
No.127626
>>125031
I think I've got the opposite problem. I'm ridiculously kinky, and the closest thing any of my characters have to a girlfriend in a recurring longterm rp is a girl mind-controlled into liking my character to try and curb her growing lust for her own underage sister.
It didn't work, btw. Now she drags both of them into weird, fetishy bondage-heavy sex and uses the sexual energy to recharge her psychic powers, but there are shades of girlfriend-type relationships between all three of them
I just want something sweet and romantic, but my kinks always make it weird. Doesn't help that my usual long-term partner is big on kidnapping and non-con too.
No.127703
>>127622
As >>127625 said, it's really just shitters that can't into flexibility.
No.127731
>>127622
Very much the same here. I'm kinky as shit but any connotations of malice immediately put me into an avoidant mood, so anything but the softest domination is a huge no-go for me. It all boils down to intent for me; why would I want to hurt someone, or be hurt, especially if I like them? I've lived a passive, in many cases humiliating and pathetic life, so of COURSE I want to be treated nicely. Likewise, I won't lash out or humiliate others to make up for my own shortcomings, and the immense number of people who do is something that makes me sad and confused.
Does not fucking compute fam.