/a/ - Animu & Mango

They don't let groups of men enter either.

>>812688

What's happening here?

Let's be honest, the food can't be any good if they have to depend on a gimmick like that.

It's not sexist, it's Single-ist. Japan is just trying to get their men to look at real women, because the high-density population on NEET Island is basically turning into the Rat Utopia Experiments.

>>812706

Prevent women from entering the workforce, low birth problems immediately solved.

>>812705

>>812688

Isn't this for purikura? I figured it was either perverts or highchool guys dicking about and scaring off the customers. Probably perverts.

I think this might be more /jp/ than /a/ mind you

>>812709

Get rid of birth control. It turns women into castratos.

>>812706

Women brought it on themselves. It's their own fault 3D is so PD

>>812709

That's the productive half of the workforce. This kills the Japanese Economy. The guys are just working 9-5 so they can go home to their anime and 2d girls. Compared to that, the women there would find a more manly date in an actual soy-based food product.

In other words, Japan is ripe with desperate Asian women who want committed relationships from anyone that will give them attention.

>>812711

A woman or couple taking dozens of lewd photos is perfectly acceptable, but a single man taking expensive dick pics is crossing the line.

>>812719

>That's the productive half of the workforce

Only a retard would believe this nonsense.

>>812688

There's a reason Japan is ground zero for 2D. The absolute most horrific 3DPD exists over there. They had to create 2D just to stay alive.

>>812735

Why do you think I'm posting it on /a/ and not a different board? You should be eating this up.

But in all seriousness, no, it's actually a serious global issue Researched by several religious organizations on why the Nuclear family unit is degenerating, not some SJW hack study. Men aren't as driven to get degrees or achieve more, women are too focused on careers and personal lives. End result is a generation of unimpressive men obsessed with their own pleasure-interests and doing the bare minimum, and women trying to replace a relationship and family with any other sort of self-fulfillment they can find.

It's not nearly as bad as Japan, but it's becoming more common elsewhere.

>>812738

>a serious global issue Researched by several religious organizations on why the Nuclear family unit is degenerating

Well, lets have it then. Cough up the sources and citations.

>nobody posting the actual answer

It's because of too much train groping (just like in your Japanese mangas!), female-only carriages are designed to give their women a brief breather from the constant ass fondlings of Japan, since otherwise their asses will get sore.

https://blog.gaijinpot.com/whats-with-women-only-carriages/

Thank you for reading my informative post.

>>812738

Employers consistently want to employ highly-educated women in places of management because it fills their pay quotas better than hiring many low-entry women who could get pregnant or sick at any moment. For that reason, employers try to hire more men in low-entry positions, and a few women in high-entry positions. That way even they can get away with hiring more men while still fulfilling their equality obligations.

>several religious organizations

Oh, you're just shitposting.

>>812738

Men are a net contribution to society where as women are a net drain.

https://www.victoria.ac.nz/news/2014/research-shows-disparity-between-tax-paid-by-women-and-men

>>812719

>In other words, Japan is ripe with desperate Asian women who want committed relationships from anyone that will give them attention.

So long as that guy is a chad.

Stop thinking Japan is so different from here. If anything, the biggest difference is that the myth of "train groping," like cited here >>812742

is just Japan being ahead of the curve on the "Me Too" witchhunt.

>>812719

I thought they had the reverse Australian issue where the women only want a guy who makes $100k/year (until they're in their 30s and get desperate because of the biological clock).

All developed and wealthy countries are experiencing a death-spiral of low birth rates. It has nothing to do with 2D porn; it has nothing to do with the motherfucking meme about soy; it has nothing to do with Japanese men being weak or Japanese women being cunts. This trend IS NOT PARTICULAR TO JAPAN. It's just that when you remove base survival from a country's top priority, people start to realize how utterly pointless and a waste of time successfully fucking is. Saving "muh race" through popping out ugly retard children is a child's logic. Real legacies, that actually improve the world (rather than make it objectively worse through producing more mouths to feed that are drains on society), are left behind by the truly intelligent, who throughout history are loathe to waste a full quarter of their precious lives caring for a useless screaming pile of shit and vomit that wants nothing to do with them as soon as its old enough to walk away.

>>812706

The birth rate of Japan is nothing to worry about. We are talking about a country that is smaller than California with the 11th highest population in all the world. The birth rates are fairly steady so its fine. If we see a birth rate of 1 for a good 5 years then its time to worry.

>>812784

You and 99% of everyone alive in first world nations are never going to leave behind any sort of legacy. Why are you so delusional? The only legacy you have a chance of leaving is something on the local level and those kinds of legacies will be lost in 15 years after death. Your only hope for legacy is producing a child.

