No.970467
>>970466
>why are we the nexus for turbo autists?
You're on an "edgy adult board" for fucking kid's TV shows you fucking retard.
No.970468
>>970467
This made me laugh.
No.970470
REMEMBER WHEN /co/ WAS LOVE?
No.970482
>>970465
Question to volounteer/BO:
Why was cannon nudity thread removed? It was posted last week or two ago. We had those in the past, and they were devoted to posting fanservice and nudity from comics and some cartoons. What happened this time around?
>>970466
Cartoons attract a decent amount of artists by default. /co/ is not alone in attracting autists (/tech/ and /v/ had a few too), but other boards are better at bullying autists and driving them away.
No.970494
>>970470
Why do think we're here?
No.970498
>>970482
>What happened this time around?
They eventually become nothing but dumping grounds for porn. No discussion, just anons shitposting about coming and dumping the same crap over and over again. They had little to no value, you can honestly dump that crap over on /rule34/ and the thread would stay up for the next 4 years compared to here.
No.970505
I've noticed on a few boards that cukchan faggots have been showing up. You can tell by the low-effort, sentence fragment, 'plz spoonfeed' threads they make. They're so impatient after wallowing in the chaotic shitstorm of cuckchan that they think "fuck it, I'll just make a few threads and if they suck, they'll just get washed away in a day!"
Also doesn't help that they are a creatively bankrupt, retarded bunch of faggots. They stagnated hard years ago and have been poorly imitating imageboard culture ever since the GG exodus.
No.970510
>>970505
I've seen many lately who are also defending going back to halfchan, or crossposting. Some have started greeting and replying to each other like fat tourists on a vacation.
>Hey there, fellow /vg/ / /aco/ / /whatever fuckchan board/ anon!
No.970519
A lot of cartoon posters went to >>>/delicious/
So maybe the solution is making this board an Anime & Comics board.
No.970522
>>970482
>Why was cannon nudity thread removed?
It probably became cancerous. Trying to deal with multiple IPs shitting up a thread to hell and back is such a time consuming process that it's better to put the thread down than spend an hour or two trying to save it.
So guys, please, don't just report a thread and go "Needs Clean-Up". Either report the posts in question, hide them, or just stop taking the bait. You have no idea how slow it is to have to manually scrub a thread.
No.970526
>>970465
You think you have it bad, ask chrow about the PDF thread
No.970541
Why was the Arthur thread deleted?
No.970542
>>970519
Found the newfag.
No.970543
>>970522
>You have no idea how slow it is to have to manually scrub a thread.
Isn't that your job?
No.970549
>>970543
>job
He does it for free, anon.
No.970579
why do you ban people for calling out celebrities' marxist politics?
No.970580
>>970579
Because fuckoff to /leftypol/
No.970581
>>970579
There are boards all about bitching about politics.
/co/ isn't one of those boards.
No.970585
>>970581
Question, can a discussion about comicgate be had as long as the autistic political Anon doesn't go full sperg and people actually talk about problems in the comicbook industry?
No.970619
>>970585
Yes, as long as it's /co/ related.
And by "/co/ related" I mean "directly connected to either comics or cartoons". None of that "bitching about some shit-head's political opinion on twitter" bullshit.
No.970645
>>970465
When are mod positions getting opened up.
I lurk a lot but I wouldn’t mind deleting the 1 sentence threads when I see them.
No.970646
>>970619
>don't talk about politics
>in a medium where every writer is shoehorning their political views
No.970647
>>970522
Alternate solution: Anchor it. Works well on /tg/ whenever there's an active thread that's turned to shit, but people still want to use it. The board is still slow enough that it will hang around for a few days, but it won't disrupt the flow of posts on the board. Also allows people to get the shitposting out of their system, instead of antagonizing volatile faggots who will, quite stupidly, immediately make another thread to bitch about how you deleted their thread.
No.970648
>>970646
Little Anon’s just upset he can’t shoehorn his favorite eceleb like Sargon.
