No.776109
Here is where we debate the pros and cons of boobs and asses.
Do you like your boobs modest or large?
Phat ass or no?
No.776113
Depends on her personality and how active she is, though I can pretty much ignore it if she has large jugs and ass but is supposed to be the #1 athlete in school. I love both of them to be large, though I can accept medium/small-ish breasts if she has a fantastic ass and hips. Flat asses are only acceptable in lolis, or no hips for that matter
No.776117
>>776109
>Do you like your boobs modest or large?
No.776124
>tits
70s torpedoes > normal and perky > tiny > cowtits
>ass
There's only good and bad here.
No.776125
I like both ass and tits to be as big as a slender frame can afford. I don't care much either for flat or balloon tits.
No.776127
>>776125
Yeah, the proportion and form has to compliment the overall body frame.
No.776157
All types of boobs have their time and place, but plump butt is forever.
1st pic is a guy By the way, dismayed when I realized.
No.776161
I like my tits large, but not /d/-tier.
No.776165
I appreciate quality assets, no matter where they may be found. Sometimes larger ones work better on some girls, while smaller works on others.
If she has no tits at all, there has to be some level of ass and hips going on, or it's just a prepubescent boy who's missing his wiener. That said, tits alone won't make up for for lack of hips and ass. So I guess when it comes down to it, ass and hips are the most important part.
No.776168
>>776160
Muscular ass, easy. Look at those thighs and calves, and how nicely it complements it.
No.776171
>>776109
DFC
F
C
A true man of tastes only likes the ass and understands that on top side, more than a handful is a waste. After all, boobs are just a fake ass.
No.776173
File: 7f9f0cc73765207⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 641.91 KB, 734x979, 734:979, 7f9f0cc737652079a5f9ffcacd….jpg)
File: bd8549eb025abbd⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 549.1 KB, 734x979, 734:979, bd8549eb025abbd3264c4fbfd2….jpg)
File: c7b0c0b7306d7ed⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 96.89 KB, 620x876, 155:219, c7b0c0b7306d7edf8d01341519….jpg)
Breats small to medium, preferably on the small side. Asses are good if they're well defined with nice hips and legs too. It's all about proportion, hyper exaggerated furry-tier garbage never fails to kill my boner. Thiccfags can go home too, everyone with taste knows it's all about fit tomboys who are slender but supple.
No.776174
A nice ass can make up for lack of tits. However, nice tits cannot make up for lack of ass.
No.776180
Breasts are the natural preference for civilized men, and asses for those of savage and unvirtuous character. My explanation is as follows:
With any human desire, it is spurred on by immediate sensation, but always has a larger reason underlying it. For example, one eats because they feel hungry and their stomach growls, but the reason that spurs us on to eating is because without food our body will have no fuel. A human is not instinctively aware of the grand reason for eating, but they are instincively aware of the growling of their stomach. The same can be said of lust. Their is the underlying necessity of continuing the species behind our boners which we are not instinctively aware of, and this necessity can naturally extend to more specific attratctions in more specific forms.
Let us consider, then, the breast/ass dichotomy. In examining the underlyinng cause for attratction to either we will reveal the true nature of the matter, and see at once which is superior. The ass is something which is developed and formed by upright standing and motion, especially running. A large ass, then, is indicative of an ability to run for long periods, and do other assorted kinds of leg work. This utility is hampered by the presence of large breasts. On the other hand, breasts serve as the means by which a mother nurses her children, and a generous bust affords (at least in appearence) a better possiblity for healthy children. This utility is not hampered by a large ass.
So I draw the conclusion that attraction to breasts is superior to (and more civilized and virtous than) attratction to ass for three reasons:
>The attraction to breasts is based on the possibility and desire for children; a long term and fruitful desire, and is therefore the more noble of the two
>Attraction to ass is based on a woman's short term survivability (as in her ability to run) in nature, but this is only pertinent in third world shitholes where life is not stable
>Breasts being placed on the front of a woman allows them to be viewed and appreciated while engaging in face-to-face intercourse, which permits for the kind of intimate romantic connection found only in civilized peoples; whereas ass must be enjoyed fromn the dog-like "mounting" position, so common in rape scenarios.
