/animus/ - Avatarfag Circlejerk

>>2356532

i try my best

tumblr makes it something to not be taken seriously

That's pretty mature for you, and I will admit I slip up with it, but usually it's not on purpose or to be disrespectful, I definitely don't have Mandy's policy on it.

But yea fuck those stupid made up genders.

>>2356546

and you're a shitty flake

this is the real theme song of these threads

"and your husband wants to be a girl"

>>2356550

you flaked on that dnd session years ago

>>2356553

yea, HAL ate a sign and i performed emergency surgery and rolled a natural 20 and they wouldnt shut up about it for like 2 years because we NEVER PLAYED AGAIN

also i have no idea what the fuck a crustpunk show it

is*

>>2356558

I was actually exasperated with how stupid they were acting, so I guess i can't be mad at you for running away from that situation. I ended up in better and longer campaigns anyways later. I was very new to DnD at the time but since I have had more exposure to it.

>>2356563

nope

sorry

>>2356567

Yea, seems like you have been busy anyways, I'm sure you have other places to be barely conscious of what is going on.

>>2356567

also dude you aren't that old yet fucking calm down

>>2356571

watching entitled parents vids?

>>2356572

Nah, just watched SsethTzeetach's vid on Kenshi.

A simulator on Post Apocalyptic China where every cunt wants your rice, your skin and everything you hold dear.

>>2356573

You are now demoted to cigarette rolling.

You roll my cigarettes now and occasionally make toasties.

Damn minorities

>>2356575

drama queen

>>2356574

ah, that joke is also often in entitled parents vids

we're old for ancient greeks who died at an average of 32

You can say nigger, Scoots.

I won't tell.

>>2356582

I didn't know that, I just watched this guy play through that game and he said 'Slavery is a step up from living in the wilderness'. It looks autistic as fuck, I don't even know if I have the attention span to learn how to play it.

>>2356587

what the fuck how does that even work

>>2356583

people misunderstand things like that

when you take an average lifespan from many years ago, it's brought way down by all the deaths in early childhood from diseases that are treatable now

if you survived childhood, you were likely to make it to 60 or above

>>2356585

You don't even know how to roll a cigarette? My god, you're a simple peasant aren't you?

Kidding aside, I'd make a shit master. I'd pledge allegiance to the other posters.

not that im saying anyone here is anti-vacci

>>2356593

no i know what netplay is, how do you ALL have different minigames at the same time and still function as a game?

>>2356590

just pointing out the misconceptions people have about average life spans.

if you have three children, two die before their first birthday, and one lives till 80, your children on average live around 27 years

averages are misleading.

>>2356596

only to people who have an infantile grasp of math

>>2356597

That sounds awesome, so everyone got their own game and they see the other players, but those players see a different game

it would have been interesting to see if everyone was individually scored on their own game

>>2356600

Its pretty dumb but a lot of fun.

>>2356601

thats the best kind of fun in life to be honest

>>2356599

it's not maths you need to understand that, it's knowing that the majority of children reaching adulthood is a very recent thing.

if it weren't for that, the average might not be misleading at all.

averages are accurate, what you need to interpret them correctly is more information, things that may have drastically raised or lowered them

>>2356598

Yeah, I like rolling tobacco and rum.

Maybe I'll play Dota2 for a bit, leave shitposting till tomorrow.

>>2356605

literally everything is math

>>2356607

using only math describe the taste of a strawberry

>>2356591

Trump is a deceptive, selective, manipulative, utter piece of shit and you fucks love him for it.

>>2356608

learn binary and by the time you do, i'll know binary too, and then i can describe the taste of the strawberry to you in zeroes and ones, but even then you won't still fully understand the taste of the strawberry without trying it, as words fail to convey certain aspects of our experiences

>>2356611

He's an actual fucking idiot. If anyone else were to act like him, or to talk like him, we'd call them idiots.

You nihilistic fucks just find it endlessly amusing, and he knows you find him amusing, so he keeps on amusing you.

He made the Secretary of Education some bitch who donated billions.

