/tech/ - Technology★

That's not a bug, that's a feature, closet authoritarian.

Pedolize legaphilia.

Pedos and drug dealers being uncaught on a platform is just a sign of credibility tbh. You can't have privacy+security yet fight against people who need it.

>>948897

this, they're canaries in the coalmine

>>948897

>>948898

This. However, it is a paradox where having them on your platform increases the likelihood of federal agencies expending resources to compromise the security. So despite being secure enough in the first place to host that content, the chances of maintaining security are reduced as you gain popularity.

As far as I'm concerned, they're anti-freedom, anti-privacy corporate/government agents trying to bring down a secure system. They're the new DDOS, so to speak.

>>948886 (OP)

You don't. Any system with anonymity by design is always going to attract people that want anonymity for nefarious purposes, and any change you make to unmask them will unmask the legitimate users too.

>why do people like to have sex with healthy virgin girls

gee, I don't know op, but make sure to consult with our jewish government to kill and castrate the goyim who do

>>948905

>keep the project open source

>don't allow retarded commits

>>948886 (OP)

For some reason I find your pic really disturbing.

>>948886 (OP)

I don't know that you need to get rid of them, so much as you need to stop them from becoming the face of your system.

>>948965

If you tolerate even one then more of them will come. They're hated and despised so any time they find tolerance they will use those places as much as possible. It's like furries, the reason you remove them is they will only draw in more furries until they dominate the place.

>>948975

>until they dominate the place.

Nobody is forcing you to become a furry and you likely won't interact with them, especially if you're not interested.

>>948981

Hello newfag. How long have you had your smart phone?

>>948985

Hello, faggot? What's your problem? Did I trigger your autism?

Pedos like that are no different than those creepy old boomer dads who lurk on chatrooms and jerk off to one or two pictures they have saved in their desktop as opposed to just watching porn or having hobbies; e.g. they're out-of-touch tech illiterates who don't have the critical thinking skills to learn how to get what they want and don't have the higher ambitions to simply do something better.

It's actually incredibly easy to find an abundance of child porn without discernible repercussions. It just so happens the overlap between pedos and tolerably smart encryption enthusiasts is a smaller one than you would think.

>>948992

Unfortunately, he is correct. While the other users on a given platform might not be trying to convert you into a pedo/furry/whatever, as their percentage of the userbase grows, they will grow increasingly intolerable. When they make up a majority of the users, they assume everyone they encounter on that given platform shares their unique flavor of retardation and cannot fathom why anyone who doesn't is even on the platform at all. This applies to everyone's little groups, not just the undesirables.

>>949013

This only applies on something facebook-like, where everything is made public and almost everyone is connected.

Why would it apply on instant messengers like Wire and Riot.im? Or an encrypted VOIP service like Mumble? How will pedos push their shit on you there?

>majority

LGBTQPF won't ever be anywhere near a majority.

>>948981

This man hasn’t used Frost MS

I think the whole problem with privacy conscious platforms is that they offer nothing but privacy. As far as normal users go, few care about privacy enough in its own right to make the switch from botnet systems without tangible benefits.

So you have two options.

1. Develop alternative platforms that are private by design and offer use cases that appeal to normies. See Signal and Telegram.

2. Raise the awareness of privacy issues on a massive scale so that normalfaggots will pressure companies and lawmakers to do something about their basic civil liberties. See: Recent Faceberg scandal and what the EFF does on a daily basis.

If someone can come up with a third options besides jerk off other autists on insular, small community honeypots then be my guest. Tor is the only platform that has reached household normie status, and it has blindingly obvious security flaws.

>>949028

In the case of instant messengers and VOIP services, you then have to contend with the reputation that has been built up around it by its users. It's not a hard ask to get John Q Techservant to use Facebook Messenger, but trying to get him to download and run something that everyone knows is used by pedo furry pirates to download cars?

>LGBTQPF won't ever be anywhere near a majority.

Of course not. But they can have local majority or perceived local majority, which feeds into itself by driving away people who aren't fuckups. One might argue that they wouldn't have so much power to ruin everything if people didn't let them have it, but one would also be trying to change the course of a river by arguing with it.

>>949036

I'm sorry, but nobody fucking cares about the reputation of software.

>>948906

>people with one of the most pressing needs for privacy possible are anti-privacy agents trying to destroy privacy by using private systems to protect their privacy

Whole thread:

>hey guys how can we destroy software freedom because I'm butthurt that some people don't like grandmas

There's a saying in the "Rationalist" community: "Politics is the mind killer." It seems to me, though, that it is in fact pedophilia that is the mind killer, as this thread aptly demonstrates.

>>948914

>t. Virgin

>>949046

>grandmas

Wew.

>>949049

There is not a good track record of "curing" pedophiles because pedophilia cannot be cured, just like homosexuality or straightness cannot be cured. However, pedos under therapy are way less likely to commit crimes than those who aren't in therapy.

>>949038

No, you don't care. That's fine. You're not a mouthbreather. The people who make up the rest of the population aren't so blessed, and they make decisions based on how many other people have made the same decision. If they don't trust it, you're left in the company of your fellow non-mouthbreathers and the kiddy-diddlers that want to diddle kiddies in privacy and the furries that have finally found a home where they can yiff in Hell for all eternity.

>>949051

>pedophilia cannot be cured, just like homosexuality or straightness cannot be cured.

Explain prison gays.

>>949049

Thanks for literally rehashing what's already been said. It's a good thing you didn't read the thread, or else you'd have to say something original.

>>949038

Tell that to someone who openly states that they use Tor. It has a terrible, damning association with criminality you dimwit.

>>949038

Actually I care. I don't want to use Tox if all the public directories for it are advertising CP. I only have to mention to someone in public to add me on tox and the botnet now considers me part of that pedo ring.

You also have to remember you're using these platforms with other people. Unless you're a very small group of people you have vetted into an inch of it's life (think silk road admins levels of paranoia) then you can't even know if you have a pedo among you. Since I don't want to hang around pedos this is a massive problem for me. I am not a tolerant man in general. I am even less tolerant of pedos.

>>949049

You can't cure a pedo and why take the risk any way? If everyone who got caught or said they were a pedo was immediately hung then people would behave better. It's larping that pedos can be cured which gives them more chances to offend. At the very very minimum all pedos should be in prisons. If you want to be a humane faggot you can make a little pedo village inside a 10 foot fence and they can live there with the other pedos until they die. No messages in or out, no visitors, just pedos living in pedo village.

>>949054

If you're desperate enough to get your dick sucked you will take whatevers willing or can be forced to fuck it. It means they're bisexual by default not straight though. Straight men won't get hard for another man.

>>949051

Cut their nuts off.

>>949062

You lost me when you started talking about your intolerance. You’re part of the problem. I agree with the sentiment that I don’t want to be associated with cretins, but sharing the same platform with someone if I don’t see what they’re doing doesn’t bother me in the slightest. When you say you don’t know if someone else is doing bad things--- and this bothers you— fucking why. There’s no bad optics if there aren’t optics at all.

>>949065

I don't tolerate pedophiles, drug addicts or retards. Explain to me why this is a problem for you.

Any person who has any standards what so ever does not tolerate destructive behaviour. tolerance leads to acceptance and then it leaves to dominance the same way homos have done it. If you kick them in the balls the moment they ask for tolerance they stop asking for tolerance and behave themselves or end up dead.

Why would I give a fuck about optics? I give a fuck about a healthy society where it's visible and where it isn't. I don't just ignore pedos because they have rape dungeons to hide kids in.

>>949061

This is what media wants you to think. Only retards would be affected by media propaganda.

>>949062

>Actually I care

You're then just as retarded as /pol/tards who say everyone should hate Firefox because Mozilla is "SJW".

>>949070

Yea, we should like firefox for firing people for not being liberal enough. That's the way we improve technology, by supporting homosexuals, who then go on to molest little boys.

Fucking genius.

>>949062

>you can't cure pedos because I say so

>it's LARPing because I say so

Nigger, I'm not advocating treating childfuckers instead of imprisoning or executing them. If you're a therapist and pedofaggotry shows up as a side effect of the patient's mental condition, try treating his main issue first and if that doesn't cure his pedophilia give him prison or the bullet.

>>949070

>/pol/tards

>>>/leftypol/

>>949073

>firing people for not being liberal enough

Never happened.

>>949074

Kys

>>949074

That's not the way pedofaggotry works mate. It's like being a homo, once the mind virus has you you're uncurable.

>>949076

Except when it did because the guy had donated to a conservative charity and they lynched him. His options were step down or be fired by the share holders.

We see you you little pedo fucks. You stand out like a sore thumb.

>>949078

>they lynched him.

He stepped down willingly. He said so himself.

>mind virus has you you're uncurable

Oh jesus fuck you're just one of those mentally retarded people. Why did your doctors give you internet access.

>>949076

See: Brendan Eich

>>949080

Just like everyone who comes under media scrutiny “resigns.” You have to be the same person who defends Mozilla every time this comes up.

>>949076

>>949080

t. pedo

>>949080

>you can jump or we push you

>I think I'll jump

SEE HE RESIGNED WILLINGLY! He picked to resign rather than be abused by us and then pushed off the edge! It was suicide! Self inflicted gun wound to the back of the head!

>Homosexuality isn't linked to pedophilia even though 80% of pedophiles identify as bisexual or gay

>Homosexuals don't have a culture where they screw young teenage boys with daddy issues to indoctrinate them into homosexuality

I'd link the sam hyde comedy skit but you would just deny it was real you little commie dick sucker.

>>949087

Being gay is a mental illness. The only reason it was declassified is because the homo lobby kept sending death threats and lawyers after the shrinks. Eventually the shrinks just said fuck it not worth the hassle and dropped it.

>>949057

>Wrong. Pedophilia isn't a sexual orientation, it's a symptom of mental illness or a bad kink.

https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/pessimism-about-pedophilia

>Pedophilia is a sexual orientation and unlikely to change.

Now let's see your sources.

