/tech/ - Technology★

>deep web

>dark web

Giving these things edgy names was a mistake. Should've just been called unindexed web and overlay web.

>>987570

It would have the same effect as long as someone would put some creepy music over it and the right after effect over a footage of people coding with balaclava on their heads. Calling it dark or deep is just the cherry on the top, if it wasn't called that, it would have some military like name like netsec, opsec, humint, osint, maybe underweb.

>>987569

you two

>>987585

I have a soft spot for cheesy shit.

>>987567 (OP)

>torbot

This seems to be somekind of CIA/NSA or whatever agency operation.

If people begins to use that shit it is going to be a big mistake. Tor is already being abused by faggots who uses bots, now if we have that shit datamining over it the network part of it is going to be killed.

>only able to find shit that is linked somewhere

Is that it? Doesn't seems impressive at all. You have trust-worthy people in your w/e illegal shit you are doing with all the information behind some sort of security and this bot means fuck all.

What, you mean public hidden services aren't private and can be crawled at any time? No shit.

>>987567 (OP)

It's a spider, but for Tor hidden services. Big fucking deal.

>>987611

>This seems to be somekind of CIA/NSA or whatever agency operation.

Yep, three letter agencies definitely put this on github. Under the name "DecSecInside." That's how they operate.

>>987647

You know, you said that jokingly. But in reality things like https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq4-1 and https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/lemongrenade exist. So yes, they actually do post projects to github openly to flaunt it in our faces. Or to trick idiots like you into thinking the project isn't actually ran by them just because it is open source.

>>987567 (OP)

darknet, dark web, and deep web all mean different things

why are they implying they're all the same thing?

>>987689

>You know, you said that jokingly

Not really. "Mockingly," or "sarcastically" would be more accurate.

>So yes, they actually do post projects to github openly to flaunt it in our faces.

Your understanding of their motives is comically ignorant.

>Or to trick idiots like you

pot kettle etc.

>into thinking the project isn't actually ran by them just because it is open source.

Tor Bot is made by a bunch of literal Pajeets, you dumb fuck.