So we see that the underlying basis and reason for attraction to breasts is of only the most wholesome and virutous kind, and therefore all virutous men must at once declare it to be the superior attraction. Naturally, the forward looking nature of enjoying breasts will be more commonly found in nations with high life expectancies, and among peoples who are more forward looking by nature. There is a reason that ass is favored almost universally in Africa, South America and South Asia, whereas breasts are favored almost universally by Europeans and white Americans.
I will add, however, that excess is unseemly no matter what department it's in, and I wholly denounce knockers the size of, for example, pic #3 in >>776161
No.776188
About boobs, basically what >>776123 says. Small to flat, and teardrop-shaped if not flat. Attraction to cowtits is simply an infantile reaction, stemming from the subconscious expectation that larger boobs hold more milk.
But when it comes to butts, it's more a matter of shape than size. The perfect butt is basically shaped like an isosceles trapezium. In terms of profile, it starts off as roughly flat to slightly convex with an inflexion point roughly around where the coccyx ends, from whence it's strictly concave all the way to the gluteal fold. Such a butt is best complemented by a short to medium-length skirt.
No.776192
I have a preference for larger boobs, but to be frank, that is secondary to the other qualities of a girl. Nice, soft boobs must be accompanied by a good personality and attitude. It's a charm that can only be brought to life by the person using it.
No.776193
Big breasts, not too big that they're can suffocate you if you look at them wrong, that with a nice slim waistline, with wide hips and a muscular ass with a moderate layer of fat. Not too much that it's cottage cheese shit, but enough that you can slap it for a nice jiggle or grab it without the ass feeling like a lump of steel.
No.776197
I'm a man of flatness at heart. There is just something so adorable and outrageously sexual about a small girl exposing her flat chest with perky underdeveloped candy corn nipples. I do however go through phases of liking big boobs. Not giant boobs but ones with very good shape. B cups go home.
>>776160
Right.
No.776210
With breasts, a flat chest is super hot, budding loli boobs are delicious, and small breasts are cute. Anything above that and I either try to ignore them or it becomes a turn off. The only exceptions are wide-hipped aras and fatties, whose breasts compliment their frames well. But a generic adult-ish female with big breasts on a thin frame? They udderly disgust me.
Ass is always where it's at. So many shapes and sizes are appealing to me. Within lolis alone there are enough ratios and levels of realism in proportions to last a lifetime. Tight loli hips, "squid shape", long and thin, rectangles, leggy lolis, bony lolis, stout lolis, bendy lolis, oversized thighs and ass, I love them all.
No.776212
>>776180
>Fully explains great taste
>Turns around and shows his lack of said taste
Beat it nerd.
No.776224
>>776180
Don't challenge us in this department, lover of cowtits, for we have a turboautist on our side.
http://www.lloydianaspects.co.uk/evolve/breasts.html
>Another false “bigger is better” argument is that which says that a man will find big breasts sexy because he knows that any children he fathers by the breasts’ owner will not go hungry. In fact, the breasts on a nullipara contain mainly fat, not milk-producing tissue. They are almost no indication at all of the amount of milk a woman might produce in the future. Breasts typically increase in size for the first eight months of lactation. Besides, an ability to produce more milk than is needed is no advantage. Once a woman has produced enough to feed her baby well, any excess production is expensive waste. Almost all women can produce enough to feed a child. Milk production increases to meet demand, so a woman bearing twins will produce more (2).
>That women do vary their behaviour according to their own brand of attractiveness is supported by a number of observations. For instance, women who have sexier bodies, rather than pretty faces, are more likely to indulge in casual sex, and lose their virginity three years younger. They also put more emphasis on the physical attractiveness of their partners, and in other ways tended to be more masculine (Mikach and Bailey, 1999). This is possible partly because a woman can be exposed in the womb and during life to testosterone. Some women have high levels of both sex hormones, and testosterone makes people lustful. Women with large breasts achieve menarche (periods) earlier, and get married less often (Manning, J.T. et al., 1997). This suggests that the instincts of women are fine-tuned to their best reproductive interests, and that breasts are sexy. A woman who is likely to succeed in the long term, due to beauty and brains, may grow smaller breasts and wait longer before losing her virginity. Another option for a woman is to become as sexy as possible as quickly as possible, and start breeding as young as possible. This doesn’t mean that they are not fussy about the men they mate with, but it does mean that they would put less weight on how long those men stayed with them. They could get the best sperm by being sexy, rather than being intelligent, but they can only get the best sperm this way when they are young, so they “go for it”. There is supposedly a link between high levels of sex hormones, both oestrogen and testosterone, and lower intelligence, which fits this pattern. This would also fit the frequently noted phenomenon of women thinking little of the intelligence of busty young sexy rivals of easy virtue.