>Thanks for demonstrating pedophilia's mind-killing effects in your post.

The OP's post said absolutely nothing about exploiting their poor opsec. In fact your post is the first one to even suggest it.

Anyway I hate to tell you guys but most pedos actually have pretty good opsec. Not all of them are random Tox pajeets (and even a lot of those guys run Tox through Tor so they're not exposing their IP). So unless you're going to turn hardcore glow in the dark trying to spread compromised binaries of open source software or commit other untrustworthy actions that will drastically harm the community at large (and probably pedos the least since they're the most plugged in to when shit gets compromised because their friends start disappearing), then you're not going to be able to catch or remove most of them.

But that's a good thing. As has been stated earlier in this thread, pedos are the proof that your system is secure. If pedos don't use your system or all suddenly stop using it, then your system's privacy and/or security guarantees have been nullified or were always null (and because computers are amoral agents, not just for them, but for you too).

Any other opinion is just whiny agecuck pizzaschizo bitching.

Also:

>complaining about pedophilia

>while posting loli-esque anime girl

You're clearly a repressed pedo and self-hating agecuck.

>>949078

>That's not the way pedofaggotry works mate. It's like being a homo, once the mind virus has you you're uncurable.

You think pedophilia is a "virus" that you can catch through contact with them? What, did a pedo show you some Candydoll pictures that gave you a boner? Please explain to us why you're so worried about catching the evil pedo virus anon. ;)

>>949092

Pedophilia is a mind virus you can catch through sexual abuse. That's why MK Ultra operations used child sexual abuse to mind break people so they could remold them and brain wash them.

You don't catch it like you do the cold. you catch it through abuse which fucks up the development of the brain, which then has to adjust it's self to deal with the trauma. It's the same way violent parents make violent kids. What is normal to you becomes what you project out into the world. If being fucked in the ass by a faggot is normal to you then you repeat the behaviour on another kid. Which is observable in abused children and one of the major signs of a child being abused so need investigating at home.

>>949089

>>949082

They never threatened him or fired him. He left because he didn't want a buch of SJWs to shit on Mozilla, which is ironic because it seems like you're doing it anyways.

>>949102

>They never threatened him or fired him.

You're correct. They just dug up some shit from 10 years ago and applied pressure until he willingly quit. Never threatened him at all. People just willingly quit a position like that all of the time because they caught giving money to a wrongthink cause a decade ago.

>>948886 (OP)

You operate honeypots to remove them. This allows you to police the content of the network without compromising the overall security. After all if it allows total free speech then glow in the darks operating honeypots shouldn't be an issue for anyone. They have a right to use the network just like everyone else. The pedos will fall for it like they always do.

Look how easily you drew them out with this thread. They can't resist some good jailbait.

>>949057

>sexual orientation

LMAO

There is normal sexuality and then there's various flavors of perversion. Nobody is born perverted, and if you're going to justify one form, you have no presuppositions to coherently contradict the others.

>>949097

But tons of pedos are still complete virgins, having zero sexual experience at all, whether in childhood or beyond. And I already know what some people are going to say to that: "Well then they're pedos because they were never able to move past the proper sexual developmental stages everyone else goes through and are consequently fixated upon childhood blah blah blah", but if your theory is that pedophilia is caused both by kids being exposed to sex too early and the exact opposite of that (kids not being exposed to sex early enough), then it's probably not a very good theory.

The simplest and most sensible explanation that accounts for the observed data about pedophilia is that it's just a genetic issue. For example, pedos are far more statistically likely to have attached earlobes and minor deformities of their ears and feet too, so it's basically just an overarching genetic screwup where the pedophilia part of it is the only significant symptom that modern people care about (since we've become more advanced than to ostracize people for minor aesthetic deficiencies). After all, you can't be socialized or molested into being more likely to have attached earlobes. The "cycle of abuse" theory just doesn't gel with the actual physical/scientific/statistical data we now have about pedos.

Although, most child molestation actually isn't even committed by actual pedos, so maybe that's where the idea comes from. It is quite possible that being molested could make you more likely to become a child molester yourself later in life, even if it doesn't make you more likely to become an actual pedo.

>>949098

>get demonstrably proven wrong about scientific fact with cited source

>"W-well y-y-yeah but we're just gonna kill 'em anyway baka!"

I didn't even ask what you wanted to do about pedos. I just asked for proof of your claim that pedophilia isn't a sexual orientation. You can admit that the science supports pedophilia being a sexual orientation and still want to kill them.

Retards like you are why the right is slowly losing its momentum. It used to be the side of facts, logic, sound reasoning, statistics, and inconvenient truths. But now we've simply let in too many morons like you in who have zero debating skills and constantly try to hide that fact behind left-equivalent buzzwords (problematic = degenerate, etc.). You truly are SJWs in reverse and our greatest failure is that we didn't find some way to filter your kind out back in the Dark Enlightenment days before you became the true cancer you are now.

>>949108

>Look how easily you drew them out with this thread. They can't resist some good jailbait.

says the agecucks who made a whole thread to autistically screech about people being to use free software in a way that they don't like.

>>949103

>They

You think Mozilla when you say they, but it was actually the Firefox community aka users.

>>949114

>There can't be multiple causes for a dysfunction.

Being exposed to sex too young will cause normalization of childhood sexual activity.

Being a mental manchild who identifies more as a child than an adult will warp the usual sexual preferences to become pedophilia. i.e. people want to fuck people their own age. If they consider themselves to be mentally children they will want to fuck children. I remember a story on /b/ years ago about a kid who got on his dads computer at 10 looking for porn. Being 10 he wanted to see girls his own age so looked for that shit. It makes perfect sense.

Pedophilia may have some genetic disposition but you can't deny homosexuals pray on young boys in order to convert more homosexuals. This is predatory mental damage transition and depending on how you define wanting to fuck 10-14 year olds is a matter of STD pedophilia.

>Most child molestation isn't committed by actual pedophiles

WTF am I reading? are you just trolling at this point? If you fuck a child you're a pedo. End of story. And that isn't even true when you look at the data.

>The right is losing momentum because it doesn't support pedophiles

Hows TRS these days? Still run by jews?

>>949114

>Retards like you are why the right is slowly losing its momentum. It used to be the side of facts, logic, sound reasoning, statistics, and inconvenient truths. But now we've simply let in too many morons like you in who have zero debating skills and constantly try to hide that fact behind left-equivalent buzzwords (problematic = degenerate, etc.). You truly are SJWs in reverse and our greatest failure is that we didn't find some way to filter your kind out back in the Dark Enlightenment days before you became the true cancer you are now.

Welcome to ideology, the world over. You have a handful of people capable of rationalizing and thinking and doing shit, no matter what camp you're looking at. The rest are warm bodies and laborers, schlepping things around and occupying space to make the thinkers look like they have significant enough numbers to matter.

It's not a club or an organization, so you can't control membership with lists or dues. It's not a physical location, so you can't drive the retards off. It's not even a state of being, so you can't feasibly murder the ones who do or do not believe these things because it could change in a heartbeat.

This should not surprise, disappoint, annoy, or dismay you.

>>949117

"The community" doesn't exist. It's a piece of software not a village. SJWs saber rattled until he was forced to resign. The same way they always do.

It won't be long until the left starts making a major public push for pedo accceptance. They've been laying the groundwork for a while now. Everywhere you go these "debates" are happening, all of a sudden. Civil war can't be far away now.

>>949092

>complaining about pedophilia

>while posting loli-esque anime girl

Interesting that the left has also been pushing this narrative super hard recently. Constant spam about how anything related to female anime characters is pedophilia. But at the same time they're also trying to get pedophilia normalized. It seems to be some stratagem to get people to associate pedophilia with anime while at the same time somehow accepting (actual) pedophilia. Anyway, leftists need to be purged.

>>949114

I didn't make the claim. I don't care if it's a (((sexual orientation))) or if it's claimed to be one by various (((scientific papers))) and (((studies))). Anyone with a brain knows most science past the year 1899 isn't worth looking at because it's (((soft science)))). I'm not the one in here defending child fuckers. Why don't you post some sources faggot.

>you're just a reverse SJW

If that means I want to live in a high trust, white, society with morals then I'm guilty as charged. Don't confuse unwillingness to debate with lack of ability. I don't debate pedos and faggots because they have a mind disease and experience has shown me that they will not debate the issue and will instead argue in bad faith like you're doing by calling me reverse-SJW, telling me I'm the cancer that ruined /pol/, and finally declaring your victory because you found some sources from left wing rags to backup your retarded arguments.

My beliefs are simple and backed up by years of proof: Sex outside of monogamy and marriage without the goal of procreation is bad for people. The more partners one has sex with the less likely they are to bond with any of them. Faggots have sex with more partners than anyone. Hence their degenerate behavior and constant need to new kinks. If they had few partners in life like normal people and actually respected what marriage is they wouldn't be such a cancer in society nor would they spread AIDS at the alarming rate they currently spread it. This is why they're constantly on the hunt for new young assholes because people aren't born that way and must be brought into the fold. They should not be raising children simply because they take those children to their faggy parades where people walk around naked. Which again, if they wanted to be accepted into greater society they wouldn't be doing. No one wants to watch men parade down the streets in thongs.

>>949117

Yes anon it was the users that plastered shit all over major websites like OKCupid encouraging people to lynch him for not supporting fag marriage. Perfectly normal things that could happen to anybody.

>>949124

I'm right as fuck but I can see a link between lolicon slice of life animes and pedoish. Lots of people picked up fetishes from hentai they wouldn't other wise have.

>>949127

I like you. Never trust any one who claims logic and reason are the only merits in life. Logic and reason cannot compete with the unreasonable. If someone is insane and wants to smash your face in with a rock you cannot reason with him and no amount of logic can change that.

People need to understand that the illogical and the lie is often a better tool than the truth. As long as you win it doesn't matter how honest you were. If you lose then you're dead so it doesn't matter how honest you were.

Understanding the truth is important but it shouldn't be the hill you die on.