He made the head of the Environmental Protection Agency some fuck who was known for hating the EPA.

he's been bullying his own Attorney General for doing HIS ONLY DECENT THING by recusing himself from a legal process,

and has replaced his Attorney General (THE MOST IMPORTANT LAWYER IN AMERICA) with a fellow con-man with a record of being a piece of shit,

all to blow up the investigation against him.

He also hasn't released his taxes.

>>2356610

you'd also need to express every single part of human biology that is involved in perceiving taste in binary. and we aren't even close to knowing that stuff in any terms.

everything in theory may be math, in practice, it doesn't work. some things just need a more terse means of description.

when me and my best friend are on coke we regularly have this same discussion, where if you took one snapshot in time of the entire universe, where you knew the momentum, direction, spin, affecting forces, etc. etc. of every subatomic particle, wave, etc. etc. in the universe, you'd be able to work out everything that happened before then, and everything that will happen after then with perfect accuracy, so free will is a complete illusion, everything that happens and every choice you make was inevitable, it was just the inevitable result of what came before it, expressible mathmatically.

same shit, it works in theory, in practice it's useless because we'll never be able to do it, so we need simpler catch-all concepts to understand things

>>2356613

it would work if you were a computer and could read everything in math, like a computer does

FORGIVE ME SENPAI

BUT I MUST GO ALL OUT

just this once

it's an interesting thought

when people say free will is an illusion, they usually mean because we're a biological computer, that placates us with an illusion of free will despite making every decision on our behalf

they rarely point out that basically everything is an infinitely complex but predictable domino effect, free will doesn't exist because what happens is only the inevitable result of what happened before it, and no matter how far back you look, if you have every data point at any exact moment, everything was always completely predictable

it's not just that it's not you making your decisions, there was never a decision, it was always going to happen

>>2356621

>>2356621

>>2356621

>>2356621

>>2356621

>>2356621

>>2356621

>>2356616

>>2356621

sentience plays a questionable role in this, yes a lot of our behaviors are extremely predictable but until we know how every mechanism that governs our brains work we can't really fully explain what experiencing sentience is, truly

>>2356624

whatever sentience is, there's nothing given what we know about the brain and the mind at the moment that it too isn't ultimately predictable.

>>2356624

ands that's why we have illusions like free will, chaos, etc.

because we don't have, and can't have, all the data required to understand it as anything else c:

If that's true it is ok for me to fuck dogs because that's just what I am programmed to do.

>>2356627

it means it was entirely inevitable, yes, in theory

it's a nice thought experiment, and it's probably true, but as far as you are concerned, you seem to have choices, so that was a bad one

but yeah. in theory, punishment is pointless because people had no choice in what they did, but like what you're punishing, the punishment was also inevitable

it's weird to think about.

>it's weird to think about.

but it was inevitable and predicatable that you would think about it.

lol

this stuff is fucked man

it's hard to decide if the idea makes you more or less comfortable

>>2356628

Cant respond much but after this raid i have a q 4 u

>>2356633

sure thing pupper

>>2356635

i do scripting not programming, programming is a whole other level of complex, but if you got someone who knew it i'd imagine it's pretty easy, and i'd also imagine that already exists many times over, just gotta find it

>>2356629

do you care about having a clear picture of the reality of things?

because you talk in this super rhetorical manner, and everyone talks rhetorically sometime, but I'm not sure if deep down you actually want to know.

You seem like someone who might just have an opinion on Democrats or a person if someone told you to have an opinion on a person.

I really started thinking that you might be a disingenous person when you portrayed the media as deserving of Trump's words about them.

>>2356638

like i said i'm sure plenty of little programs that do that are out there, but that is an awkward thing to phrase as a query you can google

maybe "full screen crosshair" or something might turn it up?

>>2356637

tell cup I miss him and I'm sorry I'm this way

>>2356638

first few seconds in google suggest what you want are "full screen helplines", i'll keep looking

>>2356639

Kanra, when are you going to leave this place. Everytime I come back to see if you've left, you're here and still arguing over the most trivial and inane shit to the lowest level of resolution you can construe as a winning position.

>>2356639

Are you aware how absolutely cancerous the media is or are you one of the naive folks that believes it actually a free enterprise dedicated to anything other than profits?

Oh wait, youre an unironic communist, so of course you cant grasp that propaganda organs arent good.