>muh over population

That is truly a childs logic. You can logically tell yourself that it was better to not confess your feelings to that girl or you could realize that you are not a machine and are in fact human. Thus you need children, legacy, people who care about you to be have your primal human needs taken care of.

The reason birth rates in first world nations fall is feminism.

>>812826

I'm a novelist; I've already left behind a legacy, and unlike DNA which corrupts at a rate of more than 50% per generation, it's immutable and eternal. So long as there are harddrives and libraries on Earth, somewhere my words and thoughts will endure, pure and unchanged. Races will die out, countries may rise or fall, your meaningless stupid ideology and everyone who ever knew you will be gone in a century or so.

You're the delusional one. You've been brainwashed by those in power into giving up your own spawn to be an increasingly larger workforce of slaves for a system much greater than your scope of comprehension. Bringing children into a world where it's been, time and again, proven to be composed more of suffering than of pleasure, for everyone everywhere, is foolishness. It's not only stupid and pointless, it's selfish and cruel. You only do it so you have someone to wipe the shit off your decrepit ass once you've grown too old to do it yourself.

>>812857

>I'm a novelist

Prove it. Show us what you've published. Even if you were it doesn't matter because you could also be forgotten unless you're of the level of Shakespeare, Goethe, Pound Eliot, Joyce, etc.; you'd have to be one of them, one of the greats, to actually matter anyway.

>more of suffering than of pleasure

Life isn't about the pursuit of happiness, isn't about getting your rocks off, you nihilistic, bourgeoise piece of shit. Suck start a shotgun.

>>812826

Why should I care about leaving behind a legacy at all? Who gives a shit?

>>812892

>Prove it

That is not required to prove my argument is correct. Even if I'm lying through my teeth, it doesn't change the fact that the truth of its logic frightened you so much, you were forced to make an impossible demand: "I'll only concede this argument if you turn the sky green!"

I could be forgotten? Perhaps. But you WILL be forgotten. It's a guarantee. Do you remember your great grandparents, who were alive a hundred years ago and died before you were born? Of course not. Literally NOBODY does, unless they were a prominent and important historical figure, and even then it's only secondhand or thirdhand knowledge. All they were has disappeared; all that they built has crumbled into dust; everything they cherished has changed. The only "legacy" remaining is a group of great-grandchildren that are completely indistinguishable from everyone else.

The species doesn't need your contribution of children to survive. It will do just fine without you, and as stated before, it's a net negative. That's why it's important to leave behind a unique legacy, something particular to yourself. But that would take too much work, wouldn't it? Far easier to just grab the nearest girl, squirt in her cunt, and call it a job well done, right? After all, from the way you talk about women and "feminism", it's pretty clear you're the type to relegate child-rearing as "women's work"; so your contribution begins and ends at your own orgasm. Yet you presume to lecture me on hedonism?

Of course, you completely misunderstood my meaning on pleasure and pain, simply because you're incapable of looking past the base meaning of a word. But that is unsurprising. You are, after all, a child; you think nobody reads anything other than the "classics"; I bet you think people don't even read after leaving school. After that, offering only some trite insults regarding terminology you do not understand (and how DOES one "start a shotgun" by sucking on it, pray tell?) is simply par for the course for someone of your minuscule capacity.

If the full scope of your intelligence is only sufficient enough to produce a quartet of sons to go work in the nearest coal mine, until they die of black lung; and a couplet of daughters to be brood bitches for rich businessmen, I won't deign to stop you. Enjoy your "life".

>>813072

Oh okay, guess I was wrong.

>>813072

>if you turn the sky green!"

>Proving authorship is asking for changing of reality

I know you wish to be hyperbolic, but you could just concede that you've written nothing or nothing of value.

>But you WILL be forgotten.

That's your insecurity, anon, not mine.

>The species doesn't need your contribution of children to survive.

It somewhat does. Apply this logic (the bystander effect) to every individual, e.g., someone else will birth a child. Your dependence to be remembered is intertwined with the perpetuation of the species. After all, who is going to remember you if no one breeds any more children or a complete extinction?

>After all, from the way you talk about women and "feminism", it's pretty clear you're the type to relegate child-rearing as "women's work"

My first post was the one to which you are now replying right now, retard.

>You are, after all, a child; you think nobody reads anything other than the "classics"; I bet you think people don't even read after leaving school.

Yeah, they don't. No one wants to read anything that does not have the prestige of greatness, and the majority of people do not read after high school. Secondly, just to produce mediocre work is virtually no different than impregnating a woman or women. People who are mediocre (you) won't be read in a thousand years.

>Of course, you completely misunderstood my meaning on pleasure and pain

Then elaborate on your idiosyncratic definitions, you snowflake.

>>813138

>Samefagging

>>813072

>and how DOES one "start a shotgun" by sucking on it, pray tell?

Your novel must be great anon.