6ba17f No.685490 [View All]
I didn't actually draw this Mine would've been worse
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8d31ea No.686355
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
7eb77b No.686363
>>686344
Is it a Fieseler Fi 167?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
14d25f No.686365
>>686344
Oh, it's the Fieseler Fi 167 isn't it…
Out of date and the Graf Zeppelin was never completed.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8a3359 No.686393
>>686365
How did the Kriegsmarine manage to be so colossally inept as to keep an almost-finished capital vessel of immense strategic value sitting in port for 3 years then resume construction when their remaining surface contingent was beyond saving anyway?
Even the Luftwaffe for all its autism never went that far off the rails.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
4e6868 No.686420
>>686393
Only the wermecht was competent.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8b7038 No.686436
>>686420
the Wehrmacht had 3 arms, the Heer, the Luftwaffe and the Kriegsmarine.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
4e6868 No.686449
>>686436
Only the heer were competent.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
24e0b4 No.686520
>>686393
Nobody in the Kriegsmarine had any real expereince with carrier ops, the Luftwaffe was throwing a shitfit and claiming it had the right to aircraft and the only aircraft carrier worthy planes were iffy at best. I also doubt that a German carrier would make much difference given the situation.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fae886 No.686538
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
43adbc No.686540
>>686301
its not an axis plane either, I thought it was a copy of the dauntless when I first saw it.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
085137 No.686553
>>686540
For the first pic, キ67 四式重爆撃機 「飛龍」, and the previous Dauntless looking one is the Sukhoi Su-2.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
43adbc No.686557
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8d0cad No.686616
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
14d25f No.686652
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8ae07d No.686672
>>686393
CANT21, or at least some kind of Italian seaplane
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
e460b9 No.686680
>>686672
Top is a ki 46 recce and bottom is something soviet.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8ae07d No.686686
>>686680
Yes (reporting name was Dinah though, so A-), and no, it's not a Soviet plane.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
43adbc No.686713
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8d0cad No.686717
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
3ec018 No.686718
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
43adbc No.686719
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8d0cad No.686722
>>686719
I’m really bad at plane identification, it’s embarrassing and shameful.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8a3359 No.686725
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
43adbc No.686734
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8a55e4 No.686739
This took longer than I wanted it to
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
6ba17f No.686743
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8a55e4 No.686745
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
6ba17f No.686746
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
6ba17f No.686750
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8a55e4 No.686751
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8d0cad No.686752
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d2ef11 No.686755
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
43adbc No.686756
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
6ba17f No.686770
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8a55e4 No.686804
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8a3359 No.686814
>>686734
Looks like an Ar 196.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
43adbc No.686823
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
5d48ff No.686833
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
43adbc No.686838
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
6ba17f No.686867
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
43adbc No.686897
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
e91315 No.686898
>>686897
Quite certain it's a Spitfire. The clipped wings, four-bladed propeller and cockpit is making me think Mk IXe. Am I way off?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
43adbc No.686899
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8a3359 No.687027
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
43adbc No.687063
>>687027
again, wrong engine
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fd9c87 No.687193
I'll just post these two that are extremely easy to guess.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8a3359 No.687202
>>687193
Left is a Typhoon Mk.II, right is a Wyvern.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fd9c87 No.687206
>>687202
>Typhoon mk.2
Close enough, it's actually a Tempest. If I were going for a Typhoon I'd go with a triblade prop, not quad.
inb4 tempest is just Typhoon II
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
e91315 No.687213
>>686899
Of course, you even emphasized the details on the engine. Please tell me it's a Mk XII then.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
43adbc No.687216
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.