>>949121

What a stupid post

>>949138

SOL shit is often sexualized. Lots of crotch and ass shots.

Pedos are scared of Muslims. That's why the homos have latched onto the alt right or whatever you wish to call it. They know Muslims will murder them so they're trying to co opt the right movement in order to get rid of Islam and save themselves. There's a good podcast called Third Jimpact which covers a lot of the gay mafia's shit in the alt right sphere.

>>949119

Your reasoning is a classic post hoc fallacy. No matter what the premises are, you'll create a story that makes them support your conclusion, because you do not actually want to evaluate any premises independently but are rather instead entirely precommitted to that conclusion being true. If I told you that some pedos had no taboo sexual contact as children and also lost their virginities at normal ages (which is true of plenty of them as well), then you would (and probably will) find some reason to explain why that also was the cause of their pedophilia.

If your theory is true, then what is the proper age for an individual to be introduced to sex that makes them the least likely to become a pedo? There must be some "sweet spot" if your ideas are consistent.

>but you can't deny homosexuals pray on young boys in order to convert more homosexuals

Do they "pray" (it's "prey" you fucking retard) on young boys in order to convert them to homosexuality, or do young boys who already have homosexual inclinations tend to be more drawn to adult males of their kind?

>WTF am I reading? are you just trolling at this point? If you fuck a child you're a pedo. End of story. And that isn't even true when you look at the data.

If some guy pisses me off and I shove a metal rod up his ass to get back at him, am I gay? If I've banged 10000 chicks and 1 guy because I was curious, am I gay? There are obvious non-pedo motivations for sexual contact with children: pure sadism, mental illness/compulsive behaviors/weird OCD shit, curiosity, wanting to try something taboo just because it's taboo, and opportunity ("I'm horny and can't find an adult. I'm not really interested in kids but a hole's a hole and it's available."), which is probably the biggest one.

It's the same reason why a lot of men become gay in prison: greater availability. A guy who would choose an 18 year old over an 8 year old 1000/1000 times if he had the choice isn't a pedo just because he resorts to the 8 year old when he feels like he doesn't. True pedos are at least *more* attracted to the 8 year old than the 18 year old (even if they have some attraction to women too), otherwise the word has no meaning. There are even stories of brain tumors causing pedophilic behavior in people too.

>Hows TRS these days? Still run by jews?

lol every single of one of your brainlet faggots does this exact spiel:

>Your reasons for being against X aren't very logically sound.

>HURR DURR SO YOU'RE SAYING WE HAVE TO SUPPORT X HAHA NICE TRY SCHLOMO

Do they produce you retards in a factory or what?

>>949120

I was naive enough to believe that forcing people to confront uncomfortable and unpopular truths about race, sexuality, gender, immigration, human inequality, etc. would filter out retards in general. It's clear that was wrong.

>>949147

>Pedoniggers

>scared of Muslims

That's pretty funny when you remember Islam's infamous tolerance of pedophiles, especially gay pedophiles. A pedo's biggest worry under a caliphate would be competition.

>>949123

>Bullshit, pedos go anywhere they aren't actively hunted down or purged. Facebook, Twitter, and IRC aren't remotely secure yet they have loads of pedophiles.

Yeah, pedos never get arrested. Child porn busts never happen. People sharing CP on Facebook or Twitte have zero to worry about, which is why all of the main CP hubs are hosted there and not darknets. You're a real smart one.

>It's like you pedoniggers are so removed from reality from wasting so much time fapping to CP you don't even bother learning the board culture. Congratulations on being a mentally ill normalfag.

>agecucks accusing other people of being normalfags

>thinking nobody recognizes your super sekrit obscure spicy wolf bitch

>thinking you're hardcore because you've seen Lain

l m a o - Please, oh master of the arcane and hip, enlighten me with more knowledge of these until now uncovered Laosian zoopraxiscopes. You are the first person to discover them.

>>949127

>I didn't make the claim. I don't care if it's a (((sexual orientation))) or if it's claimed to be one by various (((scientific papers))) and (((studies))). Anyone with a brain knows most science past the year 1899 isn't worth looking at because it's (((soft science)))). I'm not the one in here defending child fuckers. Why don't you post some sources faggot.

I did post sources. You just put your ebin kike parentheses around them and ignored them. What sources do you want me to post? Also, the designation of pedophilia as a sexual orientation is based off of neurological evidence, hardly soft science at all.

>If that means I want to live in a high trust, white, society with morals then I'm guilty as charged.

Colonial Delaware was a high-trust white society with morals. Its age of consent was 7. So you're okay with that?

>Don't confuse unwillingness to debate with lack of ability.

>"I-I-I c-c-could totally destroy you in a d-debate if I wanted to baka! But I'm not because... it's a waste of my time because you're wrong because I say so regardless, which is why I'm going to write a large paragraph right after this anyway."

>experience has shown me that they will not debate the issue and will instead argue in bad faith like you're doing by calling me reverse-SJW, telling me I'm the cancer that ruined /pol/

lol the truth sure makes you butthurt, doesn't it?

>finally declaring your victory because you found some sources from left wing rags to backup your retarded arguments.

Harvard endorsing objective observations of neurological differences between pedo minds and non-pedo minds = "left wing rag" - This is why you're a brainlet.

>Sex outside of monogamy and marriage without the goal of procreation is bad for people. The more partners one has sex with the less likely they are to bond with any of them.

So we should make sure that girls are bequeathed to their partners as young as possible, before puberty even, to make promiscuity as unlikely as possible? Since we know niggers and other shitskins don't care about the law or any standard of morality, promoting the age of consent is just creating a universal policy for white men of "Tyrone and Muhammad get a turn first."

>>949128

>People need to understand that the illogical and the lie is often a better tool than the truth. As long as you win it doesn't matter how honest you were. If you lose then you're dead so it doesn't matter how honest you were.

t. anita sarkeesian - listen and believe goyim

>Understanding the truth is important but it shouldn't be the hill you die on.

>hill you die on

SJW phrase detected

>>949138

>If you don't believe pedophiles are parasitic, watch how they try attaching themselves to any growing movement or community. Entry level /pol/-tier beliefs are growing more common so imageboard pedos try insisting they're an integral part of the right

Pedos have been on *chans (and spreading racial redpills) far before you The_Donald pizzacuck migrants.

>>949147

>Pedos are scared of Muslims. That's why the homos have latched onto the alt right or whatever you wish to call it. They know Muslims will murder them

What the fuck are you talking about? Muslims worship a literal fucking pedo who married a 6 year old. (Look up Muhammad's wife Aisha.) Why would pedos be afraid of them?

Congratulations: your post is by far the most retarded thing I've read all year. Really, you want to invite Muslims into your country to kill pedos? The same Muslims who worship a fucking pedo? How low is your IQ?

Brainlet Sargon fanboy confirmed

I wonder why pedos are so drawn to these sort of communities. Maybe the mods can come in and clear up the thread a bit. Mass ban any one supporting pedos and white knighting them.

>>949164

>you have to support Sarcuck to not be an agecuck

Who is the next boogeyman you're going to use as a brainlet buzzword?

Everyone fuck off, none of what you're posting has to do with technology or the OP anymore.

>>949174

The answer to OP's question was fairly simple (ban them on moderated communities and collect their dox on unmoderated or distributed services) so there's nothing left to do besides sitting back and watching autistic pedophiles scream.

>>949171

>The point was that pedophiles hang around anyplace they aren't quickly cracked down on, and nothing you said invalidates that.

You mean Indian pajeets and random Eastern Euros who live in shithole countries with little law enforcement presence? How many pedos in Western countries are hanging around Facebook sharing CP on it? If you're going to use pajeets as your standard of argumentation then why not claim that pedos have a habit of shitting on the street too?

>You being familiar with them just makes your "posting Lain/Holo == closet pedophilia" screeching even more retarded.

Anime girls are absolutely designed to emphasize neoteny. Your agecuck self-repression doesn't change the fact that they are implicitly pedophilic.

Also, they are *chans. "Imageboad" can refer to a *chan-style site or a *booru-style. The imageboards that aren't *boorus are *chans. Of course you are a true newfag so I wouldn't expect you to understand the distinction. We never should have raided Habbo.

>>949176

>watching autistic pedophiles scream.

says the autistic agecuck brigade that made a whole thread to screech about people using free software in way that they don't like in the first place.

>>949176

>watching autistic pedophiles scream.

Except both autistic sides are screaming. Anyone discussing this further is an idiot.

>>949185

>and safely have sex together without harming each other

citation needed

>>949185

>Kids cannot consent, they don't comprehend what sex is or means and lack the emotional and psychological tools to not be fucked up when engaging in sexual activities

[citation needed]

The idea that kids don't comprehend what sex is in the age of the Internet is laughable agecuck garbage.

>>949189

Since you insist... https://www.xvideos.com/?k=gay+anal+amateur

>>949192

This. Well, kids over 12 at least.

>>949191

>Even if you've truly been around this long, you're doing a terrible job of fitting in and that's a real accomplishment.

Why would I want to fit in with newfag retards when that would just mean being a shittier poster?

>>949194

The average age that an American child discovers pornography nowadays is 8 according to statistics, and you can expect that to get lower.

>>949197

>"Sure he's seen every interracial double penetration video on PornHub but he's still muh innocent little precious angel baby who knows nothing about any of those bad naughty things!"

Ask me how I know you're a hysterical moralfag agecuck. We used to make fun of fat retarded middle aged housewives on places like this but apparently they came back with a vengeance to possess the bodies of the young men that used to mock them.

>>949204

>These days retarded thots in their 20s and 30s still don't understand the purpose and responsibilites of sex, what makes you think some smartphone zombie under 12 is going to fare much better?

Gee, it's almost as if women are braindead cattle who don't need to understand anything about sex other than how to use it to please the men that own them, and thus it doesn't matter how early their male owners decide to teach them. Mind expanding, isn't it agecuck?

If it were really immoral to have sex with someone less mature than you, then all male/female sex would be immoral as women never mature.