http://www.lloydianaspects.co.uk/evolve/thighs.html
>In the past, our female ancestors did not have such great pressure on them to be athletic. Gathering is not a frantic activity. The women would have gone around in groups, often tending to children as they gathered. If any dangerous predators turned up, they did not escape death by running, but by calling for help, throwing stones, using pointed sticks, fire, group tactics, and the like. The cost, therefore, of having fat away from the centre of gravity, was not very great for women.
>There was a definite cost of a paunch. Paunches are not sexy. The reason a paunch on a woman is not sexy is simple. A woman with a paunch looks pregnant, and pregnant women are in no state to be impregnated by a man, and so men’s instincts will evolve to find big prominent bellies unsexy. In order to avoid appearing pregnant, women evolved to deposit fat stores away from the belly, and the next nearest place was the backside and thighs. Here, the cost of encumbrance was that women could not run quite as fast as otherwise they might, but the benefit of looking more fertile was greater than that cost.
No.776228
>>776160
Neither. Get that western garbage out of here.
No.776229
>>776189
At last I truly see
No.776230
>>776224
I have read what you posted in the past, and I don't necessarily disagree with it. I was not making the argument that "bigger is better" for breasts, I was making the argument breasts are better than ass, at any size, and I did so by means of an argument that was less "materialistic," so to speak. (Namely that breasts of any size are geared towards child nurturing.) The only point that I made that your excerpt addresses directly is when I mentioned that ass is for running, which is contradicted here by saying that prehistoric women didn't need to be athletic. I don't know if I buy that completely, though. Even women would have needed to walk long distances, or perhaps run on occasion. The muscle buildup from doing this, combined with the estrogen related fat depositing, would have led to large asses and thighs, in keeping with my original theory.
It's a bit difficult for me to call, though, since I didn't make an entirely evolutionary argument to begin with. To put it simply, I could suppose you were right that ass is more natural as an attractive force when viewed from the perspective of nature and animalism, but my assertion that "breasts are better than ass" rests on the reality that humans do not live as animals anymore, they have mores and virtues which set them apart. My argument rested on virtue and civilization, and is not necessarily related to the evolutionary progress of mankind in an immediate biological sense.
In any case, I stand by what I said and I stand by cowtits, always and forever. Even though they beget no more milk than small ones, their size to me represents bounty of life and good health.
No.776250
I prefer at most modest breasts, but DFC is the gold standard by which every breast is judged.
Asses are my real passion though, and are great in every variety as long as they are proportional to the frame of the body and the personality of the women. Hips themselves play a large part in this too.
No.776255
>>776109
>first image
thatsamanbaby.png
No.776256
>>776124
>torpedo tits
You are a good person with excellent taste and I wish you the best of luck
No.776283
>>776279
What if my waifu is a dark skinned toned bootie goddess?
No.776301
>>776283
It cant be helped, but you'd love all of your waifu, breasts included.
No.776304
>>776124
>torpedos
I don't get this meme, the best part big tiddies is the effect gravity has on them
>>776160
Left
No.776309
>>776304
So through dick, unity and through boobs, peace?
No.776310
Small breasts are nicer, but large ones are also fine to a certain point. What's really important is the shape. Sagging tits are one of the least attractive things that exist, and it's even worse when some awful artists make tiny, budding loli breasts sag. Why the fuck would you do that? It's both hideous and unrealistic. Sagging anything is just thoroughly unattractive and is a sign of decline and being past the peak, suggesting that she's only going to get uglier from there.
Same goes for butts. The shape is much more important than the size. Too much fat and it becomes nigger tier, especially combined with vomit-inducing behaviour like twerking. Some fat works as long as the shape is good, such as in the fifth image in >>776210. The hips are obviously important too, and that's why almost all good loli artists usually give the girls more of an hourglass figure than real people would have at that age.
A bit of fat is obviously needed because that's one of the things that distinguishes female shapes from male, but it should never be excessive or sag. That is only a sign of decline and poor health. That's why torpedo tits are repulsive; they're basically signalling that the owner is unhealthy and growing less attractive. Also since some claim that gigantic tits is a sign of fertility (this was debunked earlier in the thread), I want to mention that wide hips is a much better sign of this, because wide hips suggests that the owner is also keeping in shape since the stomach area is thinner than the hips.
