>>970834 (OP)
OP (and the rest of the /pol/ lurkers here) if you can put aside your LARPing for a moment, here's an analysis of several futures depending on how we decide to organize society in the face of all encompassing automation.
It does talk about Socialism and Communism though, so you've been warned.
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2011/12/four-futures/
Some points:
> Much of the literature on post-capitalist economies is preoccupied with the problem of managing labor in the absence of capitalist bosses. However, I will begin by assuming that problem away, in order to better illuminate other aspects of the issue. This can be done simply by extrapolating capitalism’s tendency toward ever-increasing automation, which makes production ever-more efficient while simultaneously challenging the system’s ability to create jobs, and therefore to sustain demand for what is produced.
> Taken to its logical extreme, this dynamic brings us to the point where the economy does not require human labor at all. This does not automatically bring about the end of work or of wage labor [...] [but] it does mean that human societies will increasingly face the possibility of freeing people from involuntary labor.
> There are therefore four logical combinations of the two oppositions, resource abundance vs. scarcity and egalitarianism vs. hierarchy.
At this point the article branches in analyzing each quadrant.
Youtube tl;dr because I am kind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS2lrusOO8E