No.970649
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>970645
Not my call, but probably not for a long while. Especially after last time.
Though to be honest, it's probably not a job you want (see video attached for an accurate portrayal of what it's like to mod a board).
>>970647
I'll probably do that from now on
No.970661
>>970649
Ask the BO, you can do that can’t you?
No.970665
>>970649
>>970661
Is Beyonder even still around?
No.970792
>>970505
>Also doesn't help that they are a creatively bankrupt
>anon makes a webm
>cuckchaner steals webm makes it shorter and soundless to post it in cuckchan
>cuckchaner post that piece of shit webm in h8chan
you have no fucking idea
No.970801
>>970505
>>970510
Mobile app, Clover, now supports 8chan.
Bully them until they go back.
>>970792
Soundless <3mb webms should be a site wide ban.
No.970804
Why was the Arthur thread deleted? Why are many threads about blacks deleted', including you're own we wuz containment thread? Are you Redwood?
No.970891
>>970804
>Why was the Arthur thread deleted?
I can't really remember why. It's long since been pushed out of my ban logs.It probably became cancerous or got purged when banned an anon and scrubbed their posts. Either way, Arthur threads are allowed.
>Why are many threads about blacks deleted', including you're own we wuz containment thread?
I haven't deleted that many threads about blacks lately. I know a couple weeks ago I deleted at least two because they were just about dumbshit articles that were only tangentially related to /co/. As for my attempt at a containment thread, I deleted it because it was a huge mistake.
>Are you Redwood?
No.
No.970936
>>970891
Why don't you just delete the posts that got them banned instead of all of their posts?
No.970937
>>970936
Because that would be sensible
No.970945
>>970936
Because some anons like to shitpost across the board.
No.970948
>>970945
Then why don't you D+ the ones that are chronic shitposters and not D+ the ones that aren't?
Fucking christ this isn't rocket science
No.970959
>>970945
>because I'm lazy
Thanks for answering.
No.970961
>>970948
>Then why don't you D+ the ones that are chronic shitposters and not D+ the ones that aren't?
Because when some anon decides they need to shit up the board, it would take an hour or two of manually deleting individual posts just to save some thread they made three weeks ago. Now imagine that with multiple anons shitting up the board. I could be spending an entire day scrubbing posts just because they made a thread about loli's asses that's really taking off.
Or, I can just delete all of their posts and save myself some time. If there's an option to delete some posts and keep others, I haven't found it yet after three years of looking.
No.970964
No.970965
>>970465
is it always the same guy who links multiple posts and then types "hey /tv/"?
No.970966
>>970965
I think it's the same guy who changes his IP. I believe the best course of action would be a range ban.
>>970649
Hey, I'm already a mod on /cow/. I know a thing or two about cleaning up hot garbage while getting screamed at by autists. Whatever the job entails here, I can handle it.
No.970968
>>970585
>>970619
>You can discuss comicsgate as long as the thread doesn't get shit up by politispergs
That's a longwinded way of saying "you can't discuss comicsgate". Might as well throw up a general to contain it, if you ask me. /v/ still has Gamergate generals, even today, after all.
No.970970
>>970968
Generals are not a good thing.
No.970974
>>970972
They breed cancerous autism.
No.970975
>>970972
You don't really need them when you can make a dedicated board for it if it has enough traffic to have a reasonable roll.
No.971005
>>970972
Lurk moar. In any general, really.
No.971014
At what pint does a thread become cancerous?Also are LOL threads considered cancerous?
No.971017
I'm pretty sure it's like three faggots that are going out of their way to shit up the board over the past few months. They're probably goons that know each other through some IRC or discord circlejerk.
>>970470
Yeah, I also remember when that mentality attracted cancerous shippers and then tumblards.
No.971026
>>970972
Lurk a fucking decade
No.971181
>>971017
Like if you notice, it's all the same shit all the time with these guys. Every single fucking post is the same.