>>949210

lol you agecucks are the ones obsessed with interracial because you want to guarantee that any girl you might have sex has had dozens of opportunities to get non-white dick inside of her before your precious morality allows you to even flirt with her.

>>949209

Fucking immature people is a bad idea: this is why fucking thots is a bad idea and it's also why pedofaggotry is an awful idea.

>>949210

Not only that, in spite of babbling about how the right needs to accept his degeneracy he's using the very degeneracy the right despises as an excuse to tell them they need his own specific brand of degeneracy.

>>949212

>having any degree of attraction for a girl under the magic Jewish feminist-decided age of "consent" is "toddler rape"

classic agecuckery

>>949185

Oh look we have a feminist. One who denies sexual violence has anything to do with sex.

>>949003

>It just so happens the overlap between pedos and tolerably smart encryption enthusiasts is a smaller one than you would think.

t. still gets his cheese pizza from cuckchan

>>949218

that means you agree and people who rape kids under another "magic number" should be removed?

>>949217

>Fucking immature people is a bad idea: this is why fucking thots is a bad idea and it's also why pedofaggotry is an awful idea.

Then you aren't allowed to bang any woman ever except maybe the rare one over 50 who has already had 5 kids or so and has been sobered up a bit from her natural feminine irrationality by the realities of child-rearing. Enjoy you agecuck faggotron.

>Not only that, in spite of babbling about how the right needs to accept his degeneracy he's using the very degeneracy the right despises as an excuse to tell them they need his own specific brand of degeneracy.

>refusing to let Tyrone and Muhammad have a turn at every white girl before you're even allowed to look at them is degeneracy

How's it going Dworkin?

>>949049

>The second is to gather any identifing information they provide and either dox the little shits or report them to the authorities (ideally while staying anonymous yourself so the retarded legal system doesn't backfire on you).

>anonymity for me but not for thee

Weasel.

>>949214

>instead of defending his position all he can muster is "y-you're a cuck" and "muh race"

<I'm not obsessed you are!!!!1!

lmao.

>>949219

So you actually think that men suddenly become homosexuals in prison, that workers in geriatrics turn into gerontophiles and 100 % of convicted child molesters are pedophiles? Wew laddie.

>>949221

Females are property and a man has the right to use his feminine property sexually in any way that he wants, as the only purpose of her sexuality is to please him. Anything else is agecuckery.

>>949185

>Kids cannot consent, they don't comprehend what sex is or means and lack the emotional and psychological tools to not be fucked up when engaging in sexual activities.

JMGirl alone proves you wrong.

>>949199

Discovering pornography is not equal to discovering sex. You don't get the desire to fuck until you're at least 10.

>>949225

oh okay, what about males?

>>949225

Stop falseflagging. You're not one of mine and you know it, /pol/faggot.

>>949228

I ain't searxing that shit, fella.

>>949224

>So you actually think that men suddenly become homosexuals in prison

Uh yeah? It's a pretty well documented phenomenon.

>that workers in geriatrics turn into gerontophiles

People self-select into working in geriatric medicine and elderly care. People do not self-select into prison. Learn basic logic you fucking moron.

>100 % of convicted child molesters are pedophiles? Wew laddie.

Some of them are pedophiles. According to the statistics, most of them aren't.

>>949231

I'm not one of yours because if you disagree with my statement then you're a kiked-up alt-lite agecuck.

>>949235

Molesting a child makes you a pedophile. If you weren't attracted to children you wouldn't fuck one.

>>949232

'Course not. God forbid you ever challenge your programming. Who wants to be the next target, amirite?

>>949238

Being sexually-attracted to children makes you a pedohile. Molesting children makes you a child molester.

I have an idea for how to deal with this problem. It's something new and radical, so you may have trouble believing it, but just bear with me. Here it comes:

Stop forcing guys to deny their natural-born inclination to fuck sweet teenage pussy because jealous feminist hags made no-evidence allegations that it was harmful.

>>948886 (OP)

Make it so hard to use that only high IQ people can figure it out, you would still get pedos on it but it wouldn't be the annoying retarded ones that cause the most trouble

>>949239

This is jewish word games in action. Pay attention to how hey try to divorce actions from desires to do that action.

>>949242

Does looking at snuff films make you a murderer?

>>949240

hurr durr but MUSLIMS like it too so it MUST be wrong and also you're SCHLOMO for saying that even though the age of consent was originally pushed by Jewish feminists and uuuh we're gonna GAS you because I say so even though I'm too afraid to jack off to a bitch without checking her ID first

"If you fuck your own prime teen pussy instead of shitskins, you lose." - agecucks

>>949245

You should've asked about GTA or CoD. That's likely more of his liking.

>>949245

sniff films aren't the same thing kike. Now kill yourself.

>>949246

Age of consent has always existed in white societies so you don't kill the fucking girl in child birth.

>>949249

>so you don't kill the fucking girl in child birth

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_youngest_birth_mothers

>>949243

>It isn't what's well documented is that they use rape as a means of showing dominance over other inmates and when they decide to have consensual sex is just because they're desperate to get sex.

Most gay sex in prison is consensual. This is well documented. The prison rape myth is pushed by niggers so that they don't have to admit that they let another nigga go downtown while locked up because of pure muh dikery and not because they were forced.

>Didn't answer my question.

Yes, because your question is based on false premises.

>And why is that? Studies have concluded that it's because a. they have easier access to kids than other targets and b.they do not get off to the sexual part of raping per sé: they get off to the dominance of rape.

That's exactly what I already said before:

>>949156

>There are obvious non-pedo motivations for sexual contact with children: pure sadism

If you're a sadist, then you enjoy the pain and humiliation of others (which quite obviously tends to often include sexual elements), and preying on children makes sense for you since they're easy targets, whether you're generally sexually attracted to them or not. This is why the fact that most people convicted of age of consent offenses aren't pedos (or hebes, ephebos, etc.) is true even though it confuses normalfag brainlets, because alternative motivations exist.

>>949249

These laws weren't necessary, people in europe still married at around 20 and not 12. Ironically it's only some african tribes where marriage at the onset of puberty is the norm. Maybe pedos should fuck off there, it's where they belong.

>>949250

Thanks to modern medicine they don't die anymore, that doesn't prove it's right

>>949254

>Thanks to modern medicine they don't die anymore, that doesn't prove it's right

No, but it proves the "lol they'll die" argument is bullshit.

>>949249

>Age of consent has always existed in white societies so you don't kill the fucking girl in child birth.

The age of consent in colonial Delaware was 7. It didn't start getting raised until feminism arrived in the 1800s.... which makes sense, since prepubescent girls can't get pregnant anyway, so there's no point in restricting having sex with them for that reason anyway you moronic fucking brainlet. Do you even think before you spew such dumb bullshit?

>>949247

>Fucking teenagers isn't pedophilia, it's usually just a bad idea and teenagers suck.

And adult women are just so great, right? Bullshit. All these people who constantly shriek "WAAAAAAH CANNOT CONSENT" can't name any fucking thing an adult knows about sex that a teen can't learn with five minutes of googling.

As for what to do about actual pedophiles, you should understand that it would be much easier to manage them if resources weren't being taken up going after normal adult guys who fuck willing teen girls.

>>949255

Would you want your daughter to be impregnated at 10?

>>949254

>These laws weren't necessary, people in europe still married at around 20 and not 12.

You really think nobody married before 20 historically?

>>949256

What about the feminism of the 1800s was bad in your opinion?

you guys have convinced me that technology is a mistake.

>>949250

rare exceptions happen. Now go look up what internal damage is done to girls under 13 who get fucked.

You're saying "I should be able to hurt children for my own pleasure",

>>949256

I said white not Amerimutt.

>There's no reason not to have sex when it causes internal damage and can learn to infertility.

>>949261

No I haven't said that, but the average was much later. It was a rare exception.

>>949257

>All these people who constantly shriek "WAAAAAAH CANNOT CONSENT" can't name any fucking thing an adult knows about sex that a teen can't learn with five minutes of googling.

And they'll also be the first to tell you about how immature and fundamentally intellectually deficient women of all ages are (which is true).

>>949258

Appeal to emotion. Just as keikaku.

To answer, no, but not because she'd die. I personally wouldn't want that because she still has a lot to learn about not being selfish. Fortunately for me, condoms have existed for fucking ever and it's statistically unlikely that she'd be ovulating yet.

>>949264

>Now go look up what internal damage is done to girls under 13 who get fucked.

I've seen it first-hand. Fucking none, unless the guy is a brutal cunt or hung like Ron Jeremy.

>>949269

No that's not an appeal to emotion you moron. If you'd reject it for your own daughter but not for other girls your framework is inconsistent.

>>949262

All of it? What was good about it?

>>949264

>rare exceptions happen. Now go look up what internal damage is done to girls under 13 who get fucked.

So it's okay to do anything as long as it doesn't cause internal damage? Groping, blowjobs, light penetration, full penetration as long as you properly stretch them out first, etc.?

I mean I mostly agree with you here. I think females should have the same protections against physical abuse that animals do. Anything else is inhumane.

>>949265

>No I haven't said that, but the average was much later. It was a rare exception.

How rare was it? What are the statistics on the matter? We know their record-keeping was very decentralized and spotty back then so it's unlikely that you have any. All we know is what the law was, that is, what they considered baseline acceptable.

>>949272

But a man's daughter is his property unless he decides to bequeath her to another man. Anybody would be mad about their property getting pregnant in an unplanned manner. A farmer would be mad if his cow randomly got pregnant. It doesn't mean he's against cattle breeding.

>>949275

>All we know is what the law was, that is, what they considered baseline acceptable.

What was unacceptable was sex outside of marriage, this isn't the case anymore. Nowadays a chad could go around and knock up several 12 year olds, basically ruining their lives. How would you prevent that?

>>948886 (OP)

Make your anonymous platform a moderated anonymous platform. You may not be able to expose or effectively ban pedos, but you can at least delete their content to keep the feds off your back.

tbh the anti-agecuck right needs a dedicated place to hang out so we can avoid pizzacuck/agecuck retards if we want to.

