>>1005437
I was curious, so I tried searching around. They were my favorite toys growing up I'm not a fag, so do your own math on that one, so I was wondering about it.
They rebooted them to be pieces of shit that're one step above Lego men, it looks like. The original Polly Pockets had the benefit of being small enough you could easily bring them everywhere. They rebooted them around the 2000s and they were still much smaller than Barbies but still had clothes. They were plastic that'd rip way too easily, but they were still fun to play with. These look the same size of the 'reboot' Polly Pockets (probably so kids don't choke) but aren't flexible at all and don't look like they have clothes. Why are toy/cartoon creators so fucking stupid? What kid would want this crap? It's the worst of both Polly Pockets. Little girls already have barbies and legos.
In case you're curious, pics related are the evolution of the toys, with the last being the most recent. Sorry about sperging though, realizing this just irritated me. I wouldn't be surprised if they're trying to cash in on the Barbie cartoon market with this show, too. So goddamn low-effort.