/cuteboys/ - Boypussy

Most circumcised guys I've seen tell that "I don't care that I was uncircumcised, uncut dicks look weird to me" because that is normal to them whereas uncut dicks look abnormal. I'm against forced circumcision but I doubt many people will look for this service, only a handful of guys will do that I think. FtM people might find this somewhat helpful though, not sure.

>>357200

weren't they aiming to start testing in like 2020 or something? hopefully it works out

>>357192

i think making the whole sausage is gonna prove much harder than making the wrapper

>>357205

If you can figure out how to grow foreskin where there is none, then it's a good start towards figuring out how to make the rest of it outta nothing. I'd see a lot more trans people supporting this financially than men who have been circumcised.

>>357177

I've been waiting on it for several years. It doesn't look like it's ever going to happen.

>>357211

Are you retarded? Trannies are a VERY tiny population. There are far more men angry about being robbed of a working dick.

>>357200

>>357212

They’ve made some recent break throws. Also regenertive medicine (which foregen uses) is picking up at a decent pace. Also they have VERRY little funding. They’ve alwayse admited it will take a while.

Goys, stop waiting for this mythical surgery and just start restoring on your own. You can get back most of the looks and function. I've said for two years now that this surgery will not be available by 2020 and the recently updated Foregen road map confirms this. I maintain that they will not have a public surgery by 2021. Why wait 4 more years minimum? In that time, you can completely restore.

>>357200

It's messed me up too.

>>357485

Fuck off this thread isn't for you.

>>357517

Most restored foreskin looks noticeably thicker than natural foreskins from what I've seen. I was doing it for a while a few years ago but gave up before any significant progress.

>>357517

>I've said for two years now that this surgery will not be available by 2020 and the recently updated Foregen road map confirms this. I maintain that they will not have a public surgery by 2021

That’s been common knowledge since 2015.

>>357520

>Someone could fund this whole fucking thing right now for $30 million

> For less than a third of the budget of a typical Hollywood blockbuster movie

That's practically pocket change for a billionaire; the kind of money they would make back in a few months just sitting on their ass with the investments they already have. Yet none of them will lift a finger to improve the lives of millions of men? Or even themselves…? Rich men tend to be older white men from religious families; they're probably ALL circumcised. Are you telling me that NOBODY that wealthy has any interest in fixing their half-a-dick?? You have got to be fucking kidding me.

You would be hard-pressed not to realize that Western Civilization simply does not have its priorities straight. If humanity exists in a thousand years, they will look back at this time as the worst period of human civilization: a true dark ages of unnecessary pain and suffering.

(in the womb), if you know anything about anatomy, the penis and the vagina start out as the same thing and then develope one way or another.

the foreskin, is basically the clittoral hood and the head of the penis, is essentially the clittoris

(give or take some of the internal erectile tissue or "butterfly wings" on the inside of the sides of the vagina) but no matter what, both males and females have a "head" and then the rest of the organ's body.

>penis head (contains some erectile tissue)

>rest of the length. (erectile tissue)

or

>clittoris (contains some small erectile tissue)

>rest of the vagina (and butterfly wing shaped erectile tissue)

so there are foreskins, and clittoral hoods.

>clittoral hoods by the way are the thing that some women have removed or reduced because having too much clittoral hood makes it difficult to move it out of the way and reach the sensitive CLIT during sexual experiences

why do some women get this done? some women enjoy direct clittoral stimulation, some do not. while many women do not like direct clittoral stimulation, there are others that do but even those who do not can still have problems reaching their girl "bean" so to speak. since the clittoris can vary from very small to more generous sizes (and extra big in some special women) very good for them right? depending on the woman, and depending on the woman the clittoral hood can be larger or smaller, there are some women who fall into the category of small clit + large clittoral hood which leaves them in a tough situation where it is more difficult for them to get pleasure or successfully orgasm since the clittoris is so hidden. some women can't even reach their clittoris after trying to gently lift aside their clittoral hoods and often end up only being able to get and orgasm if they use a strong vibrator, and for some women even that doesn't work. there are alot of cases of women who are unable to reach orgasm. really sad and my heart goes out to them. everybody deserves the freedom to be able to enjoy that if they so choose.

just in case you're confused, involuntary female circumcision (clit REMOVAL without consent) (very evil) is NOT the same thing as a voluntary consensual clittoral hood reduction procedure done with a proffesional doctor. in some very bad places girls are sent to have their clits removed which is equal to a boy having the head of their penis removed. obviously, this is very very fucked up and just plain wrong since most of them never have an orgasm in their life after that and if they do have any, they don't feel that great.

so my point is that they don't remove the foreskin to reduce pleasure, they do it so that you can actually feel good by exposing the head of the penis for better access in regards to sexual activity, keeping things clean, using the bathroom, and so on. Imagine having a plastic bag over your penis constantly but you have to peel it back in order to pee, wash, or perform in a sexual activity.