>>949282

You have a place to hang out. It's a tree with a rope round your neck.

>>949282

Ever heard of prison?

>>949272

>If you'd reject it for your own daughter but not for other girls

I personally wouldn't get any other ten-year olds pregnant, either. Condoms have existed for fucking ever. What others do with their own bodies is not my concern, nor is teaching them how to treat their own body my concern, unless they are my wards.

>>949275

>All of it? What was good about it?

Maybe you could define the feminism of the 1800s first, since you brought it up.

>>949279

>What was unacceptable was sex outside of marriage, this isn't the case anymore. Nowadays a chad could go around and knock up several 12 year olds, basically ruining their lives. How would you prevent that?

If their fathers have chosen to relinquish effective control of them as feminine property, making them feral, then they should be captured and put up for auction on the open market, with the proceeds going to benefit the system of male dominance of females. Since they're little whores they probably won't fetch as high of a price as fresh girls, but it's better than nothing. At the very minimum they can do manual labor. If nobody wants them for any reason, then they can be a part of a gladiatorial spectacle or something. It's up for men to decide, not shrill feminist harpies.

>>949289

What if he thinks it feels better without?

>>949061

I always openly state that I use tor.

I also openly state that I value my privacy a lot.

And quite a few of the people I hang out with understand the dangers to privacy that are around.

I don't yet use tor for everything, but sooner or later I do intend to do so.

The reputation it mostly has is a safe haven for drug dealers, most normal people assume there are very, very few pedos, so they don't think of a possibility of a "pedo" community. At least in my social circles. And drugs aren't seen as completely evil by most, so it is not a very problematic reputation to have.

>>949284

>The problem is that if our fucking adults are still immature, the teenagers are usually even worse. In most cases fucking teenagers is a sign of bad judgement in both people.

You're right. We need to raise the voting age to 25, as well as the age of consent. Gun ownership is right out unless you're at least 40 and a government employee.

>>949291

My daughter has a gun. Condom or bullet.

>>949288

No, I'm not going to give you an exhaustive explanation of an entire 100 year segment of an ideological movement's history because you're too autistic to actually just state your objections to my points clearly.

>>949293

>raising age of consent instead of raising your fucking kids right and cracking down on thottery

Deferring responsibilities even further into adulthood will only result in adults growing even more immature.

>>949296

This sounds like a perfect justification for getting rid of the kike feminist-created AoC.

>>949295

You're just using feminism as a buzzword to sound convincing to retarded alt-rightists.

>>949296

>Deferring responsibilities even further into adulthood will only result in adults growing even more immature.

Abosolutely, 100% correctafuckinmundo. Why the shit do you think leftists roped feminists into doing it in the goddamn first place?

>>949298

http://historyoffeminism.com/british-feminists-role-in-the-reform-of-age-of-consent-laws-in-colonial-india/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent#History_and_social_attitudes

>Early feminists of the Social Purity movement, such as Josephine Butler and others, [...] began to turn towards the problem of child prostitution by the end of the 1870s. Sensational media revelations about the scourge of child prostitution in London in the 1880s then caused outrage among the respectable middle-classes, leading to pressure for the age of consent to be raised again.

http://historyoffeminism.com/votes-for-women-sexual-morality/

>The success of this campaign prompted feminists to launch a crusade against the sexual exploitation of young girls. In 1885 they achieved a victory when the Criminal Law Amendment Act, which raised the age of sexual consent to 16, was passed. Feminists and others founded the National Vigilance Association to ensure that this act was put into practice and to promote equal high moral standards between the sexes.

By creating cultures that aren't degenerate

>>949303

The evil feminists wanted to end child prostitution?

>>949305

When is it okay, in your opinion, for a woman to trade sex for security? How old does she have to be to do that?

>>949305

That was their excuse anyway. If that's all they cared about, then they would have simply made laws against child prostitution. Instead they used the issue as an emotional trigger to raise the age of consent so that their roastie asses could avoid competition from fresh PTP.

>>949297

>>949301

From what I remember, in burgerland 16 used to be the age where fathers and such considered their daughters eligible for marriage, sometimes going a bit lower. The problem is that going back to 16 or younger in our culture's current state would only result in even more teenage thottery and degeneracy, so we need to fix our culture first.

(((Coincidentally))), most of these fixes remove our resident "right-wing" pedonigger's excuses for fucking kids. Based off his behaviour, I doubt most fathers in a high trust white society would hand their daughters over to him anyways.

Hitler outlawed pedophilia by the way, how do you explain this? Was he a literal feminazi?

>14-year-old fucks 14-year-old

>Amerimutts: "Nice!"

>19-year-old fucks 14-year-old

>Amerimutts: "SHE LACKS THE KNOWLEDGE TO CONSENT UNLESS IT WAS WITH SOMEONE CLOSE TO HER AGE, THEN SHE SOMEHOW HAS THIS KNOWLEDGE, FUCKING MURDER HIM EVEN IF SHE SAYS SHE LOVES HIM!"

Getting real tired of this feminist double standard bullshit. Fuck them and the nu-male manginas who enable them. Consent isn't limited to certain people. You can either give consent or not. There's no middle ground to this.

>>949293

There are people who unironically believe this. They're called liberals.

>>949308

Nobody has made a reasonable argument against any reasonable point that I've made this whole thread so I've resorted to simply mocking you agecuck faggots.

>>949308

>Pedophiles have, in average, a lower IQ.

Please, show me these studies that "prove" this and totally weren't done amongst a biased population (i.e: convicted violent low-income felons).

>>949314

>implying any argument could change your mind

I've seen you in all corners of this site spewing the same bullshit over and over again, you're a lost cause.

>>949312

Hitler raised Germany's age of consent laws? Do you have any proof?

Also Hitler was a drugged up degenerate who destroyed Germany.

>>949313

>They're called liberals.

The scummiest thing authoritarian leftists have ever done is to convince the entire world that they should be called "liberals".

>>949312

AoC in Nazi Germany was 14. It's still 14 even now as long as you're under 21, but even if you're over 21 it's still not illegal unless the parents complain.

>>949305

Raising the AoC doesn't stop child prostitution. Feminists were just using that as an excuse to outlaw their sexual competition. If you weren't an illiterate retard, you would have realized that was the point being made.

>>949317

Pedos had to wear a pink triangle

>>949312

>Hitler outlawed pedophilia by the way, how do you explain this?

Hitler was an authoritarian. Authoritarians on both sides of the fence desire one thing: Complete, uncontested social control.

>>949319

>Feminists were just using that as an excuse to outlaw their sexual competition

Proof?

>>949316

I barely post on this site nowadays since it's full of retards like you, but keep trying to convince yourself that your agecuck bullshit isn't starting to be exposed. People are waking up to your feminist kikery.

>>949323

Your posting style is very unique, you usually post screencaps of older posts you probably made yourself. Why aren't you doing that anymore?

>>949322

The proof is implicit. If their only concern was child prostitution, then their laws would have specifically targeted child prostitution only. Raising the AoC would have had nothing to do with it.

>>949327

>no proof

So they just raised it because they want you so badly?

>>949324

>Nigger, you still haven't stated what happens when your child wife grows up.

I can speak for nobody but myself but, I'd still love her, because while physical attraction may have been the impetus of my desire, I wouldn't have stayed around long enough for her to "grow up" unless I loved and cared about her.

I pity "exclusive" pedophiles who get literally disgusted at adult bodies. Their relationships are doomed to die, and I only hope they can end the ones they form without malice.

>>949331

You're still growing old and will never have your child bride, and no adult woman will want you either.

>>949322

The proof is in the pattern of policies that feminists support. From outlawing prostitution to complaining about sexy video game characters to going after sexbots, the one constant in everything feminists have ever done is trying to be the gatekeepers of all sources of sexual satisfaction.

>>949336

The feminists that fought child prostitution are the same ones that complain about videogames?

>>949324

You realize that there are multiple anti-agecucks in this thread right? You were asking that of a completely different person. Anyway, to answer your question despite that, I'm also sexually attracted to adult women (not even a third as much but still some) so it wouldn't be a big deal. Plus I wouldn't abandon a girl that I loved just because she's unattractive to me now anyway. I mean, what happens when your adult wife gets old and wrinkly if you're not a gerontophile? Are you a fucking retard?

If I want a young girl, then I'll just get a second (or third, or fourth, etc.) one. Nothing prevents a man from owning multiple pieces of female property.

>>949326

I post through Tor, so no I almost never post images. You're talking about an entirely different person. Like I said, it's pathetic how desperate you are for everyone that disagrees with you to be one person.

>>949336

>if you don't support child rape you can't support sexy video game characters

>>949303

Feminists lie constantly, you cannot trust a feminist source on feminism.

>>949340

Who redefined what "rape" is, by adding the word "statutory" to it?

>>949337

Isn't it true? How are the odds that you'll get your way?

>>949328

The proof is by contradiction faggot. Learn basic logic and stop being such a brainlet and you'll understand it.

>>949338

They are descended from the exact same ideological tendencies.

lol agecucks are getting so BTFO in this thread.

>>949342

>How are the odds that you'll get your way?

"Never tell me the odds."

- some dumb faggot in a Jew movie

>>949343

>lol agecucks are getting so BTFO in this thread

They always do. If history tells true, expect to be banned soon. That's what they always do when they can't shout down discussion.

>>949340

>Feminists lie constantly, you cannot trust a feminist source on feminism.

Is that the best you can come up with?

>"S-sure every s-source says that f-feminists were the earliest supporters of raising the age of consent... b-b-but... they're lying about it... even though they have no reason to."

Can you find me a source showing that feminists didn't support raising the age of consent back then or that they were against it?

>>949343

>The proof is by contradiction faggot.

How does raising the age for sex contradict fighting child prostitution?

>lol agecucks are getting so BTFO in this thread.