No.776364
>>776304
>However, please limit it to two boobs per person
Even Takaki knows harems are shit tier.
No.776395
>>776304
There's torpedo/pear and silicon.
No.776425
>>776109
So, both of your photos look like traps.
No.776426
>>776425
The one on the left isn't even a trap, it's just a guy.
No.776435
I like small boobs but covered up by a t-shirt. I like how the shirt just hugs onto the body despite the curvature.
No.776438
Hmm...
> lactation < scat
< paizuri == sumire
> droopy tits < saggy buttocks
< flat chest > flat ass
> sideboob == intergluteal cleft curvature seen from the frontgap (I don't know the term for this)
This is quite the conundrum.
No.776439
>>776438
Oops, meant lactation > scat, gross.
No.776443
>47 posts later and only 2 anons notice
Well done, OP.
No.776454
>>776438
Lactation is one of my fetishes. I would love having a motheru to put some milk in my coffee, tea, or cereal and let me have some to drink when I wanted.
No.776456
>>776443
Everybody noticed, except you.
No.776491
>>776454
>breast feeding handjob
No.776502
>>776456
>implying implications
No.776503
>>776491
Search for 'anime momdom' if you want more
No.776504
>>776456
>Everybody
Factually wrong, see >>776376 >>776380
No.776541
>Tits are life ass is hometown
Reflect once again on this sagely wisdom.
No.776556
>>776109
Firstly you're a faggot, not posting females.
Secondly neither matters. You could have an ugly girl with any single good body part, it's a waste. You also have proportions as an issue, some people would look shit with big/small tits/ass. Lastly personality is important, if she's a bitch and a whore, good looks are wasted.
The most important thing is firstly the personality, then her body as a whole, proportions and such.
That said, tits are objectively a sign of a more civilised society, look at tits v ass on a global map. Now some autists
>>776171
Will refer to tits as a fake ass. This is spin of a simple thing our friend doesn't want to admit. Ass lovers are less evolved. Yes the ass came first when humans were apes, since we walked, breasts became the new hotness. If you think tits are a fake ass, then I suggest you give up on fapping to humans, as humans are fake apes. Which are a fake, of a fake, of a fake. Obviously you should fap to amoebas or some other lesser evolved ancestry.
Tits produce milk.
Asses produce shit.
Tits don't smell.
Asses do.
Tits are hygienic.
Asses are not.
>>776160
Toned is always superior. Shame that most artists can't draw muscles and you end up with lots of male bodybuilder like drawings with vaginas.
Also, a toned ass gives amazing thighs and hips. It also won't give you cottage cheese skin with no elasticity.
Do you have more images like this?
No.776559
>>776230
Only a civilized man thinks that he can divorce nature. But nature is your mother, not your wife! You speak of not being "materialistic" and "animalistic", yet you long for the fat on a woman's chest. If you want to be so "virtuous", then why do you care about such things? Just feed the newborns with chemicals from a bottle.
No.776568
>North Korea likes asses
Truly best Korea.
No.776571
>>776556
>>776568
>Places that are cold prefer tits over ass
No shit, Sherlock. If you're wearing heavy cloths all the time, than boobs will stand out more than a fine ass will. Man should embrace instinct while using technology to his advantage. A good ass typically means good hips. Fat sacks up top mean nothing compared to child bearing hips!
No.776663
>>776568
Argentina is white.
No.776670
>>776556
Why are we talking about 3D here?
I advise this thread to be deleted since it will only attract crossboarders of this kind. This is not even anime.
No.776686
>>776571
>Australia
>Egypt
>Argentina
>Cold
No.776689
>>776686
There's always going to be statistical anomalies with countries that barely have access to the internet.
And aussies originally come from up north, and are a bunch of crazy cunts.
No.776690
>>776689
Who gives a fuck? That has nothing to do with /a/ and sounds exactly like what >>776670 was talking about.
No.776691
>>776690
>the debate of breasts vs ass has nothing to do with /a/
Yeah I guess anime girls don't have any of those.
Have fun larping as a mod.
No.776698
/a/ stop fighting, we're not talking about 3DPD and dropping relevant hints of biology as a grounding for what 2D is an abstraction of is not out of line for this topic. And the topic isn't something for us to fight over either, a true connoisseur appreciates both boobs and butts for their own sakes.