>but circumcised people get dry penis skin!

people apply lotion to their skin on their whole body to keep it from getting dry right? why do people seem to have the problem where they apply lotion everywhere except the one place they claim to have so many dryness issues? if my hands become dry, I take care of it. if my elbows are dry, I take care of it. if my knees are dry, I take care of it. if my front or back is dry, I take care of it. but if any parts of my private areas are dry, even if they are parts that are not effected by circumcision, I just forget to take care of myself! so I'll blame the fact that I got circumcised.

do people assume that just because the foreskin is gone, that the rest of the penis (parts besides the head and foreskin region) that are always exposed regardless of if a circumcision has been done or not are somehow any more or any less likely to become dry and require lotion? I mean, any skin on the human body is capable of becoming dry. why shouldn't I apply lotion or oil where it's needed? (avoiding areas where lotion or oil shouldn't go) I take good care of myself and never have any issues. if you're going to take the effort and moisturize your hands and the rest of your body, why the hell wouldn't you make a small amount more effort compared to all the lotioning up you just did and get the one spot you missed? makes sense right?

>>357580

Cool copypasta. You paste this every time there is a thread on this topic. I wonder (((why)))

>>357630

The true irony is that discarded foreskins are used to culture collagen that goes into… wait for it… skin creams and lotions! There's an entire multi-million-dollar industry, and the best part is that they're not only getting free resources, they've created their own market. The whole "lotion as lube" is a meme you only see in American media and parlance, arguably created completely by the people who are getting rich by it. Even other countries where circumcision is common, this sort of thing doesn't exist; they just use purpose-made lubricant.

You have to admire the terrifying cruelty of it all. Chop a guy's dick skin off and use it to make lotion, and then brainwash him into using that same lotion to masturbate his dysfunctional dick, for the rest of his life. Like refusing to feed a starving man, and forcing him to eat his own severed body parts to survive.

>>357520

>IPO in 2021

I know what I'm investing in.

>>357629

>stirner

>literally a cuckhold

>>357580

Your argument might make a tiny bit of sense if the penis was similar to the clitoris in anything other than appearance, but unfortunately it's not. The penis isn't secreted inside a fold of lubricated skin like the clitoris is; it juts out at an angle. You know when guys talk about needing to wear certain kinds of pants or trousers because their dick chafes? Yeah, that happens because men have the disadvantage of their genitals rubbing up against their clothing all of the time, which is exactly the kind of abrasion that the foreskin is designed to protect against. Because men don't have a lubricated fold of skin to secrete their genitals inside, they instead have one that extends out: The foreskin. So not only does the glans dry out when you remove its protective skin, but it becomes exposed to the elements as well.

I remember you. It's nice that you incorporated some knowledge of female anatomy into your argument since the last time you dared to put this unresearched cretinous and frankly libelous waste of nervous stimulation anywhere I could see it, but and let me make this totally clear

You do not know what a foreskin is

A foreskin is NOT a lump of inanimate skin that sits on the end of your dick and blocks sensation. It is the most sensitive part of the male body to both pleasure and pain, and this has been recognized by medical science for generations now. That's why when uncut men masturbate they move the foreskin, not their hand over the shaft. The myth that the glans is the only place that can even feel pleasure is propagated by cunts like you who grow up unable to masturbate properly, around other people who aren't able to masturbate properly, and assume that's just how it is.

And while you wisely state that infant genital cutting is not the same thing as a consensual clitoral hood reduction surgery, you completely failed to take into account that this discussion is about MALE INFANT GENITAL MUTILATION.

If you want to be cut then fine, all power to you, enjoy your broken dick, but don't forget that what your post is advocating for is exactly the same thing you spent half of your post objecting to, you miserable fucking pawn sacrifice. How dare you even come in here and give us shit for not wanting babies cut. You should be ashamed of yourself.

I hope to god that you're a woman, because there is literally no other excuse for being this woefully ignorant of male anatomy.

I have scars on my dick from friction burns as a result of having to live for the rest of my life with half of my skin missing and if I see another one of you fucking brainwashed cucks talking about the foreskin being a disadvantage in real life I'm going to go on a fucking shooting spree.