Only in your limited mind pedo

>>949347

>Doesn't sound like a recipe for happy property to me.

Worked fine for the Persians. Of course, you have to be shit-hot enough to financially support them all...

>>949338

>>949340

You're being disingenuous as hell. Teenage girls and sexy video game characters are both competition for women and that's why feminists went after them. Besides, teens get tried as adults in court all the time. If you can try them as an adult, they're adults. You shouldn't treat them as adults in one circumstance but children in the other.

>>949339

I also post through Tor, but I'm not too keen on making women property. I like the feeling that a girl would stay with you if she had the option to go somewhere else.

>>949347

>Doesn't sound like a recipe for happy property to me.

Women are formless like water. They have no convictions and very few immutable preferences. If enough people with enough status tell them that belonging to men who have multiple wives is a good thing, if they can watch glamorous people on screens doing it, if everybody they know does it, then they will think it's the greatest thing on the planet and be more than happy to be a part of it. In fact, they will find the opposite weird. If the full force of social pressure were applied to the issue, in 20 years you would have women laughingwhores.jpging at you for saying that you don't want to bang lolis. Anybody who isn't an absolute beta blue pill woman-worshiping retard understands this.

So, Schlomo, explain to me why you think that we should use women's natural urges to conform against men instead of to please them.

>>949351

>women are competition for women

Is there even one woman that has trouble finding a man? If anything the men are the ones who'd have a motivation to eliminate competition.

>>949348

>Find me a source that disagrees with the propaganda bubble you live in

Oh that will be easy. I'll just google feminist lies about the age of consent.

>>949338

Of course not. The former have been dead for a while, stupid. The ideology, however, has remained unchanged.

>>949344

Han Solo wasn't a dumb faggot. He married a much younger girl because he knew what was up.

>>949349

>How does raising the age for sex contradict fighting child prostitution?

Different poster here. It's not that it contradicts it, it's that it has nothing to do with it. Feminists pulled a bait-and-switch by saying they had to raise the age of consent to get rid of child prostitution when the two issues had no relation to each other. They capitalized on a genuine crisis to push their agenda to control the sexual marketplace. This is typical feminist behavior.

>>949355

Unchanged huh?

>>949356

>a genuine crisis

You still haven't broken your conditioning. You're getting there, but not quite there yet.

>>949356

>when the two issues had no relation to each other.

Prove it

>>949351

>I also post through Tor, but I'm not too keen on making women property. I like the feeling that a girl would stay with you if she had the option to go somewhere else.

Forming a contract with your feminine property that she is allowed to dissolve at any time voluntarily would be your right, though I don't see why you would.

>>949349

Would raising the age of consent to 25 be fighting the prostitution of 18 - 25 year old girls?

>>949350

That's true of any property. You need to be rich to own multiple houses, etc.

>>949359

>prove a negative

That's not how the burden of proof works, faggot.

>>949356

Actually they have a lot to do with each other. If you have a girl say "no, I didn't do it for money" they can't touch a prostitution ring. All the prostitutes claim they aren't because their pimp tells them to. If you just outright make it illegal for any of them to do the activity it's an instacrime which cannot be avoided.

It goes from needing to catch money changing hands to catching them at any point in the activity.

>>949362

>All the prostitutes claim they aren't because their pimp tells them to

Or because, and now I know this is a stretch, they like money.

>>949353

Depends on the society you live in. In a society where men are a bunch of white knighting manginas who defend anything women say and will accept women of extremely low value because they're desperate for any pussy at all, they don't have any trouble. The point is that in a society where the age of consent is as low as it should be, women have to compete just as much as men, and if a woman gets to 25 without being married her chances are low because guys will pick 15-year-old girls. However, you do sort of have a point in that high age of consent is also supported by the wealthy elite because they can break their own laws at will. They eliminate competition by outlawing it, the same as feminists do, which is why the rich often work with feminists. In both cases, cancerous age of consent laws are being used to wrongfully break up legitimate relationships.

>>949354

Going by your logic, how can we trust that feminists are against rape? Since you think they're lying about being in favor of the age of consent, they could be lying about that too. I think we all should become feminists since after all they could just be lying about their rampant misandry. Maybe they're all pro-white wannabe housewives, right Sherlock?

>>949353

>Is there even one woman that has trouble finding a man?

Ugly, domineering ones. They don't want the beta faggots who are willing to gladly be trampled on, they think they deserve alphachadbros.

>>949361

You can't even prove that it had no effects on child prostitution? Shouldn't be that hard if you're right. you aren't.

>>949367

Feminists aren't against rape. They have made it very clear men who are raped don't deserve support and should STFU and die. Why do you think they hate MRAs so much?

>>949362

>Actually they have a lot to do with each other. If you have a girl say "no, I didn't do it for money" they can't touch a prostitution ring. All the prostitutes claim they aren't because their pimp tells them to. If you just outright make it illegal for any of them to do the activity it's an instacrime which cannot be avoided.

So by your logic we should make all sex illegal to more efficiently fight prostitution. Arrest everyone who has sex and then sort out if prostitution is involved later.

This is the mind of an agecuck.

>>949369

>You can't even prove that it had no effects

And you can't not prove that it didn't not have no effects. Let's keep going around.

>>949370

*rape of women

>>949373

You admit that you can't prove something yet you claim it's true.

>>949369

Outlawing sex with women aged 18 - 25 would have an effect on the prostitution of them. That doesn't make it good policy.

>>949372

Nice strawman pedo. I never stated I was against adult prostitution.

>>949376

This doesn't start with somebody claiming "there is no link". This starts with "there IS a link so we need to DO something about it". There's no point in arguing with somebody who failed high-school debate and refuses to understand how the burden of proof works.

>>949367

>Going by your logic, how can we trust that feminists are against rape?

They're fine with statutory "rape" if it's an adult woman and a teenage boy. More of that sexual market control there.

>>949374

>At least hitting them monetarily and then outing them into their communities and local cops when they refuse to pay the next time ought to lower the numbers.

>when they refuse to pay

Agecuck integrity folks

>>949377

18-25 are old enough to sell their bodies if they want to, it's still a stupid idea.

>>949378

It's not a strawman. You're supporting raising the age of consent as a tactic to fight the prostitution of girls under it. It works the same regardless of what the age is. It's still retarded.

>>949381

Paypigs gotta pay me to keep their fetishes a secret.

Btw, blackmail money is going up next week paypig, better pay up

>>949379

You made the claim that there is no connection ("it has nothing to do with each other"), but you can't support that claim with any evidence. What is there to debate?

>>949384

>using GayPal

>ever

Anyone who does this deserves what they get.

>>949374

Hacker vigilantes work both ways. I've heard of numerous incidents where hackers have fucked with some Chris Hansen watching faggot. That needs to happen a lot more often tbh.

>>949385

You have to prove there's a link, not the other way around.

>>949385

>What is there to debate?

Your claim that there is. The positive claim is the one that requires proof. That's how the burden of proof works. Now that I've done what your high-school failed to do, show me yours. You can't. You have none, and you are the one claiming positive.

>>949386

Money goes where money is.

Ain't nobody using your shitcoin that you going to out scam shlomo

>>949387

Lot more hackers and doxers do it on pedos cuz blackmailing is easy to do to them and earn some cash

>>949388

>>949389

Whoever makes a claim carries the burden of proof.

>>949391

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)

>The burden of proof is always on the person who brings a claim in a dispute. It is often associated with the Latin maxim semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, a translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."

I am laying no charges. I am claiming there are no charges to be laid.

>>949391

Whoever makes a positive claim carries the burden of proof.

>>949394

>fails at every argument

>resorts to shitposting as a substitute for reading and critical thought

Math checks out, captain.

>>949393

>>949392

>wants to convince other people that the law should be changed

>doesn't even remotely bother providing evidence for his claims

>>949396

>doesn't even remotely bother providing evidence for his claims

And there it is, and here it is. Maybe you'll read some of it. I doubt it, but maybe. Later, folks. If I don't get banned for "spam", I'll probably be banned for "pedo", or something equally asinine.

On child sexuality not being harmful

================================

Research

--------

Susan Clancy:

http://www.salon.com/2010/01/19/trauma_myth_interview/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Clancy#The_Trauma_Myth

https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/trauma-myth

Rind, Tromovitch, Bauserman:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy

http://www.mhamic.org/rind/

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100196502/guardian-paedophiles-are-ordinary-members-of-society-who-need-moral-support/

Other:

http://www.mhamic.org/sources/sandfort.htm

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10948796/Paedophilia-is-natural-and-normal-for-males.html

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jan/03/paedophilia-bringing-dark-desires-light

https://www.newgon.com/wiki/Research

http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume16/j16_2.htm

Second-hand harm:

http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume10/j10_1.htm

Food for thought

----------------

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_Morality_and_the_Law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_youngest_birth_mothers

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/01/07/don_t_pooh_pooh_the_left_s_push_to_normalize_pedophilia

http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/when-rape-is-not-rape

What about consent?

----------------

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_as_an_adult

http://www.cnn.com/2011/09/27/health/transgender-kids/

https://www.google.com/webhp?ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=circumcision+and+consent

https://www.google.com/search?q=pure+nudism&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

Anecdotes

---------

https://www.ipce.info/host/rivas/positive_memories.htm

On pedophilia not being a disorder

==============================

Research

--------

http://www.sexarchive.info/BIB/pedophilia.htm

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jan/03/paedophilia-bringing-dark-desires-light

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/local/la-me-pedophiles-20130115

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/01/07/don_t_pooh_pooh_the_left_s_push_to_normalize_pedophilia

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/01/dsm-pedophilia-mental-disorder-paraphilia_n_4184878.html

On legalizing child pornography

===========================

Research

--------

http://phys.org/news/2010-11-legalizing-child-pornography-linked-sex.html

http://phys.org/news166769376.html

http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt/legal-child-pornography-reduces-child-sex-crimes-milton-diamond-hawaii

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationship_between_child_pornography_and_child_sexual_abuse

Food for thought

----------------

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zec7oZUrGg8

http://www.cracked.com/personal-experiences-1658-5-ways-were-making-pedophilia-worse.html

Falkvinge:

https://falkvinge.net/2012/05/23/cynicism-redefined-why-the-copyright-lobby-loves-child-porn/

https://falkvinge.net/2012/09/07/three-reasons-child-porn-must-be-re-legalized-in-the-coming-decade/

https://falkvinge.net/2012/09/11/child-porn-laws-arent-as-bad-as-you-think-theyre-much-much-worse/

human-stupidity.com:

http://human-stupidity.com/irrationality/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt

http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt/watching-child-pornography-victimizes-child-voodoo-science

Wikileaks:

http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/An_insight_into_child_porn

>>949397

Show me the one that proves that raising the AoC had no effects on child prostitution.

