[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / asmr / ausneets / pawsru / sonyeon / vg / wx ][Options][ watchlist ]

/tech/ - Technology

You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Email
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

File (hide): 37c1003c63e465f⋯.jpg (110.89 KB, 500x500, 1:1, confused.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

 No.965036>>965059 >>965092 >>965628 >>966198 >>966298 >>968680 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

If you had to reinvent networking, as in write a replacement for TCP/IP, what would it look like?

 No.965041

Gentoo running on a VIM.. hold on let me write a fizz buzz as example...


 No.965043

It would look like TCP/IP.


 No.965059

>>965036 (OP)

Everyone would run TempleOS


 No.965066

all traffic embeded in child porn so it's illegal to snoop.


 No.965070

I am thinking sending and receiving Java POJO with all necessary parameters, either that or JSON


 No.965092>>965113

>>965036 (OP)

IPv4 but with a bigger address space

TCP is fine

replace most higher level stuff with 9p


 No.965103>>965113

idk 9P


 No.965113>>965227

>>965092

>what is ipv6

>>965103

You know that does not do the same thing right.

<hurr durr lets replace ethernet frames with discord messages

not even a coherent idea


 No.965140>>965144

Headers would transmitted only every 10th packet and payloads would grow during those 9 packets to accompany the space of missing header.

If header isn't transmitted ask for retransmission. Other than that I would do the same stuff.


 No.965144>>965246

>>965140

>headers would not exist on every packet

So how the fuck do the packets get routed? You have to have meta routing information in the packet.


 No.965227>>965231

>>965113

>what is ipv6

not ipv4 with a bigger address space


 No.965231>>965447 >>965470 >>965533

>>965227

It pretty much is. Which part specifically do you have issue with. Go on, I will wait.


 No.965246>>965247

>>965144

Imagine a train

Does every every passenger car has it's own locomotive? No.

When this new protocol goes through routers then router will know that next 9 packets will go to the same destination.


 No.965247

>>965246

>the next 9 packets

So really its just one jumbo packet and it cant receive anything else until it is completed because it can't distinguish them. Retarded.


 No.965447

>>965231

Compatibility with IPv4


 No.965450>>965533

Everything would be the same but ipv4 would be 128 bit addresses, fuark this ipv6 bs.

I tell a lie, encryption would be in there, a lot of cruft and complexity exists because we didn't have encryption at the start.


 No.965466

Write it some way to force people to design OSes around the OSI model. That would reduce bloat and security issues.


 No.965470>>965533

>>965231

>Which part specifically do you have issue with. Go on, I will wait.

Tying physical addresses to relative addresses.

Using hex for addresses.

Using colons for address field delimiters. why the fuck should you have to hit shift to dial a number?

ICANN giving out entire blocks to anyone just like they did with ipv4.


 No.965511>>965533

Jumbo packets would be mandatory.

10M Ethernet had 1500 MTU. Why didn't it increase to 1500000 for 10G Ethernet?


 No.965533

>>965231

>It pretty much is

Except it isn't. What you're looking for is http://enhancedip.org/

>>965450

No, fuark you.

>>965470

>Tying physical addresses to relative addresses.

besides link local addresses, nobody forces you.

>Using hex for addresses.

that's actually nice

>>965511

If there wasn't one standard MTU then either routers would have to fragment, which makes them vulnerable to DoS, or end devices would have to do Path MTU Discovery, which they they rarely do for IPv4. Fortunately Path MTU Discovery is mandatory for IPv6.


 No.965540>>965543 >>965554

The problem with computer networks is not a technical but a social one. The problem is that every idiot can connect to the internet. The solution is to forbid everybody but European men who know what they are doing from using computers.


 No.965543>>965544

>>965540

So requiring a literacy test to use the internet?


 No.965544

>>965543

No, more like having to learn Greek or Latin if you want to read the Bible.


 No.965554>>965556

>>965540

What's sopping you from creating private network over the internet? You can set up simple technical challenge to enter like on hackthebox.eu


 No.965556>>965559 >>965587

>>965554

It's not about me and you. It's about normal people meddling with powers they don't understand and hurting themselves and everybody else in the process.

I'd just like to live in a world were computers and communication networks enrich and empower us and the societies we live in, rather than seeing them used to enslave and disarm the goyim.


 No.965559>>965567

>>965556

The best option for this is, still, emails or very specific and underground IRC channels if you need RT comms.


 No.965567

>>965559

You either did not read my last post, do not want to understand it, or are pretending you didn't.


 No.965587>>965589

>>965556

So you're proposing a jewish tech priesthood and an underclass of tech illiterate goy peasants, got it.


 No.965589>>965595

>>965587

I am dreaming of a world were kikes like you don't exist.


 No.965595

>>965589

You fail to realize that normies using tech is not a problem but a mere symptom. Kikery isn't stopped by limiting technology to elites, who are kikes.


 No.965628>>965650 >>966244

>>965036 (OP)

Replace ip address + port with a domain name. Routers are already dns servers, so this is just the natural next step

>don't need a separate name resolution round trip

>connections stay open when you move around on the network

>don't need a separate protocol for ports, just add a subdomain

>indefinitely large address space, won't need faggy NATs, nor ipv4/v6 distinction

>names don't necessarily describe location on the network, harder to geolocate people

TCP (as opposed to UDP) would be a userspace protocol, just like god intended.


 No.965650

>>965628

Fuck you, faggot.


 No.966198


 No.966244

>>965628

fuck off nigger, next you'll want a unicode domain name and a 10000 page spec on what kind of names are acceptable (profanity, homoglyphs, etc)


 No.966298

File (hide): 6b3e858b17eba54⋯.jpg (203.62 KB, 960x540, 16:9, aeroscraft.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): aa4e5079eb41c06⋯.jpg (5.44 MB, 5650x4384, 2825:2192, NH43901-enhanced.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): a8970c2d536ccec⋯.jpg (422.66 KB, 1500x958, 750:479, graf-zeppelin-los-angele00….jpg) (h) (u)

>>965036 (OP)

>reinvent networking

Internet Protocol over Aryan Carriers.


 No.968680

File (hide): 4b5d946fcca576e⋯.jpg (8.84 KB, 220x207, 220:207, cyarvin.jpg) (h) (u)

>>965036 (OP)

Urbit.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
36 replies | 2 images | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / asmr / ausneets / pawsru / sonyeon / vg / wx ][ watchlist ]