Regardless of your thoughts on trump the media are pure vultures. Youd have to be a fool to believe otherwise.

>>2356645

that may be the technical term but "helplines" shows results with help line phone numbers, this is about as awkward as i'd imagined

>>2356646

yeah it has certainly been done numerous times, but finding it is gonna be the difficult part. crosshair seems to get closer than helplines because of how search engines work, but helplines is apparently the technical name for exactly that

>>2356652

you were meant to find it

>>2356648

>Unironic communist

Oh for godsake, man.

>>2356655

it's not a browser game is it?

cause i could write it ezpz for a browser with JS, but i assume you want it for .exe games, in which case you need a program not a script

>>2356658

i played adventure quest when i was a young thing c:

it wasn't mindblowing, but what's incredible is you found it because of ads and you didn't regret clicking them

>>2356662

i remember very little of the specifics sadly :/

it probably still exists tbh

Yes, we know. Trump is right. He might lie like 10 humans combined, have crooks that surround him everywhere, grifters in charge everywhere, people around him that tell the truth while he stays in his Fox & Friends make believe world. He's still Jesus though and us 60 million plus will always know that and talk about it on facebook, twitter, all social media including every thread on every forum we go to always, 24/7!

the bern had tegridy

>>2356667

I can't help it my flag and ISP are fucked. I should be shitting in Theresa May's chair in her office.

erin will taste cold steel

>>2356660

I would imagine you could at least give me the benefit of living by the advice I give to others.

Also, as to trump, there's a lot you don't know, and indeed very few people know, about the aristocratic class. You would need to delve into some rather unsavory and esoteric theosophies to uncover the truth of the matter.

Is this the designated shitting street?

But he leads the world.

>>2356674

hah, me and nick listened to the unicef poo in loo song today

>>2356681

Have you considered that you may need to fight fire with fire in some circumstances?

>>2356679

oshit

right not gonna lie my memory is slipping so bad these days that i regularly do congnitive tests for dementia

so i can't picture it at all, however, it rings a bell

did it have ed edd n eddy?

>>2356678

Not sure who that is, or what that is

Fuck me that was a horrid game I was in, oh well, at least I got this haunt to crawl back into. Slept most of the day and got fuck all to do.

>>2356626

Don't currently, can't? That's not a very realistic answer considering how fast we are figuring things out.

>>2356684

unicef is just about the largest charity in the world, and the poo in loo song is a song and video they made to convince indians to stop shitting in the street

the main lyric is "take the poo to the loo"

embed related

>>2356685

i think i probably did play this, but yeah, like i said, all i have is a vague awareness of that, no real memory

>>2356688

can't

variables are practically infinite or literally infinite depending what you want to know and how you look at it

>>2356690

You gotta be pretty savage if you're just gonna shit in the street. Like this child right here.

>>2356690

I know Unicef, I don't know who Nick is. Also what the fuck, did they make this shit with Mii's?

>>2356694

nick is Yan, my bf

and lol yes i also said that

What the fuck did I just watch

p-p-p-poo poo poo poo poo

everywhere

p-p-p-poo poo poo poo poo

next to you

>>2356695

Oh

At least I'm not the only one who saw the resemblance

Grab her right by the pussy.

>>2356695

he won't be your bf for long

>>2356690

wrong, just because you can't directly measure particles doesn't mean you cannot find methods around directly measuring them to get accurate and usable results, the current quantum theories are still rapidly evolving and changing, and new knowledge is constantly being made readily available.

ultimately there will never be a full scale understanding of where we came from and exactly where we are going down to the molecule because that information has been fundamentally lost forever, but that doesn't mean we cannot get a grasp of the forces that are closer nd more relevant to us, we don't need to see exactly what happened to have a good enough idea to form the basis of knowledge with which we build the additional steps to understand, more or less, everything we need to about the universe

seeing the complete image is not necessary for that

BC is right

He's my gf now

>>2356704

have you talked to akame today? he's not answering his phone

>>2356705

really glad im not in that image

>>2356706

Like I say every time, none of your business and that's his choice so leave him be

>>2356705

So glad I'm at the back, no one is fit to penetrate my boyhole.