>>949398

>still demanding proof for a negative claim

Thanks for playing.

>>949399

There is no child prostitution crisis anymore. Now your turn.

>>949396

It may not be possible to prove a negative, but you can still provide evidence for it. See the arguments over the existence of God. In this case, the evidence in question would be the Rind study and every study that's ever assessed the intelligence of teens compared to that of adults (they're exactly the fucking same). A psychologist named Bruce Rind did a meta-study of 59 studies claiming to justify feminist age of consent laws and found them to be completely devoid of scientific merit, with numerous instances of sampling bias and sample sizes too low to draw any reasonable conclusions from. In response, feminists got his study condemned by the US Congress, proving they had absolutely no rebuttals to anything he said. If you want to learn more, don't read the Wikipedia article because it was written by feminists as with every other Wikipedia article remotely related to sex.

>>949401

>There is no child prostitution crisis anymore

There never was.

>>949402

Children and teenagers are more vulnerable then adults and thus require special protection from predators.

>>949394

>Most arguments for fucking prepubescent children vanish if you remove Jews, Sandniggers, and Niggers proper.

>"Don't worry goy! You'll be able to find a white virgin over the age of 18 as soon as we remove all the kikes and shitskins from your country. It should only take 50 to 100 years or so. You can wait that long right?"

>muh dik

Yes, that's exactly what it is. Women live exclusively to serve men, which means that serving our dicks is one of their primary functions (the others being raising our children and miscellaneous feminine support tasks like housework). Why shouldn't we be pissed at faggot busybodies trying to tell us what we can't do with our own rightful property? It's like banning somebody from buying a house and then mocking them with "hurr durr muh need for muh shelter you have no other argument". You will hang Schlomo.

>All the pedophile is left with is "muh dik" and that doesn't fly when he could wait a couple years for a wife physically and mentally capable of housewife stuff and bearing children

>hurr durr you shouldn't be allowed to choose what property you can own because I don't think it's good property

>fuck jews but also thank you jews for pushing pedophilia and pornography

Agecuck logic:

>kikes spend years pushing the anti-pedo agecuck hysteria on television, in movies, in newspapers, etc.

>some faggot writes a Salon article and one kid wears a dress

>"SEE! THE KIKES ARE PUSHING PEDOPHILIA!"

>>949401

This is both a post hoc fallacy and you mistaking correlation for causation.

>>949405

I'd accept that for kids, but for teens there's no evidence of this.

>>949404

> I'd kill you with a rifle

You'd throw a firebomb through a window in the night, because authoritarians and collectivists are cowards who can't do a thing without a mob at their backs.

>>949404

>actually believing the lebbit spacing meme

More proof that agecucks are the biggest newfags around

>>949405

>Children and teenagers are more vulnerable then adults and thus require special protection from predators.

I agree. That's why I advocate for children to learn how to shoot as soon as they learn what "death" is.

>>949407

You're claiming that there is no correlation as well. No connection, remember?

>>949405

By your logic, I can claim that 25-year-olds are vulnerable and need special protection from 40-year-olds.

>>949414

By your logic a newborn deserves no more protection then a 40 year old?

>>949410

>You'd throw a firebomb through a window in the night

No I wouldn't I'm not some /leftyfag/. Real men have no issues doing what is right in front of their community.

>>949411

>it's just a meme!

Maybe so but when combined with the rest of your tells it's obvious you aren't from here or you're a newfag. Most likely you're the same tripfag that's been shitting up the board all summer.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4270804/

Brain regions have unique windows of vulnerability to the effects of traumatic stress.

>>949417

>Real men have no issues doing what is right in front of their community.

Well, if you ever find me, I'll be waiting. Bring friends, and make sure to take me from range or by surprise.

>in front of their community

Here's hoping your virtue-signalling doesn't end up in a lot of dead bodies.

>>948890

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0145213415004408

The purpose of this study was to compare internalizing and externalizing behavior problems of those with a history of sexual abuse to those with a history of maltreatment, but not sexual abuse. [...] Findings indicated significantly more problems in the CSA group than the maltreated group without CSA over time.

>>949417

If you weren't a newfag you would never bring up "reddit spacing" since you'd know that it was the proper way to write on a chan until Habbo kids who didn't care about proper formatting came along. The only one giving off tells here is you.

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1524838014526068

Across the majority of studies, conduct disorder was significantly and directly related to child sexual abuse, especially repeated sexual molestation and abuse involving penetration, even after controlling for various sociodemographic, family, and clinical variables. The association between child sexual abuse and conduct disorder was not confounded by other risk factors, such as gender, socioeconomic status, school achievement, substance problems, physical abuse, parental antisocial behavior or substance problems, parent--child relationships, and family disruption, conflict, or violence. Evidence for a significant interactive effect between child sexual abuse and monoamine oxidase A gene on conduct disorder was scant. Early sexual abuse might predispose to the subsequent onset of conduct disorder which, in turn, may lead to further sexual victimization through association with sexually abusive peers or involvement in dangerous situations or sexual survival strategies.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1440-1819.2001.00787.x

The present study shows that subjects who had been abused within the last couple of months had significantly lower cortisol in comparison to control subjects (age, social economic status and race matched). The data suggest that children may have an impaired HPA axis after early trauma.

http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-26229-001

Sexually abused children demonstrated heightened sexual preoccupation and behavior problems, lower cognitive abilities and school achievement, and more stressful past histories.

>>949422

>>949419

>>949424

>>949425

How weird that these all focus on abuse, especially violent abuse and coercion, and not on attempting to support the popular claim that "all sexual activity with children is abusive".

>>949416

People are only vulnerable if they lack knowledge and power. Sex ed is the only thing you need to not be vulnerable to this kind of exploitation, not that you can even define exploitation in a consistent way. A newborn isn't going to have that education, but a 14-year-old will have that and that means there's no good reason to stop them from fucking whoever they want as long as that person also has this education.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1132055915000083

As a whole, the results of this study support undoubtedly [...] that CSA/ASA victimization had a significant and positive effect (injury) on mental health, of a smallto large-size, and generalizable.

Riddle me this, /tech/.

When is a rape not a rape?

>>949430

Then learn how to be specific. You always argue that the AoC is crap but never how low you want it to be. So don't blame me if I assume the worst.

>>949428

I'm pretty sure most of them weren't forced, that's never necessary.

>>949434

>You always argue that the AoC is crap but never how low you want it to be

Not him, but the federal government has NO place in the bedroom unless somebody is being abused. Even then, it's a matter better left to a state, or town government, or a family. Closer to home, the batter.

I get the feeling like this guy is just trolling trying to make the right wing look like pedos.

>>949426

>people with stressful past histories do worse in school

>must be because they had sex with an adult and not because of their stressful past history

Do you fucking niggers even read the studies you post? Hell, did the people who fucking made them even read them? Half of these studies this retard is posting are fucking paywalled anyway so we can't check their methodology. If we could we'd probably find out their sample size consists of 10 fucking people. That's what always happens with these idiots.

>>948905

>it is a paradox where having them on your platform increases the likelihood of federal agencies expending resources to compromise the security

Explain to me how this is a bad thing? All the security we have today is a result of every compromised security measure that has taken place up until this date. You sorta want your system to be hacked sooner than later so that you can patch the vulnerabilities.

Look at it like strength training. The more you train, the more muscle mass you build and the stronger you become. If you lead a sedentary lifestyle, your muscles atrophy. Encouraging attackers to attack your system alleviates atrophy in your security measures which only results in you leveling up and being able to better fortify your system's defenses.

>>949437

Is "forced sexual intercourse" your definition of "pedophilia", or is that the definition of "rape"? I'm not advocating for legalizing abuse, as much as you want to strawman me as doing so. I'm advocating for common goddamn sense and realizing that "consent" defined logically and "consent" defined legally have become two very different animals.

>>949441

Ikr, they must all be false since they aren't in your favor.

>>949443

All I'm saying is that it's easy to get a young child to 'consent'.

>>949422

>center your "research" around the phrase "child sexual abuse", specifically excluding anyone who doesn't see their childhood sexual conduct as abusive

>"See! We proved it's always bad!"

My studies of traumatic legume consumption (TLC) prove that peanuts should be banned. Not a single person who responded to my call to participate in a study about their experiences with tragically consuming legumes ever enjoyed eating a peanut, and in fact many of them had violent allergic reactions to it. Some people think that eating peanuts can be safe, but my research into TLC proves that it is ALWAYS harmful. After all, not a single participant disagreed. What could be wrong?

more grant money plz

>>949445

It's easy to get anyone to consent as long as you have money. How strange, then, that those who support these AoC raises are the ones who have money. You would logically expect it to be the opposite, right?

>>949447

I see lots of potential for damage, why should anyone be interested in allowing you to fuck up future tax payers?

>>949420

Oh I have to come find you now? Don't you want to come debate me with your superior logic IRL? Aren't you proud of being a pedo? Why aren't you in the streets telling the masses about your enlightened way of life? Maybe it's because you know it's wrong and people that have raised children would beat you to death with their bare hands?

My point stands, you're a coward that'll only support this shit from the comfort of your mother's basement.