1. Anything sexual causes them to chimp out and scream at everyone for being a degenerate loser virgin nerd.
2. All of them use the same shitty memes, are obsessed with the same obscure bits of information and drama, practically speak their own language.
3. Even though only one spams "hey /tv/" all of them act like /tv/ and /co/ are mortal enemies.
No.971191
>>971187
If it became so, it would certainly prevent crossposter scum from admitting their vices out loud, unashamed.
No.971209
>>971017
Yeah. I've seen quite a few threads with tons of meta-posting, sagespamming, one of them avatarfags with superman/capeshit images, and they'll reply to any non-sage post "WHY DID YOU BUMP THIS REEEE!!!". Reporting these retards doesn't seem to work, honestly the board management here is too timid to deal with all the cancerous migrants from 4chan who were rangebanned over there (though I suspect a few of them might be saboteurs…)
No.971211
>>971209
Don't forget the anons who think that everyone who replies to a post is samefagging.
inb4 I get called a samefag for pointing this out.
No.971231
>>970581
bullshit
That's the exact kind of thinking that led comicbooks down the shithole they find themselves today,declaring something as apolitical is like removing white blood cells from the body because they may cause leukemia.It's the average fedoralord wet dream/fantasy of removing christianity from the west because muh christianity held us 1000 years back and then thinking that something else even more radical in nature islam won't take that opportunity to leap in and fill the gap left behind;whether they like it or not.
Also remove namefield
>>971181
No.971232
>>971209
Wish we had something more effective than a post deletion, but less severe than a ban. You ban someone and they take it really personally. They might even evade come back and try to start trouble, like
>HOW FUCKING DARE YOU BAN ME
And then that only makes things worse. Obviously, the faggot is at fault for starting more trouble and the BO or BV is only more justified in punishing them again, but it would be really nice if every ban or attempt at discipline and order didn't potentially lead to even more obnoxious drama. Remember Powergirl Autist and how multiple boards were dealing with that dumb cunt's shit for months and months after he got a slap on the wrist here?
No.971239
>>971232
5 minute ban with big red text calling them a name so other anons abuse them would work better.
You're more likely to stop acting like a dickhead if every anon laughs at you than getting banned and deleted and no one noticing.
No.971241
>>970661
>>970665
>>970964
I spoke to Beyonder. He's still around, but prefers to keep a low profile. Volunteers won't be added unless there's a need for it.
>>971014
When a thread is reduced to bait and anons taking the bait, that's a pretty good sign that the thread's become cancerous.
>>971187
Since I haven't gone to 4chan in over three years and have no desire to go there, my answer is probably "no".
>>971231
This post is the only post you have on the entire board, and it's bitching that you can't bitch about politics on /co/.
I think in a way it justifies my position.
No.971247
>>971241
>This post is the only post you have on the entire board, and it's bitching that you can't bitch about politics on /co/.
Pretending Marxists don't exist doesn't make them go away
(USER WAS BANNED FOR LOW QUALITY POSTING. THANKS FOR LETTING ME KNOW ABOUT IT.) No.971251
>>971247
You're either a Redditor that came here during the election or from /leftypol/ trying to falseflag to stir shit.
Either way, you need to kill yourself.
No.971264
I think people should be allowed to talk about SJWs ruining comics if they're talking about the actual comics being ruined.
Something like the "UNSOLICITED OPINIONS ON ISRAEL???" line where the actual story is made worse because the author is an over-opinionated hack, or how sales are declining because of bad writing. That sort of thing should be allowed, because it's actually about comics. You're talking about what's happening in the comic, right?
But bullshit like "Mark Waid say this CRAZY thing on twitter!!!" or "You won't BELIEVE what the new writer of Howard the Duck thinks of gun control!!!" isn't about comics. It's pointless twitter bullshit. Who cares what some faggot on Twitter thinks? It isn't politically relevant, and it isn't comics.
