/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover★

cvs pharmacy generic brand stretch fit seems to have it. the feature is called something like 3 tube core.

extra bonus, the velcro is built into a single wing so it's like one giant tab.

Downside, it had a design flaw that the seam in the back connecting the wing to the padding was very weak and will fall apart.

lose weight and fit into a pampers size 7. it's not that hard and they have that technology. They feel fucking tits.

>>59823

Skinnyfag here. Can confirm. It's strange how papms still wick away way faster than any cheap adult brand like depends. It's like they aren't even trying to be protective.

Seriously, I can straight up unload into a pamps without fear of leaks and still come out with my junk feeling relatively dry. The other brands feel like pissing into a cheap sponge.

>>59826

100% agree with you. Wow, it's like hearing myself talk.

ABDL diapers are all the same to me. They all seem to import from the same chinese manufacturer and slap a different logo on the front.

You can't beat baby diapers. Pampers are my all time number 1 diaper. They're designed to perfection by people who's job it is to ensure comfort for it's wearers.

Also, it's like being part of a club where only a select few are members.

Leave the incontinence pants to the fatties, lol.

>>59827

The only part that sucks about pamps is the capacity. And…obviously so. They weren't designed for me. I CAN unload completely into one comfortably…ONCE. Which is awesome. But man, I would kill for a "size 8," or older youth style diaper that worked just like pamps.

They other part I like about them is that they "hug" in just the right spots…again not designed for me, so they obviously would be tighter. But it just feels SOO much more comfortable.

>>59823

>>59826

>>59827

>>59828

>>59832

Why are you shilling this hard?

Do you guys use convertups or are you tiny enough to fit in baby diapers right out of the package?

>>59846

For me, skinny enough to fit. Barely. And only non-erect. And no size smaller than 6 depending on the brand.

I have absolutely no idea how you manage to fit into baby diapers.

When I bought baby diapers in my early teens they kinda fit me lengthwise but the tapes were nowhere near.

After I got my first proper adult diapers I never looked back.

Plus nowadays all baby diapers (in the West, atleast) have cloth-like covers. Which isn't a total buzzkill for me, but I sure prefer plastic.

I must admit real baby diapers have something special about them… there are some local brands here that are the same size as Pampers Size 8 would be - maybe I should try them.

>>59862

You see, I'm the opposite when it comes to cloth/plastic backed. I prefer the softer cloth. Especially the inside material. It's like letting your dick lay in a cloud. And as far as fitting in them, it's not perfect.

You have to "exercise" the stretchy tabs. By that I mean pull them out to their max tensile strength limit, and then gently return to normal. Do it a few times and each pull makes the tapes a little looser than the last, and stretch slightly further each time. If I were to just attempt to put them on right out of package, they would surely break.

Afterwords they go on like a slight breeze. And I have near full range of motion with my hips and thighs without fear of a break.

Now, I'm 6'2" and 140 lbs. I'm a lanky mo-fo. And I have like….no ass to speak of. So that helps with the fitting also.

However. after use, they sag really bad…which is really good. But with that, they are guaranteed to break after like 5-10 minutes. You can't enjoy it for long, but you can enjoy it long enough to count.

>>59874

and sorry for the wall of autism.

>>59858

https://www.pampers.nl/producten/pampers-baby-dry

The best I could find was the official pampers-netherlands. If you got to the drop down list for sizes, 8 is available as a selection, but not available for purchase. The current rumor is that they were slated for Feb 2018 but got delayed to Aug 2018. Problem there is that there is still no evidence to support the product is coming to market. No bar codes, serial codes, product place-holders…. nothing. The idea is that it's probably delayed again.

Take that info for what you will. Personally, I'll believe it when I see it.

>>59832

They should just do an adult line under a different brand name already, I'll just pretend that's what Crinklz are in my headcanon.

I wish a company still made color waistbands and leg gathers.