>>2356703

that's not what we were talking about though is it

if we don't know even a single variable, then it's still as good as chaos to us

so no, can't. at all. impossibly beyond our resolution given any amount of time to advance.

do you know what the quantum eraser experiment shows? is basically the double slit, but the particle is entangled with another, and the observed one lands second.

double slit shows particles (it is easiest and usually done with photons but others behave this way) behave entirely differently if they are observed even passively.

quantum eraser shows that if you observe the second particle after the first has already hit, the first behaved as if it knew the second was going to be observed, showing on a quantum scale, time is not linear

that means at that scale, a finite number of particles can produce infinite variables, because if only one is entangled with another not observed, the whole system is unpredictable.

>>2356708

just give me a yes or no, jeez

>>2356711

Let me think about it a bit ::)

>>2356710

pretty sure im the one who linked that video here like 5 times

>>2356707

It's not a dishonor.

>>2356709

Why not get plowed by erin?

and we just have to out cameras EVERYWHERE

off to a good start tbh

>>2356713

and i continue to not watch videos people link in thread :3

it's another thing me & my bestie like to go into when we do coke

put*

>>2356714

Getting plowed by anyone is degeneracy.

I'm not a degenerate.

Jokes aside, tried to find my prostate by sticking a candle in my pooper. Didn't feel anything, I don't get why people like stuff up the butt.

that's another mind boggler.

that on a quantum scale time is not linear.

particles can react to something that hasn't happened yet.

reminds me of an interesting story about some being that perceive time as a physical dimension, like they can go up a hill to the future and down a ditch to the past

which is probably about the only way the human mind can picture what these entangled particles are literally doing, perceiving time in a way that is not unidirectional

>>2356712

you are so annoying

>>2356716

sounds like a great thing to talk about when you aren't doing coke too

>>2356722

na when we not on coke we like funny videos

>>2356721

Not as much as you are asking me questions about things I have never once provided an answer for. Do you think the answer is going to change if you're obnoxious enough?

>>2356720

You have to think, that essentially time is just the reaction of particles in a given space to the forces being applied to them through various facets of natural universal interaction, it's nothing more than a contrivance for our convenience. Something we fabricated to make understanding easier in the first place, it's no real surprise the universe does not honor our imaged concepts.

>>2356726

oh no, it's not imagined, it's literally the fourth dimension, it's just the way we perceive it, and everything above the quantum scale seems to perceive it, is not the only way it can be perceived

in theory if you could keep an entangled photon bouncing around unobserved for long enough, you could use it to ask the future questions

with one particle you could start the experiment, write down the question, and get a yes or no answer from the future by them observing particle two and collapsing the wave function, one slit = yes, wave = no

with more you got binary messaging

>>2356727

it's not as it is classically described at all, time is entirely different than most people understand it so calling it a contrivance is simply acknowledging that is is usually misunderstood, and it is inescapably inter-tangled with space as they are basically the same thing

HOLY SHIT TALKING TO THE FUTURE IS NOT ONLY POSSIBLE, IT'S POSSIBLE NOW

so scientists are obviously already doing that, holy shit

okay now i'm having a meltdown

cause the minute they discovered this behaviour someone incredibly smarter than me worked out you could do this that very second

obviously it's being done

who's benefit is this being done for

i may not recover from this

>>2356732

Who I speak with and when I've spoken with them is none of your business. If he wants to talk to you, he'll talk to you. If he wants to talk to me, he'll talk to me

Look what you all did to my waifu

>>2356725

Maybe I need to get plowed by someone to do it right, but das gay.

>>2356734

no, he's important to me so it is my business

all you have to respond is with a "yes" or a "no"

>>2356737

That's a pretty big stretch

Fuck off Kanra

>>2356733

you're missing an important factor here, they would need incredibly precise control of the entangled particle experiment to get meaningful data even with large numbers of entangled particles, so I don't feel like there is a real danger of this being exploited any time soon

>>2356733

This is why I prefer to be ignorant,

to learn dark truths would be taxing on the mind.

I don't even know what you're on about, so I guess I'm safe from your brain melting inspiration.

>>2356740

Of all the animals, why a dinosaur?

