>>965372
>I admit it's a little unclear to me what the exact legal status of this adopted definition is.
It's legal status is nonexistent.
>It certainly isn't legislation, but it doesn't look like simple party policy either
That's exactly what it is, being a ruling by the Labour party's National Executive Committee. Of course, if Labour come to power they might implement it into law.
>existing "hate speech" law
That bit at the end of the article has little to do with the rest, it was just kikes trying to prove the "necessity" of having any criticism of Israel banned by producing a list of "hate crimes".
From the article:
>They were faced by a small counter-protest of campaigners, many of whom were draped in the flag of Israel, arguing that it was for Jewish people to determine what constituted discrimination against them.
The fucking audacity of these kikes. They're literally demanding the right to be immune to criticism.