>>358950

Straight men (and really, ANY men who top) are expected to have this perfectly neutral or grim face, never so much as making a single sound, when having sex and cumming. So the fact that they aren't getting very much pleasure out of their dick seems perfectly reasonable.

ARE there actually any gay billionaires? I kinda seriously doubt it.

>>358996

I actually really like when a guy groans or breathes heavily. It's a pretty great feeling knowing that you're giving them that kind of intense pleasure.

>>357629

>posting shit some edgy cuck said

Very typical leftykikes.

>>357518

thick foreskins sound cute :3

>>357693

how?

>>359350

>how

Did you ever read his stupid shit you dumb ass? Of course you didn't because you belong with the "read a muh book" crowd that barely can breath let alone read or type.

His edgy fedora shit combined with his "its ok if some other dude fucks your wife" shit makes it pretty clear he was reddit (read leftypol) before image boards or the internet where ever thing. He's a cuck in every sense of the word but that's why leftypol loves him because leftypol gets reminded that they are exactly the same as him, dumb asses that think that they are smart and witty.

>>359365

How’s he a cuck? He says people should only do things if it’s in there self-intrest.

>>359375

No clearly says men should let their wives be railed by other because that is what he wants. He is a cuck and you fucking know it. Self-interest my ass.

>>359384

Where did he say that?

>>359384

>>359365

>Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! Cuck!

You're a motherfucking chicken, and you will never be anything else.

>>359403

You read his books didn't you?

>>359441

Hello Madox? Still a little pissy about people not accepting your shit fetish? This is you trying to justify it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SE6jy78tV78

>>359468

>You read his books didn't you?

have you

>>359481

Yes.

>>359483

And what book did he clim to be a cuck?

>>359550

It's more a book about him:

>That she did what she wished, and that Stirner let her do what she wished-that of course may have let her appear in the eyes of the marriage-slaves as detestable as it later did to her, but it can only make the two of them more likable to us. Every act of making up the mind for the other, for that matter, would not have fit at all into the nature of those involved, for whom "marriage" meant only a loose band that was thrown around them purely externally. And not on the "unfaithfulness" of the wife-how ridiculous!-did "this marriage perish," but simply and only under the pressure of the circumstances in which he and she unfortunately all too soon found themselves.

From His Life and His Works.

This explains the whole "muh spook" thing.

I hope you people realize what's going to happen when this actually becomes possible.

The doctors are going to say that a child can't consent to having the foreskin-restoring procedure, and the parents will all agree of course. Then, after spending his entire teen years masturbating with a mutilated dick, the unfortunate boy will be so used to it that when he finally reaches age 18, he'll simply elect not to have it done anyway.

Nothing will ever change.

>>357192

I think lots of cut guys feel bad about it and act casual though, I know I do

>>357192

at least in america, being against circumcision usually is met with derision, at best it's considered to be a silly opinion.

>>360231

ironically, i think this sort of procedure will probably reach prominence with gays first and may even end up being seen as a gay thing to do.

>Jews stole my foreskin and turned it into women's regenerative facial cream

>they did a very good job though

Hell, I'm not even gay, but that fucking kike did a good job. All of my cut friends were practically butchered. Like when you grab their dick you can't even move the skin on the shaft a milimeter, the kikes stole so much skin the whole thing is straining and stretching when hard.

Thank Odin they didn't take that much from me.

>>365366

> ironically, i think this sort of procedure will probably reach prominence with gays first and may even end up being seen as a gay thing to do.

If you think the hedonistic approach of faggots will restrain anti-hedonistic "conservative" factions, then you'll be surprised about the possibility of insurance companies making money, and doctors at the same time. If Foregen is indeed legit, it could revolutionize regenerative biotechnology. This would also make it a target for larger corporations, and figures to snatch up the company if their technology is functional, but when is the question.

If there's more exposure, and shedding light on the corrupt industry thriving off of the foreskins of children, then mothers, and fathers will gradually grow aware to the abuse that's taken to them. Insist on more sexual education about these parts, and then tell the pubic through media such as videos, film, posters, pictures, shitposting memes to grow attention to the matter until a replacement is found for the cream companies.

Even if dirty tactics used by SJWs have to be employed, it's better to draw any sort of attention to it. Something to speed up attention on regenerative biotech will certainly attract a lot of attention, and I hope it doesn't end up being bought out or swept under the carpet, until reappearing as a more expensive procedure.

>>365366

Being opposed to circumcision is already considered gay. In fact caring at all about mens' sexual health will get you stereotyped as gay almost without question. Hell I'm pretty sure a lot of Americans even subconsciously link foreskins to homosexual tendencies for some reason. It's fucking weird.