>>59874

Well - I suppose you're younger than me. I grew up with plastic backed diapers and all my fond early diaper memories include the feel of the plastic. Both disposables and also plastic pants that feel even more like plastic than the typical cover on a disposable.

Maybe they have improved the tabs since my days (this was like 20 years ago). If I stretched them I could kinda get them on but they wouldn't hold.

They could actually reach the front of the diaper - just not the landing zone. Perhaps now with the cloth-like covers they actually stick anywhere on the front?

By the way, in the store today I did see that Pampers Baby Dry do have a size 8 listed, but haven't seen anyone actually stocking it.

I remember the first Pampers I bought were actually around the size that would be 8 now (18-36kg perhaps?) - they stopped making it for whatever reason.

>>60023

You in the EU or NA? They were slated in EU back in February but got delayed. Maybe they're holding for enough production to do a world-wide simultaneous release?….for some odd reason? It's a diaper, not entertainment media. Who cares?

Also I probably am younger. 24, M, USA. And yeah, the cloth-like does kind of work for sticking the tabs, but not well enough at all to be piratical. I'm able to barely reach the landing strip myself, but I can, so it works.

>>59876

What's weird is that they marked the size 8 as 17kg+ which works out to 37lbs. Size 7 claims to be 41lbs +

>>60069

I might have gotten the size wrong… will double check next time I see a pack.

I'm in the EU, by the way.

>>60093

Weird… I did some searching online and found one site with a pic of size 6 Baby-Dry being 35+ lbs, 16+ kg:

https://pics.drugstore.com/prodimg/585286/2_900.jpg

Another with a picture of size 7 saying 33+ lbs, 15+ kg:

https://www.bed-wet.com/fr/les-protections/les-changes-complets/pampers-baby-dry-taille-7-xxl-paquet-de-30-couches-pampers-baby-dry-7-28-par-pampers.html

Have the sizes changed meaning at some point?

>>60095

Maybe the sizes have regional differences. A size 7 in one region may be made differently than size 7 in another.

>>60097

Kind of like how a size 12 shoe in America is not the same as a size 12 shoe in EU?

>>60095

American children are heavier at similar body proportions around the diaper area. That's my guess.

>>60188

Fat since the beginning :3

>>60097

I double-checked and size 8 is 17+ kg, size 7 is 15+ kg.

Weird, because it's not like there's an established regional size system or such, unlike shoes. The brands here even differ in the exact weights they claim each numbered size represents.

And from what I can remember the numbered size system wasn't around when I first bought baby diapers - instead it was just listed weights and names.

I think the first Pampers I bought were called Baby Dry XL or something like that. Another brand called its similar size range Junior.

>>60198

No. 6' 2". I'm just lanky as fuck. I've been scrawny my whole life. I wore toddler size clothes until I was 8.

Biggest issue is that as clothing sizes get bigger, they get both longer AND wider to compensate. I just need longer. So everything is either loose, or gives me some wicked midriff. They make big-n-tall, not…tall

The diapers fit kind of like how they do in that third pic. Albeit, even just a tad tighter than that.

>>59858

Well it is diaper changing time for this little lady, she reallyy does need it..

>>59823

>>59826

Neither of you look cute in them. You look like you're wearing speedos. Buy a real diaper.

>>66197

t. mad fatty

>>60210

Checked the bag of 7s ive got. says 17+ kg on it, which would imply they moved the other sizes around again rather than make a bigger one.

>>66197

i can enjoy both, adult diapers AND pampers. and idc how it looks. it feels amazing. and it's pretty cheap, too. among other practical benefits.

>>66295

Same. To some extent I actually prefer Pampers. the look and smell alone are already great, and they are fairly cheap while still having some decent capacity.

What % of diaper R&D employees do you think are incon?

What % are closet fetishists?

>>66517

What if every one that makes things has a fetish for that thing?

Like you go to a store and see a new doughnut brand with smaller oblong holes created just cause someone wanted to have them for their dick.

Think about this next time you see a new product.