>>949423

>still pretending to be an oldfag

Tell us again how "the chans" always believed in the blackpills you constantly peddle /leftypol/. I'm really interested in hearing about the history of "our culture" and why "we" believe in it.

>>949435

>Because she isn't your property yet, you fucking mong, as stated elsewhere in this thread she's another man's daughter and it's his job to hand his daughter to a good husband.

Then when I start building my daughterfu harem (of my own daughters), keep your faggot agecuck ass out of my way. That's all I ask. Deal? Or should we gas you now?

>>949440

>I get the feeling like this guy is just trolling trying to make the right wing look like it's against feminism.

^ That's how stupid you sound.

>>949444

>feminist accidentally tells the truth and trips confirm it

Actually they're false because their methods are so laughably unscientific they'd get failed out of a first-year psychology course if they weren't politically sponsored by the feminist lobby. Your shit is worse than fucking creationism.

>>949452

>Why don't you stand in the street while white when the angry niggers in Watts are on the rampage? Aren't you proud of being white?

>>948897

>You can't have privacy+security yet fight against people who need it.

/thread

I think most agree that pedos need to be btfo, but this type of thinking in op only leads to collateral damage. Its basicaly "security for me, but not for thee". I am sure everyone can think about how this could become a slippery slope that ends up affecting more than one group of people.

>>949449

I'm pretty sure a kindergardener doesn't care much about money, a cookie might be enough. A pretty bad deal but yes they're actually THAT stupid.

>>949459

>A pretty bad deal but yes they're actually THAT stupid

And if the guy is not gentle, kind, and very, very loving, that cookie sure as shit won't be anywhere near enough, anymore.

>>949456

>implying Rockwell and friends didn't go meet with the black Islams and find common ground

Like I said, you're a coward.

>>949450

>I see lots of potential for damage, why should anyone be interested in allowing you to fuck up future tax payers?

Since when should women be allowed to work and pay taxes? How much of a fucking braindead boomer are you?

>YEAH WELL WE HAVE TO RESPECT WOMEN 100% BECAUSE MUH TAXES

>>949452

>females being subservient to men is a blackpill

Keep talking Schlomo.

>>949457

I have no issues with pedos using encrypted networks like Tor and Freenet. Just like I have no issues with glow in the darks using them to bait pedos to their honeypots.

>>949461

>implying Rockwell and friends were the ones on roofs defending their property when the riots happened

Koreans btfo whites once again

>>949463

>putting words in my mouth

What happened to the "just give up" posting you've been doing all week faggot? You know that's what I was referring to. Your arguments are shit and it's obvious you're just shitposting at this point.

>>949462

>let me fuck your daughter or else

>(of my own daughters)

>let me fuck your daughter or else

>(of my own daughters)

Do your kike masters not teach you agecuck shills even how to read nowadays or what?

>>949467

If that's not what you meant, then explain what I'm saying that's a blackpill instead of just bitching.

>>949453

>building my daughterfu harem (of my own daughters)

Enjoy breeding a race of retarded subhumans worse than the nogs and kebabs you removed in the first place, assuming the white society you fought for allows rampant incest in the first place.

>>949444

>Fuck you, you can't disagree with me! I'll get the government to ban you from speaking!

>Yay, thanks government! Now I can publish all the studies I want and call anyone who points out that they're bullshit a science denier! Hooray for feminism!

Remember kiddies! Most CSA (actual rape and abuse as opposed to "statutory" rape) takes place in the home! Incest/propertyfag is likely not a real opinion, but rather a carefully-constructed false flag persona.

>>949470

>implying all breeding nowadays shouldn't be conducted via strictly scientific eugenic pairings

>implying birth control doesn't exist

>implying inbreeding would be allowed

With modern technology, sex rightfully exists only for male satisfaction. That means that they can make use of whatever feminine property they want.

>>949464

This is the correct answer imo. Ignore them and give LEAs the rights to fuck their shit up in any way technically possible.

>>949474

>haha i posted le laughing anime girlie now i won ;)

This is why your side is losing. You have no points to make.

>>949477

>your side is losing.

In what country do you live where the majority believes that women, including small girls, should be property and are there for sexual pleasure? The islamic state perhaps?

>>949475

>With modern technology, sex rightfully exists only for male satisfaction. That means that they can make use of whatever feminine(male) property they want.

>With modern technology, sex rightfully exists only for male satisfaction. That means that they can make use of whatever masculine property they want.

>With modern technology, sex rightfully exists only for male satisfaction. That means that they can make use of whatever animal property they want.

This sounds (((awfully familiar)))

>>949481

Told you. falseflag Jew agitprop.

HOLY FUCK THIS THREAD

>>949483

Hi, lurker. Do you have an opinion, or are you just wasting (not so) valuable thread real estate?

>>949484

I'm just really surprised how fast this thread blew up.

>>949479

>nationalism on the rise everywhere.

Uuuh yeah, that's why you're losing. People are getting redpilled about everything left and right. Do you really think they're going to avoid being redpilled about this one particular issue forever just because your whiny agecuck ass can't let go of the anti-pedo hysteria kike propaganda about it that you were pumped full of for decades? How long do you think men are going to let feminists control them and their penises for? We're breaking the conditioning Schlomo and you can do nothing about it other than cry.

You really think generations of kids nowadays growing up with every girl in their school being a certified softcore porn star Instathot are going to be agecucks like you? I'm assuming you were born in the 80s or 90s, right around the peak of the "child sexual abuse", "Satanic ritual abuse", and "daycare sex abuse" hysterias. That is the only reason you feel so strongly about this issue. You are still drunk on shit you heard on the talmudvision 10 or 20 years ago. If you were intelligent you'd understand that you are a victim of pure feminist propaganda designed to attack men, but unfortunately you're obviously a retard.

I hope you like helicopter rides.

>>949485

Controversial issues tend to do that, especially in a place where the "random" board is run by ban-happy kikes.

>>949487

>>949485

/tech/'s slow moderation doesn't help either

>>949481

lol, you think that the kikes are pushing that female sexuality should exist for male satisfaction only? You realize that (((putting parentheses around things))) isn't some sort of magic right? Your opinion still actually has to, at a minimum, not blatantly make no fucking sense and contradict reality completely.

>>949490

>lol, you think that the kikes are pushing that female sexuality should exist for male satisfaction only?

Kikes' position on literally fucking everything can be summed up thusly: X for me but not for thee.

>guns for me but not for thee

>freedom of speech for me but not for thee

>sex with children for me but not for thee

>rights for me but not for thee

You can do it with basically any word.

If only anti-agecucks are banned as a result of this thread, then that will just prove our point and add more fuel to the fire of the last redpill (and we can always find new proxies). Go ahead and try it agecuck fags.

>>949486

>How long do you think men are going to let feminists control them and their penises for?

It's already been far too long. The damage feminists have already done to gender relations is almost certainly irreparable. Even if the laws were to be changed, the hatred that men feel for the disgusting whores who raised the age of consent will remain, and it'll poison any future attempts at relationships.

>You really think generations of kids nowadays growing up with every girl in their school being a certified softcore porn star Instathot are going to be agecucks like you?

Strangely enough I've actually heard statistics saying teens are having less sex than ever nowadays. It seems counterintuitive, but the same kind of cancer that you find in adult society exists in schools and always has.

>>949489

Do you believe this thread requires moderation? If so, why?

>>949491

That's true. This is why we need to open up the proper ownership of female property to every (white) man.

>>948888

check'd

>>949490

Looks like you need even more spoonfeeding.

>With modern technology, sex rightfully exists only for human satisfaction. That means that they can make use of whatever feminine/masculine/animal/plant property they want.

>>949493

>Strangely enough I've actually heard statistics saying teens are having less sex than ever nowadays.

This one seems easy to explain to me. Even a relatively average-looking teen Stacy can get thousands of followers on Instajew and other social media sites nowadays (due to legally repressed demand for PTP among men, driving them online to satisfy it), artificially inflating their self perception of their own SMV and making them less likely to accept guys their own age for sexual relationships, driving them toward higher status older men. I would imagine that almost all of the reduction in teen sex rates is due to guys getting laid less and not due to girls being less thotty.

>>949497

>human satisfaction

When did I say that? It exists for MALE satisfaction. Women have shown that they can't have any control over their own sexuality without destroying society, so they get none.

>>949502

Logic kinda checks out, in the most cynical way, but I think you are wrong to disregard the advance in sexual education. Look at Neutralland. They start sex ed in their schools very early.

>>949505

I don't why early sex education would reduce teen sex rates (as opposed to say teen pregnancy rates). At best it would make whores more knowledgeable about the social context of sex so that they can lie about how much they're having on surveys more effectively.

>>949397

same copypasta from 5 years ago

>>949506

>I don't why early sex education would reduce teen sex rates

When you remove the mystery of sex, it becomes less of a temptation. It's normalized, so your average, rebellious girl doesn't feel as much of a need to go fuck Chad and the rest of the varsity football team to stick it to Daddy.

>>949507

Still unassailable five years in the future. Will still be five years from now. Also:

>((((((((((le current year))))))))))

>>949508

I don't think that's true. We have zero reason to believe that teen girls who are verifiably more slutty nowadays in every context we can monitor them in directly (social media) aren't more slutty in every other context too. Plus, the statistics also show that the age of virginity loss is going up for guys much faster than it is for girls, so it must be teen guys and not teen girls getting laid less. Studies also show that women tend to underestimate the amount of sex partners that they've had on surveys, so you have to factor that in too. When you add it all up, one conclusion is clear: teen girls are thotting it up but teen guys are getting left out in the cold.

>>949512

I believe both are at work. Prohibition increases desire and demand for the prohibited substance/action/speech. So it is, so it has always been. When you remove the taboo of learning aobut and having sex, it becomes less alluring. Combine that with a modern culture that is currently victimizing and demonizing men for being male and wanting sex while celebrating female empowerment and liberty, and what do you get? Bippity boppity boo.

The ideal world is to remove the second part of said equation. I firmly believe that the statistical rates would achieve parity within a decade.