No.776705
>>776426
I am unable to believe this.
No.776737
>>776188
Fuck you big boobs are good too. Squish is fun.
No.776740
>>776210
I want to sniff loli asses.
No.776757
>>776740
>I want to sniff loli asses.
Would they even have a smell?
No.776783
>>776698
But if I dont apply 3D logic to 2D the cowtits (every cup higher than C) will win!
No.776801
>>776787
>Hug oppai from behind
>Achieve the same thing
Checkmate lolis.
No.776806
>>776799
Well Suruga Kanbaru does have a fine ass.
No.776931
>>776757
Yes. They smell like heaven.
No.776934
>>776160
The left part is most evidently inaccurate: one can't lug around tens of kilograms of excess fat with an underdeveloped lower body. She won't be as muscular as the girl on the right underneath the blubber but she isn't going to lack muscle mass completely like your typical CGDCT anime girl.
No.776940
>>776559
I'm not suggesting we divorce nature. We find virtue within the bounds of nature. My point is that tits are the source of life and nourishment, asses are not. Isn't it better to be attracted to the source of life than a mere ass? It doesn't matter how large or small the breasts are, so long as they fulfill this purpose. Any man who finds greater beauty in breasts must draw his attraction from their purpose at some point. As far as cowtits are concerned, fondness for them goes much in the same vein as seeing a cornucopia or some such thing. When one thinks of a cornucopia, they think of plenty and prosperity. A cornucopia is a symbol of these things. In the same way I think that large breasts are a symbol of fertility, even if they don't produce any more milk than small ones.
This is the crux of my referring to things like "materialism" and "animalism." The symbol, the essential "idea" of the cornucopia and what it means to us is a product of human civilzation. It is not a divorce from, but an augmentation of appetites given to us by nature. So it is too with breasts, and so it comes back to my original post.
No.776946
>>776931
So it's an imaginary smell?
No.776954
>>776946
No, a real heavenly smell that has the aroma of peach cream, honey, and perfume.
No.776961
>>776783
To be fair, it depends on genetics and diet (give or take other factors) for real life anime boobs.
No.777377
>>776934
Fat people actually have less muscle than skinny people due to the constant supply of glucose preventing genesis of muscle tissue. I'm not saying this is always the case; sumo wrestlers, for example, will consume as many calories as possible within several hours and then fast for the rest of the day. I doubt this is the case for many regular people, however.
No.777379
>>776961
Exactly, breast tissue and fat are different things. Most 3DPD with 'large breasts' are just fat.
No.777395
>>777377
Sumo's spend the majority of the day training like mad cunts then binge eat up to 10k calories in the evening to pack on the weight.
No.777400
>>777377
Then explain to me why fat people usually have a higher BMR than skeletrons. Not daily calorie expenditure, BMR.
No.777403
>>777395
That's literally what I just said.
>>777400
Overworked internal organs. Energy is used for a lot more than just moving.
No.777420
>>777400
How much more do you think a fat person's heart has to work? And that's just one thing to consider.
No.777464
>>777420
>>777403
Why would their internal organs consume more energy if fat tissue is mostly inert?
No.777600
>>776934
>>776160
One thing people keep frogetting when looking at 2d fats and assuming 3d fats follow similar rules is that, as you can clearly see here >>777377 , 3DPD landwhales do just as >>777395 said, they indulge themselves not only in the worst possible kind of edible food there is, they overdo it about four-to-five or even more times what an average human needs. You can clearly see that their bodies can't even contain the amount of fat they generate, as that negro whale shows with her grossly overflowing arms. 2d pictures however show a body that is either exaggerated in its proportions or that, despite being exaggeratedly fat, still had required some minimum effort training to get the fat to move to the right spots and the person in question herself being able to even stand up without requiring some sort of physical support.
No.777609
>>777403
>That's literally what I just said.
He just translated it into the language of the professionals, as to avoid possible future confusions. We don't want a bunch of /fit/izens coming here to argue about the finer point of that kind of training, do we?
No.777616
>>776160
>there are only two extremes instead of a smoothly graded scale spanning between them
About two thirds to the right for me.
No.777617
What>>776254 said.
>>776123
Don't corrupt his wisdom, heretic.
No.777662
>>776255
I thought you were joking