>>2356739

PoS

>>2356741

Don't tell my master to fuck off or I'll post pictures of your dick

>>2356742

you only need one pair for a yes or no

>>2356743

if you want to know, search "quantum eraser" on youtube

also even if you read the entangled particles the energy from earth and any activity on it can still only travel at the speed of light so light would still take that amount of time to interact with the entangled particles, and utilizing distance is the only way we can actually exploit this variable time distortion realistically, meaning you'd still just be getting information that had to travel to those entangled particles at the speed of light

erin you are making my HEAD, HURT!!!!!!!!!!!

>>2356745

Yup, that's me. Are you going to stop pretending you want to talk to me yet?

>>2356749

particle A is affected by particle B's end result before that end result has happened

all you need to do is keep particle B bouncing around long enough

for example if it's monday and you want to know if it rains on wednesday, you just need to keep particle B bouncing around for two days so on wednesday they can let it land observed if it rains and unobserved if it doesn't, and you'll be able to know if it rains on wednesday, on monday

there are no caveats here, you can ask the future questions

this is real

and i'm freaking out

>>2356748

No they're not, they're scary.

Scarier than horses.

>>2356750

Not a bad idea. I'll get on ebay for a T-Rex costume.

>>2356755

im pretty sure we can't even keep one bouncing around for more than a few hours, yet alone days

>>2356759

but you see what i'm saying? and you see that i'm clearly incredibly far from the first person to realise this?

so even if we don't have precise enough equipment to keep a photon bouncing between two mirrors for a substantial length of time right now, people are working on this?

and you haven't heard about it?

because it is LITERALLY POSSIBLE TO SEE THE FUTURE AND NOBODY WHO IS FUNDING RESEARCH ON THAT IS GOING TO TELL ANYONE?

>>2356761

The rule always in entanglement is that you can't transfer information. Only after you examine both (or all) of the entangled answers can you determine that entanglement occurred. Individually, each entangled event looks perfectly random and gives no hint of events taking place at other locations.

>>2356762

all you need to observe for an answer is if the wave function collapsed at A or not, and all you need to do to give that answer in the future is observe B as it passes through the slits or not

if A shows a wave, B was not observed, if it shows a particle, B was observed

that is literally an information transfer

you never need to observe A, only where it hit

that's how we know this works in the first place

i would be sleeping by now but this is gonna keep me up for a while, i might order a pizza

>>2356768

Now that's something I can understand and get behind. What kind of pizza?

I'll look up 'quntum erasure'. Already done long multiplication in my maths class so I feel I could fancy a joggin noggin.

Plus, there is something fucking great when it comes to coffee and a cigarette but I don't know why. Caffienne and nicotine are fucking ooomph.

Kanra, who do you think that the most corrupt and biased corporations and ideological puppets on the planet hate Donald Trump so much?

Is it envy?

>>2356774

kill yourself

>>2356764

>>2356764

Erin, you still haven't established a way to ask the question to the future person

>>2356788

write it on a piece of paper and leave it with the experiment

>>2356789

Erin that's dumb

>>2356792

why

as long as you leave it till the time you would be giving back the answer the answer will arrive

the ones sending the answer back only have to still have it there

>>2356793

The way you are describing the experiment necessitates collapsing the wave function of the particle

>>2356796

it does not

but i am too tired to continue. goodnight.

>>2356797

It does

There is no way to tell what particles are entangled is when entanglement occurs, you can't have a particle entangled with a wave function and you can't know what particles are entangled retroactively before it occurs.

But goodnight I really would not want to get that exasperated over the phone

>>2356798

No way to know except*

>>2356798

you are wrong but like i said i am done, shattered, sorry, we can pick this up tomorrow if you hold on to those concerns

>>2356800

We totally can, and I will tell you why it is so unrealistic to expect quantum entanglement to be so readily useful in an applicable way

Ideally we would be closer to quantum computing if that were the case

This video will explain why Erin is wrong of anyone cared about the topic.

She's ugly as hell

>>2356812

Some of them aren't bad

>>2356818

Loco isn't here anymore save the furry porn for loco

not even a good shitpost, really

You are kept on a leash, right.

Grow up Kyle.

I like Kyle less now tbh.

>>2356787

Fuck yeah they did. Ass to mouth, double dutch rudder, all the filthy shit that you are too dainty to imagine.