No.971283
>>971241
>This post is the only post you have on the entire board
adressing the number of my posts instead of the content doesn't make magically disprove the point i'm making hotpocket-kun
No.971290
I have a dynamic IP you know
No.971291
>>971241
>This post is the only post you have on the entire board, and it's bitching that you can't bitch about politics on /co/.
That doesn't make him incorrect.
No.971301
>>971280
>When you're talking about the cancer trying to kill the board and the cancer tries to beg you not to get chemo
No.971308
>>971291
No, he's full of shit. Nothing he said was /co/ related at all other than the word "comicbooks". He blames "politics" for comics turning to shit, when any /co/fag worth their salt would know comics turned to shit after the Great Comic Book Crash of 1993 when Marvel attempted to corner the comics market.
He's disgusting, casual, off-boarder scum that'd have us bitching about dykes and niggers instead of comics.
No.971312
>>971264
I don't even know why people act impressed with they go to twitter and find liberal shit, I mean, it's current year comicbook industry, it's to be expected.
No.971314
>>971308
>He's disgusting, casual, off-boarder scum
I'm a disgusting off boarder casual scum that started the share threads on this board using this image before before that retard that nearly nuked the board deleted that thread 2 years ago and before you and your reddit spacing posting ass ever managed to weasle yourself in the position hotpocketing for the board;not that i'd expect you to remember anything of that
It's true that i haven't posted in a while mostly due to personal shit and a waning interest in comics since everything has been steadily getting shittier and shittier as time progresses but it's also apparent that during that time Beyonder stopped even pretending in giving a shit about this place so it makes sense he would put a literal newfag that doesn't know what he's talking about,let alone what he's doing, in a position of power
No.971319
>>971314
>while mostly due to personal shit and a waning interest in comics
Hello, Shitty Webcomics.
No.971324
>>971314
At this point you're just being a whiny bitch, you barley come here and think you have any form of credibility.
No.971326
>>971314
Some friendly advice:
Instead of whining about shit you don't like and trying to act like you run the place, how about you just contribute good content to the board like that share thread you mentioned. Getting into fights with people about what they're "allowed" to post and yammering about what talentless hacks writer on their shitty twitter feeds contributes nothing of value to this place.
No.971338
>>971326
The problem arises when people can't complain about shit threads/posts but the shit also stays right where it is. If you don't want people to complain, do your fucking job.
No.971339
File: 92c88b51618fa3c⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 127.73 KB, 364x404, 91:101, nee3a66055a6b992bd1ed6382f….jpg)
>>971326
Some friendlier counter-advice to that:
Instead of pontificating to me about my supposed failings as a poster of this board maybe you should screen your janitors a bit more carefully;especially if you're the one supposed to be running the place and not merely pretending to.A thousand shitposts of mine can't even put a dent into this board as much as a newfag janitor on a powertrip
No.971436
>>971308
>any /co/fag worth their salt would know comics turned to shit after the Great Comic Book Crash of 1993
American comics have always been shit.
t. Europe
No.971610
Hey, Janitor? I just wanted to say: god bless you for making this thread. God bless you for reaching out to your userbase and communicating with us, and thank you for helping us root out and expose the people trying to fuck up the board.
You did a great job here.
No.971615
>>971610
You filthy bootlicker.
No.971815
Yennymod, did you bumplock this thread? That's a really bad idea. People should be able to see and reply to this thread because it helps the board.
No.972390
No.972410
>>971876
This kind of attitude is why this board is shit.
No.973712
So the butthurt sage spammer keeps running about accusing everyone of talking to themselves.
He's probably the hey poster/shift key cuck judging from his persistence and the generally undefined reasons that he gets mad at everything.
You planning on curbing this autism, or should I just stop reporting him entirely and keep on trucking?
No.973715
No.974989
>>970498
Does that mean that fan service and nudity thread are completely out of the question? What if one of the thread rules would be "no porn, fanart, or erotic comics"?
No.975830
>>973712
Depends, how autistic are you?